Professionalization Of Social And Behavioral Scientists Research Paper

Academic Writing Service

Sample Professionalization Of Social And Behavioral Scientists Research Paper. Browse other  research paper examples and check the list of research paper topics for more inspiration. If you need a research paper written according to all the academic standards, you can always turn to our experienced writers for help. This is how your paper can get an A! Feel free to contact our research paper writing service for professional assistance. We offer high-quality assignments for reasonable rates.

This research paper focuses on social and Behavioral scientists as professionals in the United States. It addresses the nature of these professions, the process of professionalization, the role of credentials, patterns in degree production, and the contours of the labor force in social and Behavioral science (hereinafter called social/related science) fields. In this context, professionalization refers to the processes through which individuals become socialized as professionals. Certification refers to the authorization or authentication of credentials. And, labor force refers to that portion of the population (in this case of these professions) that is economically active; that is, either employed or, if unemployed, available to work.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% OFF with 24START discount code

1. The Social And Behavioral Sciences As Professions

The social and Behavioral sciences constitute more than a single profession. Disciplines like economics, political science, psychology, and sociology have their own specialized training, expertise, reward structures, associations, networks, and norms. As scientific fields dedicated to the study of human social phenomena, they share features in common. Yet, because of their arenas of knowledge, occupational cultures, collegial interactions, labor markets, and how they are perceived by others, they comprise different professional groups. Moreover, these professions are not the same as the academic profession—although many persons with advanced degrees in the social/related sciences (especially with doctoral degrees) are employed in colleges and universities and, as such, are also academic professionals.

2. The Process Of Professionalization

Professionalization involves the development of skills, identities, norms, and values associated with becoming part of a professional group. Through this process, recruits to the social and Behavioral sciences acquire both substantive and methodological knowledge and develop understandings of their roles that permit them to function as professionals in these fields. Also, by training newcomers, these professions seek to ensure that the work of their sciences will continue congruent with certain principles and practices.

Research on professionalization dates back to the 1950s. Early research focused on the medical (e.g., Becker et al. 1961, Merton et al. 1957) and legal (e.g., Lortie 1959, Warkov and Zelan 1965) professions. Scholars also began examining graduate education in relation to academic or scientific careers (e.g., Pease 1967, Wright 1964). As these and recent studies (see, e.g., Keith and Moore 1995) indicate, although professionalization continues during the early years of employment, graduate departments are the primary socialization sites. In departments, students learn what is expected and rewarded and, conversely, what constitutes unacceptable practices (e.g., Anderson et al. 1994).

Across scientific disciplines, graduate education aims to develop in students a level of scholarly proficiency through formal (e.g., courses, qualifying exams, dissertations) and informal (e.g., attendance at scholarly meetings) training. A curriculum that initiates students progressively into more independent work and autonomous thinking helps develop professionals who can both master knowledge and produce original work (Sullivan 1991). Also important is a curriculum that examines the range of roles integral to being a professional scientist (e.g., teaching, engaging in peer review of others’ work). Similarly, a curriculum needs to address what it means to be a professional in terms of oral and written communication, ethical conduct, and other career skills. Finally, quality mentoring is key (e.g., Keith and Moore 1995, Anderson et al. 1994). It makes a difference for students’ productivity, belief in the norms of appropriate conduct, professional activity, self-confidence, and satisfaction with graduate school.

Through the professionalization process, graduate students also develop shared norms of science that transcend any one discipline. Merton (1973) saw these to be ‘universalism’—research should be judged based on scientific merit; ‘communality’—findings should be made public; ‘disinterestedness’—research should be done to advance knowledge; and ‘organized skepticism’—the scientific community should suspend judgment until the evidence is in. While scholars debate the influence of these norms and the presence of countervailing norms (Zuckerman 1988, Ritzer and Walczak 1986, pp. 225–35), few would dispute that there is a culture of science and that socialization in graduate school aims to engender support for and adherence to its norms.

Professionalization is important as well to the development of expertise, patterns of activity, and values that are discipline-specific. Scientific disciplines differ as to their intellectual tasks, their methods of inquiry, and how their work is done and rewarded (e.g., Biglan 1973, Lodahl and Gordon 1972). For example, chemistry in comparison to sociology has a longstanding tradition of intensive collaboration on more tightly defined problems. Thus, chemistry students are more closely supervised, work in research teams, and are involved in joint publication; sociology students have more intermittent contact with advisors, work more independently, and may or may not engage in collaboration (see Anderson et al. 1994, Babchuk et al. 1999). Sociology students, however, work and publish more collaboratively than do anthropology students, who are in a field more influenced by single-investigator, ethnographic research (Babchuk et al. 1999).

Not unexpectedly, departments vary within and across fields of science in how they structure training programs and the quality of what they do. While successful recruits exit with the same formal credential (a doctoral degree), their actual experiences differentially prepare them to work productively and navigate successful careers. Above and beyond any effects of department prestige on graduates’ careers, the nature of graduate training has far reaching implications for professional development.

3. Credentials And Certification In The Social/related Sciences

Credentialing generally refers to a system or process that establishes the status, legitimacy, or expertise of persons. With respect to individuals, credentials may be issued in the form of: (a) degrees, diplomas, or other certificates by educational organizations; (b) licenses regulated by states; or (c) certificates by professional associations. Institutions too are credentialed by governmental agencies (e.g., incorporation charters) or private accreditation processes (e.g., regional accreditation associations), which create standards for operation and attest to the quality of what is being offered (Freidson 1986, Chap. 4).

For academic and scientific professions, universitylevel training is key. In these professions, completion of a program of training culminating in the award of a degree is the most basic credential that attests to expertise. Credentials such as degrees formally bestow on individuals the right to practice a profession or use a professional title (Freidson 1986). The legitimacy of the degree, as Freidson pointed out, relies on the fact that educational institutions themselves are credentialed (i.e., accredited) by the state or, formally or informally, by professional associations.

In the social and Behavioral sciences, the advanced degree awarded to an individual constitutes the basic professional credential. The masters degree provides a measure of stature for an individual as a professional in these sciences. While there is a growing market of interest for MA-level social/related scientists (especially outside of the academic workplace), the doctoral degree is still considered to be the full credential.

Psychology is the only social/related science discipline with a well-established process for certifying individuals beyond the advanced degree or for accrediting programs. To engage in clinical practice, psychologists need to be licensed by the states in which they intend to practice. Licensure in psychology requires demonstrating proficiency in designated areas and passing a standard examination created by the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, an alliance of agencies across North America responsible for licensure and certification of psychologists. In terms of accreditation, the American Psychological Association (APA) has a widely used, voluntary process for accrediting doctoral programs in the specialty areas of clinical, counseling, or school psychology programs (or combinations thereof ). Some applied or practice associations in other social/related science disciplines are initiating such efforts (e.g., in 1995, the Society for Applied Sociology joined with the Sociological Practice Association), but none has substantially taken hold.

Despite intermittent calls within some social/related sciences, there has been no strong impulse to further attest to individuals’ expertise through additional credentials or certification programs. The American Sociological Association (ASA), for example, established but quickly abandoned a certification program for social psychologists in the early 1960s due to concerns about their certification by APA. In 1986 and 1990, respectively, Ph.D. and MA certification programs were launched by the ASA but generated little interest. In 1992, the ASA’s MA Certification Program Committee expressed doubts about continuing the Program, noting that certification of sociologists is handled through receipt of an MA or Ph.D. In 1998, the ASA Council terminated the Association’s program.

In the end, the conferral of advanced degrees through the university seems to provide a sufficient credential across fields of science. For each social related science discipline, only a small proportion of academic departments has the authority to prepare the next generations for careers in their profession. In 1997, approximately 240 of the 4,009 institutions of higher education awarded doctorates. Except for psychology, there are only 110–50 Ph.D.-conferring programs and 90–170 MA-only programs in the social sciences (psychology, with its clinical specialty, has approximately 435 doctoral and 260 MA-only programs). Thus, while scientific professions generally do not control the market through elaborate mechanisms of certification and accreditation, the size and structure of their educational systems affect the supply of trained professionals.

4. Degree Production

4.1 BA Degrees

Undergraduate majors in social/related science fields constitute the potential pipeline of those who might be attracted to and eligible for becoming social and Behavioral scientists. They are also an important ‘client’ group that creates demand for trained social related scientists as faculty members in the academic workplace. And, finally, even with only a bachelor’s degree, they are a sector of the future workforce that may ultimately be employed in jobs classified as social/related science occupations (ostensibly among those that do not require more advanced expertise or skills).

Compared to mathematical, physical, and biological sciences, undergraduates declare majors in the social/related sciences later in their academic careers. This is primarily attributable to the scarce attention given to the social/related sciences as fields of science in the elementary and secondary school curricula. Therefore, many undergraduates have their first exposure to these fields as part of fulfilling their general education requirements.

Despite later exposure to these fields, the social and Behavioral sciences confer a substantial number of BA degrees. In 1967, even excluding psychology, there were twice as many BA degrees in the social sciences (72,398) as in the next highest field of science and engineering (36,197 engineering BAs). By 1997, the biological/related sciences had more than doubled, but there continued to be more BA degrees conferred in the social sciences than in other fields (see S&ED 2000, Table 5).

The number of BA degrees also varies within the social/related sciences. A comparison of four disciplines—economics, political science, psychology, and sociology—makes the point. As shown in Table 1, in 1967 these fields attracted similar numbers of majors, but by 1997 there was much more dispersion. Most obvious is the substantial increase, almost four-fold, in the number of BA degrees in psychology between 1967 and 1997. Also, there are fluctuations in levels of interest in different disciplines at different points in time. Over the current period—1990 to 1997 (not shown in table), sociology and psychology had the largest proportional increase in BAs (55 and 38 percent, respectively) while political science and economics conferred a declining number of degrees (about -10 and -30 percent, respectively). These data are based on S&ED 2000, Tables 50, 52–4.

Professionalization Of Social And Behavioral Scientists Research Paper

4.2 MA And Ph.D. Degrees

As with BA production, both MA and Ph.D. production has generally increased across fields of science since the late 1960s (see S&ED 2000, Tables 12, 19). For most social and Behavioral sciences, substantial growth was evident between 1967 and 1972, followed by a dip in the 1980s, and continued growth in the

1990s. At the MA level, the social/related sciences continued to put more MA-trained persons into the labor force than did other science and engineering fields (although there are also a substantial number of MA engineers). At the Ph.D. level, despite growth, there were also differences over time among fields. In the most recent 5-year period, doctoral degree production in the social sciences, biological sciences, and engineering continued to increase, but physical sciences and mathematical/computer sciences declined or remained level.

Within the social/related sciences, there were also variations in Ph.D. production by discipline (see Table 1). Between 1967 and 1997, the number of doctoral degrees awarded in psychology was substantially higher than in other disciplines in absolute numbers and in growth. In 1997, psychology conferred about 3,600 doctoral degrees, about six times more than sociology and three times more than economics (although about 35 percent of these were clinical doctorates). Because of a decline in clinical doctorates in recent years, psychology has grown only modestly over the 1990s (about 10 percent) in comparison to political science and sociology that have both increased their Ph.D. degree production by about 30 percent (based on S&ED 2000, Tables 50, 52–4).

4.3 Women And Minorities And The Ph.D. Degree

4.3.1 Gender. Since the 1960s, there has been a dramatic increase in women receiving Ph.D. degrees across all fields of science and engineering (see S&ED 2000, Tables 19, 23, 26, 35, 49–51). In 1997, 8,921 women received their Ph.D. degrees in contrast to 1,096 women in 1967. These numbers represent a substantial difference in the shares of Ph.Ds. awarded to women (32.8 percent in 1997 and 8.4 percent in 1967). Fields, however, vary considerably in the proportion of Ph.Ds. awarded to women, with the social/related sciences and the biological sciences conferring a much higher proportion than the physical sciences and engineering.

There are notable differences within the social and Behavioral sciences as well (see S&ED 2000, Tables 50, 52–4). For example, in sociology and psychology, women received approximately 20 percent of the Ph.Ds. in 1967, and 55 and 66 percent, respectively, in 1997. In comparison, in economics and political science, even with increasing proportions of women awarded Ph.Ds., in 1997 women still received no more than about 30 percent of these degrees.

4.3.2 Race Ethinicity. The data on earned doctorates for racial and ethnic minorities were first reported in the 1970s. By 1977, across all fields of science and engineering, the number of persons of color receiving Ph.Ds. (about 750) was quite small (see SED 1997, Table 8). In 1977, proportions of minorities receiving Ph.Ds. ranged from 5 to 7 percent in the life sciences, physical sciences, social related sciences, and engineering. While the proportions of persons of color receiving Ph.Ds. increased over time, by 1997, they were still quite low—ranging from 12 to 18 percent across fields of science.

Important differences are evident among fields of science in the percentage of doctorates awarded to racial/ethnic minority groups (see SED 1997, Table 8). In 1997, in the physical sciences, Asian–Americans received the highest proportion of Ph.Ds. at over 7 percent and blacks the lowest proportion at under 2 percent. The social sciences included much higher proportions of black and Hispanic Ph.Ds. Overall, across the social/related sciences, somewhat more than 5 percent of the Ph.Ds. were awarded to blacks, slightly less than 5 percent to Hispanics, and slightly less than 4 percent to Asian–Americans.

There are also differences within the social/related sciences (see S&ED 1991, Table 3, SED 1997, Table A- 2). For example, in 1997, economics and sociology awarded 28 and 25 percent, respectively, of their Ph.Ds. to racial and ethnic minorities, but varied as to which minorities received Ph.Ds. In economics, 16 percent of the Ph.Ds were awarded to Asian–Americans and 6 percent to African–Americans; in sociology, almost 10 percent were awarded to African– Americans and 6 percent to Asian–Americans. The overall small number of Ph.Ds. awarded to racial ethnic minorities signals the need for more intentional outreach to all persons of color at earlier stages in education. Despite increases in awarding Ph.Ds., the proportion conferred to racial ethnic minorities is still below their proportion in the US population.

5. The Social And Behavioral Science Labor Force

As noted in the introduction, the labor force includes those persons who are economically active—either employed, or, if unemployed, available for work. In 1998, according to the Current Population Survey (CPS) conducted by the US Census Bureau, approximately 137 million persons were active in the civilian workforce of the US, including 6 million unemployed persons. Social and Behavioral science professionals constitute only a miniscule segment of this overall labor force (approximately one-half of 1 percent) if such professionals are defined as persons having an advanced degrees (an MA or Ph.D.) in a social/related science.

5.1 Employment Status Of Social And Behavioral Scientists

The overall employment status of those with advanced degree training in the social and Behavioral sciences is quite favorable. According to the National Science Foundation’s Scientists and Engineering Statistical Data System (SESTAT), there are some 656,100 social/related science professionals in the labor force (494,100 and 162,000 at the MA and Ph.D. levels, respectively). Employment rates for these individuals

 are strong. In 1997, only 0.9 percent of all Ph.Ds. and 1.8 percent of all MAs in the social/related sciences were unemployed (see SESTAT 1997, Table B-2).

Of the 160,500 employed Ph.Ds. with social and Behavioral science training, the vast majority (87 percent) was employed full-time (see SESTAT 1997, Tables B-2 and B-5). Also, approximately 117,000 of these Ph.Ds. were employed in science and engineering occupations. This proportion (73 percent) is consistent with other fields of science (see SESTAT 1997, Table A-3). Also, as might be expected, most of these Ph.Ds. (108,000) were working directly in social/related science occupations.

5.2 Social And Behavioral Science Occupations And Professional Training

In terms of standard approaches, the labor force in the social/related sciences can be conceptualized as: (a) those persons trained in the social and Behavioral sciences, or (b) those persons working in social and Behavioral science occupations. In contrast to a focus on degree training per se, classification into occupational categories includes persons trained in other fields who are working in these areas but excludes persons with relevant training who are working in other occupational areas. For example, social/related science occupations would include persons with Ph.Ds. in business who are teaching sociology in a university but would exclude persons with Ph.Ds. in sociology managing a business (see National Science Foundation 1999).

SESTAT classifies persons into occupations in terms of both work and education. Based on the SESTAT surveys, in 1997, approximately 350,000 persons with a BA degree or higher were classified as being in a social/related science occupation. This occupational category includes jobs that vary widely as to the nature of the work and required expertise. As might be expected, most persons classified as working in this occupation received their highest degree in a social related science (approximately 80 percent across all degree levels). Furthermore, having an advanced degree beyond the BA also matters: the vast majority of persons working in a job classified as a social related science occupation have an advanced degree (see SESTAT 1997, Table A-3).

The value of an advanced degree can further be seen by looking at the relationship between BA, MA, or Ph.D. training in a field and working in an occupation classified as being in that same field (i.e., ‘in-field’ occupation). As shown in Table 2, for all fields of science, persons at successively higher degree levels are more likely to be working in occupations classified as ‘in-field.’ In the social and Behavioral sciences, 2.6 percent of those persons with BAs was working in a social/related science occupation compared to 21.6 percent and 67.6 percent, respectively, of those with MA and Ph.D. degrees. By the Ph.D. level, there is also far less variability across fields of science in the proportion of persons working in ‘in-field’ occupations.

Professionalization Of Social And Behavioral Scientists Research Paper

5.3 Sectors Of Employment

Examination of Ph.D.-level professionals in the social and Behavioral sciences shows the centrality of the academic workplace in relation to other work sectors. Across scientific fields, more Ph.Ds. were employed by 4-year colleges and universities than by any other employment sector (in 1997, 43.4 percent for all degree fields and 47.4 percent for the social/related sciences). The next highest work sector for all Ph.D. fields was business at 30.5 percent overall, although not as high a proportion of social science related scientists was employed by the private sector as in other fields (see SESTAT 1997, Table C-2).

While specific disciplines within the social and Behavioral sciences followed this overall pattern, there are important differences. As shown in Table 3, in 1997, a substantially greater proportion of sociologists (72 percent) than psychologists (34 percent) were employed by 4-year colleges and universities. In contrast, greater proportions of psychologists and economists were employed in the business sector. Also, for psychology, a larger proportion of Ph.Ds. is self-employed (17 percent), ostensibly due to the sizable number of psychologists who are in clinical practice.

Professionalization Of Social And Behavioral Scientists Research Paper

5.4 Women And Minorities In The Social/Related Science Labor Force

5.4.1 Gender. Based on the 1997 SESTAT surveys, of the 160,500 employed Ph.Ds. with social/related science training, 62 percent were male and 38 percent were female (see SESTAT 1997, Table C-2). As could be anticipated from changes in the gender composition of Ph.D. degrees conferred over the years, substantially more employed female Ph.Ds. received their degrees in recent years. Of those who received their degrees 20–4 years ago, approximately 70 percent were male. In contrast, of those who received Ph.Ds. within the last 5 years, approximately 45 percent were male (see SESTAT 1997, Table C-10). This pattern holds across social related science disciplines—from psychology that substantially increased in the production of female Ph.Ds. to economics that continued to produce more male Ph.Ds. (see SESTAT 1997, Table C-9).

Males and females with Ph.Ds. in the social/related sciences vary only modestly in terms of sectors of employment. Gender differences within disciplines are

 more striking than any overall trends. For example, a higher proportion of male than female economists was employed by 4-year colleges and universities (56 versus 49 percent) while a higher proportion of female than male economists was in the government sector (20 versus 12 percent) (see SESTAT 1997, Table C-2).

5.4.2 Race/Ethinicity. Of the 160,500 Ph.Ds. in the social and Behavioral sciences employed in the workforce in 1997, the vast majority across social/related science disciplines was white (88 percent). The data on Ph.Ds. of color in the workforce are consistent with what is known about the production of minority Ph.Ds. since the mid-1970s (see SESTAT 1997, Table C–9). Of those who received their Ph.D. degrees 20– 4 years ago, 92 percent were white and 2.9, 2.5, and 1.7 percent were black, Asian-American, and His- panic, respectively. In comparison, of those receiving degrees within the past 5 years, 82 percent were white and 4.4, 9.5, and 3.7 percent were black, Asian-American, and Hispanic, respectively (see SESTAT 1997, Table C-11).

The 1997 data on employment sector reveal an important difference between minority and white Ph.Ds. in the social/related sciences (see SESTAT 1997, Table C-4). Higher proportions of Ph.Ds. of color were employed in 4-year colleges and universities than were their white counterparts (57, 56, and 54

 percent, respectively, for blacks, Asian–American, and Hispanic Ph.Ds. compared to 46 percent for white Ph.Ds.). That higher proportions of minority Ph.Ds. are employed in higher education compared to white Ph.Ds. likely reflects strong efforts by the academic sector to diversify its workforce in the context of a very low number of Ph.Ds. of color being trained.

5.5 Current Patterns For New Ph.Ds.

Analysts examining the current employment picture for social/related scientists are variously optimistic, with some being quite favorable (Spalter-Roth et al. 2000) and others being more cautious (Siegfried and Stock 1999). A recent survey of graduates awarded their Ph.D. degrees between July 1996 and August 1997 provides important data. The survey focused on 14 scientific fields, including economics, political science, psychology, and sociology.

As shown in Table 4, unemployment is generally quite low for newly exiting graduates. With the exception of chemistry and political science at 4.6 and 7 percent, respectively, other disciplines were all below 4 percent. Furthermore, Ph.Ds. in the social related sciences fared very well. While compared to other scientists, a somewhat higher proportion of social and Behavioral scientists were employed part-time (in particular political science and psychology), a lower proportion were in temporary positions. Most striking is the relatively high proportion of social related science Ph.Ds. employed in the academy, with sociology being the highest at 83 percent. Also, these data suggest a favorable academic market for social related scientists. Newly minted Ph.Ds. in economics, political science, psychology, and sociology were finding employment in the academy in proportions comparable to, if not higher than, their overall presence in this sector (compare Table 3).

Professionalization Of Social And Behavioral Scientists Research Paper

6. Continuing Issues For The Social And Behavioral Science Professions

For at least the next 10 years, the academic market appears to be positive. Despite the complexities of making predictions (see, e.g., Breneman 1988, Smelser and Content 1980, Schuster 1992), Bowen and Sosa (1989) anticipated these trends. In particular, the picture for social/related scientists is consistent with their projections of an undersupply of Ph.Ds. due to such factors as high undergraduate enrollments, stable to diminished graduate enrollments, anticipated faculty retirements, and increases in nonacademic employment. Bown and Sosa projected more demand than supply through 2007 and believed this pattern would continue, though at a slower rate.

It is important to keep in mind that the academic marketplace is broad and undergoing a restructuring. In reality, it consists of multiple and overlapping markets (e.g., research universities, liberal arts colleges) that have different ‘buyers’ and ‘sellers’ (see Smelser and Content 1980, Schuster 1992) and that vary in prestige and mobility. Furthermore, these markets themselves are not fixed. The community college, for example, is currently the fastest growing sector of academic employment. Finally, potential changes in the structure of these markets (e.g., increases in student-faculty ratios, more use of part-time or contractual teaching appointments, increased use of distance learning) could affect Ph.D. shortages.

The market for social/related scientists outside of the academy also merits more attention. For certain disciplines, like economics and psychology, the proportions working in nonacademic settings are sizable. Furthermore, the data indicate that social related scientists are increasingly located in these settings. A National Academy of Sciences report (1969) observed a slow but evident trend to greater nonacademic employment. Between 1968 and 1997, there was a 12 to 20 percent decrease in the proportion of sociologists, political scientists, economists, and psychologists employed in educational institutions. Consistent with commentators (e.g., Rosenfeld and Jones 1988, Schuster 1992) noting a ‘pull’ not a ‘push’ to these work sectors, the steady increases in nonacademic employment seem to occur irrespective of the tightness of academic markets.

As the social and Behavioral sciences move into their second century as professions, the overall environment for these fields is currently strong. The challenges before them, however, are also many. They are at a juncture where their ambitions could enlarge and these professions could grow to address some of the most challenging issues of human Behavior and society. How they organize themselves and their work and how they prepare their next generations for contributing knowledge and expertise will, more than any other factors, shape what these professions are and become.


  1. Anderson M S, Seashore L K, Jason E 1994 Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate school misconduct. Journal of Higher Education 65: 330–50
  2. Babchuk N, Bruce K, Peters G 1999 Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines. The American Sociologist 30: 5–21
  3. Becker H S, Geer B, Hughes E C, Strauss A L 1961 Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  4. Biglan A 1973 Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 204–13
  5. Bowen W G, Sosa J A 1989 Prospects for Faculty in the Arts and Sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
  6. Breneman D W 1988 Research on academic labor markets: Past and future. In: Breneman D, Youn T I K (eds.) Academic Labor Markets and Careers. Falmer Press, New York
  7. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology 1998 Employment of recent doctoral graduates in science and engineering: Results of professional society surveys. []
  8. Freidson E 1986 Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  9. Keith B, Moore H A 1995 Training sociologists: An assessment of professional socialization and the emergence of career aspirations. Teaching Sociology 23: 199–214
  10. Lodahl J B, Gordon G 1972 Structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review 37: 57–72
  11. Lortie D C 1959 Laymen to lawmen: Law school, careers, and professional socialization. Harvard Educational Review 29: 352–69
  12. Merton R K 1973 The normative structure of science. In: Merton R K (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (First published Merton R K 1942 Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1: 115–26)
  13. Merton R K, Reader G G, Kendall P L 1957 The Student-Physician. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
  14. National Academy of Sciences, Social Science Research Council 1969 The Behavioral and Social Sciences: Outlook and Needs. National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC
  15. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies 1999 Counting the S&E workforce—It’s not that easy. Issue Brief-NSF-99-344, May 3,1999. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
  16. Pease J 1967 Faculty influence and professional participation of doctoral students. Sociological Inquiry 37: 63–70
  17. Ritzer G, Walczak D 1986 Working: Conflict and Change, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
  18. Rosenfeld R A, Jones J A 1988 Exit and re-entry in higher education. In: Breneman D, Youn T I K (eds.) Academic Labor Markets and Careers. Falmer Press, New York
  19. Schuster J 1992 Academic labor markets. In: Clark B R, Neave G R (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Higher Education, Vol. 3, Analytical Perspectives. Pergamon Press, New York
  20. S&ED 1991 Science and engineering doctorates: 1960–90. Detailed statistical tables, NSF-91-310 Final. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
  21. S&ED 2000 Science and engineering degrees: 1966–97. Detailed statistical tables. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
  22. SESTAT 1997 Characteristics of scientists and engineers in the United States: 1997 Detailed statistical tables. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
  23. Siegfried J J, Stock W A 1999 The labor market for new Ph.D. economists. Journal of Economic Perspective 13: 115–34
  24. Smelser N J, Content R 1980 The Changing Academic Market: General Trends and a Berkeley Case Study. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
  25. Spalter-Roth R, Thomas J, Levine F J 2000 New doctorates in sociology: Professions inside and outside the academy. Research Brief, Vol. 1, no. 1. American Sociological Association, Washington, DC
  26. Sullivan T A 1991 Making the graduate curriculum explicit. Teaching Sociology 19: 408–13
  27. Survey of Doctoral Recipients 1997 Characteristics of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1997 Detailed statistical tables. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
  28. Survey of Earned Doctorates 1997 Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities: Summary Report 1997. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
  29. Warkov S, Zelan J 1965 Lawyers in the Making. Aldine, Chicago
  30. Wright C R 1964 Success or failure in earning graduate degrees. Sociology of Education 38: 73–97
  31. Zuckerman H 1988 The sociology of science. In: Smelser N J (ed.) Handbook of Sociology. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
Program Evaluation Research Paper
Procrustes Analysis Research Paper


Always on-time


100% Confidentiality
Special offer! Get 10% off with the 24START discount code!