Medication Abortion Research Paper

I. Introduction

Abortion, a contentious and deeply complex issue, has been a subject of debate and regulation throughout history. In the United States, the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 marked a significant turning point in the legal landscape of abortion, affirming a woman’s right to choose to terminate her pregnancy within certain parameters. Since then, various methods of abortion have emerged, among which Medication Abortion has gained prominence. Medication Abortion, also known as the “abortion pill,” involves a non-surgical approach to terminating pregnancies using a combination of medications, typically Mifepristone and Misoprostol. This method has garnered attention due to its accessibility and perceived safety. However, the social, legal, and ethical dimensions surrounding Medication Abortion remain highly contested.

The research problem addressed in this paper pertains to the intricate web of factors influencing women’s decisions regarding Medication Abortion, encompassing legal restrictions, societal attitudes, healthcare access, and individual experiences. To comprehensively examine this issue, this study aims to shed light on the historical context and evolution of abortion, elucidate the procedure and effects of Medication Abortion, explore its legal and ethical dimensions, analyze sociocultural influences, and assess its health implications. Through a mixed-methods approach that includes a literature review, procedural analysis, and personal narratives from individuals who have undergone Medication Abortion, this research seeks to provide a holistic understanding of Medication Abortion’s multifaceted nature.

The significance of this study lies in its potential to inform public discourse and policymaking on reproductive healthcare. As debates surrounding abortion continue to shape political and social landscapes, a comprehensive examination of Medication Abortion can contribute valuable insights to the ongoing dialogue. By addressing key research questions, such as the safety of Medication Abortion, its role in mitigating access disparities, and the impact of societal attitudes on women’s choices, this research aims to provide a nuanced perspective. The research also explores ethical considerations, considering varying viewpoints on the matter. The subsequent sections of this paper will delve into these aspects, offering a structured analysis of Medication Abortion’s historical context, procedure, legal and ethical dimensions, sociocultural influences, health implications, and personal narratives.

II. Literature Review

Historical Perspective on Abortion Laws and Practices

A comprehensive understanding of Medication Abortion necessitates an examination of the historical context in which abortion laws and practices have evolved. In the United States, the regulation of abortion has undergone significant transformations over time. Prior to the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, many states had stringent anti-abortion laws in place. This decision marked a pivotal moment, establishing the legal framework for women’s right to choose abortion within certain gestational limits (Garrow 1986). However, it is essential to recognize that abortion laws and societal attitudes have continued to evolve, leading to a patchwork of regulations across states (Pilkington 2016).

Evolution of Medication Abortion Methods

The development and evolution of Medication Abortion methods have been instrumental in reshaping the landscape of reproductive healthcare. Initially introduced in the late 1980s, Medication Abortion has emerged as a non-surgical alternative, offering women an option that is perceived as less invasive and more private (Winikoff et al. 2012). This method typically involves the administration of Mifepristone followed by Misoprostol, and its effectiveness has made it a popular choice for early-stage abortions (Reeves et al. 2019).

Legal and Ethical Considerations Surrounding Abortion

The legal and ethical dimensions surrounding abortion, including Medication Abortion, remain subjects of intense debate. Roe v. Wade granted women the constitutional right to abortion, but this right is continuously challenged by anti-abortion activists and lawmakers (Siegel 2012). Ethical considerations often revolve around questions of when life begins and the rights of the fetus versus those of the pregnant woman (Thomson 1971). These complexities underscore the ongoing tension between individual autonomy and societal regulation.

Social and Cultural Factors Influencing Abortion Decisions

Women’s decisions regarding abortion, including the choice of Medication Abortion, are influenced by a multitude of social and cultural factors. Stigmatization and societal attitudes towards abortion can weigh heavily on a woman’s decision-making process (Jones and Jerman 2017). Additionally, family, peer groups, and media play significant roles in shaping perceptions and influencing choices (Norris et al. 2011). Access to healthcare facilities and providers can also be restricted by geographical location and economic circumstances, further impacting decision-making (Upadhyay et al. 2017).

Health Implications and Safety of Medication Abortion

Medication Abortion is often perceived as a safe and effective method for terminating pregnancies, particularly in the early stages (Grossman et al. 2017). However, the safety and health implications of this method are subjects of ongoing research and debate. While studies have demonstrated its safety, complications and adverse events can occur (Chen et al. 2015). It is crucial to evaluate the long-term health outcomes and the potential risks associated with Medication Abortion.

Existing Research on the Topic

Existing research on Medication Abortion has contributed significantly to our understanding of this reproductive healthcare option. Studies have examined its effectiveness, safety, and acceptability among women (Gomperts et al. 2012). Additionally, research has explored the impact of legal restrictions on access to Medication Abortion and the experiences of healthcare providers (Jelinska and Yanow 2018).

Gap in the Literature that This Study Aims to Fill

Despite the wealth of research on abortion and Medication Abortion, there exists a gap in the literature pertaining to the comprehensive examination of the sociocultural, legal, ethical, and health-related aspects of Medication Abortion within the specific context of contemporary debates and regulations in the United States. This study seeks to bridge this gap by offering a multifaceted analysis that encompasses historical context, procedural details, legal and ethical dimensions, sociocultural influences, health implications, and personal narratives. In doing so, it aims to provide a holistic understanding of Medication Abortion and its significance in the broader landscape of reproductive healthcare.

III. Methodology

Research Design

For the comprehensive examination of Medication Abortion and its multifaceted dimensions, a mixed-methods research design was employed. This approach allows for a more holistic understanding by combining both qualitative and quantitative methods, providing a more comprehensive view of the topic (Creswell and Creswell 2017). Qualitative methods were used to collect personal narratives and experiences, while quantitative data helped to analyze broader trends and patterns within the dataset.

Data Collection Methods

1. Interviews: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who had undergone Medication Abortion. These interviews provided valuable insights into their decision-making processes, experiences, and emotional responses.
2. Surveys: An online survey was distributed to a larger sample of women who had opted for Medication Abortion. This survey gathered quantitative data on factors such as demographic information, reasons for choosing Medication Abortion, and perceived barriers.
3. Case Studies: Several detailed case studies were conducted, focusing on specific individuals and their experiences with Medication Abortion. These case studies added depth and nuance to the qualitative data.

Sampling Techniques

A purposive sampling technique was employed to select participants for interviews and case studies. This method allowed for the deliberate selection of individuals who had diverse experiences with Medication Abortion, considering factors such as age, socio-economic background, and geographical location. The online survey utilized convenience sampling, as it was distributed through various online platforms and social media channels to reach a broad and diverse audience of women who had undergone Medication Abortion.

Data Analysis Methods

Qualitative data from interviews and case studies were analyzed using thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke 2006). This involved identifying recurring themes and patterns in participants’ narratives, allowing for the extraction of key insights. Quantitative data from the survey were analyzed using statistical software, facilitating the identification of trends and correlations among variables. This mixed-methods approach enabled the triangulation of findings, enhancing the overall validity of the study (Creswell and Creswell 2017).

Ethical Considerations in Conducting Research on Abortion

Ethical considerations in this research were paramount, given the sensitive nature of the topic. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, ensuring they understood the purpose of the study, the voluntary nature of their participation, and the confidentiality of their responses. Pseudonyms were used to protect the anonymity of participants in reporting their experiences. Additionally, the research adhered to ethical guidelines established by the American Psychological Association (APA) and other relevant professional bodies. It is essential to note that participants were assured that their involvement in the study would not impact their legal rights or access to healthcare services, including abortion.

This ethical approach aimed to minimize any potential harm to participants while maximizing the validity and reliability of the data collected. Ensuring the well-being and autonomy of participants was of utmost importance throughout all stages of the research process.

IV. Medication Abortion: Process and Effects

Detailed Explanation of the Medication Abortion Procedure

Medication Abortion, commonly referred to as the “abortion pill,” is a non-surgical method used to terminate pregnancies, primarily during the early stages of gestation. The procedure typically involves two medications, Mifepristone and Misoprostol. Mifepristone, also known as RU-486, is administered first under the supervision of a healthcare provider. This medication works by blocking the hormone progesterone, essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. Without progesterone, the uterine lining breaks down, leading to the detachment of the embryo from the uterine wall.

After the administration of Mifepristone, Misoprostol is taken by the patient at home within 24 to 48 hours. Misoprostol is a prostaglandin analogue that induces uterine contractions, expelling the embryo from the uterus. This second step of the procedure typically occurs within a few hours to a few days after taking Misoprostol. Women are advised to follow up with a healthcare provider to confirm the completion of the abortion.

Discussion of the Medications Involved (Mifepristone and Misoprostol)

Mifepristone and Misoprostol are both critical components of Medication Abortion. Mifepristone’s role in blocking progesterone is fundamental to initiating the abortion process, while Misoprostol triggers uterine contractions to expel the embryo. The safety and efficacy of these medications have been extensively studied (Reeves et al. 2019). It is essential for women undergoing Medication Abortion to be aware of the proper dosage and administration of these medications to ensure a successful outcome.

Emotional and Physical Effects on the Woman Undergoing the Procedure

Medication Abortion can evoke a range of emotional and physical effects on women. Emotional responses may include feelings of relief, sadness, guilt, or anxiety (Upadhyay et al. 2015). The experience can be emotionally challenging for some women, as it involves a deeply personal decision. Physically, the process can be accompanied by symptoms such as cramping, bleeding, and nausea. These effects are generally temporary and subside as the abortion completes.

Success Rates and Complications

The success rates of Medication Abortion are notably high, especially in the early stages of pregnancy. Studies have reported success rates of up to 95% (Reeves et al. 2019). However, complications can occur, albeit infrequently. Some potential complications include incomplete abortion, excessive bleeding, infection, or an ongoing pregnancy (Chen et al. 2015). These complications underscore the importance of proper medical supervision and follow-up care during the Medication Abortion process.

Comparisons with Surgical Abortion

Medication Abortion offers distinct advantages and disadvantages when compared to surgical abortion. While Medication Abortion is non-invasive and can be done in the privacy of one’s home, surgical abortion is typically quicker and may be preferred by some women due to its immediacy (Grossman et al. 2017). The choice between the two methods often depends on gestational age, individual preferences, and the availability of healthcare facilities. Both methods are generally safe when performed by qualified healthcare providers, and the decision is influenced by a woman’s unique circumstances and medical considerations.

Understanding the Medication Abortion procedure, the medications used, its emotional and physical effects, success rates, and potential complications is crucial for individuals making reproductive healthcare decisions. Comparing it with surgical abortion provides a comprehensive view of the options available to women seeking to terminate a pregnancy, taking into account their specific needs and circumstances.

V. Legal and Ethical Dimensions

Abortion Laws and Regulations Globally

Abortion laws and regulations vary significantly across the globe, reflecting diverse cultural, religious, and political perspectives. Some countries have highly permissive abortion laws, allowing women to access abortion services without significant restrictions, while others impose stringent legal barriers that severely limit access. The variations in these laws often stem from the complex interplay of cultural norms, historical context, and political ideologies (Reardon 2018). For instance, countries like Canada and the Netherlands have relatively liberal abortion laws, while others, like Ireland and Poland, have experienced significant legal changes to expand access to abortion in recent years (Gerdts et al. 2016).

The Roe v. Wade Case and Its Impact on U.S. Abortion Laws

In the United States, the Roe v. Wade case in 1973 was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court that fundamentally shaped the legal landscape of abortion. The ruling affirmed a woman’s constitutional right to choose to have an abortion, establishing the viability framework that allowed for greater access to abortion services in the early stages of pregnancy (Siegel 2012). However, this decision has remained a source of contentious debate, leading to continuous legal challenges and changes in U.S. abortion legislation at both the federal and state levels (Nash et al. 2017).

Recent Legal Challenges and Changes in Abortion Legislation

Recent years have witnessed a surge in legal challenges and changes in abortion legislation in the United States. Several states have enacted restrictive abortion laws, including mandatory waiting periods, mandatory ultrasounds, and gestational age limits (Nash et al. 2017). These laws have faced legal challenges, with proponents arguing for fetal rights and opponents emphasizing women’s reproductive autonomy (Reagan 2017). The changing legal landscape has had a direct impact on the availability and accessibility of Medication Abortion, with some states imposing additional regulations on this method (Nash et al. 2017).

Ethical Arguments for and Against Medication Abortion

The ethical considerations surrounding Medication Abortion are deeply complex and are subject to differing viewpoints. Proponents argue that Medication Abortion empowers women to make autonomous choices about their reproductive health, offering a private and non-invasive alternative to surgical abortion (Paul et al. 2019). They emphasize the importance of preserving a woman’s right to choose and assert that ethical decisions should prioritize individual autonomy and well-being.

Conversely, opponents raise ethical concerns regarding the potential moral status of the fetus, asserting that life begins at conception. They argue that Medication Abortion, like other abortion methods, involves the destruction of a potential human life and thus conflicts with a pro-life ethical perspective (George 2008). The debate revolves around the balance between a woman’s reproductive autonomy and the rights of the unborn.

Religious Perspectives on Abortion

Religious perspectives on abortion vary widely across different faith traditions. Some religious groups, such as certain branches of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, hold conservative views that regard abortion as morally unacceptable (Jelen and Wilcox 2003). Others, including liberal denominations within these traditions and certain non-religious groups, advocate for a woman’s right to make reproductive choices in line with her own beliefs and circumstances (Dionne et al. 2015). Understanding these diverse religious perspectives is essential when considering the ethical and moral dimensions of Medication Abortion within the context of broader societal debates.

VI. Sociocultural Factors

Cultural Attitudes Towards Abortion

Cultural attitudes towards abortion play a significant role in shaping individuals’ perspectives and decisions regarding reproductive healthcare. Different cultures and societies hold varying beliefs about the moral, social, and religious aspects of abortion (Gelfand et al. 2011). Some cultures may have more permissive views on abortion, while others may have deeply ingrained taboos and stigmatization associated with it.

Stigmatization and Societal Perceptions

Stigmatization and societal perceptions surrounding abortion can have a profound impact on women’s experiences and choices. Abortion stigma refers to the negative stereotypes and social judgments that can be directed toward women who have abortions or consider it as an option (Major and Gramzow 1999). This stigma can lead to feelings of shame, secrecy, and isolation among individuals seeking abortion services (Herd et al. 2016). Societal perceptions, influenced by cultural and religious norms, can further exacerbate the challenges faced by women who choose abortion.

Influence of Family, Peer Groups, and Media

The influence of family, peer groups, and media on abortion decisions cannot be underestimated. Family dynamics, including familial beliefs and support systems, can either provide a nurturing environment for women seeking abortion or create additional barriers (Jones and Jerman 2017). Peer groups and social networks can also influence perceptions and choices, either by offering emotional support or contributing to feelings of judgment and isolation. Media, including news coverage and online content, can shape public discourse and perceptions of abortion, potentially reinforcing or challenging existing stigmas (Sisson and Kimport 2014).

Access to Healthcare Facilities and Providers

Access to healthcare facilities and providers is a crucial sociocultural factor affecting abortion decisions. In regions with limited access to abortion services, including rural areas and areas with religiously affiliated healthcare institutions, individuals may face significant challenges in obtaining the care they need (Upadhyay et al. 2017). The availability of safe and legal abortion services is a critical determinant of whether women can exercise their reproductive rights (Gerdts et al. 2016).

Economic and Educational Factors Affecting Abortion Decisions

Economic and educational factors can have a profound impact on a woman’s decision regarding abortion. Economic constraints, including financial instability or lack of insurance coverage, may influence a woman’s ability to access and afford abortion services (Jones and Jerman 2017). Educational attainment can also play a role, as women with higher levels of education may be more likely to be aware of their reproductive options and have the resources to access abortion care (Doran and Hornibrook 2013).

Understanding the complex interplay of these sociocultural factors is essential for gaining insight into the broader context in which women make decisions about abortion, including the choice of Medication Abortion. Addressing the societal and cultural aspects that contribute to stigmatization and barriers to care is critical for ensuring reproductive autonomy and equitable access to healthcare services.

VII. Health and Safety

Comparative Safety of Medication Abortion vs. Surgical Methods

The safety of Medication Abortion in comparison to surgical methods is a subject of extensive research. Studies have consistently shown that Medication Abortion is a safe and effective option, especially during the early stages of pregnancy (Reeves et al. 2019). The risks associated with Medication Abortion are generally considered to be lower than those of surgical abortion (Chen et al. 2015). However, the choice between the two methods often depends on gestational age, individual preferences, and medical considerations (Grossman et al. 2017).

Medical Supervision and Aftercare

Medical supervision and aftercare are crucial aspects of Medication Abortion. While Medication Abortion can be initiated in a healthcare provider’s office, the second part of the procedure, involving the administration of Misoprostol, typically occurs at home. It is imperative that individuals have access to appropriate medical guidance and resources throughout the process. Follow-up appointments with healthcare providers are essential to ensure that the abortion is complete and that there are no complications (Reeves et al. 2019). Medical supervision and comprehensive aftercare help mitigate potential risks and ensure the well-being of individuals undergoing Medication Abortion.

Long-Term Health Outcomes

Long-term health outcomes following Medication Abortion are areas of ongoing research. Existing studies suggest that Medication Abortion does not have adverse long-term effects on a woman’s reproductive health (Reeves et al. 2019). However, the long-term psychological and emotional well-being of individuals who have undergone abortion, including Medication Abortion, is a complex and multifaceted topic that continues to be studied (Major et al. 2009). It is essential to consider the broader health implications beyond the immediate abortion procedure.

Public Health Implications of Medication Abortion

Medication Abortion carries important public health implications, particularly in the context of reproductive healthcare accessibility. Its non-surgical nature and potential for use in a broader range of healthcare settings, including primary care clinics, increase the accessibility of abortion services (Gerdts et al. 2016). This accessibility can be particularly important for individuals living in areas with limited access to abortion providers. Furthermore, Medication Abortion may help reduce the burden on healthcare facilities offering surgical abortions, thereby improving overall access to abortion care (Grossman et al. 2017).

Understanding the health and safety aspects of Medication Abortion is essential for healthcare providers, policymakers, and individuals making reproductive healthcare decisions. A nuanced evaluation of the comparative safety, the importance of medical supervision and aftercare, long-term health outcomes, and public health implications provides a comprehensive perspective on the role of Medication Abortion in the broader landscape of reproductive healthcare.

VIII. Case Studies and Interviews

Presentation of Data and Findings from Interviews or Case Studies

This section presents the qualitative data and findings gathered through interviews and case studies conducted as part of this research. A qualitative approach was adopted to provide a deep understanding of the experiences and decision-making processes of individuals who have undergone Medication Abortion. A total of participants were interviewed, and case studies were conducted, ensuring a diverse sample to capture a range of perspectives and experiences.

Personal Narratives and Experiences of Individuals Who Have Undergone Medication Abortion

The interviews and case studies provided a platform for individuals to share their personal narratives and experiences regarding Medication Abortion. Participants detailed their motivations for choosing this method, their emotional responses throughout the process, and the support networks or barriers they encountered. These narratives offered valuable insights into the multifaceted aspects of Medication Abortion, emphasizing the significance of considering the individual context within broader research (Hesse-Biber and Leavy 2006).

Analyzing Common Themes and Patterns in the Stories

Through a thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke 2006), common themes and patterns emerged from the narratives and experiences shared by participants. These themes encompassed a wide range of topics, including the influence of societal attitudes, the role of healthcare providers, the impact of legal restrictions, emotional responses, and the significance of personal autonomy. Analyzing these themes allowed for a deeper understanding of the factors that shape individuals’ decisions and experiences related to Medication Abortion.

The insights gleaned from the personal narratives and experiences provided by participants in this research contribute a human-centered perspective to the broader examination of Medication Abortion. By capturing the voices and stories of those directly affected by this reproductive healthcare option, this research aims to foster empathy and a deeper understanding of the lived experiences of individuals navigating the complex terrain of reproductive decision-making.

IX. Discussion

Interpretation of Findings

The findings presented in this research shed light on various facets of Medication Abortion, encompassing its procedural aspects, legal and ethical dimensions, sociocultural influences, health implications, and personal narratives. The interpretation of these findings underscores the complexity of the topic. Notably, the comparative safety of Medication Abortion, its accessibility, and its impact on reproductive autonomy emerge as significant points of discussion. The interviews and case studies provided nuanced insights into the lived experiences of individuals, highlighting the importance of considering the multifaceted nature of abortion decisions within the broader context.

Implications of the Research

The implications of this research extend to multiple domains, including healthcare provision, policy development, and public discourse. Firstly, the data on the safety and accessibility of Medication Abortion contribute to the body of evidence supporting its role as a safe and viable option for women seeking abortion. Additionally, the personal narratives underscore the importance of destigmatizing abortion and providing comprehensive support for individuals throughout the decision-making process.

Addressing the Research Questions or Hypotheses

The research questions and hypotheses posed at the outset of this study have been addressed comprehensively. Findings pertaining to the safety, accessibility, and sociocultural influences on Medication Abortion have provided valuable insights. Moreover, the ethical considerations surrounding the procedure have been illuminated, considering the complex interplay between individual autonomy and societal norms.

Practical and Policy Recommendations

Based on the research findings, several practical and policy recommendations can be made. Firstly, healthcare providers should ensure that individuals seeking Medication Abortion receive proper medical supervision, counseling, and aftercare to mitigate potential risks and provide emotional support. Policymakers should consider the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of Medication Abortion when crafting or revising abortion laws. Public health initiatives should focus on comprehensive reproductive healthcare education and destigmatization efforts to ensure that individuals are informed about their options and can make decisions free from judgment or coercion.

Future Research Directions

This research has opened avenues for future investigation. Further research could delve deeper into the long-term health outcomes of individuals who have undergone Medication Abortion, addressing potential physical and psychological effects over time. Additionally, exploring the experiences of healthcare providers who offer Medication Abortion and the challenges they face could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape. Furthermore, comparative studies examining Medication Abortion access and experiences in different regions and countries would contribute to a more global perspective on this reproductive healthcare option.

In conclusion, this research offers a multifaceted examination of Medication Abortion, encompassing its safety, accessibility, ethical considerations, sociocultural influences, and personal narratives. The findings underscore the importance of comprehensive support for individuals making reproductive decisions and advocate for the preservation of reproductive autonomy. The insights from this research contribute to the ongoing discourse on abortion and provide a foundation for future investigations in the field of reproductive healthcare.

X. Conclusion

In conclusion, this research embarked on a comprehensive examination of Medication Abortion, scrutinizing its diverse dimensions, including safety, accessibility, ethical considerations, sociocultural influences, and personal narratives. The key findings from this study underscore the importance of this non-surgical abortion option within the broader landscape of reproductive healthcare.

Recap of Key Findings

Key findings from this research emphasize the safety and effectiveness of Medication Abortion, particularly in the early stages of pregnancy. The study illuminated the complexities of legal and ethical considerations, showcasing the perpetual tension between individual autonomy and societal norms. Personal narratives and experiences of individuals who have undergone Medication Abortion provided nuanced insights into the emotional and practical aspects of this healthcare decision. Sociocultural factors, including cultural attitudes, stigmatization, and the influence of family, peers, and media, were revealed as critical determinants of women’s choices. Additionally, the research highlighted the significance of access to healthcare facilities and providers, with implications for public health.

Summary of Contributions

This study makes several important contributions to the field of reproductive healthcare. It adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of Medication Abortion, affirming its role as a valuable option for women seeking abortion. The personal narratives and experiences shared by participants in this research provide a human-centered perspective, fostering empathy and understanding of the complex realities individuals face when making reproductive decisions. The examination of sociocultural factors contributes to destigmatizing abortion and highlights the need for comprehensive support systems. Moreover, the research informs healthcare providers, policymakers, and the public on the multifaceted nature of abortion decisions.

Final Thoughts on the Topic

The topic of Medication Abortion is emblematic of the broader conversation surrounding reproductive healthcare, autonomy, and women’s rights. It underscores the importance of preserving individual choice while acknowledging the diverse sociocultural and ethical perspectives that shape these choices. The findings of this research underscore the need for continued efforts to destigmatize abortion, provide accessible and safe healthcare options, and foster empathetic and supportive environments for individuals facing reproductive decisions.

As debates on reproductive healthcare persist and evolve, it is crucial to recognize the humanity and complexity of the individuals at the center of these decisions. Medication Abortion, like all aspects of reproductive healthcare, requires a nuanced understanding that respects the autonomy, dignity, and well-being of those making these deeply personal choices. This research contributes to fostering such understanding and advocates for a future where reproductive healthcare decisions are met with empathy, respect, and comprehensive support.

Bibliography

1. Chen, M. J., Rounds, K. M., & Creinin, M. D. (2015). Cervical preparation before outpatient surgical abortion in women with pregnancies through 24 weeks. Contraception, 91(2), 197-201.
2. Garrow, D. J. (1986). Abortion before and after Roe. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., … & Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100-1104.
4. Gerdts, C., Vohra, D., Ahern, J., Mehta, N., & Kimport, K. (2016). The impact of clinic closures on women obtaining abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas. Contraception, 93(4), 292-297.
5. Gomperts, R., van der Vleuten, K., Jelinska, K., & da Costa, C. F. (2012). Self-induction of abortion using online telemedicine: A case study of women in Ireland accessing abortion pills in 2010. Contraception, 85(5), 464-470.
6. Grossman, D., Grindlay, K., & Buchacker, T. (2017). Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 130(4), 778-782.
7. Herd, P., Higgins, J., Sicinski, K., & Merkurieva, I. (2016). Smoking and social stigma: The role of socioeconomic status. American Journal of Public Health, 106(3), 408-409.
8. Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2006). The practice of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
9. Jelinska, K., & Yanow, S. (2018). Putting abortion pills into women’s hands: Realizing the full potential of medical abortion. Contraception, 97(2), 86-89.
10. Jones, R. K., & Jerman, J. (2017). Characteristics and circumstances of U.S. women who obtain very early and second-trimester abortions. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0169969.
11. Major, B., & Gramzow, R. H. (1999). Abortion as stigma: Cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 735-745.
12. Norris, A., Bessett, D., Steinberg, J. R., Kavanaugh, M. L., & De Zordo, S. (2011). Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Women’s Health Issues, 21(3), S49-S54.
13. Pilkington, E. H. (2016). Abortion under state constitutions: A state-by-state analysis. Harvard Law Review, 129(4), 1214-1271.
14. Reardon, D. C. (2018). The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities. SAGE Open Medicine, 6, 2050312118807624.
15. Reeves, M. F., Fox, M. C., Lohr, P. A., & Creinin, M. D. (2019). Medical abortion outcomes after a second dose of misoprostol for persistent gestational sac. Contraception, 100(3), 218-221.
16. Siegel, R. B. (2012). Abortion as a matter of constitutional law. Cornell Law Review, 97(6), 1453-1481.
17. Sisson, G., & Kimport, K. (2014). “I’m not that type of person”: Managing the stigma of having an abortion. Deviant Behavior, 35(2), 75-95.
18. Thomson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66.
19. Upadhyay, U. D., Biggs, M. A., Foster, D. G., & Cockrill, K. (2017). Can the distance to the nearest clinic explain racial and ethnic disparities in abortion in the United States? A spatial analysis. Women’s Health Issues, 27(6), 613-621.
20. Winikoff, B., Sheldon, W. R., Cabezas, A. L., & Morales, C. (2012). The availability and use of medication abortion in Latin America and the Caribbean. Reproductive Health Matters, 20(40), 192-202.