Abortion Role in Gender Equality Research Paper

I. Introduction

Abortion, a deeply contested and emotive issue, has long been at the center of discussions surrounding women’s rights, reproductive health, and gender equality. With roots dating back centuries, abortion has evolved from a clandestine practice into a subject of global discourse, one that resonates with the broader movement for gender equality. Historically, women have been denied agency over their reproductive choices, and restrictive abortion laws have been one of the most pronounced manifestations of this inequality (Morgan, 2019). This research paper sets out to investigate the intricate interplay between abortion and gender equality, addressing a critical contemporary concern. The research problem at hand is the multifaceted impact of abortion laws, sociocultural factors, access to reproductive health services, health and safety considerations, intersectionality, advocacy efforts, legal challenges, and controversies on the status of gender equality. By examining this complex web of influences, this study seeks to unravel the significance of abortion as a pivotal factor in determining women’s rights and societal equity. In doing so, it underscores the urgency of addressing this issue, particularly in the context of ongoing global movements advocating for women’s empowerment and gender parity. This research paper is structured as follows: it begins with a comprehensive literature review, delving into historical perspectives, theoretical frameworks, and previous research findings. It subsequently explores the impact of abortion laws on gender equality, the role of sociocultural factors, disparities in access to reproductive health services, health and safety concerns, intersectionality, advocacy efforts, legal battles, and controversies. The paper concludes by offering recommendations for policy reforms and future directions in the pursuit of a more equitable society where reproductive rights are firmly anchored in the broader framework of gender equality.

II. Literature Review

Historical Perspectives on Abortion and Gender Equality

The historical context of abortion is essential in understanding its intricate relationship with gender equality. Across different societies and time periods, women have grappled with both the practice of abortion and the legal and social restrictions imposed upon it. Historical accounts reveal how patriarchal systems have often used abortion as a means to control women’s bodies and limit their agency over reproductive choices (Sanger, 1920). These historical insights underscore the enduring struggle for gender equality and the significance of abortion as a marker of women’s autonomy and rights.

Key Concepts and Definitions Related to Abortion and Gender Equality

To delve deeper into the intersection of abortion and gender equality, it is crucial to establish key concepts and definitions. Reproductive rights, encompassing the right to choose abortion, lie at the core of this discourse. These rights involve not only access to safe and legal abortion but also the broader autonomy to make informed decisions about one’s body and reproductive health (Cook, Dickens, & Fathalla, 2003). Gender equality, on the other hand, pertains to the equal rights, opportunities, and treatment of individuals regardless of their gender, encompassing economic, social, and political spheres (UN Women, 2020). Abortion’s role in achieving or hindering gender equality hinges on these foundational concepts.

Review of Relevant Theories and Frameworks

Various theoretical frameworks contribute to our understanding of abortion’s role in gender equality. Intersectionality theory, introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw, emphasizes the interconnected nature of social identities and how they intersect to create unique experiences of oppression and privilege (Crenshaw, 1989). This framework is invaluable in comprehending how marginalized groups, such as women of color and LGBTQ+ individuals, navigate the terrain of abortion rights within the broader context of gender equality. Additionally, feminist theories, including liberal feminism, radical feminism, and reproductive justice theory, offer diverse perspectives on how abortion intersects with gender equality (Hartmann, 1979; Roberts, 1997; Ross & Solinger, 2017). These theories provide critical lenses through which to analyze the complexities of abortion-related gender issues.

Previous Research and Findings on the Topic

A wealth of previous research has explored the relationship between abortion and gender equality. Studies have documented the impact of restrictive abortion laws on women’s rights and healthcare access in countries like Ireland and El Salvador (Thornton, 2018; Goodwin, 2017). Research has also revealed how cultural and societal factors influence women’s abortion decisions, highlighting the importance of understanding local contexts (Inhorn & Birenbaum-Carmeli, 2008). Moreover, analyses of abortion advocacy movements and legal challenges have shed light on the strategies and obstacles faced by activists in the fight for gender equality (Hays, 2019; Nash, 2018). This literature review will synthesize and build upon these prior findings, contributing to a deeper understanding of abortion’s multifaceted role in the pursuit of gender equality.

III. Abortion Laws and Gender Equality

Examination of Abortion Laws and Policies in Various Countries

The landscape of abortion laws varies significantly across countries, reflecting a wide spectrum of approaches ranging from highly restrictive to permissive. In some nations, such as Ireland and Poland, restrictive laws have historically prohibited abortion in nearly all circumstances, placing severe limitations on women’s reproductive autonomy (Thornton, 2018; Stryker & Michalski, 2019). Conversely, countries like Canada and Sweden have adopted liberal abortion policies that prioritize women’s rights and health, allowing for a more comprehensive reproductive choice (Berer, 2017; Skinner, 2019). This section will examine the diversity of abortion laws and policies worldwide, highlighting the contrasting approaches and their implications for gender equality.

Analysis of How Abortion Laws Can Impact Gender Equality

Abortion laws play a pivotal role in shaping the gender equality landscape. Restrictive laws often perpetuate gender inequality by denying women control over their reproductive decisions and exposing them to health risks associated with unsafe abortions (Kumar & Hessini, 2009). These laws can reinforce traditional gender roles and contribute to the stigmatization of women who seek abortion services (Norris et al., 2011). Conversely, countries with progressive abortion laws tend to promote gender equality by recognizing women’s right to autonomy and reproductive health care (Kismodi et al., 2019). By analyzing the impact of abortion laws on gender equality, this section will elucidate the far-reaching consequences of legal frameworks on women’s rights and societal equity.

Case Studies of Countries with Restrictive and Liberal Abortion Laws

To illustrate the tangible effects of varying abortion laws, this section will present case studies of countries with contrasting legal approaches. Examining countries like Ireland and Argentina, where restrictive abortion laws were overturned or reformed, will provide insights into the potential for legal change and its impact on gender equality (de Zordo, Mishtal, & Anton, 2019; Morgan, 2020). Conversely, case studies of countries like El Salvador and Nicaragua, which maintain strict anti-abortion legislation, will underscore the persistent challenges and human rights violations faced by women in such contexts (Goodwin, 2017; Rocha, 2017).

Discussion of the Legal Frameworks Surrounding Abortion and Women’s Rights

The legal frameworks governing abortion are intertwined with broader questions of women’s rights and autonomy. This section will delve into the legal arguments and debates surrounding abortion, including issues related to bodily autonomy, reproductive freedom, and women’s health. It will also explore international human rights treaties and conventions that recognize women’s right to make decisions about their own bodies (Cook, 2008). By engaging in this discussion, the research will illuminate the legal complexities surrounding abortion and its profound implications for gender equality on a global scale.

IV. Sociocultural Factors and Gender Equality

Exploration of Sociocultural Factors Influencing Abortion Decisions

The decision to seek an abortion is intricately linked to sociocultural factors that shape individual choices and experiences. This section delves into the multifaceted influences on abortion decisions, considering factors such as family dynamics, community norms, and personal beliefs. Research has shown that these sociocultural factors can significantly impact a woman’s autonomy and ability to make decisions about her reproductive health (Purcell, Cameron, & Lawton, 2014). Understanding how these factors intersect with gender equality is essential for a comprehensive analysis of the role of abortion in women’s lives.

Analysis of the Role of Religion, Stigma, and Societal Attitudes

Religion, stigma, and societal attitudes are powerful determinants of how abortion is perceived and experienced. Religious beliefs can have a profound influence on individuals’ moral and ethical judgments about abortion, often leading to the stigmatization of women who seek the procedure (Ganiel & McElwee, 2016). Societal attitudes, shaped by cultural and historical contexts, can either support or hinder women’s reproductive choices and, consequently, their gender equality. This section will analyze the interplay between religion, stigma, and societal attitudes and their impact on women’s reproductive autonomy.

Case Studies on Cultural Perspectives and Gender Equality

Case studies from various cultural contexts will be presented to illustrate the diverse ways in which sociocultural factors intersect with gender equality in the context of abortion. For example, the experiences of women in predominantly Catholic countries like Ireland and Poland, where religious influences have historically played a central role in shaping abortion policies and societal attitudes, will be examined (Stryker & Michalski, 2019). Additionally, case studies from regions where traditional gender roles are deeply entrenched will provide insights into how cultural perspectives on women’s roles impact abortion decision-making and gender equality.

Discussion of the Societal Pressures Faced by Women in Relation to Abortion

Societal pressures on women considering abortion can be profound, encompassing emotional, social, and economic dimensions. Women often grapple with fear of judgment, ostracization, and discrimination when making decisions about their reproductive health (Morgan, 2019). Economic constraints and the lack of social support can further exacerbate these pressures, affecting not only the choice to have an abortion but also the broader pursuit of gender equality (Jerman, Frohwirth, Kavanaugh, & Blades, 2017). This section will discuss the intricate web of societal pressures that women face in relation to abortion, shedding light on their implications for gender equality.

V. Access to Reproductive Health Services

Discussion of the Importance of Access to Safe and Legal Abortion Services

Access to safe and legal abortion services is fundamental to women’s reproductive health and, by extension, gender equality. When abortion services are easily accessible, women can make informed decisions about their bodies and reproductive futures, aligning with their own life goals and circumstances (Grimes et al., 2006). This section underscores the pivotal role of safe and legal abortion services in upholding women’s rights and autonomy, emphasizing their significance within the broader framework of gender equality.

Examination of Barriers to Access, Including Geographic, Economic, and Legal Factors

Despite the importance of access to abortion services, numerous barriers impede women’s ability to exercise this right. Geographic barriers can be substantial, particularly in rural or underserved areas, where the nearest abortion clinic may be hundreds of miles away (Rocca et al., 2013). Economic factors, including the cost of the procedure and associated expenses such as travel and accommodations, can render abortion unaffordable for many women (Jones & Jerman, 2017). Moreover, legal restrictions, waiting periods, and mandatory counseling can create additional hurdles (Henshaw, 2009). This section examines the multifaceted barriers to accessing safe and legal abortion services, highlighting the ways in which they intersect with gender inequality.

Case Studies Highlighting Disparities in Access

Case studies from various regions will be presented to illuminate the disparities in access to abortion services. These case studies will delve into the experiences of women who face significant obstacles due to their geographic location, economic status, or legal restrictions. For example, the experiences of women in the United States, where access to abortion services can vary greatly from state to state, will be contrasted with countries that have implemented comprehensive reproductive healthcare systems, such as Sweden (Jones & Jerman, 2017; Skinner, 2019). These case studies will underscore the real-world consequences of limited access to safe and legal abortion services.

Discussion of the Impact of Limited Access on Gender Equality

Limited access to safe and legal abortion services has profound implications for gender equality. When women are denied the ability to control their reproductive choices, they may be forced into motherhood or face the dangers of seeking unsafe, clandestine abortions (Gerdts et al., 2016). This can perpetuate cycles of poverty, limit educational and career opportunities, and reinforce traditional gender roles (Ganatra et al., 2017). Furthermore, women who belong to marginalized groups, including women of color and low-income women, often bear a disproportionate burden of restricted access, exacerbating existing inequalities (Harris, Debbink, Martin, & Hassinger, 2011). This section will explore how limited access to reproductive health services perpetuates gender inequality and inhibits progress towards a more equitable society.

VI. Health and Safety Considerations

Analysis of the Health Risks Associated with Unsafe Abortions

Unsafe abortions pose significant health risks to women and are a direct consequence of restricted access to safe and legal abortion services. Women resorting to unsafe methods, such as self-induced abortions or seeking help from untrained providers, face a multitude of health complications, including severe bleeding, infections, injuries to the reproductive organs, and long-term health issues (World Health Organization, 2012). This section critically analyzes the health risks associated with unsafe abortions, emphasizing the physical and psychological toll it exacts on women.

Examination of Maternal Mortality Rates in Relation to Abortion

The link between maternal mortality rates and abortion is a crucial facet of the discussion on reproductive health. In regions where abortion is heavily restricted, maternal mortality rates tend to be higher due to the prevalence of unsafe abortion practices (Ganatra et al., 2017). This section examines the relationship between maternal mortality and abortion within the broader context of gender equality, highlighting the disproportionate burden of mortality faced by women in these regions.

Discussion of the Implications of Unsafe Abortions on Gender Equality

Unsafe abortions not only jeopardize women’s health but also have significant implications for gender equality. Women who experience complications from unsafe abortions may suffer long-term health consequences, limiting their educational and career opportunities (Gerdts et al., 2016). Additionally, the stigma and legal repercussions associated with unsafe abortions can exacerbate gender inequality by pushing women into the shadows and reinforcing traditional gender roles (Astbury-Ward, 2008). This section explores the multifaceted impact of unsafe abortions on gender equality, emphasizing the urgent need for comprehensive reproductive healthcare.

Case Studies Illustrating the Health and Safety Consequences of Restricted Access

Case studies from regions with restricted access to safe abortions will be presented to illustrate the real-world consequences of limited reproductive healthcare. These case studies will showcase the stories of women who have experienced the physical and emotional toll of unsafe abortions due to legal restrictions and lack of access to proper medical care. Additionally, the experiences of healthcare providers working in environments with restrictive abortion laws will be explored, shedding light on the ethical and medical challenges they face. These case studies will provide compelling narratives to underscore the urgency of addressing health and safety considerations within the abortion and gender equality discourse.

VII. Intersectionality and Abortion

Exploration of How Factors Like Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Sexual Orientation Intersect with Abortion and Gender Equality

Intersectionality theory, developed by Kimberlé Crenshaw, provides a critical framework for understanding how various social identities intersect to shape individuals’ experiences and access to resources. When applied to the context of abortion and gender equality, it becomes evident that factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and sexual orientation play a profound role in determining a person’s ability to exercise reproductive rights. This section explores the intricate ways in which these intersecting factors impact access to abortion services and the realization of gender equality.

Analysis of the Unique Challenges Faced by Marginalized Groups

Marginalized groups, including women of color, low-income individuals, and LGBTQ+ communities, often face unique challenges when navigating the terrain of reproductive rights and abortion. Structural inequalities, systemic discrimination, and healthcare disparities compound the barriers they encounter (Collins, 1990). Women of color, for instance, may experience racism within healthcare systems, while LGBTQ+ individuals may encounter prejudice and insensitivity from providers (Ross & Solinger, 2017). This section delves into the distinct challenges that marginalized groups confront in relation to abortion, emphasizing the need for an intersectional approach to advancing gender equality.

Case Studies Highlighting the Experiences of Intersectional Identities in Relation to Abortion

Case studies from diverse regions and populations will be presented to illustrate the experiences of individuals with intersectional identities in their pursuit of reproductive rights. These case studies will highlight the stories of women of color, low-income individuals, and LGBTQ+ individuals who have navigated the complexities of abortion access in the face of multiple forms of discrimination. By examining their experiences, this section will shed light on the unique challenges and resilience of marginalized communities within the broader discourse on abortion and gender equality.

VIII. Advocacy and Activism

Overview of Organizations and Movements Advocating for Reproductive Rights and Gender Equality

Advocacy and activism are pivotal in the fight for reproductive rights and gender equality. Numerous organizations and movements across the globe are dedicated to advancing these causes. This section provides an overview of prominent advocacy groups, such as Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, and the Center for Reproductive Rights, which work tirelessly to protect and expand reproductive rights. Additionally, it highlights movements like #ReproductiveJustice and #MyBodyMyChoice, which have gained significant momentum in recent years, rallying for the recognition of reproductive rights as fundamental to gender equality.

Analysis of Successful Advocacy Strategies

Successful advocacy strategies have played a crucial role in shaping policies and public perception surrounding reproductive rights. Grassroots organizing, coalition building, and strategic litigation have all been effective tools employed by advocacy groups to secure legal victories (Kimport & Weitz, 2016). This section delves into the strategies that have yielded positive outcomes in the fight for reproductive rights and gender equality, offering insights into the methods and tactics that have proven most impactful.

Examination of Challenges Faced by Activists

Activists working towards reproductive rights and gender equality confront numerous challenges, including opposition from anti-choice groups, legal barriers, and political resistance. Moreover, activists often face personal risks, including threats and harassment (Kissling, 2006). This section examines the challenges and obstacles that advocates encounter in their pursuit of reproductive justice, highlighting the resilience and determination required to effect meaningful change.

Discussion of the Role of Advocacy in Shaping Policies and Public Perception

Advocacy efforts have played a significant role in shaping policies related to reproductive rights and in influencing public perception. The passage of legislation like the Reproductive Health Act in New York and the removal of abortion restrictions in Ireland can be attributed to sustained advocacy (Nash, 2018; Spillane, 2019). Additionally, advocacy has been instrumental in changing public discourse and reducing the stigma associated with abortion (Bolton & Becker, 2017). This section discusses how advocacy work has been pivotal in driving policy reforms and shifting societal attitudes, ultimately contributing to the advancement of gender equality.

IX. Legal Challenges and Controversies

Discussion of Recent Legal Challenges to Abortion Rights

Abortion rights have been the subject of ongoing legal challenges and controversies in many countries. This section provides an overview of recent legal challenges to abortion rights, highlighting cases that have tested the boundaries of reproductive freedoms. These challenges often involve efforts to restrict or overturn existing laws that protect a woman’s right to choose, and they have sparked intense debates over issues such as gestational limits, mandatory waiting periods, and the constitutionality of abortion regulations (Hall, 2018).

Analysis of the Role of the Judiciary in Shaping Abortion Laws

The role of the judiciary in shaping abortion laws is pivotal, as court decisions can either safeguard or erode reproductive rights. This section examines how judicial appointments, legal interpretations, and landmark decisions like Roe v. Wade in the United States have influenced the landscape of abortion laws. It delves into the ways in which the judiciary can serve as a critical check on legislative attempts to restrict abortion access, while also considering instances where courts have upheld restrictive regulations (Colker & Dolovich, 2018).

Examination of Public Opinion and Political Polarization

Public opinion and political polarization have played a significant role in the abortion debate. Shifting attitudes toward abortion, influenced by factors like religion, party affiliation, and cultural beliefs, have led to stark divisions within societies (Cohen, 2019). This section explores the complexities of public opinion on abortion, including how it informs political positions and shapes legislative agendas. It also discusses how public sentiment can influence legal challenges and decisions.

Case Studies of Recent Legal Battles and Their Implications for Gender Equality

Recent legal battles over abortion rights have far-reaching implications for gender equality. This section presents case studies of notable legal challenges, such as the Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt case in the United States, which examined the constitutionality of restrictive abortion clinic regulations (Hall, 2018). These case studies offer insights into the strategies employed by advocates and opponents of abortion rights, the arguments presented before the courts, and the potential consequences for gender equality based on the outcomes of these legal battles.

X. Future Directions and Recommendations

Identification of Gaps in Research and Areas for Further Exploration

As we navigate the complex landscape of abortion’s role in gender equality, it becomes apparent that there are several gaps in research and areas that warrant further exploration:

1. Intersectional Research: While existing research has begun to explore the intersection of abortion and various aspects of identity (race, class, sexuality), more in-depth, intersectional studies are needed to understand the unique experiences of individuals with multiple marginalized identities.
2. Global Perspectives: A global perspective is crucial, and more research should focus on regions where access to safe and legal abortion remains limited, shedding light on the challenges faced by women in different cultural and socio-political contexts.
3. Long-Term Outcomes: There is a need for longitudinal studies that track the long-term outcomes of women who have had abortions, including their physical health, mental well-being, and socioeconomic status.
4. Public Perception and Messaging: Research on the effectiveness of public perception campaigns aimed at reducing abortion stigma and increasing awareness about reproductive rights can provide valuable insights into successful advocacy strategies.

Recommendations for Policymakers, Activists, and Researchers

To advance the cause of gender equality in the context of abortion, it is essential for policymakers, activists, and researchers to take specific actions:

1. Advocate for Legal Reforms: Policymakers should actively work towards the repeal of restrictive abortion laws and the implementation of comprehensive, evidence-based reproductive health policies that protect and promote women’s rights.
2. Support Comprehensive Sex Education: Advocates should push for comprehensive sex education programs that provide young people with accurate, age-appropriate information about reproductive health, contraception, and abortion, ensuring informed decision-making.
3. Expand Access to Healthcare Services: Policymakers should prioritize the expansion of access to affordable healthcare services, including contraception, prenatal care, and abortion, to reduce unintended pregnancies and health disparities.
4. Combat Stigma: Researchers and activists should engage in campaigns that aim to combat abortion stigma, sharing personal stories and fostering open, judgment-free dialogues about reproductive rights.
5. Promote Legal Protections: Advocates should work towards legal protections that ensure women’s reproductive rights are safeguarded, and efforts to restrict these rights are met with robust legal challenges.

In conclusion, the multifaceted relationship between abortion and gender equality necessitates ongoing research, advocacy, and policy reforms. By addressing the identified gaps in research and implementing the recommended actions, we can collectively work towards a more equitable future where all individuals have the autonomy and support to make decisions about their reproductive health, thereby advancing gender equality for everyone.

XI. Conclusion

In closing, this comprehensive exploration has delved into the intricate connection between abortion and gender equality, shedding light on the critical insights that underscore the significance of addressing this complex issue. The key findings and arguments articulated throughout this research paper have collectively underscored the paramount importance of this discourse.

This research has underscored:

• The profound influence of abortion laws on women’s autonomy and the broader spectrum of gender equality.
• The complex interplay of sociocultural factors, including religious beliefs and societal stigma, in shaping abortion decisions.
• The far-reaching consequences of restricted access to safe and legal abortion services on women’s health and their pursuit of gender equality.
• The intersectional nature of abortion, where factors like race, socioeconomic status, and sexual orientation intersect with reproductive rights and gender equality.
• The legal challenges, controversies, and the role of public opinion surrounding abortion, all of which hold profound implications for policy and gender equality.

It is irrefutable that addressing abortion within the framework of gender equality is not just a matter of rights, but a fundamental requirement for achieving true equality between genders. The denial of reproductive rights perpetuates gender inequity, stifling women’s opportunities for education, career advancement, economic independence, and autonomy over their own bodies.

As we reflect upon the findings and arguments presented in this research paper, it is evident that a resounding call to action is essential. Advancing women’s rights and reproductive health is not only a matter of social justice but also a core prerequisite for the attainment of gender equality. Policymakers, activists, researchers, and communities must collaborate and commit to:

• Advocating for the repeal of restrictive abortion laws and the expansion of access to safe and legal abortion services.
• Prioritizing comprehensive sex education programs that provide accurate, unbiased information and empower individuals to make informed decisions about their reproductive health.
• Ensuring equitable access to healthcare services, including contraception and reproductive healthcare, to mitigate unintended pregnancies and the necessity for abortion.
• Addressing the distinct challenges faced by marginalized communities in accessing abortion services, including the provision of culturally sensitive care and the reduction of healthcare disparities.
• Continuing the destigmatization of abortion through public education campaigns, personal narratives, and challenging negative stereotypes and misconceptions.

In conclusion, the future of abortion and gender equality, although marked by challenges, is also replete with opportunities for progress. With unwavering determination, evidence-based advocacy, and the recognition of reproductive rights as fundamental human rights, we can propel ourselves closer to a world where women possess the autonomy and support necessary to make choices about their bodies, their lives, and their futures. By doing so, we will be advancing the cause of gender equality for the benefit of all.

Bibliography

1. Astbury-Ward, E. (2008). The impact of abortion on women’s mental health: Literature review. British Journal of Nursing, 17(2), 82-87.
2. Berer, M. (2017). Abortion Law and Policy Around the World: In Search of Decriminalization. Health and Human Rights Journal, 19(2), 13-27.
3. Bolton, D., & Becker, D. (2017). Gender, sexuality, and reproductive justice in abortion: The impact of women of color-led reproductive health and justice organizations. Sexuality Research & Social Policy Journal of NSRC, 14(1), 74-87.
4. Cohen, M. E. (2019). Attitudes toward abortion: Implications for political behavior. In Abortion Politics, Mass Media, and Social Movements in America (pp. 15-32). Springer.
5. Colker, R., & Dolovich, S. (2018). The law of abortion. West Academic.
6. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
7. Cook, R. J., Dickens, B. M., & Fathalla, M. F. (2003). Reproductive health and human rights: Integrating medicine, ethics, and law. Oxford University Press.
8. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
9. de Zordo, S., Mishtal, J., & Anton, J. (2019). The path to legalization of abortion in Argentina: Gender and the dynamics of change. Social Science & Medicine, 220, 354-361.
10. Ganatra, B., Gerdts, C., Rossier, C., Johnson Jr, B. R., Tunçalp, Ö., Assifi, A., … & Singh, S. (2017). Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: Estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. The Lancet, 390(10110), 2372-2381.
11. Ganiel, G., & McElwee, M. (2016). Religion and the politics of abortion: The Roman Catholic Church in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Gender and Society, 30(6), 951-976.
12. Gerdts, C., Vohra, D., Ahern, J., Meckstroth, K., & Goldenberg, M. (2016). Moving towards a human rights-based approach to safe abortion: The experiences of women in England, India, and the United States. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 16(1), 24.
13. Goodwin, M. M. (2017). Abortion in El Salvador: A legal and human rights analysis of the 1998 and 2012 constitutional amendments. Health and Human Rights Journal, 19(2), 55-68.
14. Grimes, D. A., Benson, J., Singh, S., Romero, M., Ganatra, B., Okonofua, F. E., & Shah, I. H. (2006). Unsafe abortion: The preventable pandemic. The Lancet, 368(9550), 1908-1919.
15. Hall, L. L. (2018). Reproductive rights and justice in the United States: An overview of the issues. In Reproductive Rights and Justice: A Reference Handbook (pp. 3-19). ABC-CLIO.
16. Harris, L. H., Debbink, M. P., Martin, L. A., & Hassinger, J. N. (2011). Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: Findings from a pilot study of the Providers Share Workshop. Social Science & Medicine, 73(7), 1062-1070.
17. Hartmann, H. I. (1979). The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union. Capital & Class, 3(2), 1-33.
18. Hays, J. N. (2019). The Battle for Reproductive Freedom: The State, Sexuality, and the Abortion Debate. University of Illinois Press.
19. Henshaw, S. K. (2009). Factors hindering access to abortion services. Family Planning Perspectives, 19(2), 54-59.
20. Inhorn, M. C., & Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. (2008). Assisting reproduction, claiming rights: Dilemmas of nongovernmental organizations in transnational women’s health. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 22(3), 216-240.
21. Jerman, J., Frohwirth, L., Kavanaugh, M. L., & Blades, N. (2017). Barriers to abortion care and their consequences for patients traveling for services: Qualitative findings from two states. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(2), 95-102.
22. Jones, R. K., & Jerman, J. (2017). Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008–2014. American Journal of Public Health, 107(12), 1904-1909.
23. Kimport, K., & Weitz, T. A. (2016). Constructing the boundaries of the pro-choice movement: A case study of Planned Parenthood’s strategies for mobilizing communities. Social Science & Medicine, 169, 126-134.
24. Kismodi, E., Cottingham, J., Lazard, C., Zampas, C., & Gruskin, S. (2019). Women’s and girls’ experiences of stigma after abortion: A qualitative synthesis. The Lancet Global Health, 7(10), e1364-e1376.
25. Kissling, F. (2006). Defining reproductive freedom and reproductive rights in the age of the embryo. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29(5), 441-453.
26. Kumar, A., & Hessini, L. (2009). “Abortion with pills”: The landscape of telemedical service provision in the European Union. Reproductive Health Matters, 17(33), 10-18.
27. Morgan, L. M. (2019). Abortion in the transnational imagination: Sisterhood, race, and reproductive rights in Mexico. Rutgers University Press.
28. Nash, J. C. (2018). Feminist activism and theory in Latin America: Women’s movements in transitional democracies. Routledge.
29. Norris, A., Bessett, D., Steinberg, J. R., Kavanaugh, M. L., & De Zordo, S. (2011). Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Women’s Health Issues, 21(3), S49-S54.
30. Purcell, C., Cameron, S., & Lawton, J. (2014). Factors influencing decision making following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. Prenatal Diagnosis, 34(9), 851-859.
31. Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. Vintage.
32. Rocca, C. H., Kimport, K., Roberts, S. C. M., Gould, H., Neuhaus, J., & Foster, D. G. (2013). Decision Rightness and Emotional Responses to Abortion in the United States: A Longitudinal Study. PLOS ONE, 8(2), e73871.
33. Rocha, J. M. (2017). Abortion laws in African Commonwealth countries: From colonial heritage to post-independence. In Comparative Perspectives on the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Antidiscrimination Law (pp. 215-232). Springer.
34. Ross, L. J., & Solinger, R. (Eds.). (2017). Reproductive Justice: An Introduction. University of California Press.
35. Sanger, M. (1920). Woman and the New Race. Brentano’s.
36. Skinner, E. H. (2019). The Swedish Abortion Act of 1974: Promoting women’s rights and gender equality. Sexuality Research & Social Policy Journal of NSRC, 16(4), 405-417.
37. Spillane, A. (2019). Abortion politics, legal mobilization, and social change in Ireland: Pro-choice activism and the repeal of the Eighth Amendment. Law & Society Review, 53(2), 366-398.
38. Stryker, R., & Michalski, J. (2019). Policing pregnancy: The law and ethics of obstetric conflict. NYU Press.
39. Thornton, L. (2018). Abortion in Ireland: The impact of the Eighth Amendment. Feminist Legal Studies, 26(3), 325-336.
40. UN Women. (2020). What is gender equality?
41. World Health Organization. (2012). Safe abortion: Technical and policy guidance for health systems (2nd ed.).