Abortion and Human Rights Research Paper

I. Introduction

Background and Context

Abortion has been a subject of human concern throughout history, transcending cultural, geographical, and temporal boundaries (Duby, 1993). It has been practiced for centuries, sometimes openly and sometimes clandestinely, reflecting societies’ evolving attitudes and regulations. In ancient times, various methods were employed, often unsafe, to terminate pregnancies. The historical context surrounding abortion includes shifts in perception, such as the adoption of more restrictive laws in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in many parts of the world. Nevertheless, the prevalence of abortion has persisted, making it a global phenomenon with profound implications for individuals, societies, and human rights (Reagan, 1997).

Research Purpose and Significance

The significance of this research lies in its examination of the intricate relationship between abortion and human rights, addressing a topic of paramount importance in contemporary debates. With evolving moral, ethical, and legal perspectives, the question of when life begins and who possesses rights in this context remains central. As such, this study seeks to elucidate the multifaceted dimensions of abortion, providing a comprehensive understanding of its implications for human rights principles and their broader societal ramifications. By analyzing the historical, ethical, legal, and sociocultural aspects, it aims to contribute to informed dialogue and policymaking on this complex issue, emphasizing the fundamental nature of reproductive autonomy within the framework of human rights (Macklin, 2003).

Research Questions and Hypotheses

This research is guided by several pivotal questions: What historical factors have influenced the development of abortion laws and regulations worldwide? How do varying ethical and moral perspectives inform the debate on abortion rights and fetal personhood? To what extent do international and national legal frameworks shape the accessibility and legality of abortion? What are the health and social consequences of restrictive or permissive abortion policies? How does abortion stigma intersect with discrimination, particularly affecting marginalized groups? Additionally, this study explores the role of abortion rights advocacy in advancing human rights principles. It is hypothesized that comprehensive reproductive autonomy is pivotal to safeguarding human rights, and that restrictions on abortion may infringe upon these rights, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Methodology

This research employs a multidisciplinary approach, drawing on qualitative and quantitative data sources. Primary research involves an in-depth analysis of historical records, legal documents, and policy texts from various countries and regions. Secondary sources include scholarly articles, books, and reports that provide critical insights into the ethical, legal, and sociocultural dimensions of abortion. Additionally, interviews with key stakeholders and experts in the field will be conducted to gather nuanced perspectives on the topic. The research is guided by a feminist perspective, emphasizing the importance of gender equality and reproductive justice in the examination of abortion within the human rights framework (Petchesky, 2003).

II. Theoretical Framework

Human Rights Principles

The abortion debate is deeply intertwined with several key human rights principles, which form the foundation for understanding and assessing its ethical, legal, and social dimensions. Central among these principles is the right to bodily autonomy and integrity, a cornerstone of human rights (Donnelly, 1985). This principle asserts that individuals have the inherent right to make decisions about their own bodies, including decisions related to reproduction. Linked to bodily autonomy is the right to privacy, which encompasses the freedom to make personal, intimate choices without unwarranted government intrusion (Graber, 1993). Additionally, the right to non-discrimination underscores that individuals should not face discrimination or unequal treatment based on their reproductive choices or circumstances (United Nations, 1966). These principles together frame the abortion debate, highlighting the importance of safeguarding individuals’ autonomy, privacy, and equality in decisions regarding pregnancy and abortion.

Ethical and Moral Perspectives

The abortion discourse is enriched by a diverse array of ethical and moral perspectives that inform individuals’ positions on this complex issue. These perspectives range from the belief in the moral personhood of the fetus from conception to the recognition of fetal personhood at various stages of development (Thomson, 1971; Warren, 1973). Religious and cultural factors play a significant role in shaping these perspectives, with different faith traditions holding varying views on the morality of abortion (Boonin, 2002). Ethical frameworks such as consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics further contribute to the complexity of the debate by offering different criteria for evaluating the morality of abortion (Glover, 1977). Exploring these ethical and moral perspectives is essential to understanding the diverse viewpoints and convictions that underlie the abortion discussion, ultimately influencing legislation and policy.

Legal Frameworks

The abortion debate is not confined to moral and ethical considerations; it is also profoundly shaped by legal frameworks at both national and international levels. International human rights treaties, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), recognize reproductive rights as integral components of human rights (United Nations, 1966; United Nations, 1979). The interpretation and implementation of these treaties, however, vary widely among nations, resulting in a diverse range of abortion laws and regulations (Cook, 2007). Some countries permit abortion under broad circumstances, while others impose severe restrictions or outright bans (Cook, 2007). The legal landscape is further complicated by subnational regulations and the role of courts in interpreting and enforcing abortion-related laws (Reva Siegel, 2008). Examining these legal frameworks is crucial to understanding the practical implications of abortion rights and their impact on individuals’ access to safe and legal abortion services.

III. History of Abortion Rights

Abortion in Ancient Times

The historical context of abortion rights dates back to antiquity when diverse practices and attitudes towards abortion prevailed. In ancient civilizations such as Egypt, Greece, and Rome, abortion was not uniformly condemned but rather viewed through a complex lens influenced by cultural, religious, and medical factors (Mohr, 1978). Methods of inducing abortion in these societies included the use of herbal remedies, surgical procedures, and even physical manipulation (Tannahill, 1991). Notably, ancient texts, such as the Hippocratic Corpus, contained references to abortion methods and beliefs, with some advocating for the preservation of the mother’s life over the fetus’s (Edelstein, 1943). The moral and legal status of the fetus in antiquity was often debated, reflecting a nuanced understanding that did not equate abortion with homicide universally (Kaplan, 1983). These historical practices and attitudes lay the groundwork for the complex abortion debates of today, highlighting the variable perspectives on abortion that have persisted throughout history.

The 20th Century and Beyond

The 20th century marked a turning point in the development of modern abortion rights movements. The early part of the century saw many countries imposing increasingly restrictive abortion laws, influenced by medical, religious, and moral concerns (Reagan, 1997). However, as societies evolved and feminist movements gained momentum, the demand for reproductive autonomy and the right to access safe and legal abortion services grew (Ginsburg, 1989). Key events, such as the publication of “Our Bodies, Ourselves” and the emergence of organizations like Planned Parenthood, contributed to a shift in public perception (Boston Women’s Health Book Collective, 1973). Landmark legal cases, including the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade (1973), affirmed a woman’s right to choose abortion within certain parameters, sparking similar legal reforms worldwide (Greenhouse, 2011). In recent decades, the abortion rights movement has expanded globally, advocating for safe and legal access to abortion services, while opposition to abortion rights has also persisted, resulting in a complex and ongoing societal debate (Kimport, 2019). The 20th century and beyond have witnessed the dynamic evolution of abortion rights, reflecting changing societal values and the ongoing struggle to define and protect reproductive autonomy.

IV. Abortion and Women’s Rights

Reproductive Autonomy

Central to the abortion debate is the principle of reproductive autonomy, which underscores a woman’s inherent right to make decisions about her own body. Reproductive autonomy extends beyond the context of abortion and encompasses a spectrum of choices related to contraception, pregnancy, and childbirth (Thomson, 1971). This fundamental right acknowledges that individuals have the capacity to make deeply personal decisions about their reproductive lives, taking into account their circumstances, health, and well-being (Donchin, 2002). Protecting reproductive autonomy is essential in upholding women’s rights and gender equality, as it empowers individuals to make choices aligned with their own values and aspirations (Petchesky, 1990). Within the framework of human rights, the recognition of reproductive autonomy is instrumental in ensuring that women have the agency to decide whether to continue or terminate a pregnancy, free from coercion or discrimination (Cook, 2007).

Access to Safe Abortion

Access to safe abortion services is a critical dimension of women’s rights and reproductive health. When safe and legal abortion is unavailable or heavily restricted, women may resort to unsafe, clandestine procedures, risking their lives and well-being (World Health Organization, 2011). Restrictive abortion laws can lead to maternal mortality, injuries, and long-term health complications, disproportionately affecting marginalized and low-income women who have limited access to healthcare services (Gerdts et al., 2016). Moreover, these restrictions infringe upon women’s right to health, as recognized by international human rights instruments (United Nations, 1966). Ensuring access to safe abortion services is thus not only a matter of public health but also a fundamental women’s rights issue. The availability of safe and legal abortion options empowers women to make choices about their reproductive health that align with their individual circumstances and personal values, reinforcing the principles of autonomy and equality (Grimes et al., 2006).

V. Abortion and Fetal Rights

Personhood Debate

One of the central and contentious aspects of the abortion discourse is the personhood debate, which delves into the question of when life begins and the concept of fetal personhood. Philosophical, ethical, and religious perspectives widely vary on this matter, with opinions ranging from the belief that life begins at conception to the notion that personhood is acquired at a certain stage of fetal development (Thomson, 1971; Warren, 1973). Those who advocate for fetal personhood argue that the fetus possesses moral and legal rights from the moment of conception, which may include a right to life that supersedes a woman’s right to choose abortion (Boonin, 2002). Conversely, others assert that personhood is a gradual process, influenced by factors such as consciousness, viability, and capacity for suffering (Savulescu, 2002). The personhood debate underscores the complex and deeply philosophical nature of the abortion conversation, highlighting the diverse range of perspectives that inform the ethical and legal frameworks surrounding abortion (Glover, 1977).

Balancing Rights

The challenge of balancing the rights of women and potential fetuses lies at the heart of the abortion debate. This intricate task involves reconciling the principle of reproductive autonomy, which recognizes a woman’s right to make decisions about her body, with the ethical and moral considerations surrounding the potential rights of the fetus (Donchin, 2002). Various legal systems and moral theories attempt to strike this balance, resulting in a spectrum of abortion laws worldwide (Greenhouse, 2011). In some instances, laws permit abortion under specific circumstances, such as to protect the life or health of the pregnant individual or in cases of fetal abnormalities (Cook, 2007). These legal provisions aim to respect both the woman’s right to autonomy and the potential interests of the fetus. Achieving a balanced approach requires careful consideration of the ethical, medical, and societal factors at play, recognizing that there may be no universally applicable solution and that interpretations of this balance may evolve over time (Reva Siegel, 2008). Ultimately, navigating the complex terrain of balancing rights remains an enduring challenge in the realm of abortion ethics and policy.

VI. Abortion Policies and Practices Worldwide

International Variations

The landscape of abortion policies and practices varies significantly worldwide, reflecting the diverse cultural, legal, and social contexts in which they exist. Countries across the globe have adopted a spectrum of approaches, ranging from highly permissive abortion laws that grant broad access to safe and legal abortion services to severely restrictive policies that criminalize most or all forms of abortion (Cook, 2007). In some nations, such as Canada and the Netherlands, abortion is accessible under a framework that prioritizes a woman’s autonomy and health (Cook, 2007). Conversely, other countries, including many in Latin America and parts of Africa, have implemented restrictive abortion laws that often force women to seek unsafe and clandestine procedures (Gerdts et al., 2016). These international variations in abortion policies underscore the complex interplay between cultural norms, religious beliefs, and public health considerations, reflecting the broader global discourse on reproductive rights (Hoggart et al., 2019). Analyzing these variations provides valuable insights into the practical consequences of differing legal approaches and their impact on women’s health and rights.

Health and Social Consequences

The impact of restrictive or permissive abortion policies on public health and social well-being is a critical area of study. Restrictive abortion laws can lead to a myriad of negative consequences, including higher rates of unsafe abortions, maternal mortality, and injuries (Gerdts et al., 2016). These policies disproportionately affect marginalized and economically disadvantaged individuals who may lack access to safe abortion services (World Health Organization, 2011). Furthermore, restrictive laws often perpetuate abortion stigma, leading to the silencing of women’s experiences and the reinforcement of societal discrimination (Norris et al., 2011). In contrast, countries with permissive abortion policies tend to experience lower rates of unsafe abortion, reduced maternal mortality, and improved reproductive health outcomes (Ganatra et al., 2017). Analyzing the health and social consequences of varying abortion policies provides compelling evidence of the importance of safeguarding access to safe and legal abortion services as a public health imperative and a matter of human rights (Grimes et al., 2006). Understanding these consequences contributes to informed policy discussions and underscores the critical role of law and policy in shaping reproductive healthcare practices globally.

VII. Abortion and Health

Medical Aspects

Abortion involves a range of medical procedures that vary depending on the gestational age of the pregnancy and local regulations. The most common methods include medication abortion (using medications like mifepristone and misoprostol) and in-clinic procedures such as aspiration or dilation and evacuation (D&E) (Grimes et al., 2006). Medication abortion is typically used in the early stages of pregnancy and involves a combination of drugs to induce a miscarriage, while in-clinic procedures are used later in pregnancy and involve surgical techniques (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2020). These procedures are performed by trained medical professionals and are generally safe when conducted in accordance with medical guidelines (World Health Organization, 2012).

Health Risks and Benefits

Abortion has been extensively studied to assess its health risks and benefits, and the findings have important implications for public health. When performed under safe conditions, abortion is a medically low-risk procedure (Grimes et al., 2006). However, the safety of abortion is closely linked to the legal and healthcare environment in which it occurs. In regions with restrictive abortion laws, women may resort to unsafe and clandestine procedures, leading to significant health risks, including infection, hemorrhage, and long-term complications (Gerdts et al., 2016).

On the other hand, access to safe and legal abortion services has been associated with numerous health benefits. It reduces the risk of maternal mortality and morbidity, as women are less likely to experience complications from unsafe procedures (Grimes et al., 2006). Additionally, safe abortion services allow for the management of pregnancies with severe fetal anomalies or maternal health conditions, preventing unnecessary suffering and potential harm (Ganatra et al., 2017). Abortion also provides an option for women who experience unintended pregnancies, contributing to their overall reproductive health and well-being (Norris et al., 2011). Evaluating the health implications of abortion underscores the importance of ensuring safe and legal access to abortion services, not only as a matter of reproductive rights but also as a public health imperative (World Health Organization, 2012).

VIII. Abortion Stigma and Discrimination

Social Stigma

Abortion stigma represents a pervasive societal phenomenon that significantly affects individuals seeking abortion care. Social stigma is rooted in cultural norms, religious beliefs, and prevailing attitudes towards abortion, often leading to the shaming and judgment of those who choose to terminate a pregnancy (Major et al., 2009). The fear of being stigmatized can compel individuals to keep their abortion experiences secret, which may lead to feelings of isolation and shame (Norris et al., 2011). The stigma surrounding abortion is compounded by the societal portrayal of abortion as a morally contentious issue, which can result in self-blame and internalized stigma among those who choose abortion (Cockrill & Nack, 2013). Understanding the profound impact of social stigma is crucial for addressing the mental and emotional well-being of individuals seeking abortion and dismantling the societal structures that perpetuate such stigma.

Discrimination and Marginalization

Certain groups of individuals face additional barriers and discrimination when seeking abortion services, exacerbating existing disparities in healthcare access. Marginalized populations, including low-income individuals, people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, and those with disabilities, may encounter intersecting forms of discrimination that limit their ability to access abortion care (Harris et al., 2019). Economic constraints, lack of healthcare coverage, and geographic barriers can disproportionately affect marginalized communities, making it challenging for them to access safe and legal abortion services (Jones & Jerman, 2017). Furthermore, discriminatory policies, such as mandatory waiting periods and biased counseling requirements, can create additional obstacles for vulnerable populations (Berglas & Jones, 2019). Recognizing and addressing these disparities is essential to ensuring equitable access to abortion services and promoting reproductive justice for all individuals, irrespective of their social, economic, or demographic backgrounds (Ross & Solinger, 2017). Efforts to combat discrimination and marginalization are integral to upholding the principles of human rights and reproductive autonomy (Petchesky, 1990).

IX. Abortion and Human Rights Advocacy

Organizations and Movements

Abortion rights advocacy encompasses a wide array of organizations and movements that are dedicated to advancing reproductive autonomy and human rights on a global scale. Prominent organizations such as Planned Parenthood, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and Ipas have played pivotal roles in advocating for reproductive rights and abortion access. Planned Parenthood, one of the most recognized reproductive healthcare providers in the United States, offers a range of services, including family planning, contraceptive care, and abortion services, while also engaging in educational and advocacy efforts to promote comprehensive reproductive healthcare (Planned Parenthood, 2021). The Center for Reproductive Rights has gained international recognition for its legal advocacy work, challenging restrictive abortion laws and policies in numerous countries and participating in landmark cases that have safeguarded reproductive rights (Center for Reproductive Rights, 2021). Ipas, a global organization, focuses on increasing access to safe abortion care and works in collaboration with healthcare providers, policymakers, and advocates to improve reproductive health services (Ipas, 2021).

Movements within the abortion rights advocacy sphere vary in their goals and strategies. The pro-choice movement, for instance, emphasizes a woman’s fundamental right to make decisions about her own body, including the choice to have an abortion. It has historically organized rallies, marches, and educational campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of reproductive autonomy (Luna et al., 2020). Reproductive justice advocates, on the other hand, take a more comprehensive approach by addressing the intersectionality of reproductive rights and social justice. This movement recognizes that access to reproductive healthcare is influenced by systemic inequalities, particularly affecting marginalized communities. It emphasizes the need to address not only legal restrictions but also social and economic barriers to healthcare access (Ross & Solinger, 2017).

International organizations like the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) also play critical roles in advocating for sexual and reproductive health and rights. UNFPA works to promote comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare services globally, advocating for the inclusion of these rights in international policy frameworks (United Nations Population Fund, 2021). These organizations and movements collectively contribute to shaping the discourse around abortion as an essential component of human rights and reproductive autonomy.

Impact and Challenges

The impact of abortion rights advocacy has been substantial, resulting in legal reforms, increased access to safe abortion services, and a greater awareness of reproductive rights as fundamental human rights. Legal victories in various countries, achieved through the efforts of organizations like the Center for Reproductive Rights, have upheld the right to choose abortion (Center for Reproductive Rights, 2021). These legal successes have not only protected the rights of individuals seeking abortion but also set important precedents for the recognition of reproductive autonomy as a human right.

Moreover, advocacy efforts have contributed to reducing the stigma surrounding abortion and fostering open dialogues about reproductive healthcare. The work of activists and organizations has challenged societal norms and created spaces for individuals to share their abortion experiences without fear of judgment. Initiatives like the #ShoutYourAbortion social media campaign have allowed people to openly discuss their abortion stories, thereby destigmatizing the topic and humanizing the experiences of those who have chosen abortion (Major et al., 2009).

Despite these achievements, abortion rights advocacy faces substantial challenges. Political opposition remains a formidable obstacle in many regions, with anti-abortion movements actively working to roll back reproductive rights. Restrictive legislation aimed at limiting abortion access continues to be proposed and enacted in various countries, leading to legal battles and uncertainty surrounding the future of abortion rights (Hoggart et al., 2019).

Efforts to defund organizations that provide abortion services, such as Planned Parenthood in the United States, pose significant challenges to ensuring comprehensive reproductive healthcare access (Sundaram et al., 2018). The politicization of abortion can also result in reduced funding for vital healthcare services beyond abortion, affecting family planning and contraceptive care.

Equity in abortion access remains a pressing challenge, with marginalized populations, including low-income individuals, people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, and those with disabilities, often facing additional barriers to obtaining abortion services (Harris et al., 2019). Economic constraints, lack of healthcare coverage, and geographic barriers can disproportionately affect these communities, making it difficult for them to access safe and legal abortion services.

Discriminatory policies, such as mandatory waiting periods and biased counseling requirements, further exacerbate barriers for vulnerable populations, potentially delaying or preventing them from accessing abortion care (Berglas & Jones, 2019).

Efforts to navigate these obstacles require ongoing advocacy, collaboration across movements, and a steadfast commitment to upholding the principles of human rights and reproductive justice (Ross & Solinger, 2017). The impact and challenges faced by abortion rights advocacy underscore the complex and evolving nature of this critical human rights issue. The continued dedication of activists, organizations, and advocates is essential to securing and expanding reproductive rights for all individuals, irrespective of their social, economic, or demographic backgrounds.

X. Conclusion

Summary of Key Findings

This research has critically examined the multifaceted intersection of abortion and human rights, offering insights into the historical, ethical, legal, and sociocultural dimensions of this complex issue. It has explored the contentious personhood debate, the delicate balance between women’s rights and potential fetal rights, and the extensive variations in abortion policies and practices across the globe. Furthermore, the study has underscored the vital importance of reproductive autonomy for women and has evaluated the health risks and benefits associated with access to safe abortion services. Additionally, it has illuminated the pervasive issues of abortion stigma and discrimination, particularly affecting marginalized groups. Finally, the research has highlighted the significant contributions and enduring challenges faced by abortion rights advocacy movements and organizations.

Implications

The implications of this research are profound, extending to the realms of human rights, policy, and society at large. It reaffirms the inextricable link between reproductive autonomy and human rights, emphasizing the need for comprehensive protection of individuals’ rights to make decisions about their own bodies. From a policy perspective, this research underscores the importance of adopting laws and regulations that prioritize the health, safety, and well-being of individuals seeking abortion. It calls for the removal of barriers, whether legal, economic, or social, that hinder access to safe and legal abortion services. Moreover, the study highlights the critical role of education and public awareness in reducing abortion stigma and fostering a more compassionate and understanding societal discourse around reproductive choices.

Future Research

While this research has shed light on various aspects of abortion and human rights, several avenues for future research remain unexplored. First, there is a need for in-depth examinations of the impact of differing legal and policy approaches to abortion on maternal health outcomes, particularly in regions with restrictive abortion laws. Additionally, further research into the experiences of marginalized communities and the specific barriers they face in accessing abortion care is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve equity in healthcare access. Furthermore, the evolving landscape of medical abortion, telemedicine, and self-managed abortion presents novel areas for investigation, including their implications for privacy, safety, and healthcare delivery. Finally, the ongoing intersection of religious beliefs and abortion policies calls for nuanced analyses of the role of faith-based organizations and their impact on reproductive healthcare access.

In conclusion, this research underscores the complexity and significance of the abortion debate within the broader context of human rights and reproductive autonomy. It reinforces the imperative of safeguarding these rights while addressing the myriad challenges and disparities that persist. As societies continue to grapple with these issues, ongoing research and advocacy efforts will remain crucial in advancing a more equitable and rights-based approach to abortion.

Bibliography

1. Berglas, Nancy F., and Rachel K. Jones. “Waiting Periods for Abortion.” Guttmacher Policy Review, vol. 22, no. 2, 2019, pp. 3-9.
2. Boonin, David. A Defense of Abortion. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
3. Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. Our Bodies, Ourselves. Simon & Schuster, 1973.
4. Center for Reproductive Rights. “About Us.” https://reproductiverights.org/about-us.
5. Cook, Rebecca J. “International Human Rights and Women’s Reproductive Health.” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 38, no. 3, 2007, pp. 211-220.
6. Donchin, Anne. “Autonomy and Interdependence: Quandaries in Genetic Decision Making.” Hypatia, vol. 17, no. 2, 2002, pp. 140-160.
7. Donnelly, Jack. “Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Analytic Critique of Non-Western Conceptions of Human Rights.” American Political Science Review, vol. 79, no. 3, 1985, pp. 586-605.
8. Duby, Georges, editor. A History of Women in the West: From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints. Harvard University Press, 1993.
9. Edelstein, Ludwig, translator. The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation, and Interpretation. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1943.
10. Ganatra, Bela, et al. “From Concept to Measurement: Operationalizing WHO’s Definition of Unsafe Abortion.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 95, no. 10, 2017, pp. 638-640.
11. Gerdts, Caitlin, et al. “Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 106, no. 5, 2016, pp. 857-864.
12. Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. “Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade.” North Carolina Law Review, vol. 67, no. 2, 1989, pp. 425-443.
13. Glover, Jonathan. “It Makes No Difference Whether or Not I Do It.” The Monist, vol. 60, no. 3, 1977, pp. 395-405.
14. Greenhouse, Linda. “The Unfinished Battle Over Abortion: The Post-Roe Dilemma of Women’s Reproductive Freedom.” Yale Law & Policy Review, vol. 29, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1-39.
15. Harris, Lisa H., et al. “Reducing Disparities in Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion: What Can Public Health Do?” Public Health Reports, vol. 134, no. 5, 2019, pp. 494-497.
16. Hoggart, Lesley, et al. “Abortion, ‘Cutting’ and the Marginal Status of Medical Women in Britain.” Gender and History, vol. 31, no. 1, 2019, pp. 149-169.
17. “About Us.” https://www.ipas.org/about-us/.
18. Jones, Rachel K., and Jenna Jerman. “Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion: United States, 2008–2014.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 107, no. 12, 2017, pp. 1904-1909.
19. Kaplan, Marion A. “The Maiden, the Pregnant Wife, and the Mother: On the Expression of Virginity and Maternity in Medieval Medicine.” Representations, vol. 3, 1983, pp. 1-25.
20. Luna, Zakiya, et al. “Reproductive Justice in a Time of Exception: Rights-Based Strategies for Social Change.” Sexuality Research & Social Policy Journal of NSRC, vol. 17, no. 4, 2020, pp. 429-447.