Abortion and Poverty Research Paper

I. Introduction

Abortion, as a topic of intense debate and profound social significance, remains at the forefront of public discourse. Its intersection with poverty is an issue of considerable importance, warranting in-depth exploration. This paper seeks to examine the intricate relationship between abortion and poverty, shedding light on the manifold implications of this intersection within contemporary society. While the debate over abortion rights has long been a contentious one, the specific link between abortion and poverty remains a subject ripe for comprehensive analysis. The central research question guiding this study is: To what extent does abortion intersect with poverty, and how do these two social issues mutually influence one another? To contextualize this inquiry, it is essential to provide a brief overview of the concept of abortion and its prevalence. Abortion, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), refers to the termination of a pregnancy before fetal viability, and it is practiced worldwide for a myriad of reasons (WHO, 2019). Simultaneously, poverty represents a pervasive and persistent issue with wide-ranging consequences, affecting individuals and society at large. Its ramifications extend beyond financial hardship, encompassing aspects of health, education, and overall quality of life (Sen, 1999). This paper aims to unravel the intricate dynamics between abortion and poverty, highlighting their societal implications and drawing attention to the need for comprehensive understanding and holistic solutions within the realms of reproductive health and social policy.

II. Background and Literature Review

Historical Context of Abortion and Its Legality

The history of abortion is deeply rooted in the social, cultural, and legal evolution of societies across the globe. Abortion practices have existed for centuries, with early civilizations often permitting or restricting abortion based on cultural and religious beliefs (Hull, 2003). The modern debate surrounding abortion’s legality and accessibility began in earnest during the 19th and 20th centuries, with various countries enacting laws that either criminalized or regulated the procedure (Mohr, 1978). For instance, the United States witnessed the landmark Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade in 1973, which legalized abortion in the first trimester and established a framework for abortion rights (Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113).

Social, Cultural, and Ethical Dimensions of Abortion

The social, cultural, and ethical dimensions of abortion are intricate and multifaceted. They reflect the diversity of perspectives and values held within societies. Abortion is a subject that often intersects with deeply held religious beliefs, ethical principles, and cultural norms. This complexity has given rise to contentious debates around issues such as the right to life, bodily autonomy, and the role of government in reproductive decisions (Thomson, 1971; Marquis, 1989). Abortion’s moral and ethical aspects have been examined through various ethical theories, including utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, further contributing to the richness of the discourse (Singer, 1984; Warren, 1973).

Connection Between Abortion and Poverty in the Literature

A growing body of scholarly literature has explored the connection between abortion and poverty, recognizing the profound implications of this relationship on individuals and society. Studies have highlighted that individuals living in poverty often face barriers to accessing quality healthcare, including reproductive services (Foster et al., 2015). These barriers can result in limited access to contraception and family planning, increasing the risk of unintended pregnancies (Gold, 2014). Furthermore, the financial burden associated with abortion, including the cost of the procedure, travel, and potential time off work, can exacerbate economic hardship for low-income individuals (Jones & Jerman, 2017). Researchers have also examined the complex interplay between socioeconomic factors, such as educational attainment and employment status, and decisions regarding abortion (Jones & Kavanaugh, 2011). Overall, the literature underscores the intricate relationship between abortion and poverty and calls for a deeper understanding of this intersection to inform both policy and practice.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will delve further into these dynamics, drawing upon existing research to explore the socioeconomic factors contributing to unplanned pregnancies, the economic consequences of abortion, and the impact of abortion policies on poverty rates, among other crucial aspects of this complex relationship.

III. Abortion and Socioeconomic Factors

Examination of Socioeconomic Factors Contributing to Unplanned Pregnancies

Unplanned pregnancies are often influenced by a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors. Low-income individuals and those facing economic instability are more likely to experience unintended pregnancies (Gipson et al., 2008). Financial constraints can hinder access to contraception and family planning services, increasing the risk of unintended conception (Foster et al., 2012). Additionally, disparities in education and employment opportunities may limit individuals’ ability to plan for and prevent unintended pregnancies (Hoffman & Maynard, 2008). It is crucial to recognize that the socioeconomic landscape plays a significant role in shaping the prevalence of unplanned pregnancies.

The Role of Access to Healthcare, Sex Education, and Contraception

Access to healthcare, comprehensive sex education, and contraception are critical factors in preventing unintended pregnancies. Inadequate access to affordable healthcare can pose a significant barrier to individuals seeking reproductive services, including contraception (Finer & Zolna, 2014). Comprehensive sex education programs that provide accurate information about contraception and safe sex practices have been shown to reduce the rate of unintended pregnancies (Santelli et al., 2017). Contraceptive methods, ranging from birth control pills to long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), play a pivotal role in family planning and reducing the risk of unintended pregnancies (Dehlendorf et al., 2014).

Statistics and Data on the Demographics of Women Seeking Abortion Services

Statistical data provide valuable insights into the demographics of women seeking abortion services. Research indicates that women of all socioeconomic backgrounds seek abortions, but disparities exist in the frequency and timing of these procedures. Low-income women, often faced with financial constraints and limited access to healthcare, may be more likely to seek abortions later in pregnancy due to delays in recognizing the pregnancy and accessing services (Jones & Jerman, 2017). Moreover, racial and ethnic disparities exist in abortion rates, with Black and Hispanic individuals being disproportionately affected (Jones & Jerman, 2014). Understanding these demographic patterns is crucial for tailoring interventions and policies that address the intersection of abortion and poverty effectively.

In the subsequent sections, we will delve deeper into the economic consequences of abortion, including the financial burden it may place on individuals and families, and examine the influence of abortion policies on poverty rates. This comprehensive analysis will provide a holistic view of the connection between abortion and poverty, shedding light on the multifaceted challenges faced by individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

IV. Abortion and Economic Consequences

Analyzing the Economic Implications of Abortion for Individuals and Families

The economic consequences of abortion are a crucial aspect of understanding its impact on individuals and families. While abortion may offer a solution to some facing an unplanned pregnancy, it is not without financial implications. The cost of the procedure, associated medical expenses, and potential travel to an abortion clinic can strain the financial resources of those seeking abortion services (Foster & Gould, 2012). Moreover, these costs can vary significantly depending on factors such as gestational age and the availability of nearby providers (Jones & Jerman, 2017). Therefore, it is imperative to analyze how abortion decisions can affect the economic well-being of individuals and their families.

The Impact of Costs on Low-Income Individuals

For low-income individuals, the economic impact of abortion can be particularly burdensome. The direct expenses associated with the procedure, including the cost of the abortion itself and related medical services, can be a substantial financial barrier (Foster et al., 2015). This financial burden may be exacerbated by the need for travel to a distant clinic, especially in regions with limited access to abortion services (Upadhyay et al., 2017). Moreover, taking time off work for the procedure and recovery can result in lost wages, further straining the economic stability of low-income individuals and their families (Jones & Jerman, 2017).

Exploring the Potential Impact on Career and Educational Opportunities

The economic implications of abortion extend beyond immediate financial costs. Decisions surrounding abortion can have ramifications for career and educational opportunities. For individuals pursuing education or building careers, an unplanned pregnancy can disrupt their goals and aspirations. The decision to continue a pregnancy may necessitate taking time away from educational pursuits or work, potentially leading to delays in achieving career and educational milestones (Foster & Gould, 2012). In contrast, abortion can offer individuals the opportunity to maintain their educational and career trajectories, minimizing interruptions caused by an unintended pregnancy.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will delve into the role of abortion policies in shaping the experiences of low-income individuals facing unplanned pregnancies, as well as explore the potential psychological and mental health consequences of abortion and how they intersect with economic challenges. This comprehensive analysis will provide a holistic view of the relationship between abortion and poverty, highlighting the complex dynamics at play.

V. Abortion Access and Policies

Describing the Legal Status of Abortion in Different Regions or Countries

The legal status of abortion varies significantly across different regions and countries, reflecting diverse cultural, religious, and political perspectives. Some countries have liberal abortion laws that permit access to abortion on request, while others have highly restrictive laws that severely limit access. In some regions, the legal status of abortion is subject to change due to shifting political landscapes and evolving public opinion. For example, countries like Canada and Sweden have relatively permissive abortion laws, allowing for abortion on request within certain gestational limits (World Abortion Policies, 2013). In contrast, countries like El Salvador and Nicaragua have stringent abortion bans with severe penalties for those who seek or provide abortions (Center for Reproductive Rights, 2020). Understanding the legal landscape is essential for evaluating the impact of abortion policies on poverty rates.

Discussing the Influence of Abortion Policies on Poverty Rates

Abortion policies wield a considerable influence on poverty rates, particularly for individuals living in regions with restrictive laws. In areas where abortion access is limited, individuals may resort to unsafe and clandestine procedures, which pose significant health risks (Gerdts et al., 2016). These risks can result in substantial healthcare costs, further exacerbating economic challenges for low-income individuals. Additionally, restrictive abortion policies can force individuals to continue unwanted pregnancies, potentially leading to increased financial strain and decreased economic opportunities (Bearak et al., 2018). The impact of abortion policies on poverty rates is complex and multifaceted, necessitating a nuanced analysis.

Examining the Role of Abortion Clinics, Waiting Periods, and Mandatory Counseling

Abortion policies extend beyond mere legality to include regulations that affect access to services. Abortion clinics play a crucial role in providing safe and accessible abortion care. The presence or absence of such clinics can significantly impact the ability of individuals, particularly those in poverty, to access services promptly (Cartwright et al., 2016). Additionally, some regions impose mandatory waiting periods and counseling requirements before an abortion can be performed. While proponents argue that these measures ensure informed decision-making, critics contend that they create unnecessary delays and barriers, particularly for low-income individuals who may struggle to navigate these additional steps (Upadhyay et al., 2017).

In the subsequent sections, we will delve into the psychological and mental health dimensions of abortion, exploring the potential stigma associated with the procedure and its impact on well-being. We will also examine the concept of reproductive justice and its intersection with the abortion debate, particularly concerning marginalized and low-income individuals. This comprehensive analysis will provide a holistic understanding of the complexities surrounding abortion access and policies and their implications for poverty rates.

VI. Abortion, Poverty, and Mental Health

Exploring the Psychological Effects of Abortion on Women and Families

The psychological effects of abortion on women and their families have been the subject of extensive research and debate. While the majority of women who have abortions do not experience long-term psychological harm, the decision to terminate a pregnancy can elicit a range of emotional responses. Studies have shown that factors such as personal beliefs, social support, and the circumstances surrounding the abortion can influence an individual’s emotional experience (Biggs et al., 2015). Some women report feelings of relief and improved mental well-being after an abortion, particularly if the pregnancy was unplanned and would have posed significant challenges (Steinberg & Russo, 2008). However, others may experience feelings of sadness, guilt, or grief, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive and nonjudgmental post-abortion support services (Major et al., 2000).

Discussing the Stigma Associated with Abortion and Its Potential Impact on Mental Health

The stigma associated with abortion can have a profound impact on the mental health of individuals who have undergone the procedure. Stigmatization often arises from societal norms, cultural beliefs, and religious values that cast abortion as morally objectionable (Shellenberg et al., 2019). The fear of being judged, ostracized, or experiencing social rejection can lead to secrecy and silence surrounding the experience, potentially contributing to feelings of shame and isolation (Harris et al., 2011). This stigma can deter individuals from seeking emotional support or mental health services when needed, perpetuating the potential negative emotional consequences of abortion.

Presenting Research on the Relationship Between Poverty and Mental Health

The relationship between poverty and mental health is well-documented, and it intersects with the topic of abortion. Poverty can exacerbate existing mental health challenges and contribute to the development of new ones (Lund et al., 2010). Individuals living in poverty often face increased stressors, limited access to healthcare, and reduced opportunities for education and employment, all of which can impact their mental well-being (Reiss, 2013). In the context of abortion, these challenges can be further magnified. Low-income individuals may confront additional barriers to accessing emotional support or mental health services after an abortion, increasing the risk of untreated mental health issues (Gerdts et al., 2016).

In the subsequent sections, we will delve into the concept of reproductive justice, examining how the intersectionality of poverty, race, and gender influences the abortion debate. Additionally, we will discuss case studies and empirical evidence that illustrate the link between abortion and poverty, providing real-world examples of the complex dynamics at play. This comprehensive analysis aims to shed light on the multifaceted challenges faced by individuals dealing with the intersection of abortion, poverty, and mental health.

VII. Abortion and Reproductive Justice

Introducing the Concept of Reproductive Justice

The concept of reproductive justice, rooted in the activism and scholarship of Black women and women of color, expands the conversation beyond the narrow scope of reproductive rights to encompass a more comprehensive and inclusive framework. Reproductive justice, as coined by Loretta Ross and adopted by organizations like SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective, emphasizes the right to have children, not have children, and parent children in safe and healthy environments (Ross, 2006). It recognizes that individuals should have the autonomy and resources necessary to make decisions about their reproductive health, free from coercion or discrimination. Reproductive justice goes beyond access to abortion and contraception to address broader issues of social and economic justice, intersecting with poverty, race, and gender.

Analyzing How Access to Abortion Fits into the Broader Framework of Reproductive Rights

Access to abortion is a fundamental component of reproductive rights, but it is just one aspect of a broader framework. Reproductive rights encompass a spectrum of issues, including the right to choose when and if to have children, access to comprehensive sex education, affordable contraception, and comprehensive healthcare throughout pregnancy and childbirth. Abortion, within the context of reproductive rights, represents the option to terminate a pregnancy when it aligns with an individual’s choice. However, ensuring true reproductive justice requires addressing the structural and systemic barriers that disproportionately affect marginalized communities, including poverty, lack of access to healthcare, and racial disparities.

Discussing the Intersectionality of Poverty, Race, and Gender in the Abortion Debate

The intersectionality of poverty, race, and gender plays a critical role in shaping the abortion debate. Marginalized communities, particularly Black and Hispanic individuals, often face compounded challenges when it comes to reproductive healthcare. These communities are more likely to experience higher rates of unintended pregnancies, limited access to abortion services, and increased economic barriers (Bearak et al., 2018). Structural racism and systemic inequalities further exacerbate these disparities, making it essential to recognize that the abortion debate is not one-size-fits-all. The experiences and needs of individuals from marginalized communities must be at the forefront of discussions surrounding abortion and reproductive justice (Roberts, 2018).

In the subsequent sections, we will explore case studies and empirical evidence that illustrate the connection between abortion and poverty, highlighting the specific challenges faced by low-income individuals. Additionally, we will offer policy recommendations aimed at addressing the complex intersection of abortion, poverty, and reproductive justice, with a focus on promoting equitable access to reproductive healthcare. This comprehensive analysis aims to foster a deeper understanding of the multifaceted issues surrounding abortion and its relationship with poverty.

VIII. Case Studies and Empirical Evidence

Providing Real-World Examples of the Link Between Abortion and Poverty

Case studies and empirical evidence offer valuable insights into the tangible link between abortion and poverty. These real-world examples illustrate the complexities and challenges faced by individuals navigating these intersecting issues. One such case study is the Guttmacher Institute’s research on the impact of abortion restrictions in Texas. In 2013, Texas implemented restrictive abortion policies, including clinic closures and mandatory waiting periods. The resulting reduction in abortion access disproportionately affected low-income women, who faced increased travel distances and financial barriers to obtaining an abortion (Texas Policy Evaluation Project, 2019). This study highlights how policy decisions can directly impact the economic circumstances of women seeking abortions, particularly those living in poverty.

Another empirical study conducted by Foster and Kimport (2013) examined the reasons why women choose to have an abortion. Their research found that financial considerations played a significant role in the decision-making process. Many women cited concerns about the ability to provide for a child financially as a primary reason for seeking an abortion. This empirical evidence underscores the critical intersection between abortion and poverty, revealing how economic factors are central to reproductive decision-making.

Furthermore, the Turnaway Study, conducted by the Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) research group, offers valuable insights into the consequences of being denied an abortion due to gestational age limits. The study found that women who were unable to obtain an abortion faced increased financial strain, lower educational attainment, and a higher likelihood of remaining in poverty (Foster et al., 2018). This research highlights the profound economic and life-long implications of restricted access to abortion for low-income individuals.

These case studies and empirical findings emphasize that the link between abortion and poverty is not merely theoretical but has concrete and far-reaching consequences. They underscore the need for comprehensive policies and support systems that recognize and address the challenges faced by individuals at the intersection of these issues.

In the subsequent sections, we will explore the ethical and moral perspectives surrounding abortion, considering how different religious and philosophical views influence opinions on abortion and poverty. Additionally, we will offer policy recommendations aimed at mitigating the consequences of abortion-related poverty, informed by the evidence and insights presented in this paper. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide a holistic understanding of the multifaceted relationship between abortion and poverty.

IX. Ethical and Moral Perspectives

Presenting Various Ethical and Moral Arguments Surrounding Abortion

The ethical and moral dimensions of abortion have been at the heart of the debate for decades, reflecting diverse perspectives and values within society. Several key arguments are often invoked on both sides of the abortion discourse:

1. Pro-Choice Arguments: Proponents of abortion rights argue that a woman’s autonomy over her body is a fundamental moral principle. They emphasize the importance of personal choice and bodily autonomy, asserting that individuals should have the right to make decisions about their reproductive health, including the decision to have an abortion (Thomson, 1971). Pro-choice advocates argue that restricting access to abortion infringes upon these fundamental rights and can lead to unsafe, clandestine procedures.
2. Pro-Life Arguments: On the other side of the debate, pro-life advocates contend that life begins at conception and that the unborn fetus has a right to life that must be protected (Marquis, 1989). They argue that abortion is morally wrong because it involves the termination of a human life. Pro-life proponents often frame their arguments in terms of the sanctity of life and the moral duty to protect the vulnerable.

Discussing How Different Religious and Philosophical Views Influence Opinions on Abortion and Poverty

Religious and philosophical views play a significant role in shaping opinions on abortion and its relationship with poverty. Various religions hold diverse perspectives on abortion, and adherents often derive their beliefs from religious teachings:

1. Catholicism: The Catholic Church, for instance, opposes abortion on the grounds that it is considered the taking of an innocent human life. This stance influences the views of many Catholics and has implications for policies in regions with a significant Catholic population (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1992).
2. Islam: Islamic perspectives on abortion vary, with some scholars permitting it under specific circumstances, such as when the mother’s life is at risk or if the fetus has severe abnormalities. Islamic views on abortion are often nuanced, reflecting interpretations of Islamic law (sharia) (Aldeeb Abu-Sahlieh, 2012).
3. Secular and Humanist Philosophies: Secular and humanist philosophies often emphasize individual autonomy and bodily sovereignty, leading to more permissive views on abortion. These perspectives may focus on the importance of individual well-being and choice, which can intersect with discussions of poverty and access to reproductive healthcare (Singer, 1984).

The intersection of religion, philosophy, and abortion extends to considerations of poverty. Religious and philosophical beliefs can influence views on the role of government in addressing poverty, as well as opinions on social safety nets and economic policies. Understanding these diverse viewpoints is essential for crafting policies that respect individual beliefs while also addressing the complex relationship between abortion and poverty.

In the subsequent sections, we will explore policy recommendations aimed at addressing the challenges posed by the intersection of abortion and poverty. These recommendations aim to promote equitable access to reproductive healthcare and support individuals in making informed decisions that align with their values and beliefs, recognizing the ethical and moral diversity of society. This comprehensive analysis seeks to provide a balanced perspective on the complex dynamics at play.

X. Policy Recommendations

Offering Policy Recommendations Aimed at Addressing the Link Between Abortion and Poverty

To address the complex link between abortion and poverty and promote reproductive justice, it is essential to consider comprehensive policy measures that support individuals’ autonomy, reduce unintended pregnancies, and alleviate economic hardships. Here are several policy recommendations aimed at achieving these goals:

1. Comprehensive Sex Education: Implement evidence-based comprehensive sex education programs in schools to provide young people with accurate information about sexual health, contraception, and pregnancy prevention (Santelli et al., 2017). Access to comprehensive sex education can help reduce unintended pregnancies by promoting informed decision-making.
2. Affordable Contraception: Ensure access to affordable contraception methods for all individuals, regardless of income or insurance status. This can include expanding access to long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) and over-the-counter options (Dehlendorf et al., 2014).
3. Accessible Reproductive Healthcare: Remove barriers to accessing reproductive healthcare services, including abortion. This includes ensuring that clinics providing abortion services are accessible and available in underserved areas (Cartwright et al., 2016).
4. Support for Low-Income Individuals: Expand Medicaid coverage to ensure that low-income individuals have access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare, including contraception and abortion services (Gold, 2014). Implement sliding-scale fee structures to make abortion affordable for those with limited financial resources.
5. Paid Family Leave and Workplace Support: Implement paid family leave policies that enable individuals to take time off work without financial hardship in case of pregnancy, childbirth, or childcare responsibilities. Additionally, advocate for workplace policies that support pregnant individuals and parents, including accommodations for pregnancy-related conditions (e.g., morning sickness) and breastfeeding (Williams & Rostron, 2020).
6. Community Resources: Invest in community resources that provide support to low-income individuals, including access to childcare, housing assistance, and nutrition programs (Duncan et al., 2010). Reducing economic insecurity can alleviate some of the factors contributing to unintended pregnancies.
7. Access to Mental Health Services: Ensure that mental health services are readily available and affordable for individuals who may experience emotional distress related to abortion or other reproductive decisions (Major et al., 2000). Reducing stigma and promoting mental health support is essential.
8. Reproductive Justice Initiatives: Incorporate a reproductive justice framework into policymaking to address the broader social, economic, and racial disparities that intersect with reproductive healthcare (Ross, 2006). Recognize that individuals’ reproductive decisions are influenced by a range of intersecting factors, including poverty, race, and gender.

These policy recommendations aim to create a more equitable and supportive environment for individuals facing the intersection of abortion and poverty. By addressing both the economic and healthcare aspects of the issue, policymakers can work towards reducing unintended pregnancies and providing individuals with the resources and support they need to make decisions that align with their values and circumstances.

XI. Conclusion

In conclusion, this research paper has explored the intricate and multifaceted relationship between abortion and poverty, shedding light on a crucial intersection within contemporary society. The examination of historical context, socioeconomic factors, healthcare access, and the consequences of restrictive policies has revealed the profound impact of abortion on poverty rates and the mental well-being of those affected. We have also delved into the ethical, moral, and religious dimensions of the abortion debate, recognizing the diversity of perspectives that shape this discourse.

The significance of the link between abortion and poverty cannot be overstated. It underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of reproductive decision-making, recognizing that individuals’ choices are influenced by a complex web of factors, including economic circumstances. The evidence presented in this paper demonstrates that restrictive abortion policies and limited access to reproductive healthcare can exacerbate economic hardships for low-income individuals, particularly women.

Moving forward, future research should continue to explore the lived experiences of individuals at the intersection of abortion and poverty, considering the unique challenges they face. Additionally, policymakers should take into account the diverse perspectives and values within society when crafting legislation and policies related to reproductive healthcare.

As we reflect on the findings of this research paper, we are reminded of the importance of fostering a society where individuals have the autonomy, resources, and support necessary to make reproductive decisions that align with their values and circumstances. This calls for a collective commitment to addressing the structural and systemic inequalities that perpetuate poverty and limit access to healthcare.

In the spirit of reproductive justice and social equity, it is our responsibility to advocate for policies that respect individual choices, promote economic well-being, and uphold the principles of bodily autonomy and gender equality. The relationship between abortion and poverty is a critical area of concern, and it is our duty to work towards a future where all individuals can make reproductive decisions free from economic hardship and social stigma.

Bibliography

1. Bearak, J. M., Burke, K. L., Jones, R. K. (2018). Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: A spatial analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 3(11), e517-e526.
2. Biggs, M. A., Upadhyay, U. D., & Foster, D. G. (2015). The effect of abortion on having and achieving aspirational one-year plans. BMC Women’s Health, 15, 102.
3. Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2014). Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S1), S43-S48.
4. Gerdts, C., Dobkin, L., Foster, D. G., Schwarz, E. B., & Weitz, T. A. (2016). Disparities in abortion rates: A public health approach. American Journal of Public Health, 106(5), 816-820.
5. Hull, T. H. (2003). Roe v. Wade and its aftermath: Abortion and the regulation of sexuality. Sexuality Research & Social Policy Journal of NSRC, 1(3), 33-41.
6. Jones, R. K., & Jerman, J. (2017). How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008? Journal of Women’s Health, 26(3), 294-301.
7. Major, B., Cozzarelli, C., Cooper, M. L., & Zubek, J. M. (2000). Mixed messages: Implications of social conflict and social support within close relationships for adjustment to a stressful life event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 61-71.
8. Marquis, D. (1989). Why abortion is immoral. The Journal of Philosophy, 86(4), 183-202.
9. Mohr, J. C. (1978). Abortion in America: The origins and evolution of national policy. Oxford University Press.
10. Ross, L. J. (2006). Understanding reproductive justice: Transforming the pro-choice movement. Off Our Backs, 36(1/2), 24-25.
11. Santelli, J. S., Kantor, L. M., Grilo, S. A., Speizer, I. S., Lindberg, L. D., Heitel, J., & Schalet, A. T. (2017). Abstinence-only-until-marriage: An updated review of U.S. policies and programs and their impact. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(3), 273-280.
12. Shellenberg, K. M., Tsui, A. O., & Correl, J. E. (2019). Not just a number: Examining the lived experiences of women with more than one abortion in the United States. Women’s Health Issues, 29(2), 121-128.
13. Thomson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66.
14. Upadhyay, U. D., Biggs, M. A., Foster, D. G., & Ralph, L. (2017). Risk of abortion complications after a policy to regulate abortion providers in California. Women’s Health Issues, 27(1), 3-9.
15. World Health Organization. (2019). Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception. World Health Organization.