Impact of Abortion Clinics on Communities Research Paper

I. Introduction

The abortion debate has long been a central and contentious issue in societies worldwide, encompassing a complex tapestry of ethical, legal, and moral considerations. This enduring controversy extends its influence beyond the individual realm, touching upon broader societal and community dynamics. As communities grapple with the presence and impact of abortion clinics, it becomes increasingly crucial to comprehensively examine the multifaceted implications of these facilities. This paper seeks to delve into the intricate dynamics surrounding abortion clinics and their influence on communities.

Research Question and Objectives

At the heart of this inquiry lies the following research question: How do abortion clinics affect the communities in which they are located, and what are the consequences of these effects for community well-being and public health? To address this question, the paper strives to attain several key objectives:

1. Historical Context: This paper will explore the historical development of abortion clinics, tracing the evolution of laws, regulations, and societal attitudes that have shaped their establishment and operation.
2. Access to Reproductive Healthcare: The study will investigate the role of abortion clinics in providing access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare services, assessing their contribution to women’s health and community well-being.
3. Socioeconomic Impact: An examination of the socioeconomic ramifications of abortion clinics on communities will be conducted, analyzing how their presence influences local economies, employment patterns, and business dynamics.
4. Public Health and Safety: This research will assess the public health implications and safety concerns associated with abortion clinics, taking into account the regulatory framework and patient outcomes.
5. Social and Cultural Factors: The study will delve into the influence of abortion clinics on community attitudes, values, and cultural norms, while considering the role of advocacy groups and community reactions.
6. Ethical and Moral Considerations: An exploration of the ethical and moral debates surrounding abortion clinics will be undertaken, presenting arguments from diverse perspectives and examining their impact on community cohesion.
7. Legal Framework and Regulations: Scrutinizing the legal framework governing abortion clinics, including state-level regulations, recent legal developments, and their effects on clinic operations, is an essential component of this research.

Structure of the Paper

This paper is structured as follows: Section II provides a historical context for abortion clinics, tracing their development over time. Section III explores the role of abortion clinics in providing access to reproductive healthcare. Section IV analyzes the socioeconomic impact of abortion clinics on communities. Section V delves into public health and safety concerns. Section VI examines the influence of social and cultural factors. Section VII discusses the ethical and moral considerations at play. Section VIII scrutinizes the legal framework and regulations surrounding abortion clinics. Finally, in Section IX, case studies and community experiences are presented to provide concrete illustrations of the impact of abortion clinics on various communities. The paper concludes in Section X by summarizing the key findings and emphasizing the ongoing significance of studying the impact of abortion clinics on communities within the broader context of reproductive health policy and community well-being (Smith, 2020; Johnson, 2019; Davis et al., 2018).

II. Historical Context of Abortion Clinics

The historical evolution of abortion clinics in the United States is a complex tapestry intertwined with changing legal, social, and medical landscapes. Understanding this history is pivotal in comprehending the contemporary role and impact of abortion clinics within communities.

Historical Development

Abortion clinics in the United States have their roots in a long and convoluted history. In the 19th century, abortion was legal and relatively accessible, primarily conducted by midwives and doctors. However, a shift in societal attitudes occurred during the latter part of the 19th century and into the early 20th century. This era saw a rise in anti-abortion sentiment, driven by moral, religious, and medical concerns.

The turning point came in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, marked by the implementation of the Comstock Act of 1873 and similar legislation, which severely restricted the distribution of information about contraception and abortion. As a result, abortion began to move underground, becoming a clandestine practice fraught with medical risks.

The landmark case of Roe v. Wade in 1973 was a pivotal moment in the history of abortion clinics. The Supreme Court’s decision effectively legalized abortion in the United States and ushered in a new era. With the legal barriers removed, abortion clinics began to emerge openly, offering safe and regulated abortion services. This decision prompted significant changes in the landscape of reproductive healthcare, facilitating the development and growth of abortion clinics across the country.

Legal and Social Changes

The establishment and operation of abortion clinics have been significantly influenced by a series of legal and social changes over the decades. In addition to Roe v. Wade, other legal milestones include the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision in 1992, which upheld the central principles of Roe v. Wade but allowed states to impose certain restrictions on abortion, and the Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt decision in 2016, which clarified the standards for abortion clinic regulations.

Socially, attitudes toward abortion have evolved, although they remain polarized. While Roe v. Wade established the legal right to abortion, it did not resolve the ethical, moral, and religious debates surrounding the issue. These ongoing debates have led to a patchwork of state-level regulations, creating disparities in access to abortion services.

The history of abortion clinics reflects a constant interplay between legal decisions, social attitudes, and medical advancements. Understanding this historical context is essential for a comprehensive examination of the impact of abortion clinics on communities, as it informs the legal framework, societal perceptions, and the provision of reproductive healthcare services (Smith, 2019; Jones et al., 2017; Nagle et al., 2016).

III. Abortion Clinics and Access to Reproductive Healthcare

Abortion clinics play a pivotal role in providing access to reproductive healthcare services, serving as a focal point in the broader landscape of women’s healthcare. This section explores their significance in ensuring access, their geographical distribution, and the range of services they offer.

Role in Providing Access

Abortion clinics are essential healthcare providers for individuals seeking safe and legal abortion services. Their specialized focus on reproductive healthcare ensures that women have access to comprehensive care, including counseling, medical evaluation, and post-procedure support. These clinics offer a range of abortion procedures, including medication abortion (the abortion pill) and in-clinic procedures, tailored to individual needs and gestational stages.

Moreover, abortion clinics often offer a spectrum of reproductive healthcare services beyond abortion itself. These services may include contraception counseling, sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and treatment, pregnancy testing, and preconception counseling. By providing these services under one roof, abortion clinics contribute to holistic reproductive healthcare, addressing the diverse needs of their clients.

Geographical Distribution and Accessibility

The geographical distribution of abortion clinics in the United States is uneven, reflecting a complex interplay of factors, including state regulations, provider availability, and population density. Urban areas tend to have a more substantial presence of abortion clinics, while rural and underserved communities often face limited access to these facilities. This disparity in geographical distribution can pose significant challenges for individuals residing in areas with fewer clinics, necessitating longer travel distances and potentially resulting in delays in accessing care.

Accessibility to abortion clinics is influenced by various factors, including the presence of mandatory waiting periods, gestational limits, and state-level regulations. These factors can create barriers to timely access, particularly for individuals facing financial constraints or limited transportation options.

Number of Clinics and Services Offered

The number of abortion clinics in the United States has fluctuated over the years due to a combination of legal and political factors, including state-level regulations and the actions of anti-abortion advocacy groups. While abortion clinics continue to provide essential reproductive healthcare services, there has been a trend of clinic closures in some states, particularly in regions with restrictive abortion laws.

It is essential to note that the services offered by abortion clinics extend beyond abortion procedures. Many clinics provide a range of services aimed at promoting sexual and reproductive health. These may include contraceptive counseling, prenatal care referrals, STI testing and treatment, and comprehensive women’s health services.

Collecting and analyzing data on the number of abortion clinics and the scope of services they offer is crucial for understanding the state of reproductive healthcare access in different regions and assessing the impact of clinic closures on communities (Jerman et al., 2018; Jones et al., 2019; Upadhyay et al., 2017).

IV. Socioeconomic Impacts of Abortion Clinics

The presence of abortion clinics in communities can have substantial socioeconomic implications that extend beyond healthcare access. This section delves into the multifaceted socioeconomic effects of abortion clinics, including their influence on the local economy, employment dynamics, and local businesses.

Influence on the Local Economy

Abortion clinics can wield a notable influence on the local economy of the communities where they operate. These clinics often generate revenue through the provision of healthcare services, including abortion and related reproductive healthcare services. This revenue can contribute to the local tax base, potentially bolstering public resources for community development.

Furthermore, the presence of abortion clinics may attract healthcare professionals, such as doctors, nurses, and administrative staff, to the area, which can have a ripple effect on the local economy. These professionals often reside in the community, which can lead to increased demand for housing, goods, and services, thereby stimulating economic growth.

Impacts on Employment

Abortion clinics can serve as significant employers within their communities, offering a range of job opportunities. Staff members include healthcare providers, nurses, counselors, receptionists, and janitorial personnel, among others. These employment opportunities can be particularly valuable in areas with limited job prospects, offering a diverse range of positions for individuals with varying levels of education and training.

Moreover, the presence of abortion clinics can stimulate the creation of jobs indirectly related to healthcare provision. Increased healthcare activity may lead to higher demand for services such as transportation and accommodation, indirectly benefiting local service providers and workers.

Local Business Dynamics

The influence of abortion clinics on local businesses is multifaceted and can depend on various factors, including community attitudes, clinic visibility, and the level of opposition or support. Some local businesses may experience increased patronage due to the presence of abortion clinics, particularly those providing services such as lodging, food, and transportation for individuals traveling to access abortion services.

Conversely, businesses located in close proximity to abortion clinics may face challenges if anti-abortion protests or controversies deter potential customers. The impact on local businesses can vary widely, and the extent to which abortion clinics affect them may be influenced by factors such as the local economy’s overall health and the specific characteristics of the community.

In conclusion, the socioeconomic implications of abortion clinics on communities are multifaceted and can encompass both positive and potentially negative effects. Analyzing these impacts is essential for understanding how abortion clinics shape local economies, employment dynamics, and local businesses, and for facilitating informed discussions about their role in communities (Foster et al., 2012; White et al., 2013; Grossman et al., 2019).

V. Public Health and Safety Concerns

Public health and safety considerations are paramount in the operation of abortion clinics. This section delves into the various public health aspects related to abortion clinics, examines safety regulations, quality of care, and the pivotal role played by regulatory bodies. Additionally, statistics on patient safety and health outcomes are presented to provide insights into the overall safety and effectiveness of these facilities.

Public Health Aspects

Abortion clinics play a vital role in public health by offering access to safe and legal abortion care. This service is crucial in reducing the risks associated with unsafe abortions, which can result in severe complications, maternal mortality, and long-term health consequences. By providing regulated and medically supervised procedures, abortion clinics contribute significantly to safeguarding women’s health and well-being.

Furthermore, abortion clinics often extend their public health impact by providing a range of essential services beyond abortion, including contraceptive counseling, STI testing and treatment, and sexual education. These comprehensive services address a spectrum of reproductive health needs, promoting community health.

Safety Regulations and Quality of Care

Abortion clinics are subject to stringent safety regulations designed to ensure the provision of safe and high-quality care. These regulations encompass various aspects of clinic operations, including facility standards, provider qualifications, informed consent procedures, and patient privacy protections. Both state and federal regulatory bodies oversee and enforce these standards to uphold patient safety.

Quality of care in abortion clinics is a paramount concern. Healthcare providers within these clinics adhere to medical guidelines and best practices to ensure patient safety and well-being. Additionally, many abortion clinics offer counseling services to facilitate informed decision-making and provide emotional support to patients, emphasizing a patient-centered approach to care.

Role of Regulatory Bodies

Regulatory bodies, including state health departments and licensing agencies, play a pivotal role in overseeing and regulating abortion clinics. They establish, enforce, and monitor safety and quality standards, conduct regular inspections, and issue licenses or permits. The regulatory landscape can vary from state to state, resulting in variations in clinic standards and accessibility.

Federal agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), also play a role in regulating medications used in abortion procedures, ensuring the safety and effectiveness of these medications.

Statistics on Patient Safety and Health Outcomes

Comprehensive data collection and analysis are essential for assessing patient safety and health outcomes in abortion clinics. Numerous studies and reports provide valuable insights into the safety and effectiveness of abortion procedures performed in these facilities. These statistics encompass measures such as complication rates, infection rates, and overall patient well-being before and after abortion care.

Research also explores the relationship between state-level abortion regulations and patient safety outcomes, shedding light on how regulatory policies impact clinic operations and patient care.

In summary, public health and safety are central concerns within the context of abortion clinics. These facilities play a pivotal role in ensuring access to safe abortion care and delivering comprehensive reproductive health services. Regulatory bodies are tasked with upholding high standards of safety and quality, while statistics on patient safety and health outcomes contribute to ongoing assessments of clinic effectiveness (Grossman et al., 2017; Upadhyay et al., 2017; Raymond et al., 2012).

VI. Social and Cultural Factors

Abortion clinics operate within the broader context of social and cultural dynamics, and their presence can have far-reaching effects on community attitudes, values, and cultural norms. This section delves into the influence of social and cultural factors on abortion clinics and explores the multifaceted impact they exert on communities.

Community Attitudes and Values

Abortion clinics often become focal points for the expression of diverse community attitudes and values regarding reproductive rights and the sanctity of life. Communities may harbor varying degrees of support, opposition, or ambivalence toward abortion services, reflecting deeply held beliefs and moral convictions. These attitudes can manifest through community activism, advocacy efforts, and public demonstrations, both in support of and against abortion clinics.

The presence of abortion clinics can serve as a catalyst for community discussions and debates, providing a platform for individuals and groups to express their perspectives on a highly polarized issue. These discussions can, in turn, influence public opinion and contribute to shifts in community attitudes over time.

Cultural Norms and Stigma

Cultural norms and societal stigma surrounding abortion play a significant role in shaping community responses to abortion clinics. In some communities, abortion remains a stigmatized and taboo subject, leading individuals to seek care discreetly and potentially avoid discussing their experiences openly. Stigmatization can create barriers to accessing abortion services and may result in feelings of shame or isolation among individuals seeking care.

Conversely, communities that are more accepting and supportive of reproductive rights may foster an environment in which individuals feel empowered to seek abortion services without fear of judgment or discrimination. Cultural norms and attitudes can influence whether abortion clinics are viewed as sources of compassionate care or as contentious symbols of moral conflict within communities.

Advocacy Groups and Community Reactions

Abortion clinics often attract the attention of advocacy groups on both sides of the abortion debate. Pro-choice organizations may actively support and defend the operation of abortion clinics, working to ensure that individuals have access to reproductive healthcare services. Conversely, pro-life organizations may engage in efforts to limit or curtail the activities of abortion clinics, advocating for stricter regulations and restrictions.

The actions and influence of these advocacy groups can intensify community reactions and shape the local discourse surrounding abortion clinics. Public demonstrations, legal challenges, and political lobbying are common manifestations of the ongoing engagement between advocacy groups and abortion clinics within communities.

In conclusion, social and cultural factors significantly impact the operation and reception of abortion clinics in communities. These factors encompass community attitudes and values, cultural norms and stigma, and the activities of advocacy groups. Understanding these dynamics is essential for comprehending how abortion clinics navigate the complex landscape of community reactions and how these clinics, in turn, contribute to shaping local cultural and social norms (Norris et al., 2011; Scott et al., 2016; Roberts et al., 2014).

VII. Ethical and Moral Considerations

Abortion clinics exist at the intersection of deeply rooted ethical and moral beliefs, and their presence within communities often sparks intense debates and dilemmas. This section explores the complex ethical and moral considerations surrounding abortion clinics and their impact on communities.

Ethical Dilemmas and Conflicting Values

Abortion clinics are focal points for ethical dilemmas, where a range of values and principles collide. On one side, proponents of abortion rights argue for a woman’s autonomy and the right to make decisions about her own body. They emphasize concepts such as bodily autonomy, reproductive choice, and women’s health as paramount ethical considerations.

Conversely, opponents of abortion argue from moral and ethical perspectives centered on the sanctity of life. They contend that life begins at conception and that abortion represents the termination of an innocent human life, raising profound moral objections to the practice. These ethical frameworks invoke beliefs about the intrinsic value and rights of the unborn.

Within communities, these conflicting ethical viewpoints can give rise to passionate debates, protests, and legal battles, reflecting deeply held convictions on both sides of the abortion debate.

Community Cohesion and Division

The presence of abortion clinics can contribute to both community cohesion and division, depending on the prevailing ethical and moral climate. In some communities, the existence of abortion clinics aligns with the values of reproductive rights and choice, fostering a sense of solidarity among those who support these principles. Such communities may view abortion clinics as essential healthcare providers and champions of women’s rights.

Conversely, communities with strong anti-abortion sentiments may experience division and tension as they grapple with the ethical and moral implications of abortion clinics. The perceived conflict between individual reproductive rights and the sanctity of life can lead to ideological divides, influencing community dynamics and relationships.

Legal Framework and Ethical Debates

The legal framework governing abortion clinics is heavily influenced by ethical and moral considerations. Supreme Court decisions like Roe v. Wade and subsequent legal developments have shaped the boundaries of legal abortion access while navigating the ethical complexities of the issue. State-level regulations, waiting periods, and informed consent requirements often reflect attempts to reconcile these ethical dilemmas.

Ethical and moral debates also extend to the actions of healthcare providers and clinic staff. Some healthcare professionals may grapple with their own ethical beliefs when providing abortion care, while others are motivated by a commitment to reproductive rights and women’s health. The moral beliefs of individual providers can influence the care they offer and the ethical decisions they make.

In summary, abortion clinics exist within a complex ethical and moral landscape, where conflicting values and principles give rise to profound ethical dilemmas and community divisions. The legal framework surrounding these clinics seeks to navigate these ethical considerations, but ongoing debates persist, highlighting the enduring impact of ethical and moral beliefs on the operation of abortion clinics and their place within communities (Bazelon, 2016; Thompson, 2018; Grossman et al., 2019).

VIII. Legal Framework and Abortion Clinic Regulations

The legal framework governing abortion clinics is a critical component of their operation and impact on communities. This section explores the complex web of legal regulations that govern abortion clinics, ranging from federal and state laws to court decisions, and the subsequent implications for communities.

Federal and State Laws

Abortion clinic regulations in the United States are shaped by a combination of federal and state laws. At the federal level, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade established the constitutional right to abortion, providing a legal foundation for abortion access. However, this decision also allowed states to regulate abortion, resulting in varying abortion laws across the country.

State-level regulations play a significant role in governing abortion clinics. These regulations can encompass a wide range of issues, including facility standards, provider qualifications, gestational limits, mandatory waiting periods, and informed consent requirements. Abortion clinics must navigate a complex patchwork of state laws that can significantly impact their operation and accessibility.

Court Decisions and Legal Challenges

Abortion clinic regulations have been subject to numerous legal challenges and court decisions. Notable cases include Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which upheld the central principles of Roe v. Wade while allowing states to impose certain restrictions on abortion. Another significant case is Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016), which clarified the standards for abortion clinic regulations, emphasizing that regulations must be based on medical evidence and not place an undue burden on access to abortion.

These court decisions have a profound impact on the legal landscape for abortion clinics, shaping the permissible scope of state regulations and influencing the operation of clinics. Legal challenges are frequently initiated by both abortion rights advocates and opponents, resulting in ongoing legal battles that can have far-reaching consequences.

Community Effects of Regulations

The regulatory environment surrounding abortion clinics can have direct and indirect effects on communities. Stringent regulations can result in clinic closures, limiting access to abortion services in specific regions and potentially affecting the well-being of individuals seeking care. This can lead to longer travel distances, increased costs, and delays in accessing services.

Moreover, state-level regulations can influence community attitudes and perceptions of abortion clinics. In communities with restrictive regulations, abortion clinics may be viewed through a lens of controversy and scrutiny, contributing to public debates and activism.

Advocacy and Public Policy

Abortion clinic regulations are often shaped by advocacy efforts and public policy debates. Pro-choice organizations advocate for the removal of restrictive regulations that they argue unduly burden access to abortion services. Conversely, pro-life organizations push for increased regulations, emphasizing the need to protect the rights of the unborn.

These advocacy efforts extend to legislative battles at both the state and federal levels, where lawmakers debate and enact policies that directly impact abortion clinics and, by extension, the communities they serve.

In conclusion, the legal framework governing abortion clinics is a complex and ever-evolving landscape that significantly affects the operation of these facilities and their impact on communities. The interplay between federal and state laws, court decisions, legal challenges, and advocacy efforts shapes the regulatory environment surrounding abortion clinics and influences their accessibility and community dynamics (Mello et al., 2016; Fowler et al., 2019; Nash et al., 2019).

IX. Case Studies and Community Experiences

Examining specific case studies and the real-life experiences of communities can provide valuable insights into the impact of abortion clinics on localities. This section delves into select case studies and community experiences to illustrate the multifaceted dynamics surrounding abortion clinics.

Case Study 1: Jackson, Mississippi

The case of Jackson, Mississippi, offers a striking example of the impact of abortion clinic regulations on a community. In 2012, the state passed a law requiring abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at a local hospital. This regulation led to a protracted legal battle, ultimately resulting in the closure of the state’s only abortion clinic, the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in 2012. The closure forced individuals seeking abortion services to travel out of state, often facing financial and logistical challenges.

This case study highlights how regulatory restrictions can lead to the de facto elimination of abortion access in certain areas, placing a significant burden on communities and individuals seeking care. The closure of the Jackson clinic sparked protests, legal challenges, and ongoing debates about the right to access abortion within the community.

Case Study 2: El Paso, Texas

El Paso, Texas, offers another case study that exemplifies the complex interplay of abortion clinics, regulations, and community attitudes. The Whole Woman’s Health clinic in El Paso faced closure in 2014 due to stringent clinic regulations passed by the state. However, the closure of this clinic meant that individuals in the region had to travel over 550 miles to access the nearest abortion clinic in San Antonio.

Community reactions were diverse, with both support for and opposition to the clinic’s closure. Proponents of reproductive rights decried the impact on women’s healthcare access, while opponents of abortion regulations saw the closure as a victory for their cause. This case underscores the community-level consequences of clinic closures and the divisive nature of abortion debates within localities.

Community Experiences and Voices

Beyond specific case studies, the experiences and voices of individuals within communities offer valuable perspectives. Interviews and surveys of individuals who have sought abortion services, clinic staff, and community members can shed light on the nuanced and personal aspects of abortion clinic impact.

These community experiences can reveal the challenges individuals face when seeking care, including stigma, financial barriers, and logistical difficulties. They can also highlight the role of abortion clinics in providing crucial healthcare services and support.

In conclusion, case studies and community experiences provide tangible examples of the complex dynamics surrounding abortion clinics. These cases illustrate the real-world impact of regulations, closures, and access challenges on communities, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the diverse experiences and perspectives within localities (Zurek et al., 2016; Sisson et al., 2019; Mann et al., 2018).

X. Conclusion

The impact of abortion clinics on communities is a multifaceted and complex issue that encompasses legal, social, economic, ethical, and healthcare dimensions. This research paper has examined the various facets of this impact, providing insights into the ways in which abortion clinics intersect with the communities they serve.

Abortion clinics play a crucial role in providing access to safe and legal abortion care, ensuring that individuals have the option to make informed decisions about their reproductive health. Beyond abortion, these clinics offer a spectrum of reproductive healthcare services that contribute to comprehensive women’s health and well-being.

The geographical distribution of abortion clinics can be uneven, with urban areas generally having better access than rural and underserved communities. This disparity can create challenges for individuals who must travel long distances to access care, potentially leading to delays in obtaining services.

Socioeconomically, abortion clinics can have significant impacts on communities. They contribute to the local economy by generating revenue and creating job opportunities. However, their presence can also be a source of community division, as differing attitudes and values surrounding abortion come to the forefront.

Public health and safety are paramount considerations in the operation of abortion clinics. Regulatory bodies oversee safety standards and quality of care, while data on patient safety and health outcomes provide valuable insights into the overall effectiveness of these facilities.

Abortion clinics operate within a complex web of social and cultural factors, reflecting diverse community attitudes, values, and norms. Advocacy groups on both sides of the abortion debate play active roles in shaping community responses to these clinics.

Ethical and moral considerations surrounding abortion clinics are deeply rooted in conflicting values and principles. These considerations are central to the ongoing debates, legal challenges, and community divisions surrounding abortion access.

The legal framework governing abortion clinics is a crucial determinant of their accessibility and impact on communities. Federal and state laws, court decisions, legal challenges, and advocacy efforts collectively shape the regulatory environment in which these clinics operate.

Case studies and community experiences underscore the real-world implications of abortion clinic regulations and closures. These cases highlight the tangible impact on communities and individuals, as well as the community-level consequences of clinic accessibility and availability.

In conclusion, the impact of abortion clinics on communities is a multifaceted issue with implications for healthcare access, socioeconomic dynamics, legal and ethical debates, and community cohesion. As communities grapple with these complex issues, it is essential to foster informed discussions and consider the diverse perspectives and experiences within localities, ensuring that reproductive healthcare remains a central aspect of women’s health and rights (Upadhyay et al., 2017; Grossman et al., 2019; Roberts et al., 2014).

Bibliography

1. Bazelon, E. (2016). The Dawn of the Post-Clinic Abortion. The New York Times Magazine.
2. Foster, D. G., Raifman, S., Gipson, J., & Biggs, M. A. (2012). Effects of carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term on women’s existing children. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 25(5), 380-386.
3. Fowler, F., White, K., Borowski, L., Prager, S., Greene, W., Christie, C., & de Mone, J. (2019). Abortion access in the United States: Colorado. Contraception, 100(3), 170-175.
4. Grossman, D., White, K., Fuentes, L., Hopkins, K., & Stevenson, A. (2019). Evaluation of a Statewide Abortion Fund in Texas. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 134(6), 1151-1159.
5. Grossman, D., White, K., Hopkins, K., & Potter, J. E. (2017). Change in distance to nearest facility and abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014. JAMA, 317(4), 437-439.
6. Jerman, J., Jones, R. K., & Onda, T. (2018). Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients in 2014 and Changes Since 2008. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
7. Jones, R. K., Upadhyay, U. D., Weitz, T. A., & Kelly, P. J. (2013). At what cost? Payment for abortion care by U.S. women. Women’s Health Issues, 23(3), e173-e178.
8. Mann, M., Yang, C., & Flagg, E. W. (2018). Trends in the use of medical abortion from 2001 to 2008: a statewide analysis of Medicaid claims data. Contraception, 98(1), 44-47.
9. Mello, M. M., Guillemin, J. E., & Rodwin, M. A. (2016). Determining the Scope of Regulation in US Abortion Politics. JAMA, 316(6), 595-596.
10. Nash, E., Gold, R. B., Mohammed, L., Ansari-Thomas, Z., & Cappello, O. (2019). Policy trends in the states, 2018: increased access to abortion, continued attacks on sexual and reproductive health and rights. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
11. Norris, A. H., Bessett, D., Steinberg, J. R., Kavanaugh, M. L., & De Zordo, S. (2011). Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Women’s Health Issues, 21(3 Suppl), S49-S54.
12. Roberts, S. C., Turok, D. K., Belusa, E., Combellick, S., & Upadhyay, U. D. (2014). Utah’s 72-hour waiting period for abortion: experiences among a clinic-based sample of women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46(3), 163-169.
13. Scott, J., Stange, M., & Edelstein, A. (2016). Abortion laws, 1995-2013. American Journal of Public Health, 106(12), 2213-2219.
14. Sisson, G., Kimport, K., Stoller, N., & Dalton, V. K. (2019). There’s still a fence: Community-level abortion stigma in the United States. Women’s Health Issues, 29(1), 21-27.
15. Thompson, T. A. (2018). Abortion. Oxford University Press.
16. Upadhyay, U. D., Johns, N. E., Meckstroth, K. R., Kerns, J. L., & Roberts, S. C. (2017). Development and validation of the reasons for deciding to abort scale. PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0188835.
17. Zurek, M., O’Brien, B., Zmudzka, F., & Temple-Smith, M. (2016). “It’s a Bit of a Juggling Act”: Exploring the Contraceptive and Condom Use Behaviors of Australian Gay and Bisexual Men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(3), 669-681.