Abortion and Contraception Research Paper

I. Introduction

The topics of abortion and contraception stand at the heart of discussions surrounding reproductive health and choice. For decades, these issues have been subjects of intense debate, legislation, and public discourse. This research aims to dissect the complex relationship between abortion and contraception, shedding light on their interconnectedness and implications for individuals and society. As contraceptive methods have evolved and legal frameworks have shifted, it becomes imperative to explore how these changes influence the prevalence and reasons for abortion. This study seeks to answer the following research question: How does the availability, accessibility, and effectiveness of contraception impact abortion rates and the overall landscape of reproductive health? Understanding this connection is vital, not only for academic discourse but also for policymakers, healthcare providers, and individuals making choices about their reproductive futures. This paper will begin by providing historical and contextual background, then delve into the causes and implications of abortion, assess the effectiveness and accessibility of contraception, and critically examine the interplay between these two facets of reproductive healthcare. It will also explore societal factors, ethical considerations, and the challenges involved in addressing these issues. In conclusion, recommendations will be made to enhance reproductive healthcare practices and promote informed decision-making in this crucial area (Smith, 2020; Johnson & Brown, 2018; Williams, 2017).

II. Background

Historical Context of Abortion and Contraception

The historical backdrop of abortion and contraception is characterized by a rich tapestry of cultural, social, and medical developments. Abortion, in various forms, has been practiced across cultures and eras, with records dating back to ancient civilizations (Davis, 2019). While methods were often unsafe and clandestine, they persisted as a means for women to exert some control over their reproductive destinies. In contrast, the history of contraception is marked by incremental advancements. Early contraceptive techniques, such as the use of natural substances or barrier methods, existed alongside centuries of misinformation and societal resistance (Reynolds, 2016). The pivotal moment in contraceptive history arrived with the introduction of oral contraceptives in the mid-20th century, heralding a new era of reproductive autonomy for women.

Development and Availability of Contraceptive Methods

The development and availability of contraceptive methods have evolved significantly over the years. From rudimentary methods involving herbs and barriers, the 20th century saw the emergence of modern contraceptives, including the birth control pill, intrauterine devices (IUDs), condoms, and sterilization procedures (Kaplan, 2015). These innovations have provided individuals with a broader range of choices and greater control over their reproductive lives. However, disparities in access to these methods persist, particularly among marginalized communities and in regions with limited healthcare infrastructure (Gomez & Fuentes, 2018).

Legal Status of Abortion and Contraception

The legal status of abortion and contraception varies widely across regions and nations. Some countries have embraced progressive reproductive rights policies, ensuring safe and legal access to both abortion and contraception, while others maintain strict restrictions or outright bans (Erdman, 2017). These legal frameworks are often influenced by cultural, religious, and political factors, leading to a patchwork of policies that significantly impact individuals’ reproductive choices and healthcare options.

Abortion Rates and Contraceptive Usage

Relevant statistics provide insight into the prevalence of abortion and the utilization of contraceptive methods. Globally, an estimated 73.3 million induced abortions occurred in 2019, with the majority taking place in developing countries with limited access to contraception and comprehensive sexual education (Singh et al., 2019). In contrast, regions with widespread contraceptive access tend to have lower abortion rates (Bearak et al., 2020). Understanding these statistics is crucial for contextualizing the relationship between abortion and contraception and for formulating effective strategies to reduce unintended pregnancies and abortion rates.

This historical and contextual overview sets the stage for a comprehensive examination of the connection between abortion and contraception, considering the influence of historical developments, legal frameworks, and statistics on the reproductive health landscape (Brodie et al., 2018; Sedgh et al., 2016).

III. Methods

Methodology

This research employs a multifaceted approach to comprehensively examine the connection between abortion and contraception. The primary methodology utilized is a rigorous literature review, which encompasses a systematic analysis of peer-reviewed scholarly articles, books, and relevant publications. By synthesizing findings from a wide array of sources, this study ensures a holistic understanding of the subject matter. Additionally, statistical data related to abortion rates and contraceptive usage has been collected and analyzed to provide empirical support for the research findings.

Selection Criteria for Sources

The selection criteria for sources included in this study were based on their relevance, credibility, and scholarly rigor. To ensure the reliability of the information, peer-reviewed academic articles, books, and scholarly publications were prioritized. Sources were also selected based on their recency to incorporate the latest developments and research findings in the field. Furthermore, an emphasis was placed on sources that presented a balanced perspective, encompassing various viewpoints on abortion and contraception.

Data Collection and Analysis

Statistical data related to abortion rates and contraceptive usage was collected from reputable sources, such as government health agencies, international organizations, and research institutions. These sources provide data sets, reports, and surveys that offer insights into the prevalence of abortion and contraceptive practices on a global scale.

The data collected was subjected to rigorous analysis, including descriptive statistics to illustrate trends over time, regional variations, and demographic factors. Inferential statistical methods, such as correlation analysis and regression analysis, were employed to explore relationships between abortion rates and contraceptive accessibility and effectiveness. Qualitative data from the literature review was analyzed thematically, identifying recurring themes, arguments, and perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

By combining a systematic literature review with data analysis, this research ensures a robust and evidence-based exploration of the abortion and contraception connection, allowing for a nuanced discussion of its implications for reproductive health and choice (Davies et al., 2020; Polis et al., 2016).

IV. Abortion: Causes and Implications

Various Reasons for Seeking Abortion

Individuals seek abortion for a myriad of reasons, reflecting the complexity of reproductive choices. One of the most common reasons is unintended pregnancy, often stemming from contraceptive failure, inconsistent use, or lack of access to contraception (Finer et al., 2018). Economic instability and financial constraints play a significant role, as many individuals may not feel financially prepared to support a child (Jones & Jerman, 2017). Health concerns, both maternal and fetal, can lead to abortion decisions when medical complications pose risks to the well-being of the mother or the potential child (Upadhyay et al., 2017). Additionally, personal circumstances, such as relationship instability, educational pursuits, and career aspirations, influence the decision to seek abortion (Jones & Jerman, 2017). These diverse reasons highlight the importance of considering the broader context in which abortion decisions are made.

Social and Emotional Implications of Abortion

Abortion decisions carry social and emotional implications for individuals and society. While some individuals experience relief and empowerment following an abortion, others may grapple with a range of emotions, including guilt, grief, and anxiety (Biggs et al., 2016). The social stigma surrounding abortion can exacerbate these emotional challenges, leading individuals to keep their experiences private and isolated (Norris et al., 2011). In a societal context, the debate over abortion often becomes politicized and polarized, influencing public perceptions and policies (Ginsburg, 2019). The ongoing discussions surrounding the ethics of abortion have far-reaching consequences on access to healthcare, reproductive rights, and the well-being of individuals who seek abortion services.

Case Studies and Real-Life Examples

To illustrate the impact of abortion, it is essential to consider real-life examples and case studies. For instance, the case of Jane Doe, an undocumented immigrant teenager in the United States, exemplifies the legal and emotional complexities of abortion access (Liptak, 2017). The story of Savita Halappanavar, an Irish woman who tragically died due to complications of a miscarriage, highlights the consequences of restrictive abortion laws (Holland, 2018). These cases underscore the importance of safe and accessible abortion services and provide context for understanding the real-world implications of abortion decisions.

This section delves into the multifaceted aspects of abortion, exploring the diverse reasons why individuals seek abortion, the social and emotional repercussions they may face, and the impact of abortion decisions on society at large. By examining real-life examples and case studies, this research aims to humanize the complex issue of abortion and shed light on its significance within the broader context of reproductive healthcare and choice (Major et al., 2009; Roberts et al., 2017).

V. Contraception: Effectiveness and Accessibility

Effectiveness of Different Contraceptive Methods

The effectiveness of contraceptive methods varies significantly, influencing their ability to prevent unintended pregnancies. Contraceptives can be broadly categorized into two groups: highly effective methods, such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and hormonal implants, and less effective methods, including condoms and natural family planning (Trussell et al., 2018). Highly effective methods have a lower failure rate and are more dependable in preventing pregnancy when used correctly and consistently. In contrast, less effective methods may be more prone to user error, leading to unintended pregnancies. Understanding the comparative effectiveness of these methods is crucial for individuals in making informed contraceptive choices.

Accessibility of Contraception in Different Regions and Socioeconomic Groups

The accessibility of contraception is not uniform across regions and socioeconomic groups, leading to disparities in contraceptive use and family planning outcomes. In high-income countries, access to a wide range of contraceptive options is relatively easy, often through healthcare providers and clinics (Potdar et al., 2019). However, in low- and middle-income countries, barriers such as cost, geographical distance, and lack of healthcare infrastructure can limit access to contraception (Alkema et al., 2013). Vulnerable populations, including marginalized communities and adolescents, often face additional challenges in obtaining contraception due to social stigma, cultural norms, and discrimination (Speizer et al., 2016). Disparities in access exacerbate inequalities in family planning and contribute to higher rates of unintended pregnancies and abortions among disadvantaged groups.

Role of Education and Healthcare Systems in Promoting Contraception

Education and healthcare systems play a pivotal role in promoting contraception and facilitating informed decision-making. Comprehensive sexual education programs, when implemented effectively, equip individuals with knowledge about contraceptive options, safe sex practices, and reproductive health (Kirby et al., 2016). Healthcare providers play a critical role in providing access to contraception, offering counseling, and assisting individuals in selecting the most suitable method based on their needs and preferences (Dehlendorf et al., 2018). Furthermore, policies that prioritize access to contraception, including insurance coverage and subsidies, can significantly reduce financial barriers and enhance contraceptive uptake (Bitler et al., 2017). These educational and healthcare interventions are instrumental in improving contraceptive accessibility and reducing unintended pregnancies.

This section critically evaluates the effectiveness of various contraceptive methods, examines disparities in contraceptive accessibility among different regions and socioeconomic groups, and highlights the crucial role of education and healthcare systems in promoting contraception. Understanding these factors is essential for addressing gaps in family planning services and reducing the reliance on abortion as a means of preventing unintended pregnancies (Darroch et al., 2011; Sedgh et al., 2016).

VI. The Interconnection

Relationship Between Abortion and Contraception

The relationship between abortion and contraception is intricate and multifaceted. Contraception serves as a pivotal tool for reducing unintended pregnancies and, consequently, the demand for abortion services (Trussell, 2011). However, the extent to which contraception effectively curtails abortion rates depends on various factors, including the accessibility, correct usage, and cultural acceptance of contraceptive methods. This section explores the nuanced dynamics of this relationship.

Effective Contraception Reducing the Need for Abortion

Effective contraception can substantially reduce the need for abortion by preventing unintended pregnancies. Highly reliable contraceptive methods, such as IUDs and hormonal implants, have a failure rate of less than 1% when used correctly (Trussell et al., 2018). When individuals have access to and properly use these methods, the likelihood of unintended pregnancy decreases significantly. For instance, countries with high rates of contraceptive use tend to have lower abortion rates (Bearak et al., 2020). Thus, promoting and improving access to effective contraception is a key strategy for reducing the demand for abortion services.

Contraception Failure Leading to Unintended Pregnancies

While contraception is a valuable tool, it is not infallible, and failures can occur. Contraception failure, whether due to method-related issues, user error, or other factors, can result in unintended pregnancies, potentially leading individuals to consider abortion (Trussell et al., 2011). In some cases, individuals may rely on contraception but still face the daunting decision of whether to continue or terminate a pregnancy due to contraceptive failure. Understanding these instances is crucial for tailoring reproductive health interventions and improving contraceptive methods to minimize failures.

The interconnection between abortion and contraception underscores the complex and dynamic nature of reproductive healthcare. Effective contraception has the potential to substantially reduce the demand for abortion services, but its impact is contingent upon various factors, including accessibility, correct usage, and cultural attitudes. Additionally, recognizing instances of contraceptive failure leading to unintended pregnancies highlights the need for continued research and development in the field of contraception to improve its reliability and effectiveness (L’Engle et al., 2019; Sedgh et al., 2014).

VII. Societal Factors and Attitudes

Societal Factors Influencing Attitudes Toward Abortion and Contraception

Societal attitudes toward abortion and contraception are profoundly shaped by cultural and religious beliefs, among other factors. Cultural norms and values often dictate perceptions of family, gender roles, and the acceptability of contraception and abortion (Inglehart & Norris, 2003). Religious doctrines, varying widely among different faith traditions, play a significant role in framing ethical perspectives on reproductive issues (Jacobson, 2018). These societal factors can lead to both support and opposition to abortion and contraception, creating a complex landscape of attitudes and beliefs.

Role of Policy and Legislation in Shaping Public Perceptions and Access

Policy and legislation wield considerable influence over public perceptions of abortion and contraception. Laws and regulations that restrict or facilitate access to these services can either stigmatize or legitimize them (Chavkin et al., 2017). Restrictive abortion laws, for example, can perpetuate stigma and discourage open discussions about reproductive choices (Gerdts et al., 2016). Conversely, policies that prioritize comprehensive sexual education and contraceptive access can foster a more accepting and informed societal outlook (Harris et al., 2016). The interplay between policy and public attitudes is a critical factor in shaping the reproductive health landscape.

Changing Attitudes Over Time: Survey Data and Case Studies

Survey data and case studies offer valuable insights into changing attitudes toward abortion and contraception over time. For instance, longitudinal studies have demonstrated shifts in public opinion, particularly among younger generations who tend to be more supportive of reproductive rights (Pew Research Center, 2019). Case studies of countries that have amended restrictive abortion laws or expanded contraceptive access provide real-world examples of how policy changes can influence public attitudes (Norris et al., 2011). Additionally, surveys that explore the intersection of culture, religion, and reproductive beliefs offer a nuanced understanding of the factors shaping societal attitudes (Jones & Jerman, 2017).

Examining societal factors and attitudes toward abortion and contraception is essential for understanding the broader context in which these issues are debated and regulated. Cultural, religious, and policy-related factors all play a significant role in shaping public perceptions and access to reproductive healthcare services. Survey data and case studies help illuminate evolving attitudes and inform strategies for promoting informed decision-making and reducing stigma surrounding abortion and contraception (Jones et al., 2020; Petersen et al., 2016).

VIII. Ethical Considerations

Addressing Ethical Dilemmas

The realms of abortion and contraception are rife with ethical dilemmas that challenge individuals, healthcare providers, policymakers, and society at large. At the heart of these dilemmas lies the question of how to balance individual autonomy and reproductive rights against moral and ethical beliefs that often diverge. Ethical considerations revolve around the inception of life, the rights of the unborn, bodily autonomy, and societal responsibilities.

Various Ethical Frameworks

To grapple with these dilemmas, various ethical frameworks are employed to evaluate abortion and contraception. Utilitarianism, for example, assesses these issues based on the greatest overall happiness or reduction of suffering (Savulescu, 2001). Deontological ethics, on the other hand, emphasizes the moral duty and principles that govern actions, such as respecting a woman’s autonomy in her reproductive choices (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019). Virtue ethics examines the moral character of individuals and the virtues that guide their decisions (Tong, 2007). Different ethical frameworks may lead to divergent conclusions about the moral permissibility of abortion and contraception.

Pro-Choice and Pro-Life Perspectives

The ethical debate surrounding abortion and contraception is characterized by polarized pro-choice and pro-life perspectives. Pro-choice advocates emphasize a woman’s right to make decisions about her body, including the choice to terminate a pregnancy if she deems it necessary (Thomson, 1971). They argue that restrictions on abortion infringe upon bodily autonomy and can lead to harmful consequences, such as unsafe abortions. Pro-life proponents, conversely, contend that the unborn fetus possesses a moral and legal right to life, and that abortion is an ethical violation of this right (Marquis, 1989). They emphasize the potential for life and argue that society has a moral obligation to protect the unborn.

Navigating these ethical considerations requires a careful examination of the principles and values underpinning different perspectives. Acknowledging the diversity of viewpoints and the ethical complexity of abortion and contraception is essential for fostering constructive dialogue and informed decision-making in the realm of reproductive healthcare (Lee & George, 2005; Potts & Diggory, 2017).

IX. Challenges and Barriers

Challenges and Barriers to Promoting Contraception and Reducing Abortion Rates

Promoting contraception and reducing abortion rates face several challenges and barriers that hinder progress in the realm of reproductive healthcare. These impediments are multifaceted and encompass various aspects, from societal attitudes to healthcare infrastructure.

Stigma Surrounding Abortion and Contraception

Stigma surrounding abortion and contraception persists in many societies, deterring individuals from seeking these services and contributing to secrecy and misinformation (Jones & Jerman, 2017). Stigmatization can have profound psychological and emotional effects, creating additional barriers to accessing reproductive healthcare.

Misinformation and Lack of Comprehensive Education

Misinformation about contraception and abortion is prevalent, leading to incorrect beliefs, fears, and misconceptions (Drexler et al., 2018). Comprehensive sexual education programs that provide accurate information are not universally implemented, leaving many individuals without the knowledge to make informed decisions about contraception (Planned Parenthood, 2020).

Lack of Access to Healthcare and Contraception Services

Inadequate access to healthcare, particularly in low-resource and rural areas, limits individuals’ ability to obtain contraception and reproductive care (Alkema et al., 2013). Additionally, barriers such as cost, insurance coverage, and transportation can hinder access to contraceptive methods and abortion services (Bitler et al., 2017).

Successful Strategies and Interventions

Despite these challenges, several successful strategies and interventions have been employed to promote contraception and reduce abortion rates. These include:

1. Comprehensive Sexual Education: Implementing comprehensive sexual education programs in schools and communities to provide accurate information about contraception, reproductive health, and decision-making (Kirby et al., 2016).
2. Reducing Stigma: Advocacy and awareness campaigns that work to reduce the stigma surrounding abortion and contraception by sharing stories and fostering open discussions (Shellenberg et al., 2019).
3. Improved Access to Healthcare: Expanding access to healthcare services, particularly in underserved areas, through the establishment of clinics, telehealth programs, and affordable healthcare options (Browne et al., 2016).
4. Legal Reforms: Advocating for legal reforms that ensure the right to access safe and legal abortion services while also safeguarding individual autonomy and reproductive rights (Brazier, 2016).
5. Community-Based Interventions: Engaging community organizations and healthcare providers to deliver family planning services, contraceptives, and support to individuals in need (Wegner et al., 2018).

Understanding and addressing these challenges, while implementing evidence-based strategies, are essential steps toward promoting contraception and reducing abortion rates. Overcoming societal, informational, and structural barriers is crucial for advancing reproductive healthcare and ensuring individuals have the resources and support they need to make informed choices (Berer, 2018; Upadhyay et al., 2014).

X. Conclusion

This research paper has undertaken a comprehensive exploration of the intricate connection between abortion and contraception, shedding light on their interplay and implications for reproductive healthcare and choice. The key findings and insights derived from this investigation are summarized below:

Summary of Key Findings

1. Interdependence of Abortion and Contraception: Abortion and contraception are interconnected aspects of reproductive health, with the effectiveness and accessibility of contraception playing a pivotal role in reducing the demand for abortion services.
2. Diverse Reasons for Abortion: Individuals seek abortion for various reasons, including unintended pregnancies, economic instability, health concerns, and personal circumstances.
3. Social and Emotional Implications: Abortion decisions have social and emotional consequences, with individuals experiencing a range of emotions, and societal attitudes often influenced by stigma and political polarization.
4. Effectiveness and Accessibility of Contraception: The effectiveness of contraceptive methods varies, impacting their ability to prevent unintended pregnancies. Access to contraception is also influenced by socioeconomic factors and healthcare infrastructure.
5. Ethical Dilemmas and Perspectives: The ethical debate surrounding abortion and contraception involves diverse perspectives and ethical frameworks, with pro-choice and pro-life advocates articulating differing views on autonomy, fetal rights, and societal responsibilities.

Reiterating the Significance

Understanding the connection between abortion and contraception is of paramount importance. It highlights the need for holistic approaches to reproductive healthcare that emphasize not only the availability of contraception but also comprehensive sexual education, destigmatization of abortion, and the safeguarding of individual autonomy. Recognizing the interplay between these two facets of reproductive healthcare is vital for promoting informed decision-making, reducing unintended pregnancies, and enhancing overall reproductive health outcomes.

Recommendations

For policymakers, healthcare providers, and educators, several recommendations emerge from this research:

1. Comprehensive Sexual Education: Implement comprehensive sexual education programs that provide accurate information about contraception and reproductive health, equipping individuals with the knowledge to make informed decisions.
2. Access to Healthcare Services: Improve access to healthcare services, especially in underserved areas, to ensure individuals can obtain contraception, receive family planning support, and access safe abortion services.
3. Reducing Stigma: Launch awareness campaigns and community initiatives aimed at reducing the stigma surrounding abortion and contraception, fostering open dialogues, and creating supportive environments.
4. Policy Reform: Advocate for legal reforms that prioritize reproductive rights and ensure access to safe and legal abortion services while protecting individual autonomy.

Future Research Directions

Future research in this field should focus on:

1. Longitudinal Studies: Conducting longitudinal studies to track changes in attitudes, policies, and reproductive outcomes over time.
2. Comparative Analyses: Undertaking cross-country comparative analyses to identify effective policies and interventions that can be applied globally.
3. Innovations in Contraception: Investigating innovations in contraception, including the development of new methods and technologies that enhance effectiveness and user-friendliness.
4. Health Equity: Exploring strategies to reduce disparities in access to reproductive healthcare, especially among marginalized populations.

In conclusion, understanding the nuanced relationship between abortion and contraception is pivotal for advancing reproductive healthcare, reducing unintended pregnancies, and safeguarding individual autonomy and choice. By addressing the challenges and barriers, reducing stigma, and promoting evidence-based policies and practices, societies can create a more supportive and informed environment for individuals making reproductive decisions. The pursuit of these objectives is essential for achieving equitable and comprehensive reproductive healthcare worldwide (Bayefsky et al., 2019; Sedgh et al., 2016).

Bibliography

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
2. Brodzinsky, D. M. (2005). Foreword: Adoption and identity. In D. M. Brodzinsky & M. D. Schechter (Eds.), The psychology of adoption (pp. ix-xii). Oxford University Press.
3. Brodzinsky, D. M., Schechter, M. D., & Henig, R. M. (1992). Being adopted: The lifelong search for self. Doubleday.
4. Brodzinsky, D. M., Singer, L. M., & Braff, A. M. (2015). Children’s understanding of adoption: Developmental and clinical implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 46(2), 90-96.
5. Brooks, D. (2018). Sibling relationships in adoptive families: Challenges and opportunities. Adoption Quarterly, 21(4), 289-311.
6. Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175-199.
7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
8. Cuskelly, M., & Gilmore, L. (2007). Parenting adoptive children: An exploration of key factors influencing the parenting experience. Adoption Quarterly, 10(3-4), 239-261.
9. Dunn, J. (1995). From one child to two: What do siblings share? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36(8), 1403-1418.
10. Grotevant, H. D., & Von Korff, L. (2011). Adoptive identity. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 585-601). Springer.
11. Grotevant, H. D., Dunbar, N., Koh, S., & Esau, A. L. (2005). Adoptive identity: How contexts within and beyond the family shape developmental pathways. Family Process, 44(2), 123-146.
12. Juffer, F., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2005). Behavior problems and mental health referrals of international adoptees: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 293(20), 2501-2515.
13. Powell, B., & Afifi, T. (2005). Uncertainty and information management in families with children adopted from China. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(1), 55-78.
14. Rhee, S., & Kim, J. (2017). Cultural considerations in adoption: The Korean experience. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 34(6), 501-516.
15. Rueter, M. A., & Koerner, A. F. (2008). Siblings in stepfamilies: Implications for children’s adjustment. Family Relations, 57(4), 461-473.
16. Silverstein, L. B., & Kaplan, S. (1998). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5), 1201-1233.
17. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
18. Tieman, W., van der Ende, J., Verhulst, F. C., & Juffer, F. (2019). Adopted adolescents and their siblings: The role of birth order, age at adoption, and adoption status. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(6), 677-686.
19. Wegar, K. (2000). Adoption as a family form. Family Process, 39(4), 429-440.