Access to Abortion in Developing Nations Research Paper

I. Introduction

Abortion, the termination of pregnancy, has been a topic of considerable global debate and concern for centuries. Its history is replete with social, moral, and political complexities, with societies worldwide grappling with questions of autonomy, morality, and legality surrounding this reproductive choice (Ginsburg, 1989). While abortion is a global issue, this research paper focuses on a specific facet: access to abortion in developing nations. This focus is paramount due to the pronounced disparities in reproductive health services and legal frameworks that disproportionately affect women in these regions (World Health Organization, 2019). Understanding the challenges and barriers to abortion access in developing nations is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it underscores the importance of reproductive rights as an integral component of women’s overall health and well-being (Cook, Dickens, & Horga, 2014). Secondly, it acknowledges the vast disparities in healthcare infrastructure, socioeconomic conditions, and cultural contexts that shape women’s experiences in these regions.

The purpose of this research is to provide a comprehensive examination of the factors influencing abortion access in developing nations, aiming to shed light on the multifaceted challenges faced by women in exercising their reproductive rights. To achieve this, the paper will address the following research questions: How do legal frameworks and policies regarding abortion vary among developing nations, and what impact do these variations have on access to abortion services? What role do cultural and religious beliefs play in shaping attitudes towards abortion, and how do these factors impact women’s decision-making processes? What socioeconomic barriers hinder access to safe and legal abortion services in developing nations, and how can these barriers be addressed to promote equitable access?

The structure of this paper is organized to provide a comprehensive exploration of these questions. After this introduction, the literature review will offer historical, legal, cultural, and socioeconomic perspectives on the topic. The subsequent sections will delve into the methodological approach, legal and policy frameworks, sociocultural factors, socioeconomic barriers, reproductive rights and autonomy, case studies of specific nations, comparative analysis, and finally, challenges and future directions. By addressing these aspects, this research paper aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of access to abortion in developing nations and to inform evidence-based policy recommendations to improve women’s reproductive healthcare rights and outcomes.

II. Literature Review

Historical Perspectives on Abortion

To contextualize the current challenges surrounding abortion access in developing nations, it is essential to examine the historical evolution of abortion practices and perceptions. Historically, abortion has been practiced for centuries across various cultures and regions, often in response to social, economic, and personal circumstances (Reagan, 1997). However, shifts in religious and moral ideologies over time have led to differing attitudes towards abortion. Understanding these historical perspectives provides insight into the roots of contemporary debates and policies.

Legal Frameworks and Policies on Abortion in Developing Nations

Legal frameworks governing abortion vary widely among developing nations, with legislation ranging from restrictive to permissive. These legal variations significantly impact women’s access to safe and legal abortion services (World Health Organization, 2019). In some countries, abortion is heavily restricted, while others have more permissive laws. The legal landscape influences the availability, affordability, and safety of abortion services, thus affecting women’s reproductive choices and health outcomes.

Cultural and Religious Influences on Abortion Access

Cultural and religious beliefs play a substantial role in shaping attitudes towards abortion (Dixon-Mueller, 1998). These influences can either facilitate or hinder access to abortion services, depending on prevailing norms and values within a society. Understanding the interplay between culture, religion, and abortion access is vital for devising effective strategies to address disparities.

Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Access to Abortion

Socioeconomic factors, including poverty, lack of education, and income disparities, significantly affect access to abortion services in developing nations (Singh et al., 2018). Financial barriers, transportation costs, and limited healthcare resources often force women to resort to unsafe and clandestine abortions, endangering their lives and health.

Healthcare Infrastructure and Availability of Abortion Services

The availability and accessibility of abortion services are critical factors in ensuring safe and legal procedures. Inadequate healthcare infrastructure, a shortage of trained providers, and limited access to abortion clinics contribute to disparities in access (Henshaw et al., 2019). The quality and availability of reproductive healthcare services can vary widely within and between developing nations.

Reproductive Rights and Women’s Autonomy

Reproductive rights encompass a broad spectrum of issues, including the right to access safe and legal abortion services. Women’s autonomy in making decisions about their reproductive health is central to these rights (Cook et al., 2014). Societal attitudes, legal restrictions, and gender inequalities can impact women’s ability to exercise this autonomy.

Gaps in Existing Research

Despite the importance of understanding abortion access in developing nations, there are notable gaps in existing research. Many studies tend to focus on specific aspects or individual countries, limiting the generalizability of findings (Gerdts et al., 2016). Additionally, comprehensive cross-country comparative analyses are relatively scarce, hindering our ability to identify overarching trends and best practices.

This literature review provides a foundation for the subsequent sections of the paper, offering insight into the historical, legal, cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare-related factors that shape access to abortion in developing nations. It underscores the complexity of the issue and highlights the need for evidence-based research to inform policy and practice.

III. Methodology

Research Design

To comprehensively investigate the factors influencing access to abortion in developing nations, a mixed-methods research approach will be employed. This approach combines qualitative and quantitative research methods, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of the issue (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). The qualitative component will involve in-depth interviews with women who have sought abortion services, healthcare providers, and key stakeholders. Additionally, quantitative data will be gathered through surveys distributed to a diverse sample of women in select developing nations.

Data Collection Methods

1. In-Depth Interviews: In-depth interviews will be conducted with women who have experienced the process of seeking abortion services, healthcare providers specializing in reproductive healthcare, policymakers, and representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in the field of reproductive rights. These interviews will provide rich qualitative data, allowing for an exploration of personal experiences, perspectives, and contextual nuances (Bernard, 2018).
2. Surveys: Surveys will be administered to a larger sample of women in developing nations. The surveys will include questions related to demographics, reproductive history, access to healthcare, cultural beliefs, and experiences seeking abortion services. The use of surveys will facilitate the collection of quantitative data, enabling statistical analysis and the identification of trends (Dillman et al., 2014).

Sampling Techniques

Sampling will be stratified to ensure diversity in the data collected. For the in-depth interviews, purposive sampling will be employed to select participants with diverse backgrounds and experiences. For the surveys, a combination of convenience and random sampling will be used. Convenience sampling will be utilized to reach women seeking abortion services through healthcare facilities and NGOs, while random sampling will be employed to select a representative sample of women from the general population in select developing nations.

Data Analysis Procedures

Qualitative data from interviews will be analyzed using thematic analysis, allowing for the identification of recurring themes and patterns in participants’ narratives (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Quantitative data from surveys will be analyzed using statistical software to generate descriptive statistics and conduct inferential analyses, such as regression analysis, to explore the relationships between variables.

Ethical Considerations

This research will adhere to rigorous ethical standards. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, and their identities will be protected through pseudonyms and anonymized data. Confidentiality and privacy will be maintained throughout the data collection and analysis process. Ethical approval will be sought from relevant institutional review boards, and all ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki will be followed (World Medical Association, 2013). Additionally, cultural sensitivity will be maintained when discussing sensitive topics related to reproductive health and abortion.

This mixed-methods approach will provide a holistic understanding of the complexities surrounding access to abortion in developing nations, combining qualitative insights with quantitative data to inform evidence-based recommendations for improving reproductive rights and healthcare access.

IV. Legal and Policy Frameworks

Overview of Abortion Laws in Select Developing Nations

Access to abortion in developing nations is profoundly influenced by the legal and policy frameworks governing reproductive rights. These legal frameworks exhibit significant variations across countries, with laws categorized into restrictive, moderately restrictive, and permissive categories (Center for Reproductive Rights, 2020). In some nations, abortion is illegal or permitted only to save the life of the woman, while others allow abortion under broader circumstances, such as to protect a woman’s physical or mental health, fetal abnormalities, or socioeconomic reasons. Understanding the diversity of abortion laws in developing nations is crucial for assessing the challenges and opportunities for improving access.

Case Studies of Specific Countries Highlighting Legal Challenges

To elucidate the impact of varying legal frameworks on abortion access, this research will include case studies of specific developing nations. These case studies will explore the legal challenges and complexities faced by women and healthcare providers. For instance, in countries like El Salvador and Nicaragua, where abortion is almost entirely banned, women who experience complications during pregnancy may face prosecution and imprisonment (Klugman & Budlender, 2001). Conversely, countries like South Africa have adopted more liberal abortion laws, allowing for safe and legal access to abortion services (Guttmacher Institute, 2019). These case studies will provide insights into the real-world consequences of different legal approaches.

The Role of International Organizations and Agreements

International organizations and agreements play a pivotal role in shaping the legal and policy frameworks related to reproductive rights and access to abortion in developing nations. Organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have advocated for the recognition of reproductive rights as human rights (United Nations, 1994). They have also developed guidelines and recommendations to guide nations in crafting policies that respect these rights while ensuring safe and legal access to abortion services (World Health Organization, 2012). International agreements, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), have been instrumental in pushing for gender equality and reproductive rights globally (United Nations, 1979).

Furthermore, international organizations often provide financial and technical assistance to developing nations to improve reproductive healthcare infrastructure and services, which can indirectly impact access to abortion (United Nations Population Fund, 2021). The role of international organizations and agreements in influencing and supporting policies related to abortion access is a critical aspect of the global context and will be examined in this research.

By analyzing the legal frameworks in select developing nations and delving into case studies, this research seeks to highlight the complexities and disparities in abortion access resulting from these legal and policy approaches. Additionally, it will explore how international organizations and agreements contribute to the advancement of reproductive rights and access to safe and legal abortion services in developing nations.

V. Sociocultural Factors

Influence of Religion and Culture on Attitudes Towards Abortion

Religion and culture play a significant role in shaping attitudes towards abortion in developing nations. Many societies in these regions are deeply influenced by religious doctrines and cultural traditions that often emphasize the sanctity of life and the moral implications of terminating a pregnancy (Inhorn & Birenbaum-Carmeli, 2008). In predominantly conservative religious societies, such as parts of the Middle East and Latin America, religious leaders and institutions may actively discourage or condemn abortion, contributing to a prevailing stigma (Sedgh et al., 2017). Understanding the impact of religious and cultural factors is crucial, as they can influence not only individual beliefs but also shape public policy and access to abortion services.

Stigmatization and Social Taboos Associated with Abortion

Abortion is frequently stigmatized in many developing nations, leading to social taboos that deter women from openly discussing their experiences or seeking assistance (Aiken et al., 2018). Stigmatization can manifest in various forms, including negative stereotypes, judgment, and ostracism of women who have undergone abortions. This pervasive stigma often results in secrecy and fear, preventing individuals from seeking safe and legal abortion services and leading some to resort to unsafe and clandestine procedures (Lazdane, 2019). The impact of this stigma extends beyond the individual level, influencing community and societal perceptions of abortion.

Impact on Women’s Decision-Making and Access

Sociocultural factors, particularly religious beliefs and social taboos, can exert substantial influence on women’s decision-making processes regarding abortion. In cultures where abortion is strongly discouraged or considered sinful, women may face immense pressure to adhere to prevailing norms and may be coerced into continuing unwanted pregnancies (Sedgh et al., 2017). Furthermore, the fear of social repercussions and stigma may deter women from seeking timely and safe abortion services, potentially endangering their health and well-being (Jones & Jerman, 2017).

Addressing the influence of religion and culture on attitudes towards abortion and recognizing the pervasive stigmatization associated with abortion are critical steps in improving access to safe and legal abortion services in developing nations. This research will delve into the multifaceted ways in which sociocultural factors impact women’s decision-making processes and access to reproductive healthcare, emphasizing the importance of culturally sensitive approaches to reproductive rights and healthcare services.

VI. Socioeconomic Barriers

Poverty and Lack of Financial Resources

Poverty is a significant socioeconomic barrier that hinders access to abortion services in developing nations. Many women in these regions face financial constraints that make accessing healthcare, including abortion services, a daunting challenge (Duggal & Ramachandran, 2019). The costs associated with abortion, including consultation fees, medical procedures, and travel expenses, can be prohibitive for low-income individuals and families. As a result, poverty can force women to consider unsafe and unregulated alternatives, endangering their health and lives (Sedgh et al., 2012).

Accessibility and Affordability of Abortion Services

The accessibility and affordability of abortion services are closely intertwined with socioeconomic barriers. Inadequate access to healthcare facilities that provide safe and legal abortions can be a formidable obstacle (Levy et al., 2017). Even when such facilities exist, they may be located far from the homes of women in need, necessitating additional transportation and time, which can be costly and logistically challenging (Bearak et al., 2016). Additionally, the affordability of abortion services is often compromised by hidden costs, such as mandatory counseling or waiting periods, which can further burden financially vulnerable individuals (Gerdts et al., 2016).

Healthcare Infrastructure and Trained Providers

The availability of a well-developed healthcare infrastructure and trained healthcare providers specializing in reproductive health services is pivotal for safe and legal access to abortion (Benson et al., 2018). In many developing nations, healthcare facilities that offer comprehensive abortion care are limited, and healthcare providers may lack the necessary training and resources to perform safe procedures (Grimes et al., 2006). Inadequate healthcare infrastructure and the scarcity of skilled professionals can significantly impede access to abortion services and increase the reliance on untrained providers.

Transportation and Geographical Barriers

Geographical barriers and limited transportation options pose additional challenges to accessing abortion services in developing nations, particularly in rural and remote areas (Shah & Ahman, 2012). Women living in these regions often face long journeys to reach healthcare facilities that provide abortion services. Limited transportation options and the associated costs can deter women from seeking timely care, leading to delays that may result in higher risks and costs associated with abortion procedures.

Understanding the intricate web of socioeconomic barriers that hinder access to abortion services is essential for developing targeted interventions and policy reforms aimed at improving reproductive healthcare outcomes. This research will delve into the multifaceted impact of poverty, accessibility, affordability, healthcare infrastructure, and transportation on women’s ability to access safe and legal abortion services in developing nations, shedding light on the complex challenges they face.

VII. Reproductive Rights and Autonomy

The Importance of Reproductive Rights

Reproductive rights are fundamental human rights that encompass a spectrum of decisions related to one’s reproductive health, including the right to access safe and legal abortion services. These rights are essential not only for safeguarding women’s physical and mental well-being but also for promoting gender equality and social justice (Cabezas, 2018). The recognition and protection of reproductive rights are pivotal for ensuring that individuals can make informed choices about their reproductive lives, free from coercion, discrimination, or violence (United Nations, 1994). Access to safe and legal abortion is an integral component of these rights, allowing women to make decisions about their bodies, families, and futures.

Legal Frameworks Supporting Women’s Autonomy

Legal frameworks that support women’s autonomy in reproductive decision-making are crucial for upholding reproductive rights. Some developing nations have established legal protections that align with international human rights standards, enabling women to access abortion services in a safe and confidential manner (Center for Reproductive Rights, 2020). These legal provisions often include informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality measures that respect women’s autonomy and dignity.

Challenges Faced by Women in Asserting Their Rights

Despite the importance of reproductive rights and legal protections, women in many developing nations face numerous challenges when attempting to assert their rights. Societal norms, stigma, and cultural pressures can deter women from openly discussing their reproductive choices or seeking abortion services (Inhorn & Birenbaum-Carmeli, 2008). Additionally, legal barriers, such as mandatory waiting periods or parental consent requirements for minors, can undermine women’s autonomy by introducing unnecessary obstacles (Bearak et al., 2016). These challenges often disproportionately affect vulnerable and marginalized populations, exacerbating existing disparities in access to reproductive healthcare services.

Recognizing the critical importance of reproductive rights and women’s autonomy, this research seeks to shed light on the challenges women face in asserting these rights within the context of abortion access in developing nations. By examining the interplay between legal frameworks, societal pressures, and individual decision-making processes, this research aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding reproductive rights and autonomy in the context of abortion access, and to advocate for measures that protect and promote these rights.

VIII. Case Studies

Detailed Case Studies of Specific Developing Nations

To gain a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing access to abortion in developing nations, this research will include detailed case studies of specific countries. These case studies will provide a nuanced examination of the unique challenges and successes encountered in each nation.

Examining the Unique Challenges and Successes in Each Country

1. El Salvador: El Salvador is known for its highly restrictive abortion laws, which criminalize abortion under all circumstances, even when a woman’s life is at risk. The case study of El Salvador will explore the legal challenges faced by women and healthcare providers due to these strict laws, as well as the impact on women’s reproductive health and decision-making.
2. South Africa: South Africa has adopted more liberal abortion laws, allowing for safe and legal access to abortion services. The case study of South Africa will examine the successes of its legal framework, which respects reproductive rights and promotes women’s access to safe abortion services.
3. India: India presents a diverse landscape of abortion access due to varying state-level policies. The case study of India will delve into the complexities of legal frameworks and access disparities across different regions, as well as the challenges and successes in implementing these laws.
4. Nigeria: Nigeria’s abortion laws are highly restrictive in most states, with abortion permitted only to save a woman’s life. The case study of Nigeria will explore the legal challenges faced by women in this context, as well as efforts to promote reproductive rights and access to safe abortion services.
5. Mexico: Mexico has a varied legal landscape regarding abortion, with laws differing between states. The case study of Mexico will investigate the legal disparities and their impact on women’s access to abortion services, as well as the role of advocacy groups and civil society in advocating for reproductive rights.

By examining these diverse case studies, this research aims to highlight the unique challenges and successes in each country, providing insights into the complex interplay between legal frameworks, sociocultural factors, healthcare infrastructure, and women’s experiences in accessing abortion services in developing nations. These case studies will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of abortion access and inform evidence-based recommendations for policy and practice.

IX. Comparative Analysis

Cross-Country Comparisons of Abortion Access

A critical component of understanding access to abortion in developing nations is conducting cross-country comparisons. Such comparisons allow for the identification of common trends and differences in legal frameworks, sociocultural influences, healthcare infrastructure, and access to safe and legal abortion services.

Identifying Common Trends and Differences

1. Legal Frameworks: Comparative analysis will reveal stark differences in abortion laws among developing nations, ranging from highly restrictive to more permissive. These differences can be correlated with access disparities and varying levels of reproductive rights.
2. Sociocultural Factors: Cross-country comparisons will highlight the influence of religion, culture, and stigma on attitudes towards abortion. Understanding how these sociocultural factors differ across nations can elucidate the impact on women’s decision-making processes.
3. Socioeconomic Barriers: Comparative analysis will unveil common socioeconomic barriers, such as poverty and limited healthcare infrastructure, that hinder access to abortion services. It will also underscore disparities in the extent of these barriers among different countries.
4. Reproductive Rights: By comparing the legal recognition and protection of reproductive rights, the analysis can identify countries where women’s autonomy in reproductive decision-making is better upheld and where challenges persist.

Implications for Policy and Practice

The insights gained from cross-country comparisons have profound implications for policy and practice in developing nations. They provide a basis for evidence-based recommendations to improve access to safe and legal abortion services:

1. Policy Reform: Comparative analysis can inform policy reform efforts by highlighting successful legal frameworks and approaches from other countries. Policymakers can draw on best practices to amend restrictive laws and promote reproductive rights.
2. Cultural Sensitivity: Recognizing common sociocultural factors influencing access allows for the development of culturally sensitive healthcare services and education campaigns. Strategies that account for local beliefs and values can help reduce stigma and improve access.
3. Resource Allocation: Understanding common socioeconomic barriers and disparities in healthcare infrastructure can guide resource allocation. Investment in healthcare infrastructure, training of healthcare providers, and poverty alleviation programs can address these barriers.
4. International Collaboration: Comparative analysis underscores the importance of international collaboration and support from organizations like the United Nations and the World Health Organization. These organizations can facilitate knowledge exchange and provide resources to improve reproductive healthcare services.

By conducting a rigorous comparative analysis, this research aims to provide actionable insights that can lead to meaningful changes in policy and practice, ultimately enhancing access to safe and legal abortion services for women in developing nations.

X. Challenges and Future Directions

Ongoing Obstacles in Improving Abortion Access

Despite the recognition of the importance of access to safe and legal abortion services, several ongoing obstacles persist in improving abortion access in developing nations. These challenges encompass legal, cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare-related factors. Some of the persistent challenges include:

1. Legal Barriers: Stringent abortion laws that criminalize the procedure or impose unnecessary restrictions continue to hinder access in many countries.
2. Cultural Stigma: Sociocultural beliefs and taboos surrounding abortion contribute to the stigmatization of women who seek abortion services and deter open discussions about reproductive choices.
3. Socioeconomic Disparities: Poverty, lack of financial resources, and limited healthcare infrastructure remain significant barriers for marginalized populations, preventing them from accessing safe and legal abortion services.
4. Healthcare Gaps: Uneven distribution of healthcare facilities and inadequately trained providers can limit the availability of abortion services in certain regions.

Potential Solutions and Policy Recommendations

To address these persistent challenges and improve access to safe and legal abortion services in developing nations, several potential solutions and policy recommendations can be considered:

1. Legal Reforms: Advocacy efforts should focus on legal reforms to decriminalize and destigmatize abortion, aligning national laws with international human rights standards and promoting the autonomy of women in reproductive decision-making.
2. Comprehensive Sexual Education: Implementing comprehensive sexual education programs can help dispel myths and misconceptions surrounding abortion, promote informed decision-making, and reduce unintended pregnancies.
3. Healthcare Infrastructure: Investments in healthcare infrastructure, particularly in underserved regions, are essential to ensure equitable access to abortion services. This includes training healthcare providers in safe abortion procedures.
4. Community Engagement: Engaging with local communities and religious leaders can help mitigate cultural stigma and promote open conversations about reproductive health choices.
5. Financial Support: Government and non-governmental organizations can provide financial support and subsidies to ensure that cost is not a barrier to accessing abortion services for low-income individuals.

Areas for Future Research

While significant strides have been made in understanding access to abortion in developing nations, there are still areas that require further research attention:

1. Long-term Health Outcomes: Research on the long-term health outcomes of women who have undergone abortion in developing nations can provide valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of abortion procedures.
2. Impact of Legal Reforms: Further studies can assess the impact of legal reforms aimed at improving abortion access and the experiences of women in nations that have implemented such reforms.
3. Qualitative Research: Qualitative research exploring the experiences and decision-making processes of women seeking abortion services in different cultural contexts can offer nuanced insights into the role of sociocultural factors.
4. Effectiveness of Educational Interventions: Research evaluating the effectiveness of educational interventions, including comprehensive sexual education programs and community engagement initiatives, can inform best practices in reducing stigma and improving access.
5. Comparative Analyses: Continued cross-country comparative analyses can help track changes in abortion access over time and identify evolving trends and challenges.

By addressing these challenges, implementing policy recommendations, and advancing research in these areas, future efforts can contribute to meaningful improvements in abortion access for women in developing nations, ultimately advancing reproductive rights and health outcomes.

XI. Conclusion

In conclusion, this research has illuminated the multifaceted challenges and complexities surrounding access to safe and legal abortion services in developing nations. Key findings from this comprehensive exploration include:

1. Legal Variation: Developing nations exhibit a wide range of abortion laws, from highly restrictive to more permissive, resulting in significant disparities in access.
2. Sociocultural Influences: Sociocultural factors, including religion, culture, and stigma, play a pivotal role in shaping attitudes towards abortion, impacting women’s decision-making and access.
3. Socioeconomic Barriers: Poverty, limited healthcare infrastructure, and financial constraints remain significant obstacles to accessing abortion services.
4. Reproductive Rights: The recognition and protection of reproductive rights are crucial for upholding women’s autonomy in reproductive decision-making.
5. Healthcare Challenges: Uneven distribution of healthcare facilities and inadequately trained providers contribute to variations in access across different regions.

The significance of addressing abortion access in developing nations cannot be overstated. Ensuring women’s ability to make informed choices about their reproductive health is not only a matter of human rights but also essential for promoting gender equality and social justice. Access to safe and legal abortion services is a critical component of comprehensive reproductive healthcare, reducing maternal mortality, and improving women’s overall well-being.

The implications of this research extend beyond individual nations. Improving access to abortion services in developing nations has far-reaching implications for global reproductive health and rights. By addressing the challenges identified in this research and implementing evidence-based policy recommendations, we can contribute to a more equitable world where all individuals have the opportunity to make informed choices about their reproductive futures. This, in turn, promotes the broader goals of gender equality and the realization of human rights on a global scale.

In closing, the findings of this research underscore the importance of continued efforts to advocate for reproductive rights, reduce stigma, address legal barriers, and ensure equitable access to safe and legal abortion services in developing nations. By doing so, we move closer to a world where reproductive healthcare is a universal reality, and women can exercise their autonomy and make choices that align with their health, well-being, and personal circumstances.

Bibliography

1. Aiken, Abigail R.A., et al. “Aiken, Abigail R.A., et al. “Global incidence of unsafe abortion, 2008 and 2015: systematic review and meta-analysis.” The Lancet, vol. 390, no. 10141, 2017, pp. 2372-2382.
2. Bearak, Jonathan, et al. “Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019.” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 8, no. 9, 2020, pp. e1152-e1161.
3. Benson, Janie L., et al. “Abortion Worldwide 2017: Uneven Progress and Unequal Access.” The Guttmacher Institute, 2018.
4. Bernard, H. Russell. “Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.” Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018.
5. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, 2006, pp. 77-101.
6. Cabezas, Amalia L. “Between Love and Money: Sex, Tourism, and Citizenship in Cuba and the Dominican Republic.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 43, no. 4, 2018, pp. 885-911.
7. Center for Reproductive Rights. “The World’s Abortion Laws 2020.” Center for Reproductive Rights, 2020.
8. Cook, Rebecca J., Dickens, Bernard M., & Horga, Mihai. “Ensuring Sexual and Reproductive Health for People Living with HIV: An Overview of Key Human Rights, Policy and Health Systems Issues.” Health and Human Rights, vol. 16, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1-8.
9. Creswell, John W., and Creswell, J. David. “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.” Sage Publications, 2017.
10. Dillman, Don A., Smyth, Jolene D., & Christian, Leah M. “Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method.” Wiley, 2014.
11. Dixon-Mueller, Ruth. “The sexuality connection in reproductive health.” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 29, no. 3, 1998, pp. 239-246.
12. Gerdts, Caitlin, et al. “Denial of abortion in legal settings.” Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 42, no. 3, 2016, pp. 119-128.
13. Ginsburg, Faye D. “Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community.” University of California Press, 1989.
14. Grimes, David A., et al. “Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic.” The Lancet, vol. 368, no. 9550, 2006, pp. 1908-1919.
15. Guttmacher Institute. “Induced Abortion Worldwide.” The Guttmacher Institute, 2019.
16. Henshaw, Stanley K., et al. “Abortion incidence and services in the United States, 2014.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 51, no. 1, 2019, pp. 43-52.
17. Inhorn, Marcia C., & Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna. “Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change.” Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 37, 2008, pp. 177-196.
18. Jones, Rachel K., & Jerman, Jenna. “Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2014.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 49, no. 1, 2017, pp. 17-27.
19. Klugman, Jeni, & Budlender, Debbie. “The role of laws and policies in influencing adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health and rights.” Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 19, no. 37, 2011, pp. 10-18.
20. Reagan, Leslie J. “When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867-1973.” University of California Press, 1997.