Science Research Paper Topics

300+ Science Research Paper Topics

Acoustics Research Paper Topics

Acoustics is the science that deals with the production, transmission, and reception of sound. The first scientist to study sound scientifically was German physicist Ernst Florens Friedrich Chladni (1756–1827). Chladni was an amateur musician who became interested in finding mathematical equations to describe musical sounds. Because of his work, he is often called the father of acoustics. Science research paper topics related to acoustics include:

1. Diffraction
2. Echolocation
3. Magnetic recording
4. Sonar
5. Ultrasonics

Agriculture Research Paper Topics

The development of agriculture—the raising of crops and animals for food—has been fundamental to the development of civilization. Farming brought about the settlement of farm communities, which grew into towns and city-states. Farming also made possible sedentary (settled) lifestyles, which in turn led to increased technological development. As growing populations demand an ever-increasing food supply, the need for agricultural advances continues to this day. Science research paper topics related to agriculture include:

1. Agrochemical
2. Aquaculture
3. Cotton
4. Crops
5. DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
6. Drift net
7. Forestry
8. Organic farming
9. Slash-and-burn agriculture
10. Soil

Anatomy Research Paper Topics

Anatomy is a branch of biology that deals with the structure of plants and animals. Comparative anatomy is a related field in which the structures of different animals are studied and compared. There are three main areas of anatomy: gross anatomy deals with organs and organ groupings called systems that are visible to the naked eye; cytology is the study of cell structure; and histology examines the structure of tissues. Microscopes are used in both cytology and histology to study cell and tissue structures. Science research paper topics related to anatomy include:

1. Blood
2. Brain
3. Cholesterol
4. Chromosome
5. Circulatory system
6. Digestive system
7. Ear
8. Endocrine system
9. Excretory system
10. Eye
11. Heart
12. Immune system
13. Integumentary system
14. Lymphatic system
15. Muscular system
16. Nervous system
17. Physiology
18. Reproductive system
19. Respiratory system
20. Skeletal system

Astrophysics Research Paper Topics

Astrophysics uses the already understood theories of physics (the study of matter and energy) to describe astronomical (universal) phenomena or events. Astrophysicists try to understand the processes that cause our universe and everything in it to behave the way it does. Science research paper topics related to astrophysics include:

1. Archaeoastronomy
2. Asteroid
3. Big bang theory
4. Binary star
5. Black hole
6. Brown dwarf
7. Celestial mechanics
8. Comet
9. Constellation
10. Dark matter
11. Extrasolar planet
12. Galaxy
13. Infrared astronomy
14. Light-year
15. Meteor and meteorite
16. Neutron star
17. Nova
18. Orbit
19. Quasar
20. Radio astronomy
21. Red giant
22. Redshift
23. Solar system
24. Starburst galaxy
25. Star cluster
26. Stellar magnetic fields
27. Supernova
28. Ultraviolet astronomy
29. White dwarf
30. X-ray astronomy

Biochemistry Research Paper Topics

Biochemistry is the science dealing with the chemical nature of the bodily processes that occur in all living things. It is the study of how plants, animals, and microbes function at the level of molecules. Science research paper topics related to biochemistry include:

1. Amino acid
2. Carbohydrate
3. Cholesterol
4. Fermentation
5. Hormones
6. Lipids
7. Nucleic acid
8. Osmosis
9. Proteins
10. Vitamin

Biology Research Paper Topics

Biology (from the Greek bios, meaning “life”) is the scientific study of all forms of life, including plants, animals, and microorganisms. Biology is composed of many fields, including microbiology, the study of microscopic organisms such as viruses and bacteria; cytology, the study of cells; embryology, the study of development; genetics, the study of heredity; biochemistry, the study of the chemical structures in living things; morphology, the study of the anatomy of plants and animals; taxonomy, the identification, naming, and classification of organisms; and physiology, the study of how organic systems function and respond to stimulation. Biology often interacts with other sciences, such as psychology. For example, animal behaviorists would need to understand the biological nature of the animal they are studying in order to evaluate a particular animal’s behavior. Science research paper topics related to biology include:

1. Adaptation
2. Antibody and antigen
3. Arachnids
4. Bacteria
5. Biodiversity
6. Biome
7. Biophysics
8. Biosphere
9. Carcinogen
10. Cellulose
11. Coelacanth
12. Cryobiology
13. Disease
14. Ear
15. Enzyme
16. Eutrophication
17. Evolution
18. Fertilization
19. Fungi
20. Genetics
21. Hibernation
22. Hormones
23. Indicator species
24. Leaf
25. Lipids
26. Lymphatic system
27. Metabolism
28. Metamorphosis
29. Molecular biology
30. Mutation
31. Parasites
32. Photosynthesis
33. Plague
34. Plankton
35. Protozoa
36. Reproduction
37. Respiration
38. Rh factor
39. Sponges
40. Virus

Botany Research Paper Topics

Botany is a branch of biology that deals with plant life. It is the study of the structure and the vital processes of plants, including photosynthesis, respiration, and plant nutrition. Among the plants studied are flowering plants, trees, shrubs, and vines. Specialized areas within the field of botany include the study of mosses, algae, lichens, ferns, and fungi. Science research paper topics related to botany include:

1. Cellulose
2. Cotton
3. Flower
4. Forests
5. Horticulture
6. Leaf
7. Photosynthesis
8. Plant
9. Seed
10. Trees

Chemistry Research Paper Topics

Chemistry is the study of the composition of matter and the changes that take place in that composition. If you place a bar of iron outside your window, the iron will soon begin to rust. If you pour vinegar on baking soda, the mixture fizzes. If you hold a sugar cube over a flame, the sugar begins to turn brown and give off steam. The goal of chemistry is to understand the composition of substances such as iron, vinegar, baking soda, and sugar and to understand what happens during the changes described here. Science research paper topics related to chemistry include:

1. Acids and bases
2. Actinides
3. Alcohols
4. Alkali metals
5. Aluminum family
6. Atom
7. Atomic mass
8. Biochemistry
9. Carbon family
10. Catalyst and catalysis
11. Chemical bond
12. Colloid
13. Compound, chemical
14. Cyclamate
15. Diffusion
16. Dyes and pigments
17. Electrolysis
18. Element, chemical
19. Equation, chemical
20. Explosives
21. Filtration
22. Formula, chemical
23. Halogens
24. Hydrogen
25. Industrial minerals
26. Ionization
27. Lanthanides
28. Molecule
29. Nitrogen family
30. Oxidation-reduction reaction
31. Oxygen family
32. Ozone
33. Periodic table
34. pH
35. Plastics
36. Poisons and toxins
37. Polymer
38. Reaction, chemical
39. Solution
40. Transition elements

Ecology Research Paper Topics

Ecology is the study of the relationships of organisms with their living and nonliving environment. No organism exists entirely independently of other living and nonliving things around it. A cactus in the middle of the desert, for example, draws nourishment from the air and from the ground. It depends on sunlight for energy needed to grow. The cactus may be home to birds, lizards, and microscopic animals. Even relationships that seem to be stark and simple as that of the cactus with its surroundings involve complex ties that form the subject matter of ecology. Science research paper topics related to ecology include:

1. Acid rain
2. Alternative energy sources
3. Biodegradable
4. Biodiversity
5. Bioenergy
6. Biome
7. Biosphere
8. Carbon cycle
9. Composting
10. Drought
11. Ecosystem
12. Endangered species
13. Environmental ethics
14. Erosion
15. Eutrophication
16. Food web and food chain
17. Gaia hypothesis
18. Greenhouse effect
19. Hydrologic cycle
20. Indicator species
21. Nitrogen cycle
22. Oil spills
23. Organic farming
24. Paleoecology
25. Pollution
26. Pollution control
27. Rain forest
28. Recycling
29. Succession
30. Waste management

Engineering Research Paper Topics

Engineering is the art of applying science, mathematics, and creativity to solve technological problems. The accomplishments of engineering can be seen in nearly every aspect of our daily lives, from transportation to communications to entertainment to health care. Engineering follows a three-step process: analyzing a problem, designing a solution for that problem, and transforming that design solution into physical reality. Science research paper topics related to engineering include:

1. Aerodynamics
2. Aircraft
3. Antenna
4. Automation
5. Automobile
6. Battery
7. Bridges
8. Canal
9. Cathode
10. Compact disc
11. Dam
12. Diesel engine
13. Diode
14. Electric arc
15. Electric current
16. Electric motor
17. Electricity
18. Electrocardiogram
19. Electromagnetic field
20. Electromagnetic induction
21. Electronics
22. Fluorescent light
23. Generator
24. Incandescent light
25. Integrated circuit
26. Internal-combustion engine
27. Jet engine
28. LED (light-emitting diode)
29. Magnetic recording
30. Mass production
31. Radar
32. Radio
33. Steam engine
34. Submarine
35. Superconductor
36. Telephone
37. Television
38. Transformer
39. Transistor
40. Video recording

Genetics Research Paper Topics

Genetics is the branch of biology concerned with the science of heredity. The term heredity refers to the way in which specific characteristics are transmitted from one generation to the next. For example, we know that a tall mother and a tall father tend to have children that are tall. Geneticists (scientists who study genetics) are interested in finding out two things about this observation. First, what is there in the cells of a person’s body that directs the body to become tall rather than short. Second, how are the directions for “tallness” transmitted from parent to offspring, from one generation to the next? Science research paper topics related to genetics include:

1. Biotechnology
2. Birth defects
3. Cancer
4. Chromosome
5. Clone and cloning
6. Genetic disorders
7. Genetic engineering
8. Human Genome Project
9. Mendelian laws of inheritance
10. Mutation

Geology Research Paper Topics

Geology is the scientific study of Earth. Geologists study the planet—its formation, its internal structure, its materials, its chemical and physical processes, and its history. Mountains, valleys, plains, sea floors, minerals, rocks, fossils, and the processes that create and destroy each of these are all the domain of the geologist. Geology is divided into two broad categories of study: physical geology and historical geology. Science research paper topics related to geology include:

1. Catastrophism
2. Cave
3. Coal
4. Coast and beach
5. Continental margin
6. Desert
7. Earthquake
8. Earth science
9. Earth’s interior
10. Geologic map
11. Geologic time
12. Glacier
13. Hydrologic cycle
14. Ice ages
15. Iceberg
16. Island
17. Lake
18. Minerals
19. Mountain
20. Natural gas
21. Oil drilling
22. Plate tectonics
23. River
24. Soil
25. Volcano

Mathematics Research Paper Topics

Mathematics is the science that deals with the measurement, properties, and relationships of quantities, as expressed in either numbers or symbols. For example, a farmer might decide to fence in a field and plant oats there. He would have to use mathematics to measure the size of the field, to calculate the amount of fencing needed for the field, to determine how much seed he would have to buy, and to compute the cost of that seed. Mathematics is an essential part of every aspect of life—from determining the correct tip to leave for a waiter to calculating the speed of a space probe as it leaves Earth’s atmosphere. Science research paper topics related to mathematics include:

1. Algebra
2. Arithmetic
3. Boolean algebra
4. Calculus
5. Complex numbers
6. Correlation
7. Function
8. Geometry
9. Graphs and graphing
10. Imaginary number
11. Logarithm
12. Multiplication
13. Natural numbers
14. Polygon
15. Proof (mathematics)
16. Pythagorean theorem
17. Set theory
18. Statistics
19. Trigonometry
20. Zero

Organic Chemistry Research Paper Topics

Organic chemistry is the study of compounds of carbon. The name organic goes back to a much earlier time in history when chemists thought that chemical compounds in living organisms were fundamentally different from those that occur in nonliving things. The belief was that the chemicals that could be extracted from or that were produced by living organisms had a special “vitalism” or “breath of life” given to them by some supernatural being. As such, they presented fundamentally different kinds of problems than did the chemicals found in rocks, minerals, water, air, and other nonliving entities. The chemical compounds associated with living organisms were given the name organic to emphasize their connection with life. Science research paper topics related to organic chemistry include:

1. Carbon family
2. Coal
3. Cyclamate
4. Dioxin
5. Fermentation
6. Hydrogen
7. Hydrologic cycle
8. Lipids
9. Natural gas
10. Nitrogen cycle
11. Nitrogen family
12. Oxygen family
13. Ozone
14. Petroleum
15. Vitamin

Paleontology Research Paper Topics

Paleontology is the study of ancient life-forms of past geologic periods. Paleontologists learn about ancient animals and plants mainly through the study of fossils. These may be the actual remains of the animal or plant or simply traces the organism left behind (tracks, burrows, or imprints left in fine sediments). Science research paper topics related to paleontology include:

1. Dating techniques
2. Dinosaur
3. Evolution
4. Fossil and fossilization
5. Paleoecology

Physics Research Paper Topics

Physics is the science that deals with matter and energy and with the interaction between them. Perhaps you would like to determine how best to aim a rifle in order to hit a target with a bullet. Or you want to know how to build a ship out of steel and make sure that it will float. Or you plan to design a house that can be heated just with sunlight. Physics can be used in answering any of these questions. Science research paper topics related to physics include:

1. Acceleration
2. Aerodynamics
3. Antiparticle
4. Atomic theory
5. Ballistics
6. Buoyancy
7. Cathode
8. Cathode-ray tube
9. Color
10. Conservation laws
11. Cryogenics
12. Density
13. Diffraction
14. Doppler effect
15. Elasticity
16. Electric current
17. Electricity
18. Electromagnetic field
19. Electromagnetism
20. Electron
21. Energy
22. Evaporation
23. Fluid dynamics
24. Frequency
25. Gases
26. Gravity and gravitation
27. Gyroscope
28. Half-life
29. Heat
30. Interference
31. Ionization
32. Isotope
33. Laser
34. Laws of motion
35. Light
36. Magnetism
37. Mass
38. Molecule
39. Momentum
40. Nuclear fission
41. Nuclear fusion
42. Particle accelerators
43. Photoelectric effect
44. Pressure
45. Quantum mechanics
46. Radiation
47. Radioactivity
48. Relativity theory
49. Spectrum
50. Subatomic particles
51. Temperature
52. Thermodynamics
53. Time
54. Tunneling
55. Vacuum
56. Video recording
57. Virtual reality
58. Volume
59. Wave motion
60. X-ray

What is Science?

The term science (in Latin scientia, in Greek epistémé) means “knowledge.” In philosophy it refers strictly to proven ideas, to the exclusion of hypotheses or speculations. Until the twentieth century, proof remained mysterious, but what it achieves has been clear since antiquity: certainty, truth unshakable by criticism or doubt. In the nineteenth century Newtonian mechanics was admitted as scientific in this strict sense, and its overthrow was an earthquake. Scholars now agree that certitude is limited to logic and mathematics. Thus scientists have shifted their efforts toward securing for science a surrogate certainty—usually probability.

This shift raises many new questions, thus far unstudied. For example, is Isaac Newton’s theory still scientific? In 1962 the historian of science Thomas S. Kuhn spoke of “pre-science” and of “petrified science.” Which defunct theory should remain in the up-to-date science textbook? Kuhn suggested that it should present only the latest ideas. Which ones? If not proof, what makes an idea scientific? This is one version of the problem of the demarcation of science (as sets of statements) in disregard for other aspects of the scientific enterprise and its context— intellectual, educational, sociopolitical, and so on. Another possible point of departure is the social dimension of science. In the early seventeenth century the English philosopher Francis Bacon said that the advancement of science would improve the human condition, so investing efforts in scientific research would be the most efficient way to spend one’s spare time. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the early-nineteenth-century German philosopher, noted that the invention of gunpowder made city walls useless and so altered the political landscape. The German political philosopher Karl Marx in the nineteenth century equated science with technology (grosso modo) and declared all social and political changes as due to technological progress. Following on Marx, in 1939 the English physicist J. D. Bernal made the dubious claim that medieval science was superior to ancient science. In 1964 the Marxist philosopher Louis Althusser rejected many of Marx’s sweeping generalizations but still declared the humanities mostly errors that express bourgeois ideology; he contrasted this ideology with science proper, which includes both the exact sciences and revolutionary dialectical materialism as he understood it. He did not trouble himself to demarcate these fields sufficiently to invite detailed discussions as to whether a certain theory, say, in physics or in economics, is or is not scientific. In 1919—decades before Althusser—the American economist Thorstein Veblen studied the nature of science in an effort to examine the validity of claims for the scientific status of diverse economic theories, including that of Marx. He demarcated science historically, by reference to the scientific ethos that, he said, these theories represent; this ethos is often called humanism, the same ethos that Althusser later dismissed as bourgeois. Veblen also drew attention to the wealth of empirical finds and role of theories as explanatory (as opposed to classificatory).

Twentieth-century social science developed ideas about specific aspects of society, including prestige—social prestige, the prestige of ideas, and the prestige of scientific ideas. (Prestige is enhanced by power over life; thus nuclear physics is most prestigious.) The concept of science must include the gathering of some sort of empirical information and the search for some interconnections between that information and certain ideas. Science then appears to involve intellectual activities of some sort.

Already four centuries ago Bacon deemed science the outcome of the indiscriminate collection of factual information and its use as a solid foundation on which to construct truly scientific ideas. His view, perhaps modified, prevails as the myth of science. (Being a myth proper, it is used at times in its original variant and at other times in modification.) The problem of demarcation then becomes: What do I know, and how can I show that I truly know it? This approach puts science in a psychological context, raising the question, as suggested by the twentieth-century philosopher of science Karl Popper: Is the psychology used to characterize science scientific? Science is also a publicly available fund of knowledge; the traditional view of it as psychological leads to the view (characteristic of the approaches known as reductionism and psychologism) of everything social as inherently psychological.

If science can be viewed as psychological, so too can mathematics, as suggested by Bacon and the nineteenthcentury English philosopher and economist John Stuart Mill. The refutation of this notion led to the revolutionary shift of the view of knowledge from psychology to sociology—from my knowledge to ours—opening the way for the study of the enterprise of science, its prestige, and the social class of its practitioners. This in turn opens interesting secondary questions: Are the teaching of science and the administration of science scientific? (Is the dean of the faculty of science a scientist?) Is all sciencebased technology scientific? The sociology of science, a young discipline hatched in the early twentieth century, has not yet reached these questions. Such questions pose a difficulty: Science is international, but science-based professions are not. (Compare Japanese science with Japanese technology.) Come to think of it, how international is science? (Is establishing some lingua franca for science advisable?)

Here is a general dispute about all human studies: Existentialists and postmodernists want them to be utterly context dependent, case by case; positivists and analysts want them utterly context free. Seeking a middle ground in sociological laws to set limits on fragmentation, one may view social institutions as generalizations that determine the extent of context dependence. Money is one such institution. Rather than speak separately of the interests of every economic agent, we speak of their profit motive, which, as Georg Simmel argued in 1900, is an intermediary. This role of money makes it important and explains the success of the economic theory that eliminates it from its equations (by replacing prices with relative prices). The trouble is, while waiting for sociology to develop, how should social scientists proceed? They can make use of trivial sociology that at times is powerful. The suitable general concept here is that of games or science regulated by recognized rules (usually institutionalized). Games need not be problematic unless placed under the artificial limitations imposed in game theory, and as in the case of war games, they need not always be frivolous. As to the triviality of the sociology of games, it is advantageous: It stops the question-begging nature of the theory of science from becoming a nuisance. Thus the rules of the game are negotiable. The game of science then might, but need not, exclude science administration, science education, (science-based) technology, and more. Also the rules may be flexible. All this is a secondary issue, as it obviously should be, as long as science remains chiefly the search for ideas and information of a certain kind. The problem of demarcation now reappears: Which kind? Any kind we want.

As this view of science allows excessive freedom, it also invites instituting limitations—to some function, to some tradition, or to some existing paradigms. Paradigms can be ideas (Newton on gravity), preferred ideas (Einstein), institutions (the Royal Society of London, the local medical school, the patent office), traditions, perhaps ways of life. Approaches to problems via paradigms are limited: Taken too seriously, they prove troublesome as too much may depend on an innocent arbitrary choice. The paradigm of this trouble concerns choices of words resting on the view that the commonness of usage is its only justification. We do not want all usage justified, because we want language to function as a useful means for communication.

What then is the function of science? Among several functions, its most conspicuous is explanation, discovery, invention, better living. Jumping a few steps ahead, one can say that its chief function is the search for true explanations (as suggested by Newton, Einstein, and Popper). Its other functions are peripheral. Assuming this to be the case, one can view science as primarily but not solely the enterprise of approaching true explanations of increasing funds of publicly available information.

This is lovely but full of holes. How do we learn from experience? In what way are scientific theories empirical? Popper broke new ground when he said that theories are empirical when they exclude certain observations and to the extent that they do so. Testing them is, then, the search for these observations; the function of testing theories is to refute them so as to usher in their successors. Applying such a test to the theories of Marx and Sigmund Freud, Popper proved them nonempirical. This approach depends on the exact wording of theories, which may become testable by the enrichment of their contents. Popper later tried to square the two ideas: that the empirical is the refutable and that the aim of theorizing is the approximation of the truth (Einstein). The success of his attempt is under debate.

Robert K. Merton approached matters more historically. In 1938, in the wake of Max Weber, the German sociologist of the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, Merton identified the scientific revolution with the establishment of the Royal Society of London and the motive for it as Protestantism. He then developed a quasi-Weberian model of science, resting on the theory of science of William Whewell (1840, 1858). Merton’s views earned much fame and much criticism. The criticism is at times valid, as Whewell’s view is outdated, and at times based on trivial evidence that he idealized science (which he frankly admitted), both in the sense of presenting it at its best and in the sense that Weber recommended the developing of an ideal type. Reports on poor examples of laboratory life as if they were representative appeared as alleged refutations of his views, although fraud is hard to eradicate anywhere.

The presentation of science by Michael Polanyi (1958, 1966) is the most intriguing, even though he played down the rationality of science. He compared the sociology of science to that of the arts and deemed both artistic and scientific training as the tacit transmission of ways of life in workshops by way of personal example. Polanyi’s view is insightful and beneficial, although it overstresses tradition as endorsement while slighting the traditional encouragement of criticism and of independence (as suggested by Popper). Polanyi was in error when he ignored efforts to render the tacit explicit and open the results to criticism.

Polanyi’s views were further developed by Kuhn, who wished to extend the instruction of leaders beyond their immediate personal example limited to their workshops. Their products can travel and serve as substitutes for personal examples. These become chief examples or, in Greek, paradigms. A science is mature, he said, as it gains a ruling paradigm. This notion appealed to those who wanted their products to serve as paradigms, especially in social studies, where the craving for status is strong. Kuhn later admitted that a territory can be divided between paradigms. He also admitted that identifying a paradigm is difficult. This difficulty should not trouble followers of Polanyi, but it does bother followers of Kuhn, as he declared paradigms obligatory. Kuhn’s approach runs contrary to the view of Merton about the liberalism of science. Kuhn also declared his theory applicable only to the study of nature, not of society.

How do the studies of nature and society differ? Any discussion of this question has to be in accord with one view of science or another. One may of course go to and fro, using the best view of science to differentiate natural and social science and then taking the best differentiation one has to try to learn what it says about science. One thing is certain: Social sciences have a more important role to play in the discussion of science than was heretofore believed.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

1. Agassi, Joseph. 1981. Sociologism in Philosophy of Science. In Science and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science, 85–103. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Boston.
2. Althusser, Louis. 1964. Marxisme et humanisme. Cahiers de l’Institut de Science Économique Appliquée 20: 109–133.
3. Althusser, Louis. 1996. Marxism and Humanism. In For Marx. Trans. Ben Brewster, 219–241. London: Verso, 1996.
4. Bacon, Francis. [1620] 2000. Novum Organum [The new organon], eds. Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge, U.K., and New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bernal, J. D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. London: Routledge.
6. Carnap, Rudolf, and Richard C. Jeffrey, eds. 1971–1980. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Einstein, Albert. 1994. Ideas and Opinions. New York: Modern Library.
8. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. [1837] 2004. The Philosophy of History. Trans. J. Sibree. University of Idaho, Department of Philosophy.               http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Hegel%20-20Philosophy%20of%20History.htm
9. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Foreword by Jonas Salk. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Levi, Isaac. 1986. Hard Choices: Decision Making under Unresolved Conflict. Cambridge, U.K., and New York:Cambridge University Press.
12. Merton, Robert K. [1938] 2001. Science, Technology, and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Howard Fertig.
13. Merton, Robert K. 1965. On the Shoulders of Giants. New York: Free Press.
14. Notturno, Mark A. 1985. Objectivity, Rationality and the Third Realm: Justification and the Grounds of Psychologism: A Study of Frege and Popper. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post- Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
17. Popper, Karl R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge.
18. Popper, Karl R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
19. Popper, Karl R. 1972. Knowledge without the Knowing Subject. In Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, 106–152. Oxford: Clarendon.
20. Russell, Bertrand. 1931. The Scientific Outlook. New York: Norton.
21. Russell, Bertrand. 1948. Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits. New York: Simon and Schuster.
22. Simmel, Georg. [1900] 2004. The Philosophy of Money, ed. David Frisby. Trans. Tom Bottomore and David Frisby. 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
23. Veblen, Thorstein. [1919] 1990. The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
24. Wettersten, John R. 1995. Preliminary Report on Efforts of Psychologism to Gain Influence in Proper Epistemological, Methodological, and Psychological Societies. In Critical Rationalism: Essays for Joseph Agassi, eds. I. C. Jarvie and Nathaniel Laor. Vol. 2. Dordrecht, Netherlands, and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Whewell, William. 1858. Novum Organum Renovatum. London: John W. Parker.
26. Whewell, William. 1967. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon Their History. 2 vols. New York and London: Johnson Reprint Corporation.