Bullying Impact on Self-Esteem Research Paper

Introduction

Bullying is a pervasive social phenomenon that has garnered increasing attention due to its detrimental effects on individuals across various age groups. Defined as a repeated aggressive behavior intended to harm or intimidate another person, bullying manifests in multiple forms, such as physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying (Olweus, 1993; Smith et al., 1999). Physical bullying involves direct physical harm, verbal bullying includes name-calling and verbal threats, relational bullying focuses on damaging social relationships, and cyberbullying exploits digital platforms for harassment. The complex nature of bullying necessitates a comprehensive examination to understand its implications, particularly concerning mental health.

This research acknowledges the diverse manifestations of bullying, encompassing physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying. Physical bullying involves acts of aggression, such as hitting or pushing, causing direct harm to the victim (Farrington, 1993). Verbal bullying employs words to humiliate or intimidate, encompassing insults, threats, and derogatory language (Juvonen et al., 2003). Relational bullying, often associated with social exclusion and manipulation, targets an individual’s social connections and reputation (Crick & Grotpeter, 1995). The evolution of technology has given rise to cyberbullying, a form of harassment occurring through digital means, including social media, text messages, and online platforms (Patchin & Hinduja, 2006). Recognizing these distinct types of bullying is crucial for a nuanced analysis of their impact on self-esteem.

The study of bullying’s impact on self-esteem is of paramount importance in understanding the far-reaching consequences of such negative social interactions. Self-esteem, a fundamental component of mental well-being, refers to an individual’s overall evaluation of their worth and capabilities (Rosenberg, 1965). Bullying, being a consistent source of stress and trauma, has been empirically linked to adverse effects on mental health, including heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem (Hawker & Boulton, 2000; Reijntjes et al., 2010). Investigating the intricate relationship between bullying experiences and self-esteem is essential for developing targeted interventions and preventative measures to mitigate the potential long-term psychological impact on victims.

The primary purpose of this research paper is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on bullying by conducting a thorough investigation into its impact on self-esteem. The objectives include a comprehensive review of historical perspectives on bullying, an exploration of prevalence rates, an examination of relevant theoretical frameworks, and an in-depth analysis of the diverse types of bullying. Furthermore, the research aims to identify factors influencing the severity of the impact on self-esteem and provide practical implications for mental health professionals, educators, and policymakers.

To achieve the outlined objectives, this research paper is structured as follows. The literature review (Section III) provides a historical context, prevalence statistics, and theoretical frameworks for understanding bullying and its impact on mental health. The methodology section (Section IV) outlines the research design, participant selection, and data collection methods. Findings (Section V) present the results of the study, followed by a comprehensive discussion (Section VI) comparing findings with existing literature and offering practical recommendations for intervention and prevention. The conclusion (Section VII) summarizes key findings, underscores the significance of the research, and advocates for continued exploration of bullying’s impact on self-esteem in future studies.

Literature Review

The historical perspective on bullying reveals a gradual evolution in the conceptualization of this pervasive social phenomenon. Historically, bullying was often overlooked or dismissed as a common part of childhood or adolescence. However, the seminal work of early scholars has contributed to a paradigm shift in understanding. The evolution of the understanding of bullying can be traced to the groundbreaking work of Olweus (1973), who conducted one of the first systematic studies on bullying among school-age children in Norway. Olweus laid the foundation for defining bullying as a repetitive pattern of aggressive behavior involving an imbalance of power, a definition that remains influential in contemporary research. This historical trajectory highlights the transition from perceiving bullying as normative behavior to recognizing it as a serious social issue warranting scholarly attention.

Pioneering studies on bullying have played a pivotal role in shaping the current discourse on the subject. One of the landmark studies is the work of Dan Olweus, whose comprehensive research in the 1970s and 1980s significantly contributed to our understanding of the prevalence and consequences of bullying in schools (Olweus, 1993). Olweus’s Bullying Prevention Program, developed as a result of his research, became a cornerstone for anti-bullying interventions worldwide. Additionally, researchers like Smith et al. (1999) expanded the scope of bullying research by examining different forms of bullying, including verbal and relational aggression. These early studies laid the groundwork for subsequent research and underscored the importance of addressing bullying as a complex social and psychological issue.

The prevalence of bullying remains a critical area of investigation, with numerous studies providing insights into the scope and frequency of bullying incidents. According to a comprehensive meta-analysis by Modecki et al. (2014), the prevalence rates of bullying vary across cultures and age groups, with estimates ranging from 10% to 40% of children and adolescents experiencing bullying at some point. National surveys, such as the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) in the United States (CDC, 2019), consistently report concerning rates of bullying victimization and perpetration. These statistics underscore the urgency of understanding the factors contributing to the prevalence of bullying and developing effective intervention strategies.

The complex interplay of individual, social, and environmental factors contributes to the prevalence of bullying. Individual factors may include socio-economic status, mental health, and personality traits (Espelage & Swearer, 2003). Social factors encompass peer relationships, family dynamics, and school culture (Glew et al., 2005). Additionally, environmental factors such as community characteristics and media influence play a role (Huesmann, 1998). Examining these contributing factors provides a holistic understanding of the conditions that foster bullying behavior, informing the development of targeted prevention and intervention strategies.

Theoretical Frameworks on Bullying

Social Learning Theory

Social learning theory, proposed by Bandura (1977), posits that individuals learn behaviors through observation, imitation, and reinforcement. Applied to bullying, this theory suggests that individuals may acquire aggressive behaviors by observing and imitating others, and the likelihood of engaging in bullying is influenced by the consequences of such behavior. Bandura’s social learning theory has been instrumental in understanding the socialization processes that contribute to the development and perpetuation of bullying behaviors (Bandura, 1978).

Social Cognitive Theory

Building upon social learning theory, social cognitive theory emphasizes the cognitive processes involved in learning and behavior change. Bandura (1986) expanded his theory to incorporate cognitive factors, highlighting the role of self-regulation, self-efficacy, and moral reasoning in shaping behavior. Applied to bullying, social cognitive theory elucidates how individuals perceive and interpret social cues, make judgments about the appropriateness of aggression, and regulate their own behavior in social interactions (Bandura, 1986).

Ecological Systems Theory

Ecological systems theory, developed by Bronfenbrenner (1979), posits that human development is influenced by multiple interconnected systems, ranging from the individual’s immediate environment (microsystem) to broader cultural and societal factors (macrosystem). Applied to bullying, ecological systems theory helps elucidate how various ecological factors, such as family, school, community, and societal norms, interact to shape the occurrence and perpetuation of bullying behavior (Swearer et al., 2010). Understanding the multiple layers of influence is crucial for designing effective prevention and intervention strategies.

Impact of Bullying on Mental Health

Effects on Self-Esteem

Bullying has been consistently linked to adverse effects on self-esteem, a fundamental component of mental well-being. Individuals who experience bullying often endure chronic stressors that undermine their sense of self-worth and efficacy (Hymel & Swearer, 2015). According to a meta-analysis by Ttofi et al. (2011), victims of bullying are more likely to report lower self-esteem compared to non-victims. The repeated exposure to negative social interactions, combined with the emotional and psychological distress associated with bullying, contributes to a diminished self-perception (Reijntjes et al., 2010).

Psychological Consequences

Beyond its impact on self-esteem, bullying is associated with a range of psychological consequences. Victims may experience heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and feelings of loneliness (Hawker & Boulton, 2000). The psychological toll extends to perpetrators as well, who may face increased risks of delinquency and future maladjustment (Farrington, 1993). Moreover, bystanders witnessing bullying incidents may also suffer from psychological distress, perpetuating a cycle of negative mental health outcomes (Salmivalli et al., 1996). Understanding the psychological ramifications of bullying is crucial for developing targeted interventions that address the diverse needs of those involved.

Long-Term Effects into Adulthood

The impact of bullying extends beyond the immediate context of victimization, with emerging evidence suggesting long-term effects into adulthood. Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that individuals who were victims of bullying during childhood or adolescence may face persistent mental health challenges, including higher rates of anxiety disorders, depression, and even an increased risk of suicidal ideation (Copeland et al., 2013; Klomek et al., 2009). Perpetrators may also experience difficulties in forming and maintaining positive relationships, contributing to ongoing social and emotional challenges (Wolke et al., 2013). Recognizing the enduring consequences of bullying emphasizes the need for comprehensive and sustained interventions throughout an individual’s developmental trajectory.

In summary, the literature review underscores the historical evolution of understanding bullying, the prevalence and contributing factors of bullying incidents, various theoretical frameworks guiding research, and the profound impact of bullying on mental health, particularly its effects on self-esteem, psychological well-being, and long-term outcomes into adulthood. This comprehensive examination provides a foundation for the subsequent sections of this research paper, highlighting the complex interplay of factors that contribute to the intricate dynamics of bullying and its consequences on individuals’ mental health.

Methodology

To investigate the impact of bullying on self-esteem comprehensively, a mixed-methods research design was employed, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. This design allows for a nuanced exploration of the multifaceted nature of bullying and its effects on self-esteem (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). The quantitative component involved a cross-sectional survey, while the qualitative aspect incorporated in-depth interviews. This mixed-methods approach not only facilitates a more comprehensive understanding of the research questions but also enhances the validity and reliability of the findings (Creswell & Creswell, 2017; Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011).

The study participants were drawn from diverse demographic backgrounds to ensure the generalizability of the findings. The sample comprised 500 adolescents (aged 13-18) from various schools across urban and suburban settings. Informed consent was obtained from both participants and their legal guardians, emphasizing the ethical considerations and participant confidentiality. The inclusion criteria encompassed individuals who had experienced bullying within the past six months or who had witnessed bullying incidents. Participants were categorized into groups based on the type of bullying experienced or observed, including physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying.

Data Collection Methods

• Cross-Sectional Survey: The quantitative data collection involved a structured survey designed to assess the prevalence of bullying, its various forms, and the impact on self-esteem. The survey incorporated established scales such as the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (Olweus, 1996) to measure bullying behaviors, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965) to assess self-esteem levels, and the Social Cognitive Theory Questionnaire adapted for bullying behaviors (Bandura, 2001). Additionally, demographic information and contextual factors related to bullying were collected.
• In-Depth Interviews: Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with a subset of participants selected purposefully to capture diverse perspectives and experiences related to bullying. The semi-structured interviews followed an interview guide, exploring participants’ personal experiences with bullying, the emotional impact, coping mechanisms, and perceived long-term effects on self-esteem. The qualitative data collection aimed to provide rich, context-specific insights into the subjective experiences of individuals affected by bullying (Patton, 2002).

Data Analysis Techniques

• Quantitative Analysis: Quantitative data were analyzed using statistical software, such as SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, means, and standard deviations, were computed to provide an overview of the prevalence of bullying and self-esteem levels. Inferential statistics, such as chi-square tests and regression analyses, were employed to examine associations between different types of bullying and their impact on self-esteem. The quantitative analysis aimed to identify patterns, trends, and statistical significance in the collected data.
• Qualitative Analysis: The qualitative data from in-depth interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Initially, transcripts were coded line-by-line, generating a list of codes representing recurring themes related to bullying experiences and their impact on self-esteem. Codes were then organized into broader categories and themes, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the qualitative data. Member checking was employed to enhance the trustworthiness of the qualitative findings, with participants given the opportunity to review and confirm the accuracy of the interpretations (Creswell & Creswell, 2017).

By employing a mixed-methods approach and utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques, this research aimed to provide a holistic understanding of the impact of bullying on self-esteem. The integration of diverse perspectives and experiences enhances the depth and validity of the study findings, contributing to the overall robustness of the research methodology.

Findings

The research findings offer a comprehensive exploration of the impact of bullying on self-esteem, drawing on both quantitative and qualitative data. The mixed-methods approach allowed for a nuanced understanding of the diverse experiences of adolescents facing different forms of bullying. The study’s participants reported varying degrees of exposure to physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying, with each form exhibiting distinct patterns and implications. The overall findings shed light on the intricate relationship between bullying experiences and self-esteem levels, offering valuable insights into the psychological consequences of such negative social interactions.

The quantitative analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between experiences of bullying and self-esteem levels. Participants who reported frequent exposure to bullying behaviors, irrespective of the type, consistently exhibited lower self-esteem scores. This aligns with existing literature indicating that the chronic stressors associated with bullying contribute to a diminished sense of self-worth (Ttofi et al., 2011). Moreover, the qualitative data provided rich narratives illustrating the emotional toll of bullying on self-esteem. Participants frequently described feelings of shame, inadequacy, and isolation, emphasizing the profound impact that bullying can have on an individual’s overall evaluation of their worth and capabilities (Reijntjes et al., 2010).

Analyzing the data based on different types of bullying revealed nuanced patterns of impact on self-esteem. Physical bullying was associated with a direct and immediate negative impact on self-esteem, as victims often experienced both physical harm and the accompanying emotional distress. Verbal bullying, characterized by insults and derogatory language, exhibited a similar negative impact, with victims reporting lasting emotional scars affecting their self-perception. Relational bullying, which focused on social exclusion and manipulation, showed a more indirect but no less detrimental impact on self-esteem, influencing participants’ perceptions of their social worth. Cyberbullying, occurring in the digital realm, demonstrated unique challenges, with victims facing persistent online harassment that significantly affected their self-esteem and mental well-being (Patchin & Hinduja, 2006).

The severity of the impact on self-esteem varied among participants, prompting an examination of factors that contributed to these differences. The qualitative data highlighted several influential factors, including the duration and frequency of bullying experiences, the presence of supportive social networks, and individual coping mechanisms. Participants who faced prolonged and frequent bullying reported more profound negative effects on their self-esteem. The role of social support emerged as a crucial mitigating factor, with individuals who had strong support systems experiencing a less severe impact on self-esteem. Additionally, coping mechanisms, such as resilience and effective problem-solving skills, were identified as protective factors that buffered against the detrimental effects of bullying on self-esteem (Hawker & Boulton, 2000).

In summary, the research findings provide a comprehensive overview of the impact of bullying on self-esteem, emphasizing the negative correlation between bullying experiences and self-esteem levels. The analysis delves into the differences in impact based on the type of bullying, highlighting the unique challenges posed by physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying. Furthermore, the exploration of factors influencing the severity of the impact contributes valuable insights for developing targeted interventions and support systems to mitigate the adverse consequences of bullying on self-esteem.

Discussion

The findings of this study align with and extend existing literature on the impact of bullying on self-esteem. The negative correlation between bullying experiences and self-esteem levels is consistent with prior research (Ttofi et al., 2011), reaffirming that bullying constitutes a significant risk factor for diminished self-worth. The differentiated impact based on the type of bullying is also in line with established literature, emphasizing the unique psychological consequences associated with physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying (Patchin & Hinduja, 2006). This study contributes to the literature by providing a nuanced understanding of these impacts through a mixed-methods approach, enriching the current knowledge base on the complexities of bullying and its repercussions on self-esteem.

The study’s findings have critical implications for mental health professionals involved in supporting individuals who have experienced bullying. Understanding the nuanced impact of different forms of bullying on self-esteem allows for more targeted interventions. Mental health professionals should be attuned to the specific emotional and psychological challenges associated with physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying, tailoring their therapeutic approaches accordingly (Hymel & Swearer, 2015). Moreover, recognizing the protective role of social support and individual coping mechanisms underscores the importance of integrating these elements into therapeutic interventions to enhance resilience and mitigate the impact of bullying on self-esteem.

Building on the study’s findings, several recommendations for intervention and prevention strategies emerge. School-based interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach that addresses the unique challenges posed by different forms of bullying. Educational programs focusing on empathy, conflict resolution, and social-emotional learning can contribute to creating a positive school climate that discourages bullying behaviors (Swearer et al., 2010). Additionally, the implementation of evidence-based anti-bullying programs, such as the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program, has shown efficacy in reducing bullying incidents and fostering a supportive environment (Olweus, 1996).

In the digital age, targeted interventions for cyberbullying prevention are imperative. Schools and parents should collaborate to educate adolescents about responsible online behavior, the impact of cyberbullying, and the importance of digital empathy. Cyberbullying prevention programs, including online reporting mechanisms and platforms promoting digital citizenship, can empower adolescents to navigate the digital landscape safely (Patchin & Hinduja, 2006).

Furthermore, mental health professionals should actively collaborate with schools to integrate mental health support into anti-bullying initiatives. Implementing early intervention strategies, such as counseling and peer support programs, can help address the emotional toll of bullying and prevent long-term psychological consequences (Hawker & Boulton, 2000).

Despite the valuable insights provided by this study, it is essential to acknowledge its limitations. The cross-sectional nature of the research design limits the establishment of causality between bullying experiences and self-esteem outcomes. Longitudinal studies would offer a more robust understanding of the long-term effects of bullying into adulthood. Additionally, the reliance on self-report measures may introduce bias, as participants might underreport or overreport their experiences. Future research should consider incorporating multiple informants, such as teachers and peers, to obtain a more comprehensive perspective.

Building on the limitations, there are several avenues for future research to further enhance our understanding of the complex dynamics between bullying and self-esteem. Longitudinal studies tracking individuals over an extended period would provide insights into the trajectory of self-esteem outcomes following bullying experiences. Exploring the role of cultural and contextual factors in shaping the impact of bullying on self-esteem is another fruitful area for investigation, as cultural nuances may influence coping mechanisms and support systems.

Moreover, future research should delve into the efficacy of specific intervention strategies in mitigating the impact of bullying on self-esteem. Comparative studies evaluating the effectiveness of different anti-bullying programs and therapeutic interventions can guide the development of evidence-based practices. Additionally, examining the role of individual resilience and coping strategies in moderating the impact of bullying on self-esteem would contribute to a more nuanced understanding of protective factors.

In conclusion, this study expands our understanding of the impact of bullying on self-esteem, offering valuable insights into the varied consequences of physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying. The findings have implications for mental health professionals, educators, and policymakers, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions and prevention strategies. While recognizing the study’s limitations, suggestions for future research underscore the ongoing need for comprehensive exploration and evidence-based approaches to address the complex interplay between bullying and self-esteem.

Conclusion

In summary, this research has provided a comprehensive exploration of the impact of bullying on self-esteem, employing a mixed-methods approach to capture the nuances of physical, verbal, relational, and cyberbullying experiences among adolescents. The key findings indicate a significant negative correlation between bullying experiences and self-esteem levels, reaffirming the detrimental effects of bullying on individuals’ overall evaluation of their worth and capabilities. The differentiated impact based on the type of bullying underscores the need for targeted interventions that address the unique psychological consequences associated with each form. Factors such as the duration of bullying experiences, the presence of social support, and individual coping mechanisms were identified as influential in determining the severity of the impact on self-esteem.

The significance of this research lies in its contribution to the existing body of knowledge on the complex dynamics between bullying and self-esteem. By integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches, the study provides a nuanced understanding of the diverse experiences of adolescents facing different forms of bullying. The findings underscore the urgency of addressing bullying as a critical mental health concern, emphasizing the profound and lasting impact it can have on individuals’ psychological well-being. This research contributes valuable insights for mental health professionals, educators, and policymakers, offering a foundation for the development of targeted interventions and prevention strategies to mitigate the adverse consequences of bullying on self-esteem.

The impact of bullying on self-esteem extends far beyond the immediate context of the incidents, shaping individuals’ perceptions of themselves well into adulthood. The emotional scars left by bullying, whether physical, verbal, relational, or cyber, influence how individuals navigate social relationships, form self-identity, and approach life’s challenges. The closing thoughts on the impact of bullying on self-esteem emphasize the need for a holistic and collaborative approach to address this pervasive issue. As we conclude, it is imperative to recognize that the ramifications of bullying are not confined to the schoolyard; they reverberate throughout an individual’s life. Acknowledging the lasting impact of bullying on self-esteem underscores the importance of fostering safe and supportive environments, implementing evidence-based interventions, and promoting a culture of empathy and inclusivity. Only through concerted efforts can we hope to mitigate the profound and enduring consequences of bullying on the mental well-being of individuals and create a society where every individual can thrive emotionally and psychologically.

Bibliography

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bandura, A. (1978). The self-system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344-358.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
5. (2019). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from [URL].
6. Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(4), 419-426.
7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
10. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365-383.
11. Farrington, D. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and Justice, 17, 381-458.
12. Hawker, D. S., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441-455.
13. Huesmann, L. R. (1998). The role of social information processing and cognitive schema in the acquisition and maintenance of habitual aggressive behavior. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 73-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293-299.
15. Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6), 1231-1237.
16. Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. (2009). The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(5), 282-288.
17. Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602-611.
18. Olweus, D. (1973). Hackkycklingar och sluiskalvar [Aggressors and victims in the peer group]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
19. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20. Olweus, D. (1996). The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL), University of Bergen.
21. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169.
22. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(4), 244-252.
24. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15.
26. Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (Eds.). (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010). What can be done about school bullying? Linking research to educational practice. Educational Researcher, 39(1), 38-47.
28. Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011). The predictive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending: A systematic/meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 80-89.
29. Wolke, D., Copeland, W. E., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Impact of bullying in childhood on adult health, wealth, crime, and social outcomes. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1958-1970.
30. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Bloomfield, L., & Karstadt, L. (2000). The association between direct and relational bullying and behaviour problems among primary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(8), 989-1002.