Bullying Among Different Age Groups Research Paper

Introduction

Bullying is a pervasive social phenomenon characterized by repeated aggressive behavior intended to cause harm, imbalance of power, and an intimidating environment (Olweus, 1993). This study adopts a comprehensive definition that encompasses various forms of bullying, including physical, verbal, social, and cyberbullying, recognizing the evolving nature of this phenomenon across age groups.

Understanding bullying across diverse age groups is critical for several reasons. First, each developmental stage presents unique challenges and vulnerabilities that influence the nature and impact of bullying experiences (Smith et al., 2002). Second, interventions and preventive measures must be tailored to the specific needs of different age cohorts to effectively address the multifaceted aspects of bullying (Espelage & Swearer, 2003). Finally, studying bullying across the lifespan contributes to a holistic comprehension of the phenomenon, facilitating a more nuanced and informed approach to mental health interventions.

The primary purpose of this research is to investigate the prevalence, types, and consequences of bullying across distinct age groups. By delving into the experiences of children, adolescents, and adults, the study aims to identify commonalities and differences, providing a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon’s manifestations throughout the lifespan. Additionally, the research seeks to evaluate the efficacy of existing preventive measures and intervention strategies in mitigating the adverse effects of bullying across age cohorts.

This study posits hypotheses that anticipate variations in the prevalence and impact of bullying across different age groups, considering developmental and contextual factors. Research questions include inquiries into the specific types of bullying prevalent in each age cohort, the psychological and social consequences for victims, and the effectiveness of current preventive and intervention measures. By addressing these questions, the research aims to contribute empirical insights to inform evidence-based policies and interventions tailored to diverse age-related needs in combating bullying.

Literature Review

The exploration of bullying has evolved significantly over time, reflecting societal shifts in awareness and understanding. Early studies primarily focused on overt physical aggression, with researchers like Dan Olweus pioneering systematic investigations in the 1970s (Olweus, 1978). Subsequent decades witnessed an expansion of the concept, encompassing verbal and social forms of aggression (Smith et al., 1999). As research advanced, an increased emphasis on the psychological and emotional dimensions of bullying emerged, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding that transcends mere observable behaviors (Espelage & Swearer, 2003). This historical trajectory underscores the dynamic nature of bullying research, reflecting an ongoing refinement of concepts and methodologies.

Various theoretical frameworks have been instrumental in elucidating the complex dynamics of bullying. Social-cognitive theories, such as Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, emphasize the role of observational learning and modeling in the acquisition of aggressive behaviors (Bandura, 1973). The ecological systems perspective posits that bullying is influenced by interactions between individuals and their broader social environments, encompassing family, school, and community factors (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Additionally, the social identity theory provides insights into the interplay between group dynamics and bullying behaviors, elucidating how individuals may target others based on perceived differences (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Integrating these frameworks offers a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted nature of bullying across age groups.

Bullying exerts profound and enduring effects on the mental health of individuals across the lifespan. Numerous studies have demonstrated a link between bullying victimization and increased rates of anxiety, depression, and other mental health disorders (Hawker & Boulton, 2000). The psychological impact extends beyond immediate distress, contributing to long-term consequences such as reduced self-esteem and impaired interpersonal relationships (Reijntjes et al., 2011). Furthermore, emerging research highlights the neurobiological implications of chronic bullying exposure, emphasizing the need for a holistic understanding of the mental health ramifications across different age groups (Vaillancourt et al., 2013).

Bullying prevalence exhibits notable variations across age groups, influenced by developmental factors and contextual nuances. In the early stages of childhood, bullying often manifests as direct physical aggression but evolves to include more subtle forms, such as relational aggression, during adolescence (Crick & Grotpeter, 1995). Cyberbullying becomes increasingly prevalent among adolescents, leveraging technological advancements for harassment (Kowalski et al., 2012). In adulthood, bullying may take the form of workplace aggression or relational bullying within social networks (Hauge et al., 2007). Recognizing these age-specific patterns is crucial for tailoring interventions and preventive measures effectively, addressing the unique challenges posed by bullying at different life stages.

Methodology

Research Design

• Selection of Participants: To ensure a comprehensive exploration of bullying across different age groups, a stratified sampling approach will be employed. Participants will be categorized into three age groups: children (ages 6-12), adolescents (ages 13-18), and adults (ages 19 and above). Within each age group, efforts will be made to achieve diversity in terms of demographics, socio-economic status, and geographical location. Recruitment will involve collaboration with schools, community organizations, and workplaces, adhering to ethical guidelines.
• Data Collection Methods: A mixed-methods design will be employed to gather rich and nuanced data. Quantitative data will be collected through surveys that include standardized measures of bullying experiences, mental health outcomes, and demographic information. Qualitative data will be obtained through interviews and focus group discussions, allowing participants to share their subjective experiences and perspectives. Additionally, relevant archival data, such as school records or workplace incident reports, may be utilized to complement self-reported data.

Data analysis will involve both quantitative and qualitative techniques to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research questions. Quantitative data will be analyzed using statistical software, employing descriptive statistics to characterize the prevalence and patterns of bullying across age groups. Inferential statistics, such as ANOVA or regression analysis, will be used to identify significant associations and differences. Qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis, identifying recurrent themes and patterns within participants’ narratives. The integration of both types of data will allow for a more holistic interpretation of the findings.

Ethical approval will be sought from the relevant institutional review board before commencing the study. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, ensuring they are fully aware of the study’s purpose, procedures, and potential risks. Participants will be assured of confidentiality and the voluntary nature of their participation, with the right to withdraw at any stage without consequence. Given the sensitive nature of the topic, a debriefing session will be provided to participants, offering resources for support if needed. Furthermore, steps will be taken to minimize any potential harm, and the research will adhere to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 2013) and relevant ethical guidelines for psychological research.

This comprehensive methodology aims to generate robust and ethically sound data, facilitating a nuanced exploration of bullying experiences across different age groups and contributing valuable insights to inform prevention and intervention strategies.

Bullying Among Children (Ages 6-12)

In the context of children aged 6-12, bullying manifests through various forms, including physical, verbal, and relational aggression. Direct bullying, such as physical aggression or verbal taunts, is observable, but indirect forms, like social exclusion or spreading rumors, are also prevalent (Smith et al., 1999). Additionally, as technology becomes more accessible, instances of cyberbullying among this age group are on the rise, further expanding the landscape of bullying experiences (Mishna et al., 2009). Recognizing these diverse manifestations is crucial for accurate identification and intervention.

Several factors contribute to bullying behaviors among children. Social learning theory posits that children may adopt aggressive behaviors through observation and imitation of significant others (Bandura, 1973). Family dynamics, peer relationships, and societal influences play pivotal roles (Espelage & Holt, 2013). Moreover, individual factors such as low self-esteem or a lack of prosocial skills can contribute to the development of bullying behaviors (Reijntjes et al., 2011). Understanding these multifaceted influences is essential for designing targeted prevention efforts.

The impact of bullying on the mental health and development of children is profound. Victims often experience heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem (Arseneault et al., 2010). The persistent exposure to bullying can impede the development of crucial social skills and hinder academic achievement (Salmivalli, 2010). Additionally, the effects extend beyond childhood, potentially influencing long-term mental health outcomes (Wolke et al., 2013). It is imperative to recognize and address these consequences early on to mitigate the potential for lasting harm.

Effective prevention and intervention strategies for bullying among children involve a multi-faceted approach. School-based programs that promote a positive and inclusive climate, teach conflict resolution skills, and foster empathy have shown promise in reducing bullying (Smith et al., 2004). Additionally, involving parents in anti-bullying initiatives and educating them about recognizing and addressing bullying behaviors at home is crucial (Ttofi & Farrington, 2009). Cyberbullying prevention programs that educate children about responsible online behavior and encourage open communication with trusted adults are becoming increasingly relevant (Mishna et al., 2009). By integrating these strategies, interventions can create a supportive environment that empowers children to resist and report bullying while promoting healthy social and emotional development.

This exploration of bullying among children underscores the need for age-specific insights to inform targeted prevention and intervention efforts, recognizing the unique challenges and developmental considerations within this age group.

Bullying Among Adolescents (Ages 13-18)

During adolescence, bullying takes on diverse forms, including traditional face-to-face aggression and the increasingly prevalent cyberbullying. Direct bullying persists, involving physical aggression and verbal abuse, but relational aggression, characterized by social exclusion and manipulation, becomes more nuanced (Crick & Grotpeter, 1995). The emergence of technology has given rise to cyberbullying, where adolescents experience harassment through digital platforms, posing unique challenges for both identification and intervention (Kowalski et al., 2012). Understanding these variations is essential for comprehensive prevention and intervention efforts.

Cyberbullying, a distinct facet of adolescent bullying, has gained prominence due to the ubiquity of digital communication. This form of aggression encompasses online harassment, social exclusion, and the dissemination of hurtful content through social media platforms and messaging apps (Patchin & Hinduja, 2017). The anonymity afforded by online spaces often intensifies the impact of cyberbullying, making it imperative to address this digital dimension of adolescent bullying in intervention strategies.

The psychological effects of bullying on adolescents are profound and varied. Victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying may experience heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation (Hinduja & Patchin, 2010). The impact on self-esteem and identity development is notable, influencing adolescents’ perceptions of self-worth and social acceptance (Ybarra et al., 2007). Furthermore, the potential for long-term psychological consequences underscores the urgency of addressing bullying during this critical developmental period.

School-based interventions play a pivotal role in addressing adolescent bullying. Comprehensive anti-bullying programs, incorporating educational components, peer mentoring, and teacher training, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing bullying behaviors (Merrell et al., 2008). Creating a positive school climate that promotes inclusivity and provides mechanisms for reporting and addressing bullying incidents is crucial (Espelage et al., 2013). Additionally, fostering open communication channels between students, parents, and school staff can enhance the effectiveness of interventions, ensuring a collaborative approach to combatting bullying (Ttofi & Farrington, 2011). Digital literacy programs that educate adolescents about responsible online behavior and the potential consequences of cyberbullying are becoming integral components of school-based initiatives (Smith et al., 2008). By combining these strategies, schools can create a supportive environment that addresses the unique challenges of bullying during adolescence and promotes healthy social and emotional development.

This examination of bullying among adolescents emphasizes the need for tailored interventions that encompass both traditional and cyberbullying, recognizing the distinctive features of each and the complex interplay between them.

Bullying Among Adults (Ages 19 and Above)

Bullying among adults often manifests in the workplace, where power dynamics, competition, and stressors contribute to a unique form of aggression. Workplace bullying involves repeated and unwarranted mistreatment, such as verbal abuse, humiliation, or exclusion, leading to adverse effects on the targeted individual’s well-being and professional performance (Einarsen et al., 2003). Research indicates that workplace bullying is a prevalent and serious issue, impacting individuals across various industries and organizational hierarchies (Salin, 2003). Understanding the dynamics and consequences of workplace bullying is crucial for developing effective prevention and intervention strategies.

Bullying is not confined to formal environments; it can also occur in social settings among adults. Social bullying may involve exclusion, gossip, or other forms of relational aggression within friend groups, community organizations, or other social circles (Sercombe, 2016). The impact of social bullying on mental health and social relationships highlights the need for a broader perspective on adult bullying that extends beyond the workplace.

In the realm of adult relationships, bullying can take the form of emotional or psychological abuse. This may occur in intimate partner relationships, friendships, or family dynamics, involving behaviors such as manipulation, control, and intimidation (Coker et al., 2002). Relationship bullying can have profound consequences on the mental health and overall well-being of individuals, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and addressing these dynamics in various interpersonal contexts.

Adults facing bullying often employ various coping mechanisms to manage the stress and emotional toll. While some individuals may develop resilience and adaptive coping strategies, others may resort to maladaptive behaviors, such as substance abuse or withdrawal (Lutgen-Sandvik et al., 2007). The mental health outcomes of adult bullying encompass a range of issues, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (Matthiesen & Einarsen, 2010). The long-term consequences can extend to disrupted personal relationships, decreased job satisfaction, and impaired overall quality of life (Hauge et al., 2007). Recognizing the coping mechanisms employed by individuals facing adult bullying is crucial for tailoring interventions that promote adaptive strategies and support mental health recovery.

This exploration of bullying among adults emphasizes the diverse contexts in which it occurs and the nuanced manifestations within social, professional, and personal relationships. Addressing adult bullying requires a comprehensive understanding of the unique challenges posed by workplace dynamics, social environments, and interpersonal relationships.

Comparative Analysis Across Age Groups

Investigating bullying across different age groups reveals both commonalities and distinct patterns in experiences. Common across age groups is the negative impact on mental health, including heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and a compromised sense of well-being (Arseneault et al., 2010; Hawker & Boulton, 2000; Matthiesen & Einarsen, 2010). However, the manifestations of bullying vary significantly. Children may experience overt physical aggression or verbal taunts, while adolescents face traditional forms of bullying alongside the emerging challenge of cyberbullying (Crick & Grotpeter, 1995; Kowalski et al., 2012). In adulthood, bullying extends beyond traditional forms, with workplace aggression, social exclusion, and relationship bullying influencing experiences (Einarsen et al., 2003; Sercombe, 2016). Understanding these age-specific nuances is crucial for tailoring interventions effectively.

While bullying’s immediate impact on mental health is evident across age groups, the long-term consequences are particularly noteworthy. Children who experience bullying may carry the psychological scars into adolescence and adulthood, with potential effects on academic achievement and social relationships persisting (Wolke et al., 2013). Similarly, adolescents who face bullying may encounter challenges in forming healthy relationships and achieving optimal mental health outcomes in adulthood (Copeland et al., 2013). In the case of workplace bullying, the effects can extend to chronic stress, anxiety disorders, and decreased job satisfaction, impacting overall quality of life (Hauge et al., 2007; Matthiesen & Einarsen, 2010). Recognizing the enduring consequences underscores the importance of early intervention and comprehensive support systems.

The comparative analysis across age groups has significant implications for the development of prevention and intervention programs. While school-based initiatives are effective in addressing bullying among children and adolescents (Smith et al., 2004; Ttofi & Farrington, 2011), workplace interventions necessitate a tailored approach that considers organizational structures, power dynamics, and the unique challenges of adult bullying (Salin, 2003). Prevention programs must be adaptable, accounting for the evolving nature of bullying and the specific needs of different age cohorts. Additionally, a holistic approach that involves families, schools, workplaces, and communities is vital for creating a supportive environment that fosters resilience and addresses the root causes of bullying (Espelage et al., 2013; Salin, 2003). Integration of digital literacy programs becomes imperative for adolescents, acknowledging the growing prevalence of cyberbullying (Smith et al., 2008). By drawing insights from the comparative analysis, prevention and intervention programs can be refined to address age-specific challenges, contributing to more effective and targeted strategies in combating bullying across the lifespan.

Discussion

The investigation into bullying across different age groups has yielded crucial insights into the varied manifestations and impacts of this pervasive phenomenon. Children experience bullying in forms ranging from physical aggression to cyberbullying, with distinct developmental implications. Adolescents face not only traditional bullying but also the evolving challenge of cyberbullying, significantly impacting their mental health. In adulthood, bullying extends beyond the traditional schoolyard setting to the workplace, social circles, and intimate relationships. While the immediate mental health effects are evident across all age groups, the long-term consequences underscore the enduring impact of bullying on individuals throughout their lives.

The findings have theoretical implications for understanding the complex dynamics of bullying across the lifespan. Social learning theory (Bandura, 1973) proves relevant in elucidating the transmission of aggressive behaviors, particularly in childhood and adolescence. The ecological systems perspective (Bronfenbrenner, 1979) provides a lens for comprehending the multifaceted influences contributing to bullying across various environments. The social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) sheds light on group dynamics and their role in bullying behaviors. The theoretical framework should evolve to incorporate the digital dimension, acknowledging the unique challenges posed by cyberbullying and the intersection of online and offline experiences.

Mental health professionals can draw practical insights from this research to inform interventions and support systems. Tailored prevention programs for children and adolescents should encompass school-based initiatives that promote positive climates and digital literacy. Adolescents, in particular, may benefit from targeted interventions that address both traditional and cyberbullying. In the workplace, mental health professionals can advocate for organizational policies that prevent and address workplace bullying, emphasizing the importance of a supportive work environment. Recognizing the specific challenges faced by adults in social and relationship settings, interventions should encompass strategies for enhancing interpersonal skills and fostering healthy relationships.

Despite the valuable insights gained, this study has limitations. The cross-sectional nature of the research design limits the ability to establish causal relationships. Additionally, self-report measures may introduce bias, especially in sensitive topics like bullying. Future research should consider longitudinal designs to capture the dynamic nature of bullying experiences over time. Moreover, incorporating more diverse samples in terms of cultural, socioeconomic, and geographical factors would enhance the generalizability of findings. Exploring the role of bystanders in different age groups and the effectiveness of bystander intervention programs is an area that warrants further investigation. Furthermore, understanding the intersectionality of bullying experiences, considering factors such as gender and ethnicity, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.

In conclusion, this research underscores the need for a nuanced and age-specific approach in addressing bullying. Theoretical frameworks must adapt to encompass the evolving nature of bullying experiences, and practical interventions should be tailored to the unique challenges faced by individuals at different life stages. By addressing the limitations and building on these findings, future research can contribute to more effective strategies for preventing and mitigating the impact of bullying across the lifespan.

Conclusion

This comprehensive exploration of bullying across different age groups has illuminated diverse manifestations and consequences of this pervasive social phenomenon. Children experience bullying in various forms, including physical aggression and cyberbullying, with significant developmental implications. Adolescents contend with traditional and cyberbullying, influencing their mental health and social development. In adulthood, bullying extends beyond the traditional schoolyard, affecting individuals in workplaces, social circles, and relationships. The impact of bullying is evident across all age groups, with immediate and enduring consequences on mental health and well-being.

The significance of this research lies in its contribution to a holistic understanding of bullying across the lifespan. By synthesizing key findings, the study highlights the importance of recognizing age-specific nuances in both the manifestations and impacts of bullying. The long-term consequences of bullying underscore the need for early intervention and targeted support systems. Theoretical frameworks must evolve to encompass the digital dimension and address the intersectionality of bullying experiences. Practical implications inform the development of tailored prevention and intervention programs, empowering mental health professionals, educators, and policymakers to create supportive environments that combat bullying effectively.

The findings from this research propel a compelling call to action for addressing bullying across age groups. Recognizing the pervasive nature of bullying, stakeholders at various levels must collaborate to implement evidence-based interventions. Schools play a pivotal role in fostering positive climates and integrating anti-bullying programs tailored to different developmental stages. Workplaces should prioritize the prevention of workplace bullying through comprehensive policies and supportive organizational cultures. Communities must engage in promoting awareness and education to create environments that reject bullying in social and relationship settings.

Mental health professionals are urged to incorporate age-specific considerations into their practice, recognizing the unique challenges faced by individuals at different life stages. Early identification and intervention are essential in mitigating the long-term consequences of bullying on mental health. This research underscores the importance of fostering resilience and promoting healthy social and emotional development to counteract the negative impact of bullying.

Policymakers are called upon to enact legislation that addresses bullying comprehensively, considering the digital landscape and the unique challenges faced by individuals in different age groups. Investments in research and the implementation of evidence-based practices can contribute to the development of effective prevention and intervention strategies.

In conclusion, addressing bullying requires a collaborative and multifaceted approach that acknowledges the distinct experiences of individuals at different life stages. By heeding this call to action, society can work collectively to create environments that foster empathy, inclusivity, and resilience, ultimately mitigating the impact of bullying across the lifespan.

Bibliography

1. Arseneault, L., Bowes, L., & Shakoor, S. (2010). Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: ‘Much ado about nothing’? Psychological Medicine, 40(5), 717-729.
2. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Prentice-Hall.
3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
4. Coker, A. L., McKeown, R. E., King, M. J., et al. (2002). Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: physical, sexual, and psychological battering. American Journal of Public Health, 92(9), 1331–1337.
5. Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(4), 419-426.
6. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
7. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis.
8. Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2013). Suicidal ideation and school bullying experiences after controlling for depression and delinquency. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S27-S31.
9. Espelage, D. L., Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365-383.
10. Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2007). The relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 357-363.
11. Hawker, D. S., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441-455.
12. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206-221.
13. Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
14. Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Tracy, S. J., & Alberts, J. K. (2007). Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree and impact. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 837-862.
15. Matson, J. L., Belva, B., & Hattier, M. A. (2012). Bullying and harassment experiences in children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 83-96.
16. Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., & Isava, D. M. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 26-42.
17. Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2009). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(3), 362-374.
18. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. N. Y.: Wiley.
19. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2017). Digital citizenship and digital defense. In H. Yoshimi, M. P. Mall, & J. Weir (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Promoting Cross-Cultural Competence and Social Equity in Teacher Education (pp. 318-338). IGI Global.
20. Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(4), 244-252.
21. Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213-1232.
22. Sercombe, H. (2016). Who’s in and who’s out? Social exclusion, gender, and relational aggression in young people’s friendships. Social Development, 25(1), 101-118.
23. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.
24. Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. Psychology Press.
25. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.
26. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). What works in preventing bullying: Effective elements of anti-bullying programs. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 1(1), 13-24.
27. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27-56.
28. Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2013). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 29(3), 239-255.
29. Wolke, D., Copeland, W. E., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Impact of bullying in childhood on adult health, wealth, crime, and social outcomes. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1958-1970.
30. World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191-2194.