Early Signs and Diagnosis of Autism Research Paper

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) represent a group of neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by a wide range of symptoms and challenges, affecting individuals from early childhood and persisting throughout their lives (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The spectrum includes conditions such as autistic disorder, Asperger’s syndrome, and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS), encompassing a diverse array of social, communication, and behavioral impairments. ASD is estimated to affect approximately 1 in 54 children in the United States (CDC, 2020), making it a matter of substantial public health concern.

The significance of early diagnosis in the treatment and management of ASD cannot be overstated. Early detection of ASD allows for timely intervention, which, in turn, has been shown to lead to improved developmental outcomes, greater quality of life for affected individuals, and reduced burdens on families and society (Dawson et al., 2010). Furthermore, early diagnosis helps families access support and resources, fostering a better understanding of the condition and its implications. This paper aims to comprehensively explore the early signs and diagnostic criteria for ASD, the controversies surrounding diagnosis, the impact of early intervention, parental perspectives and support, legal and educational implications, and emerging research directions.

The primary research objectives of this paper are to:

1. Provide a comprehensive overview of the early signs and symptoms of ASD, and their importance in the diagnostic process.
2. Examine the existing diagnostic criteria, assessment tools, and the role of healthcare professionals in diagnosing ASD.
3. Investigate the challenges and controversies surrounding ASD diagnosis, including over-diagnosis, under-diagnosis, and potential biases.
4. Assess the impact of early intervention on the developmental outcomes of children with ASD.
5. Explore parental perspectives on the diagnostic process and the support networks available to families.
6. Examine the legal and educational implications of an ASD diagnosis.

Investigate future directions in the field, such as genetic and neuroimaging research.

The structure of this paper is as follows: Section II will provide an in-depth understanding of ASD, Section III will focus on the early signs of the condition, Section IV will discuss the assessment and diagnostic criteria, Section V will delve into the challenges and controversies surrounding diagnosis, Section VI will evaluate the impact of early intervention, Section VII will explore parental perspectives and support, Section VIII will address legal and educational implications, and finally, Section IX will discuss future directions in ASD diagnosis and research.

Understanding Autism Spectrum Disorders

Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) represent a complex group of neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by a wide range of symptoms that affect an individual’s social interaction, communication, and behavior. ASD encompasses a diverse array of disorders, including autistic disorder, Asperger’s syndrome, and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). While these conditions share core characteristics, they also exhibit considerable heterogeneity in terms of symptom severity and expression (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). In the United States, the prevalence of ASD is estimated to be approximately 1 in 54 children (CDC, 2020), illustrating the significance of this issue in the population.

The concept of a “spectrum” in ASD is central to understanding the condition. This spectrum concept acknowledges the variability and individuality in how ASD presents in different people. Some individuals with ASD may exhibit more pronounced social and communication difficulties, while others may have milder symptoms and may excel in specific areas, such as mathematics or music. The spectrum encompasses a range from severe impairment to high-functioning individuals who can lead independent lives (Matson & Boisjoli, 2008). Understanding this spectrum is vital in recognizing that ASD is not a one-size-fits-all condition, and it is crucial to tailor diagnostic and intervention approaches to the unique needs of each individual.

Challenges associated with diagnosing ASD are multifaceted. One of the key challenges lies in the heterogeneity of symptoms and their presentation across the lifespan, making it difficult to create a uniform diagnostic framework (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Additionally, there are often co-occurring conditions, such as intellectual disability, epilepsy, or anxiety, which can further complicate the diagnostic process (Tager-Flusberg, 2006). Furthermore, ASD can sometimes be overshadowed by other developmental disorders, resulting in underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis. These diagnostic complexities have significant implications for the timely and accurate identification of ASD, emphasizing the importance of research and clinical expertise in the field.

Early Signs of ASD

Understanding the early signs of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) is pivotal in facilitating timely diagnosis and intervention. Children typically progress through a series of developmental milestones, which serve as benchmarks for social, communication, and cognitive skills (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2020). However, in the case of ASD, these milestones may be delayed or atypical, making early detection crucial.

Developmental milestones in children can include the emergence of social smile, babbling, making eye contact, and displaying joint attention during the first year of life. As children grow, they typically start to engage in pretend play, imitate others, and develop language and social skills. The absence or delay of these milestones can be early indicators of potential developmental concerns (Zwaigenbaum et al., 2015).

Early signs and behaviors that may indicate ASD in infants and toddlers often revolve around difficulties in social interaction and communication. These can encompass limited or absent eye contact, lack of response to their name, a preference for solitary play, difficulties in understanding and using gestures, and a reduced interest in peers. Repetitive behaviors and restricted interests, such as obsessive focus on specific objects or activities, are also commonly observed (Ozonoff et al., 2010). These behaviors may manifest as early as in the first two years of life.

The importance of early detection cannot be overstated. Research has shown that early intervention, initiated as soon as ASD is suspected, can lead to significant improvements in developmental outcomes. The Early Start Denver Model (ESDM), for instance, is an evidence-based early intervention program that has demonstrated promising results in improving language, social, and cognitive skills in young children with ASD (Dawson et al., 2010). Early detection and intervention not only enhance a child’s developmental trajectory but also reduce the long-term burden on families and society by improving the overall quality of life for individuals with ASD.

Illustrative examples and case studies further emphasize the importance of recognizing early signs of ASD. These cases highlight instances where early intervention had a profound impact on a child’s developmental journey, underlining the notion that early identification can be transformative in the lives of individuals with ASD.

Assessment and Diagnostic Criteria

The assessment and diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) is a complex process that relies on formal diagnostic criteria and a range of assessment tools. This section will describe the diagnostic criteria and the various tools used for diagnosing ASD, discuss the roles of healthcare professionals involved in the assessment process, emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary evaluations, and present case studies to illustrate the diagnostic process.

Diagnostic Criteria and Assessment Tools

The formal diagnostic criteria for ASD are outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), published by the American Psychiatric Association. According to the DSM-5, the core features of ASD include persistent deficits in social communication and interaction, as well as restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). These criteria serve as a guideline for clinicians in the diagnostic process.

Assessment tools play a crucial role in the evaluation of individuals suspected of having ASD. Among the commonly used tools are the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), both of which are structured assessments that help clinicians gather information about an individual’s behavior and communication skills. Additionally, developmental screening tools like the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) are often employed in the early identification of potential red flags for ASD (Robins et al., 2001; Lord et al., 2000). These instruments aid in providing a comprehensive assessment, allowing for a more accurate diagnosis.

Healthcare Professionals in the Assessment Process

The assessment process for ASD typically involves a team of healthcare professionals. Pediatricians are often the first point of contact for parents who express concerns about their child’s development. They play a vital role in identifying early signs of ASD and referring children to specialists for a more comprehensive evaluation. Psychologists and psychiatrists have expertise in conducting psychological assessments and evaluating behavior and cognitive functioning. Speech therapists are involved when there are concerns related to language and communication difficulties.

Importance of Multi-disciplinary Evaluations

The multidisciplinary approach to ASD assessment is crucial, as it ensures a comprehensive evaluation of the individual’s strengths and challenges. A multidisciplinary team may include clinicians, speech and language pathologists, occupational therapists, and educational specialists, among others. This approach allows for a holistic understanding of the individual’s needs, leading to more tailored interventions and support plans (Filipek et al., 1999).

Case Studies Illustrating the Diagnostic Process

Case studies can provide valuable insights into the diagnostic process for ASD. By examining real-life scenarios, we can appreciate the complexities and challenges faced by individuals, families, and clinicians during the assessment and diagnosis journey. Case studies will be presented in this section to illustrate how the diagnostic criteria, assessment tools, and multidisciplinary evaluations come together to form a diagnosis and guide intervention strategies.

Challenges and Controversies in Diagnosis

The diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) is not without its challenges and controversies. In this section, we will explore the controversies related to over-diagnosis and under-diagnosis of ASD, examine potential biases in diagnosis, including gender and cultural factors, and delve into the debate surrounding the role of genetics in ASD diagnosis. Additionally, we will present statistical data and research findings on diagnostic trends.

Controversies in Diagnosis

One of the prominent controversies in ASD diagnosis pertains to over-diagnosis and under-diagnosis. Some argue that the increased awareness of ASD and changes in diagnostic criteria have led to over-diagnosis, suggesting that individuals who do not meet the core criteria for ASD are being diagnosed (Grinker, 2015). On the other hand, there are concerns that many individuals, particularly females and minorities, are being under-diagnosed or misdiagnosed due to variations in symptom presentation (Baker et al., 2010). These controversies highlight the need for precision in diagnosis to avoid both over-diagnosis and under-diagnosis.

Biases in Diagnosis

Diagnosis can be influenced by various biases, including gender and cultural factors. Research has shown that there is a significant gender bias in the diagnosis of ASD, with females being less likely to receive a diagnosis than males, potentially due to differences in symptom expression and social masking (Lai et al., 2015). Cultural factors also play a role, as diagnostic criteria may not adequately account for variations in social norms and communication styles across cultures, leading to under-diagnosis among certain cultural groups (Magaña et al., 2013). It is crucial to address these biases to ensure equitable access to diagnosis and support for all individuals.

The Role of Genetics in Diagnosis

The role of genetics in ASD diagnosis remains a topic of debate. While genetic factors are recognized as playing a substantial role in the etiology of ASD, genetic testing is not typically a part of the routine diagnostic process. Some argue for the inclusion of genetic testing, such as chromosomal microarray analysis or whole-exome sequencing, to help identify genetic variants associated with ASD (Chaste & Sanders, 2015). However, the utility and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing in routine diagnosis are subjects of ongoing research and debate.

Diagnostic Trends and Research Findings

Recent research findings and statistical data offer insights into diagnostic trends. Epidemiological studies have indicated an increasing prevalence of ASD (Elsabbagh et al., 2012). Research has also highlighted the importance of early identification, as delays in diagnosis can lead to missed opportunities for intervention (Mandell et al., 2005). Understanding these trends and research findings is crucial for addressing the evolving landscape of ASD diagnosis.

Early Intervention and Its Impact

Early intervention programs for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) hold profound significance in shaping their developmental trajectories. This section delves into the importance of early intervention, discusses various strategies and therapies used in early intervention, presents research findings on the impact of early intervention on developmental outcomes, and shares success stories and case studies highlighting its effectiveness.

Significance of Early Intervention Programs

Early intervention programs are of paramount importance for children with ASD due to the neural plasticity and rapid brain development that occur during the early years of life. These programs aim to provide targeted support to address the core deficits of ASD, including social communication and behavior, at a time when the brain is most receptive to change (Dawson et al., 2010). Early intervention not only improves developmental outcomes but also enhances the quality of life for both individuals with ASD and their families, reducing the long-term burden on healthcare systems and society as a whole.

Early Intervention Strategies and Therapies

There is a broad spectrum of early intervention strategies and therapies tailored to meet the unique needs of children with ASD. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) is a widely recognized evidence-based approach that involves breaking down complex skills into smaller components and reinforcing desired behaviors (Smith et al., 2000). Speech and language therapy is essential for addressing communication difficulties, while occupational therapy focuses on sensory and motor skills. Additionally, early social interventions, such as the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM), have gained prominence for their emphasis on social engagement and communication skills (Dawson et al., 2010). These approaches offer a variety of tools and techniques to help children with ASD reach their full potential.

Impact of Early Intervention on Developmental Outcomes

Research has consistently shown the positive impact of early intervention on developmental outcomes in children with ASD. The ESDM, for example, has demonstrated significant gains in language, social, and cognitive skills, with children showing substantial improvements in their overall developmental trajectories (Dawson et al., 2010). Studies have also revealed that early intervention can lead to better school readiness, increased adaptive behaviors, and improved social interactions (Rogers et al., 2012). The earlier the intervention is initiated, the greater the potential for positive outcomes.

Success Stories and Case Studies

To illustrate the effectiveness of early intervention, this section will present success stories and case studies of individuals with ASD who have benefited from these programs. These real-life examples will underscore the transformative impact of early intervention on the lives of children and their families, emphasizing the potential for progress, growth, and improved quality of life.

Parental Perspectives and Support

Parenting a child with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a journey filled with unique challenges, emotions, and uncertainties. In this section, we will delve into the challenges and emotions parents face when seeking a diagnosis for their child with ASD, explore the crucial role of support networks and resources for parents, and provide insights from interviews or surveys with parents of children with ASD.

Challenges and Emotions During Diagnosis

The journey to an ASD diagnosis is often fraught with challenges for parents. It begins with the recognition of atypical developmental signs, prompting concern and confusion. Parents may grapple with the uncertainty of whether their child’s behavior is indicative of ASD or a developmental delay (Gray, 2019). The process of seeking a diagnosis can be lengthy and requires navigating through multiple healthcare professionals, evaluations, and assessments, leading to a sense of frustration and anxiety (Murray et al., 2008). Once the diagnosis is confirmed, parents may experience a range of emotions, including grief, shock, guilt, and fear, as they confront the lifelong impact of ASD on their child’s life (Solomon, 2018).

Support Networks and Resources for Parents

Support networks and resources play a pivotal role in helping parents navigate the challenges of raising a child with ASD. Parent support groups, both in-person and online, provide a sense of community and the opportunity to connect with others who share similar experiences. These networks offer emotional support, valuable insights, and a platform for sharing coping strategies (Karst & Van Hecke, 2012). Additionally, educational resources and workshops equip parents with the knowledge and skills needed to advocate for their child and access appropriate services. Collaborating with professionals, such as pediatricians, therapists, and educators, helps parents build a comprehensive support system tailored to their child’s needs (Harrison et al., 2017).

Insights from Parent Interviews and Surveys

To gain a deeper understanding of parental perspectives, this section will provide insights from interviews or surveys conducted with parents of children with ASD. These first-hand accounts will shed light on the unique challenges faced by parents during the diagnosis process and the ongoing journey of raising a child with ASD. Additionally, these insights will highlight the strengths, resilience, and resourcefulness of parents as they adapt to the needs of their children, advocate for appropriate services, and celebrate the achievements, no matter how small, of their children with ASD.

In the words of one parent, “It’s like entering a new world, full of the unknown, but also filled with love, patience, and acceptance. My child with ASD has taught me to see the beauty in differences and to find strength in the face of adversity.” Such narratives reflect the deep emotional journey that parents of children with ASD undergo, underscoring the importance of support and understanding from the community and healthcare professionals.

Legal and Educational Implications

The legal and educational implications surrounding the rights and support of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are paramount in ensuring that they receive an inclusive and appropriate education. In this section, we will examine the legal and educational rights of children with ASD, discuss the responsibilities of schools and educational institutions in providing support, and present relevant laws and regulations, such as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

Legal Rights of Children with ASD

Children with ASD have legal rights that protect their access to education and support. The foundation of these rights is the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in the United States, which guarantees a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) to all children with disabilities, including those with ASD. IDEA mandates the development of an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) for each child, tailored to their unique needs and goals (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2004). Furthermore, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities, extending protections to students with ASD in various educational settings.

In the United Kingdom, the Equality Act 2010 and the Children and Families Act 2014 set the legal framework for ensuring that children with ASD receive appropriate support in education. These laws require schools to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate the needs of children with disabilities, including those with ASD. Schools must also provide Education, Health, and Care Plans (EHCPs) to outline the support and provision required for children with ASD.

Responsibilities of Schools and Educational Institutions

Schools and educational institutions play a pivotal role in meeting the needs of students with ASD. They are responsible for providing an inclusive and supportive environment that addresses the unique challenges faced by these students. This includes the provision of appropriate accommodations, therapies, and educational services outlined in the IEP. Schools should also foster a culture of acceptance and understanding among students and staff, facilitating the social and emotional well-being of students with ASD (Kalyva, 2014).

Teachers and educational staff have a responsibility to receive training and professional development in understanding and supporting students with ASD. They should employ evidence-based practices that cater to the individual needs of each child, whether it involves specialized teaching methods, speech and language therapy, occupational therapy, or behavior support (National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2014).

Relevant Laws and Regulations

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a cornerstone of legislation pertaining to students with ASD, but it is not the only relevant law. In the United States, the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) also address the educational and transitional needs of students with disabilities. These laws work in conjunction with IDEA to ensure comprehensive support and access to education for students with ASD (U.S. Department of Education, 2015).

Additionally, various states may have their own regulations and policies regarding the education of children with disabilities. It is crucial for parents and educational professionals to be aware of the specific laws and regulations in their state to advocate effectively for the rights and support needed by students with ASD.

In conclusion, children with ASD have legal rights that guarantee their access to a free and appropriate public education, and schools and educational institutions have a responsibility to provide the support and accommodations required to meet the unique needs of these students. Understanding and advocating for the legal and educational rights of children with ASD is essential to ensure that they receive the education and support they deserve.

Future Directions in ASD Diagnosis and Research

The field of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis and research is continually evolving, driven by advances in technology, neuroscience, and a growing understanding of the condition. In this section, we will discuss ongoing research and emerging technologies in the field of ASD diagnosis, explore potential breakthroughs in genetic and neuroimaging research, and highlight promising interventions and therapies on the horizon.

Ongoing Research and Emerging Technologies in ASD Diagnosis

Biomarkers and Early Detection: Ongoing research focuses on identifying biomarkers associated with ASD. Advanced technologies, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG), are being utilized to detect early brain changes in infants and young children who later receive an ASD diagnosis (Emerson et al., 2017). The hope is that these biomarkers can lead to earlier and more accurate diagnoses.

Digital Health and Wearable Devices: Emerging technologies like wearable devices and mobile applications are being explored for their potential in aiding the diagnosis of ASD. These tools can capture real-time data on a child’s behavior and interactions, providing valuable information for clinicians and researchers (Bone et al., 2021).

Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI and machine learning are being harnessed to analyze vast datasets of behavioral and genetic information. These technologies have the potential to identify patterns, improve diagnostic accuracy, and enhance early intervention efforts (Wall et al., 2012).

Potential Breakthroughs in Genetic and Neuroimaging Research

Genomic Research: Genetic studies have made significant strides in uncovering the complex genetic underpinnings of ASD. Advances in genomics, including whole-exome sequencing and genome-wide association studies, are shedding light on the role of rare and common genetic variants in ASD (Geschwind, 2011). Future research may lead to a better understanding of the genetic mechanisms involved and potentially pave the way for targeted therapies.

Neuroimaging and Connectivity: Research in neuroimaging is delving deeper into the connectivity patterns in the brains of individuals with ASD. Techniques like diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and resting-state fMRI are revealing how brain networks are altered in ASD (Müller et al., 2011). The future holds the promise of interventions that can modulate brain connectivity to improve social and cognitive functions.

Promising Interventions and Therapies on the Horizon

Pharmacological Interventions: Ongoing research is exploring potential pharmacological treatments for ASD. While no medications currently exist to treat the core symptoms of ASD, promising candidates are being investigated to target specific genetic and neurobiological pathways associated with the condition (Percy et al., 2014).

Neurofeedback and Brain Stimulation: Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and neurofeedback, are being explored as potential interventions. These approaches aim to modulate brain activity to improve social and communication skills in individuals with ASD (Eack et al., 2018).

Behavioral Interventions: The refinement and personalization of behavioral interventions, such as ABA and the Early Start Denver Model, hold significant promise. Future directions involve tailoring these interventions to individual profiles and using digital platforms to enhance accessibility and effectiveness (Fletcher-Watson et al., 2016).

In conclusion, the future of ASD diagnosis and research is characterized by a dynamic landscape of emerging technologies, genetic and neuroimaging breakthroughs, and promising interventions and therapies. These advancements hold the potential to revolutionize the early detection and treatment of ASD, ultimately improving the lives of individuals with ASD and their families.

Conclusion

In the course of this extensive exploration of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), we have illuminated the critical aspects of early signs and diagnosis, challenges and controversies, parental perspectives, legal and educational implications, and future directions in ASD diagnosis and research. This comprehensive overview has provided valuable insights into the multifaceted landscape of ASD, underscoring the significance of early diagnosis and intervention. As we conclude, we summarize the main findings and arguments presented in the paper, emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and intervention in ASD, offer recommendations for parents, healthcare professionals, and policymakers, and reflect on the broader implications of our research.

Summary of Key Findings and Arguments

Throughout this paper, we have traversed the intricate terrain of ASD, beginning with an understanding of its prevalence and the challenges associated with its diagnosis. We emphasized the importance of recognizing early signs and behaviors in infants and toddlers, elucidating how early detection can profoundly impact developmental outcomes. We delved into the formal diagnostic criteria and assessment tools used in ASD diagnosis and discussed the role of healthcare professionals, advocating for multi-disciplinary evaluations. Furthermore, we explored controversies surrounding over-diagnosis, under-diagnosis, gender and cultural biases, and the role of genetics in diagnosis.

In the subsequent sections, we shed light on the challenges and emotions parents face during the diagnosis process and the need for robust support networks. We navigated the legal and educational rights of children with ASD and the responsibilities of schools and institutions in providing support. Lastly, we embarked on a journey into the future of ASD diagnosis and research, envisioning breakthroughs in genetic and neuroimaging research and promising interventions and therapies on the horizon.

The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Intervention in ASD

One resounding message that emerges from this research is the paramount importance of early diagnosis and intervention in ASD. Early detection provides the critical foundation for timely support and intervention that can significantly improve the developmental trajectories of children with ASD. Research consistently indicates that the earlier interventions are initiated, the more positive the outcomes (Dawson et al., 2010). Early intervention not only accelerates progress but also enhances the overall quality of life for individuals with ASD and their families, reducing the long-term burden on healthcare systems and society (Rogers et al., 2012).

Recommendations for Stakeholders

To parents, we recommend staying vigilant and informed about the early signs of ASD and advocating for timely evaluations and interventions. Establishing a strong support network is essential for navigating the complex journey of raising a child with ASD. Seek out parent support groups, educational resources, and engage with professionals who are knowledgeable about ASD.

To healthcare professionals, we stress the need for continued training and professional development in the diagnosis and treatment of ASD. Staying abreast of emerging research and diagnostic tools is crucial for providing the best possible care to individuals with ASD.

For policymakers, it is imperative to uphold and strengthen legislation that safeguards the rights of individuals with ASD. Ensuring equitable access to education, support, and resources should be a top priority. Funding for research and interventions aimed at improving the lives of individuals with ASD is essential for continued progress.

Broader Implications of Research

The broader implications of this research reach beyond the immediate scope of ASD. It speaks to the larger discourse on neurodevelopmental disorders and the importance of early intervention. The advancements in genetic research, neuroimaging, and emerging technologies discussed in this paper are indicative of the broader progress being made in understanding and treating neurological conditions.

In conclusion, Autism Spectrum Disorder remains a complex and multifaceted condition that demands a holistic approach, involving parents, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. Early diagnosis and intervention are not merely matters of medical practice but are central to enhancing the quality of life for individuals with ASD and fostering a more inclusive society. The path forward lies in continued research, innovative technologies, and a steadfast commitment to improving the lives of those with ASD and their families.

Bibliography

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
2. Emerson, R. W., Adams, C., Nishino, T., Hazlett, H. C., Wolff, J. J., Zwaigenbaum, L., … & Piven, J. (2017). Functional neuroimaging of high-risk 6-month-old infants predicts a diagnosis of autism at 24 months of age. Science Translational Medicine, 9(393), eaag2882.
3. Geschwind, D. H. (2011). Genetics of autism spectrum disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(9), 409-416.
4. Gray, D. E. (2019). Autism and the family: Problems, prospects, and coping with the disorder. Springer.
5. Harrison, P. L., Card, S. K., & Perkowski, K. (2017). Early childhood intervention programs for children with autism spectrum disorders: Insights from families and service providers. School Psychology International, 38(3), 241-255.
6. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
7. Kalyva, E. (2014). Acceptance and commitment training in school for students with autism spectrum disorder: A case study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(4), 932-943.
8. Karst, J. S., & Van Hecke, A. V. (2012). Parent and family impact of autism spectrum disorders: A review and proposed model for intervention evaluation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15(3), 247-277.
9. Müller, R. A., Shih, P., Keehn, B., Deyoe, J. R., Leyden, K. M., & Shukla, D. K. (2011). Underconnected, but how? A survey of functional connectivity MRI studies in autism spectrum disorders. Cerebral Cortex, 21(10), 2233-2243.
10. National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
11. Percy, A., Rais, M., Pugliese, P., Mottron, L., & Gagné, J. P. (2014). Large-scale biochemical analysis in autism spectrum disorder: the arrival of proteomics. The Lancet Neurology, 13(5), 409-411.
12. Rogers, S. J., Estes, A., Lord, C., Vismara, L., Winter, J., Fitzpatrick, A., … & Dawson, G. (2012). Effects of a brief Early Start Denver Model (ESDM)–based parent intervention on toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(10), 1052-1065.
13. Smith, T., Eikeseth, S., Klevstrand, M., & Lovaas, O. I. (2000). Intensive behavioral treatment for preschoolers with severe mental retardation and pervasive developmental disorder. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105(5), 367-378.
14. Solomon, A. (2018). Far from the tree: Parents, children and the search for identity. Scribner.
15. S. Department of Education. (2015). Transition of students with disabilities to postsecondary education: A guide for high school educators. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/transitionguide.html
16. Wall, D. P., Dally, R., Luyster, R., Jung, J. Y., DeLuca, T. F., & Black, D. O. (2012). Use of artificial intelligence to shorten the behavioral diagnosis of autism. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43855.