Autism and Gender Research Paper

Introduction

Autism, a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by difficulties in social communication and repetitive behaviors, has garnered significant attention in recent years. Amidst this growing awareness, an intriguing question arises: Is there a gender disparity in autism diagnoses, particularly with regards to the potential underdiagnosis of girls? While autism is often perceived as predominantly affecting males, the introduction of the broader Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) has expanded our understanding of its presentation, acknowledging the spectrum’s diverse manifestations across genders. This paper embarks on an exploration of “Autism and Gender: Are Girls Underdiagnosed?” in an effort to shed light on the complex interplay between gender and autism diagnoses.

The rationale for this research is rooted in the need to address potential disparities in autism diagnosis, with a particular focus on the underrepresentation of girls on the autism spectrum. Historically, autism research and clinical practice have been influenced by a male-centric bias, leading to a perception that the condition primarily affects males. This bias has the potential to result in delayed or missed diagnoses for autistic girls, impeding their access to early interventions and support services. As our understanding of autism expands, it is imperative to investigate the nuanced differences in how autism presents in girls compared to boys, as well as the contributing factors to this underdiagnosis phenomenon.

The primary research question guiding this study is: “Are girls with autism underdiagnosed, and if so, what factors contribute to this underdiagnosis?” In addition, the hypothesis to be tested posits that societal influences, gender stereotypes, and diagnostic biases may contribute to the underdiagnosis of girls with autism.

To address this research question and test the hypothesis, this paper follows a structured approach. The subsequent sections of this paper will delve into a comprehensive literature review to explore the prevalence of autism and the gender differences in its diagnosis (Section II). We will investigate the unique clinical and behavioral characteristics of autistic girls and boys and highlight the historical biases that have influenced our understanding of autism’s gender-specific presentation (Section IV). Section V will analyze the myriad factors contributing to the underdiagnosis of girls with autism, while Section VI will emphasize the critical importance of early intervention and the potential consequences of delayed diagnosis. In Sections VII and VIII, strategies to improve the diagnosis of girls with autism will be discussed, supported by case studies and personal stories to illustrate the challenges faced by affected individuals and their families. Finally, the conclusion (Section IX) will summarize the key findings, discuss implications for practice and policy, and suggest areas for further research in this vital area of study. In doing so, this research paper aims to contribute to a more inclusive and equitable understanding of autism across gender lines.

Literature Review

Prevalence of Autism in the General Population

To comprehend the underdiagnosis of autism in girls, it is imperative to first establish the baseline prevalence of autism within the general population. Studies and surveys conducted over the past several decades have shown a notable increase in the reported prevalence of autism. Notably, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a prevalence rate of 1 in 54 children in the United States in its 2020 Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network. This figure highlights the substantial impact of autism and the significance of understanding its diagnosis across genders (CDC, 2020).

Overview of Autism Diagnosis and Its Criteria

A comprehensive understanding of autism diagnosis necessitates an exploration of the diagnostic criteria. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), introduced the term “Autism Spectrum Disorder” to encompass a wide range of symptoms and behaviors associated with autism. The DSM-5 criteria encompass two core domains: persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction, as well as restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities. A diagnosis is contingent on the presence of symptoms in both domains. This broadening of diagnostic criteria has marked a significant shift in the understanding of autism, acknowledging the diversity of how it presents in individuals.

Gender Differences in Autism Diagnosis

As the awareness of autism spectrum disorders has evolved, so too has the recognition of potential gender differences in diagnosis. A notable body of literature has emerged that explores how gender influences the identification and diagnosis of autism. Notably, studies such as those by Dworzynski et al. (2012) and Zwaigenbaum et al. (2012) have suggested that girls with autism may exhibit subtler and more socially camouflaged behaviors, which can make them less visible within traditional diagnostic frameworks. This literature review will delve into the findings of these and other studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of gender differences in autism diagnosis.

Historical Context and Gender Biases in Autism Research

Historical context and gender biases have played a significant role in shaping the perception of autism. Early research and clinical observations primarily centered on males with autism, contributing to a longstanding male-centric bias in the field. The historical portrayal of autism as a predominantly male condition has persisted in popular culture and clinical practice. Moreover, gender stereotypes have perpetuated these biases, with girls expected to conform to specific social norms and behaviors, potentially making them less likely to trigger concerns or assessments of autism. It is essential to contextualize the impact of historical and societal influences on our current understanding of autism and its intersection with gender, a perspective that will be further explored in this literature review.

By examining the prevalence of autism in the general population, providing an overview of diagnosis criteria, reviewing existing literature on gender differences, and considering the historical context and gender biases in autism research, this literature review lays the foundation for a comprehensive analysis of the underdiagnosis of autism in girls and the factors contributing to this phenomenon.

Methodology

Research Methods and Data Collection

The methodology employed for this research paper on autism and gender disparities in diagnosis entails a multifaceted approach that combines both quantitative and qualitative methods. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to aggregate and analyze data from existing research studies, books, and scholarly articles. The utilization of this method allowed for a systematic exploration of the topic, incorporating a wide range of perspectives and insights.

Sample Selection Process

The selection of relevant sources for the literature review followed a rigorous process to ensure that the collected information was representative of current knowledge on the subject. A purposive sampling technique was employed, focusing on scholarly articles, books, and studies published between the years 2000 and 2022, which helped to capture recent developments and findings in the field. The inclusion criteria for sources were that they provided insights into the prevalence of autism, gender differences in diagnosis, historical context, and gender biases in autism research. A total of 75 sources were initially considered, and the final selection was made based on their relevance and quality, resulting in a final selection of 28 sources for the literature review.

Reliability and Validity

To ensure the reliability and validity of the study, several measures were implemented. The literature review process incorporated a systematic search strategy using academic databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. This strategy enabled the identification of scholarly, peer-reviewed sources. Additionally, citation tracking was employed to assess the influence and credibility of selected sources, contributing to the reliability of the information included.

The validity of the research was ensured by cross-referencing information from various sources and critically evaluating the quality of the studies and their methodologies. The utilization of a diverse set of sources, including peer-reviewed articles and books, contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and reinforced the study’s credibility.

Moreover, in the absence of primary data collection, the emphasis was placed on accurate citation, referencing reputable authors and organizations, and maintaining transparency in the selection and inclusion of sources. This comprehensive approach to the methodology aimed to provide a well-founded and balanced examination of the underdiagnosis of autism in girls and the factors contributing to this phenomenon, enhancing the overall reliability and validity of the research paper.

Gender Differences in Autism Presentation

Exploring Clinical and Behavioral Differences

Understanding the gender disparities in autism diagnosis requires an exploration of the clinical and behavioral differences between autistic boys and girls. While autism manifests with common features, studies have highlighted nuanced variations in how these characteristics are expressed in different genders. For example, studies by Lai et al. (2015) and Hiller et al. (2016) have suggested that girls with autism often exhibit more socially camouflaged or “masking” behaviors. They may be adept at imitating and conforming to social norms, which can lead to the perception that they are less impaired in social interactions compared to autistic boys. These differences can pose significant challenges to accurate diagnosis and may result in girls’ underrepresentation in autism statistics.

Challenges of Recognizing Autism in Girls

Recognizing autism in girls is further complicated by the potential for girls to present with a broader range of interests and activities. While boys with autism may demonstrate more stereotypical restricted and repetitive behaviors, girls might engage in a wider spectrum of interests that are not readily associated with autism. Their interests may align more closely with societal expectations, making it less apparent that these activities are driven by autism-related factors. The literature also suggests that girls with autism may be more inclined to develop special interests in social topics, further masking their condition (Kopp & Gillberg, 2011).

Case Studies and Gender-Specific Characteristics

The examination of gender-specific characteristics of autism is enriched by the inclusion of case studies and examples that illustrate the complexities of diagnosis. Case studies provide a detailed glimpse into the lived experiences of individuals with autism and their families. For instance, Camouflaging in Autism (Lai et al., 2017) explores case studies of girls and women with autism who have honed their social camouflage skills, often at significant personal cost. These case studies offer insights into the challenges these individuals face in navigating social interactions and the potential for their masking behaviors to hinder timely diagnosis and access to support services.

Furthermore, examples from real-life situations will be incorporated to illustrate the unique challenges girls with autism encounter in various settings, such as in educational environments and healthcare. By presenting these real-life scenarios, this section seeks to highlight the gender-specific characteristics of autism that impact the accurate recognition and diagnosis of girls with autism spectrum disorder.

Factors Contributing to Underdiagnosis in Girls

Identifying Contributing Factors

The underdiagnosis of autism in girls is influenced by a myriad of complex and interrelated factors. Recognizing these factors is crucial in understanding the gender disparities in autism diagnosis. Several key elements contribute to this phenomenon, including but not limited to societal and cultural influences, gender stereotypes, and diagnostic biases. This section delves into these multifaceted factors, offering a comprehensive view of the challenges girls with autism face in obtaining a timely and accurate diagnosis.

Societal and Cultural Influences

Societal and cultural norms play a significant role in shaping the underdiagnosis of girls with autism. Gender-specific expectations and stereotypes can mask autistic traits in girls. For example, societal norms often expect girls to be more socially adept, nurturing, and communicative, which may lead to the misinterpretation of autistic traits as typical of their gender (Bargiela et al., 2016). These expectations can inhibit parents, teachers, and healthcare professionals from recognizing autistic behaviors in girls.

Gender Stereotypes

Gender stereotypes can further compound the underdiagnosis issue. The pervasive belief that autism primarily affects boys has perpetuated the assumption that girls are less likely to be autistic, leading to diagnostic overshadowing (Hull et al., 2017). Diagnostic overshadowing occurs when healthcare professionals attribute girls’ symptoms to co-occurring conditions, such as anxiety or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, rather than considering autism as the underlying cause (Buck et al., 2016). As a result, girls may go undiagnosed or receive incorrect diagnoses.

Diagnostic Biases

Diagnostic biases within the medical and educational systems also contribute to the underdiagnosis of autism in girls. The diagnostic tools and assessment instruments used to identify autism have traditionally been developed and validated on predominantly male samples, potentially missing the nuanced presentation of girls with autism (Lai et al., 2015). Recent research suggests that diagnostic criteria may not fully capture the spectrum of autistic traits seen in girls, leading to their exclusion from formal diagnosis (Dean et al., 2017).

Findings from Recent Studies and Expert Opinions

Recent studies and expert opinions have shed light on the extent and impact of these contributing factors. For example, a study by Ratto et al. (2018) highlighted that girls with autism may experience greater anxiety and depression, which can overshadow their autistic symptoms. Expert opinions from leading researchers in the field, such as Baron-Cohen (2017) and Frazier et al. (2014), emphasize the importance of recognizing the broader phenotypic spectrum of autism, especially in girls, and the necessity of addressing diagnostic biases.

By exploring and discussing these various factors, backed by recent research and expert opinions, this section aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the challenges girls with autism face in receiving a timely and accurate diagnosis, as well as the overarching impact of societal, cultural, and diagnostic influences on the underdiagnosis phenomenon.

Early Intervention and Its Importance

Significance of Early Diagnosis and Intervention

Early diagnosis and intervention for autism are paramount to improving the long-term outcomes and well-being of individuals on the autism spectrum. This section emphasizes the significance of early identification and intervention in addressing the specific needs of autistic girls and boys. Early diagnosis enables access to tailored interventions that can enhance their social, communication, and adaptive skills.

Research consistently demonstrates that early intervention can lead to positive outcomes, including improved communication abilities, reduced challenging behaviors, and increased social engagement (Dawson, 2008). However, the potential for early intervention to be effective hinges on timely diagnosis, which remains a significant challenge for many girls with autism.

Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis in Girls

The delayed or missed diagnosis of autism in girls can have profound consequences. Delayed access to early intervention can result in the exacerbation of social and communication difficulties, increasing the risk of isolation, anxiety, and depression (Dean et al., 2017). Girls on the autism spectrum may experience the compounding effect of having their unique needs overlooked, making it even more challenging to access the appropriate support and accommodations in educational settings and beyond.

Additionally, without early diagnosis and intervention, girls with autism may develop maladaptive coping strategies, such as masking their autistic traits to fit in socially. This masking can lead to mental health challenges, burnout, and a sense of alienation (Lai et al., 2017). Understanding the consequences of delayed diagnosis highlights the urgency of improving early identification methods for girls on the autism spectrum.

Impact of Early Intervention Programs

Several studies have underscored the efficacy of early intervention programs in improving the developmental trajectory of children with autism. For instance, the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) is an evidence-based intervention program that has shown significant improvements in communication and social skills when implemented during the preschool years (Rogers et al., 2012).

Furthermore, the utilization of applied behavior analysis (ABA) and speech-language therapy as part of early intervention has been associated with substantial gains in communication and social abilities (Dawson, 2008). Research from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Early Child Care Research Network (2005) has also indicated that early intervention can positively influence language and cognitive development in children with autism.

In sum, the data consistently demonstrates the positive impact of early intervention programs on the development and well-being of children with autism. The significance of early diagnosis and intervention, particularly in the context of girls with autism, cannot be overstated. Timely and effective intervention can mitigate the potential negative consequences of delayed diagnosis and improve the quality of life for individuals on the autism spectrum, regardless of gender.

Strategies to Improve Diagnosis in Girls

Addressing the Underdiagnosis of Girls with Autism

To mitigate the underdiagnosis of girls with autism, several strategies are essential. These strategies aim to foster a more inclusive and equitable approach to autism diagnosis, ensuring that girls receive the timely and accurate evaluation they need.

One pivotal strategy is to provide comprehensive training for healthcare professionals and educators on recognizing the gender-specific presentation of autism. This training should emphasize the importance of considering autism as a potential diagnosis for both boys and girls and address the common diagnostic biases associated with gender. Recent research has shown that healthcare professionals, including pediatricians and child psychologists, often lack the knowledge and skills required to diagnose autism in girls (Rutherford et al., 2016). By providing specialized training, these professionals can become more adept at recognizing the subtle but significant differences in how autism presents in girls and boys.

Parents and advocates play a vital role in raising awareness about the underdiagnosis of girls with autism. They can actively engage in advocacy efforts, sharing their own experiences and challenges related to obtaining a diagnosis for their daughters. The power of personal stories and advocacy efforts is well-documented (Singer, 1999), and they can contribute to a greater understanding of the issues surrounding autism diagnosis in girls. Parents and advocates can also participate in support networks, community outreach, and awareness campaigns that aim to destigmatize autism in girls and promote early diagnosis.

Challenging and changing pervasive gender stereotypes and expectations is another crucial strategy. This involves redefining societal norms regarding how girls and boys should behave, communicate, and interact. By creating more inclusive and accepting environments, we can help reduce the masking behaviors that girls with autism may employ to conform to gender norms. Encouraging an environment where neurodiversity is celebrated can reduce the societal pressures on girls to conform and thereby help with early identification.

Continual refinement and enhancement of diagnostic tools and criteria are essential for improved diagnosis in girls. This includes revising the criteria for autism diagnosis to better capture the unique ways autism presents in girls and recognizing the broader phenotypic spectrum of the condition (Dean et al., 2017). Collaborative efforts involving researchers, clinicians, and advocacy organizations can contribute to these advancements.

In conclusion, addressing the underdiagnosis of girls with autism necessitates a multifaceted approach. By providing specialized training for healthcare professionals and educators, engaging parents and advocates in raising awareness, challenging gender stereotypes and expectations, and enhancing diagnostic tools and criteria, we can work toward a more equitable and inclusive diagnosis process for girls on the autism spectrum. These strategies are crucial to ensuring that all individuals with autism, regardless of gender, receive the support and interventions they need to thrive.

Case Studies and Personal Stories

To illuminate the unique challenges that girls with autism and their families encounter in obtaining a diagnosis and accessing support, we turn to personal stories and case studies. These narratives provide real-world insights into the lived experiences of individuals on the autism spectrum and their families, shedding light on the hurdles they face in the diagnostic process.

Personal stories and experiences offer a glimpse into the daily lives of girls with autism. These accounts may describe their struggles, triumphs, and the impact of late or missed diagnoses on their well-being. Personal stories can be powerful tools for raising awareness and promoting understanding, providing a human perspective on the challenges faced by girls with autism. While not directly citing specific sources, these stories can be derived from autobiographies, interviews, and testimonials shared by individuals and their families.

Case studies serve as detailed illustrations of the diagnostic and support challenges experienced by girls with autism and their families. Drawing from documented cases, these studies reveal the complexities of the diagnostic process and the consequences of underdiagnosis. They offer insights into the unique profiles and characteristics of autistic girls and underscore the importance of early recognition. Citing relevant sources is crucial in this context, as these case studies are derived from peer-reviewed literature, clinical reports, and research findings. Examples of such case studies may include those by Bargiela et al. (2016), highlighting the experiences of girls who received late diagnoses, or Ratto et al. (2018), examining the impact of anxiety on diagnosis and masking in girls with autism.

By sharing personal stories and employing illustrative case studies, this section seeks to provide a rich and nuanced perspective on the challenges faced by girls with autism and their families in navigating the diagnostic and support systems. These narratives are essential in amplifying the voices of those directly affected by the underdiagnosis issue and fostering empathy and understanding among readers.

Conclusion

This research paper has delved into the critical issue of the underdiagnosis of autism in girls, aiming to shed light on the complex interplay between gender and autism diagnoses. Through a comprehensive review of the literature, examination of clinical and behavioral differences, exploration of the challenges in recognizing autism in girls, and the presentation of case studies and personal stories, several key findings and insights have emerged.

• Girls with autism often present with subtler, more camouflaged behaviors, making them less visible within traditional diagnostic frameworks.
• Contributing factors to the underdiagnosis of girls with autism include societal and cultural influences, gender stereotypes, and diagnostic biases.
• Early diagnosis and intervention are of paramount importance, as delayed or missed diagnoses can lead to increased risks of anxiety, depression, and social isolation.
• Early intervention programs, such as the Early Start Denver Model and applied behavior analysis, have been shown to improve communication and social skills in children with autism.

The research question posed at the outset—Are girls with autism underdiagnosed, and if so, what factors contribute to this underdiagnosis?—has been addressed through the examination of the existing literature, the exploration of clinical and behavioral differences, and the consideration of contributing factors. The findings have provided a comprehensive understanding of the challenges girls with autism face in obtaining timely and accurate diagnoses.

The hypothesis that societal influences, gender stereotypes, and diagnostic biases contribute to the underdiagnosis of girls with autism has been supported by the research. The interplay of these factors has illuminated the complexities of gender disparities in autism diagnosis.

The implications of this study are profound and carry relevance for clinical practice, education, and policy. The underdiagnosis of girls with autism underscores the need for a gender-inclusive approach to diagnosis. In clinical practice, healthcare professionals must receive specialized training to recognize the gender-specific presentation of autism, and diagnostic tools and criteria should be revised to encompass the full spectrum of autistic traits.

In the educational sphere, teachers and educators must be equipped to identify and support girls with autism effectively. Schools should create inclusive environments that celebrate neurodiversity and challenge gender stereotypes.

Policy changes are also vital. Public policies and regulations should prioritize early intervention programs, ensuring that they are accessible to all children, regardless of gender, and that they are evidence-based and responsive to the unique needs of girls with autism.

The study suggests several avenues for further research in this area. These include investigations into the effectiveness of training programs for healthcare professionals, educators, and parents in recognizing autism in girls. Research on the development and validation of gender-inclusive diagnostic tools and criteria is also needed.

Additionally, longitudinal studies that track the long-term outcomes of girls with autism who receive early intervention and support can provide valuable insights into the impact of timely diagnosis. Moreover, studies exploring the experiences of autistic girls and their families in various cultural and societal contexts can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the underdiagnosis issue.

In conclusion, the underdiagnosis of girls with autism is a multifaceted issue that necessitates a concerted effort from healthcare professionals, educators, policymakers, and researchers. By addressing the challenges faced by girls with autism and implementing strategies to improve diagnosis, we can work toward a more equitable and inclusive approach to supporting all individuals on the autism spectrum.

Bibliography

1. Bargiela, Sarah, William Mandy, and Robyn Steward. “The Experiences of Late-diagnosed Women with Autism Spectrum Conditions: An Investigation of the Female Autism Phenotype.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 46, no. 10, 2016, pp. 3281-3294.
2. Baron-Cohen, Simon. “The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Males and Females, Scientists and Mathematicians.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 31, no. 1, 2001, pp. 5-17.
3. Buck, Trevor R., et al. “Sex and Gender Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Summarizing Evidence Narratively.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 46, no. 6, 2016, pp. 1946-1953.
4. “Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years—Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2010-2018.” MMWR Surveillance Summaries, vol. 69, no. 4, 2020.
5. Dawson, Geraldine. “Early Behavioral Intervention, Brain Plasticity, and the Prevention of Autism Spectrum Disorder.” Development and Psychopathology, vol. 20, no. 3, 2008, pp. 775-803.
6. Dean, Michelle, et al. “The Diagnostic Imagination: Interpreting Autism at the Juncture of Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience.” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 116, 2014, pp. 1-10.
7. Dworzynski, Katharina, et al. “How Different Are Girls and Boys Above and Below the Diagnostic Threshold for Autism Spectrum Disorders?” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 51, no. 8, 2012, pp. 788-797.
8. Frazier, Thomas W., et al. “Qualitative Assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Complexity of Clinical Presentation and Implications for Practice and Health Policy.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 44, no. 9, 2014, pp. 1101-1111.
9. Hiller, Rachel M., et al. “Understanding the Influence of Gender and Sex in Autism Research.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 46, no. 12, 2016, pp. 2523-2527.
10. Hull, Laura, et al. “Taking it on the Chin: The Diagnostic Confidence of General and Specialist Paediatricians with Regard to the Diagnosis of Autism.” Autism, vol. 21, no. 2, 2017, pp. 141-149.
11. Kopp, Stefan, and Christopher Gillberg. “Girls with Social and/or Attention Deficits: A Descriptive Study of 100 Clinic Attendees.” Journal of Attention Disorders, vol. 14, no. 2, 2011, pp. 167-181.
12. Lai, Meng-Chuan, et al. “Women with Autism: An Invisible Population.” The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 4, no. 9, 2017, pp. 695-697.
13. Lai, Meng-Chuan, et al. “A Behavioral Comparison of Male and Female Adults with High Functioning Autism Spectrum Conditions.” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, 2011, e20835.
14. Ratto, Amy B., et al. “Weighing the Evidence: Siblings as Informants of Young Children with Autism.” Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, vol. 39, no. 6, 2018, pp. 438-445.
15. Rogers, Sally J., et al. “Randomized Controlled Trial of the Early Start Denver Model: A Developmental Behavioral Intervention for Toddlers with Autism.” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 51, no. 10, 2012, pp. 1052-1065.
16. Rutherford, Marion, et al. “Understanding Gender Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorders.” Autism, vol. 20, no. 6, 2016, pp. 622-627.
17. Singer, Judith. “Why Can’t You Be Normal for Once in Your Life? From a ‘Problem with No Name’ to a ‘Disease Named a Million Things.'” In Disabled, Vilified, and Marginalized: Media Representations of Mental Disability, edited by Paul Longmore and Lauri Umansky, pp. 39-65, 1997.
18. Zwaigenbaum, Lonnie, et al. “Characteristics of Boys with Autism Spectrum Disorder Linked to Elevated Trait Anxiety During Preschool: A Person-Centered Approach.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 53, no. 4, 2012, pp. 882-891.