Autism and Sensory Processing Disorders Research Paper

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD) are complex and multifaceted conditions that significantly impact the lives of affected individuals. ASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by deficits in social communication and the presence of restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Sensory Processing Disorders, on the other hand, pertain to difficulties in processing and responding to sensory stimuli, resulting in atypical sensory experiences (Ahn, Miller, Milberger, & McIntosh, 2004). Understanding the relationship between these two conditions is of paramount importance due to their frequent co-occurrence. A substantial body of research has identified a high prevalence of sensory processing challenges in individuals with ASD (Baranek, David, Poe, Stone, & Watson, 2006), suggesting a significant overlap between the two. This overlap has profound implications for clinical practice, intervention strategies, and the overall well-being of individuals with ASD. In light of these observations, this research paper aims to explore the interconnection between ASD and SPD, dissecting their shared features, theoretical underpinnings, and therapeutic implications. The central research questions guiding this inquiry include: What are the common sensory features experienced by individuals with ASD and SPD, and how do these features impact their daily lives? What theoretical frameworks help elucidate the relationship between these conditions? What are the implications for clinical practice and future research in addressing sensory processing challenges in individuals with ASD and SPD? This paper endeavors to address these questions and contribute to a deeper understanding of these intricate conditions, recognizing the significance of sensory processing in the lives of individuals with autism.

Literature Review

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD) represent distinct yet interrelated domains within the realm of neurodevelopmental conditions. ASD is characterized by impaired social communication, repetitive behaviors, and restricted interests (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). On the other hand, SPD refers to difficulties in processing and responding to sensory stimuli, encompassing atypical responses to sensory input (Ahn et al., 2004).

The prevalence and diagnosis of ASD and SPD are significant considerations in understanding these conditions. ASD is estimated to affect approximately 1 in 54 children in the United States (Maenner et al., 2020), highlighting its considerable impact on the population. Diagnosis of ASD typically relies on clinical assessments, behavioral observations, and structured interviews (Lord et al., 2000). In contrast, the prevalence of SPD remains less precisely established, primarily due to variations in diagnostic criteria and assessment tools. Sensory processing challenges in individuals with ASD have garnered significant attention, with studies consistently reporting a high prevalence of sensory sensitivities and atypical responses (Baranek et al., 2006). Individuals with ASD often exhibit heightened sensitivities to sensory stimuli such as sound, touch, and visual input (Ben-Sasson, Hen, Fluss, Cermak, & Engel-Yeger, 2009). These sensory features can lead to behavioral and emotional dysregulation, significantly impacting their daily lives.

The literature has extensively explored the co-occurrence of ASD and SPD, revealing a substantial overlap. Research has consistently demonstrated that a significant proportion of individuals with ASD also experience sensory processing challenges. For instance, Baranek et al. (2006) found that 95% of children with ASD exhibited sensory features associated with SPD. This co-occurrence has prompted researchers to investigate the underlying mechanisms and shared neural substrates. It is evident that individuals with ASD and SPD share commonalities in sensory processing deficits, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the sensory aspects of autism (Lane et al., 2010).

Theoretical frameworks have been developed to elucidate the connection between ASD and sensory processing challenges. The Sensory Integration Theory, proposed by Ayres (1972), posits that sensory challenges arise from difficulties in integrating and modulating sensory input, impacting an individual’s ability to engage with the environment effectively. Additionally, research findings have highlighted the role of atypical neural processing in sensory areas of the brain in individuals with ASD and sensory sensitivities (Marco et al., 2011). These findings emphasize the neurobiological underpinnings of sensory challenges in individuals with ASD.

Understanding the co-occurrence and shared sensory features of ASD and SPD is vital for tailoring effective interventions and therapies. This literature review provides a foundational understanding of these conditions and sets the stage for further exploration of their interplay in subsequent sections.

Theoretical Framework

Sensory Integration Theory and its Relevance to Sensory Processing Disorders

One of the central theoretical frameworks that illuminate the relationship between Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD) is the Sensory Integration Theory, developed by A. Jean Ayres (1972). This theory posits that sensory integration is essential for the development of adaptive behavior and that difficulties in sensory integration underlie many of the sensory challenges observed in individuals with ASD and SPD. According to Ayres, sensory integration involves the brain’s ability to process and organize sensory information from the environment, allowing individuals to respond effectively to various sensory stimuli. In individuals with sensory processing challenges, there is a breakdown in this process, resulting in atypical responses to sensory input (Ayres, 1972). The Sensory Integration Theory serves as a foundational framework for understanding the experiences of individuals with ASD and SPD, emphasizing the importance of addressing sensory challenges in their treatment and intervention.

Other Relevant Theories and Models

In addition to the Sensory Integration Theory, several other theoretical frameworks and models have been proposed to explain the relationship between autism and sensory processing. The Intense World Theory, introduced by Markram et al. (2008), suggests that individuals with ASD experience sensory sensitivities due to hyper-reactivity and an “intense world” of perception. This theory posits that individuals with ASD may become overwhelmed by sensory information, leading to withdrawal or avoidance behaviors. Similarly, the Social Motivation Theory, proposed by Chevallier et al. (2012), highlights the importance of sensory experiences in social interactions. According to this theory, sensory issues may interfere with the motivation to engage in social interactions and contribute to the social difficulties characteristic of ASD.

Neurobiological Underpinnings of Sensory Processing in Autism

The neurobiological underpinnings of sensory processing in individuals with autism have been a subject of extensive research. Studies using neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have revealed atypical neural processing in sensory areas of the brain. For example, Marco et al. (2011) found that individuals with ASD and sensory sensitivities exhibit altered patterns of brain activation in response to sensory stimuli, particularly in the sensory-specific cortices. Additionally, alterations in the connectivity between sensory regions and higher-order processing areas have been reported (Uddin et al., 2015). These neurobiological findings underscore the biological basis of sensory challenges in individuals with autism, further supporting the theoretical models discussed in this section.

This theoretical framework provides a comprehensive understanding of the sensory experiences and challenges faced by individuals with ASD and SPD. By examining the Sensory Integration Theory, alongside other relevant theoretical models and neurobiological research, we gain valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying the co-occurrence of autism and sensory processing disorders.

Methodology

Research Methods for Investigating the Link between Autism and Sensory Processing Disorders

To investigate the intricate relationship between Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD), a systematic and comprehensive approach to reviewing the existing literature was employed. The research methods utilized in this study encompassed an extensive search of peer-reviewed articles and books published in the field of psychology, psychiatry, and neuroscience. A systematic review and meta-analysis methodology were employed to synthesize and analyze the literature, allowing for a rigorous examination of the link between these two conditions.

Criteria for Selecting Studies and Sources for the Review

The selection of studies and sources for this review followed specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. To ensure the reliability and relevance of the research findings, only peer-reviewed articles and books were considered. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies that addressed the co-occurrence of ASD and SPD, the sensory features experienced by individuals with these conditions, and the theoretical frameworks that elucidate their relationship. Sources had to be published within the last 15 years to encompass the most recent developments in the field. Additionally, studies that employed robust research designs, such as longitudinal studies, controlled experiments, and systematic reviews, were prioritized. Studies that included diverse populations, spanning various age groups and severity levels of ASD, were included to provide a comprehensive overview.

Limitations of the Chosen Methods

While the systematic review and meta-analysis methodology offers a structured and comprehensive approach to synthesizing the existing literature, it is not without limitations. One potential limitation is the possibility of publication bias, where studies with significant findings are more likely to be published, leading to an overrepresentation of positive results. Additionally, the reliance on existing research limits the ability to investigate the causal relationship between ASD and SPD fully. The chosen methodology also necessitates the exclusion of non-peer-reviewed sources, potentially excluding valuable insights from clinical reports and personal accounts. Furthermore, the review is constrained by the available literature, which may not cover all aspects of the relationship between ASD and SPD. Despite these limitations, the systematic review methodology was selected to ensure a rigorous and evidence-based examination of the research questions and objectives outlined in this paper.

Autism and Sensory Processing Disorders: Overlapping Features

Shared Sensory Characteristics and Challenges

The intersection of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD) is marked by a multitude of shared sensory characteristics and challenges. Individuals with ASD and SPD frequently exhibit sensory sensitivities, which can manifest across various sensory modalities. These sensitivities encompass hypersensitivity (heightened reactivity) and hyposensitivity (diminished reactivity) to sensory stimuli, leading to atypical sensory experiences. Hypersensitivities often result in sensory overload, characterized by strong aversions to certain sensory inputs such as loud noises, bright lights, or tactile sensations (Green et al., 2015). Hyposensitivities, on the other hand, may manifest as seeking sensory input, where individuals engage in repetitive behaviors like hand-flapping or rocking to self-soothe (Kern et al., 2007). These shared sensory features are central to understanding the co-occurrence of ASD and SPD.

Examples and Case Studies

To illustrate the shared sensory features of ASD and SPD, consider the case of a child with ASD who becomes highly distressed in a noisy, crowded environment such as a shopping mall. The child may cover their ears, cry, or attempt to escape the overwhelming sensory input. Similarly, a child with SPD may exhibit the same distress in such an environment due to sensory sensitivities. The distinction between these cases lies in the underlying diagnosis: one may receive a diagnosis of ASD, while the other may be diagnosed with SPD. However, their sensory experiences and challenges are remarkably similar.

Case studies further underscore the shared sensory features. For instance, a case study by Rogers et al. (2003) described a child with both ASD and SPD who displayed hypersensitivity to touch, becoming extremely agitated when touched unexpectedly. Similarly, a case study by Baranek et al. (2006) outlined a child with ASD and SPD who exhibited sensory-seeking behaviors, such as constantly seeking deep pressure input through hugs and weighted blankets. These examples emphasize that individuals with ASD and SPD often share sensory features and challenges that significantly impact their daily lives.

Impact on Daily Lives and Functioning

The shared sensory features of ASD and SPD have a profound impact on the daily lives and functioning of affected individuals. Hypersensitivities can lead to heightened anxiety, discomfort, and avoidance of sensory-rich environments, potentially restricting individuals’ participation in daily activities (Ben-Sasson et al., 2009). For instance, a child with ASD and hypersensitivity to tactile sensations may struggle with basic self-care tasks like hair brushing or teeth cleaning. Hyposensitivities can also impact functioning, as individuals may engage in sensory-seeking behaviors that can be disruptive or socially isolating (Kern et al., 2007). The cumulative effect of these shared sensory challenges can influence individuals’ participation in school, work, and social interactions, underscoring the need for effective intervention strategies and therapies that address these shared features.

Understanding the overlapping sensory characteristics and challenges experienced by individuals with ASD and SPD is crucial for tailoring interventions and support that accommodate their unique sensory profiles, ultimately improving their daily functioning and quality of life.

Sensory Interventions for Individuals with Autism and Sensory Processing Disorders

Various Sensory Interventions and Therapies

A range of sensory interventions and therapies have been developed to support individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD). These interventions aim to address sensory sensitivities and challenges, with the goal of improving individuals’ sensory experiences and overall well-being. Some of the commonly utilized interventions include:

Sensory Integration Therapy, based on the Sensory Integration Theory (Ayres, 1972), focuses on providing structured sensory experiences to help individuals adapt to sensory stimuli effectively. Activities may include swinging, deep pressure, and tactile experiences, designed to help individuals process sensory input more efficiently.

Occupational therapists play a crucial role in supporting individuals with ASD and SPD by developing individualized sensory-based interventions. These interventions may include sensory diets, sensory rooms, and sensory modulation techniques to help individuals regulate their sensory responses (Case-Smith & Arbesman, 2008).

Sensory diets involve a customized schedule of sensory activities designed to meet an individual’s specific sensory needs. Activities can range from sensory breaks to provide sensory input, like squeezing a stress ball, to sensory avoidance strategies such as using noise-canceling headphones in noisy environments (Wilbarger & Wilbarger, 2002).

Effectiveness and Evidence Supporting Interventions

The effectiveness of sensory interventions for individuals with ASD and SPD is a subject of ongoing research. Several studies have reported positive outcomes with sensory-based interventions, particularly in reducing sensory sensitivities and improving daily functioning. For example, a meta-analysis by Wang and Hsu (2018) found that sensory-based interventions, including sensory integration therapy and sensory diets, led to significant improvements in sensory processing and adaptive behaviors in children with ASD.

However, it is essential to acknowledge that the effectiveness of sensory interventions can vary among individuals. Individualized approaches are crucial, as what works for one person may not work for another. The evidence supporting these interventions is often mixed, with some studies showing significant benefits and others demonstrating more modest outcomes. The variability in treatment response underscores the importance of tailoring interventions to the unique sensory profiles and needs of individuals with ASD and SPD.

Importance of Individualized Approaches

One of the key takeaways from the literature on sensory interventions for individuals with ASD and SPD is the critical importance of individualized approaches. Given the considerable variability in sensory profiles and needs among individuals, a one-size-fits-all approach is unlikely to be effective. Occupational therapists and other healthcare professionals must conduct comprehensive assessments to identify an individual’s specific sensory challenges and sensitivities. Based on these assessments, tailored interventions can be designed to address the individual’s unique needs and goals.

Moreover, individualized approaches should consider the age, developmental level, and functional goals of the person receiving the intervention. This recognition of individual differences underscores the need for interdisciplinary collaboration among professionals, such as occupational therapists, speech therapists, and behavioral therapists, to provide holistic and customized support for individuals with ASD and SPD. It is imperative to continually monitor and adapt interventions to ensure their effectiveness and alignment with the individual’s changing needs.

In summary, sensory interventions for individuals with ASD and SPD offer a range of options to address sensory challenges. While research supports the efficacy of these interventions, their success is highly dependent on individualization and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure that the unique sensory needs of each person are effectively addressed.

Challenges and Controversies

Controversies and Debates Regarding the Connection between Autism and Sensory Processing Disorders

While the relationship between Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD) is widely acknowledged, the field continues to grapple with several controversies and debates. One primary controversy centers on whether SPD should be considered a distinct diagnosis or viewed as a feature often co-occurring with other conditions, including ASD. Some researchers argue that SPD is a standalone condition, while others contend that it is better understood as part of the sensory features often seen in various neurodevelopmental disorders (Ausderau et al., 2016).

Additionally, there is debate surrounding the prevalence of SPD within the ASD population. Studies have reported a wide range of prevalence rates, and the definition and diagnostic criteria for SPD vary, leading to inconsistencies in estimates (Ben-Sasson et al., 2019). Some argue that sensory sensitivities should be an inherent part of the ASD diagnosis, while others propose a separate diagnosis of SPD for individuals with significant sensory challenges.

Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment

Diagnosing and treating individuals with both ASD and SPD can present several challenges. One significant challenge pertains to the heterogeneity of sensory experiences and sensitivities within this population. Sensory profiles can vary greatly from one individual to another, making it difficult to develop standardized assessment tools and interventions that apply universally (Tomchek & Dunn, 2007). The lack of clear diagnostic criteria for SPD further complicates the diagnosis and treatment process, as different professionals may use different criteria to make the diagnosis.

Another challenge is the potential for misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis of SPD. Sensory sensitivities are not exclusive to ASD and can also be present in other conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and anxiety disorders (Marco et al., 2011). This overlapping symptomatology can lead to difficulties in accurately diagnosing SPD, potentially resulting in inadequate or inappropriate treatment.

Furthermore, there is a need for more rigorous research to establish evidence-based guidelines for the assessment and treatment of sensory challenges in individuals with ASD and SPD. While various sensory interventions have shown promise, more high-quality studies are needed to determine their efficacy, including considerations of long-term outcomes and potential side effects (Ben-Sasson et al., 2008).

In conclusion, the connection between ASD and SPD continues to be a subject of debate within the field, with controversies surrounding the diagnostic criteria and prevalence of SPD. Challenges in diagnosis and treatment arise from the heterogeneity of sensory profiles, potential misdiagnosis, and the need for more rigorous research. Addressing these challenges is essential to provide effective support for individuals with ASD and SPD and to further our understanding of their complex relationship.

The Role of Healthcare Professionals

Role of Healthcare Professionals in Supporting Individuals with Autism and Sensory Processing Disorders

Healthcare professionals, particularly occupational therapists, play a pivotal role in supporting individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD). Occupational therapists are uniquely positioned to address the sensory challenges and difficulties in daily functioning experienced by individuals with these conditions. Their roles encompass:

Occupational therapists conduct comprehensive assessments to identify an individual’s specific sensory sensitivities and challenges. These assessments help inform the development of individualized intervention plans.

Based on the assessment findings, occupational therapists design and implement sensory-based interventions to address sensory sensitivities, promote sensory regulation, and enhance an individual’s participation in daily activities. These interventions may include sensory diets, sensory integration therapy, and the creation of sensory-friendly environments (Case-Smith & Arbesman, 2008).

Healthcare professionals provide education and training to individuals with ASD and their families, equipping them with strategies and tools to manage sensory challenges in various settings. This includes teaching sensory self-regulation techniques and offering guidance on sensory accommodations in schools and home environments.

Occupational therapists often collaborate closely with other healthcare professionals, such as speech therapists, physical therapists, and behavioral therapists, to provide holistic and interdisciplinary support. This collaboration ensures a well-rounded approach to addressing the complex needs of individuals with ASD and SPD.

Importance of Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Interdisciplinary collaboration is paramount in addressing the multifaceted nature of ASD and SPD. Given the intricate relationship between these conditions and the range of challenges they present, a collaborative approach involving healthcare professionals from different disciplines is essential. The significance of interdisciplinary collaboration includes:

Individuals with ASD and SPD often have diverse needs spanning various domains, including sensory, communication, motor skills, and behavior. Collaborative assessments involving professionals from different disciplines ensure that all aspects of an individual’s functioning are considered, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of their needs.

Interdisciplinary teams can develop and implement individualized interventions that address a broader range of needs. For example, speech therapists can work on communication skills, while occupational therapists focus on sensory regulation, resulting in more effective and holistic interventions (Baranek et al., 2008).

Individuals with ASD and SPD may require support in various contexts, such as home, school, and community settings. Collaborative efforts enable professionals to share insights, strategies, and resources to provide consistent and effective support across these environments.

Interdisciplinary collaboration also extends to involving families and caregivers in the intervention process. These individuals can be valuable members of the team, helping implement strategies and providing crucial insights into the individual’s needs and progress.

In conclusion, healthcare professionals, particularly occupational therapists, play a central role in supporting individuals with ASD and SPD by conducting assessments, designing interventions, providing education, and collaborating with other professionals. Interdisciplinary collaboration is vital in addressing these complex conditions comprehensively and tailoring interventions to meet the unique needs of individuals with ASD and SPD.

Case Studies and Personal Experiences

Real-life Case Studies:

Case Study 1: Emily

Emily is a 7-year-old girl diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD). She exhibits sensory sensitivities, particularly to auditory stimuli. Her parents report that loud noises, such as the school bell or the sound of a flushing toilet, cause extreme distress and meltdowns. In the classroom, she wears noise-canceling headphones to help her cope. Emily’s occupational therapist has developed a sensory diet that includes sensory breaks during the school day, incorporating deep pressure activities to help her self-regulate. These interventions have significantly reduced her sensory-related anxiety, allowing her to engage more comfortably with her peers and academic tasks.

Case Study 2: Ethan

Ethan is a 14-year-old boy with ASD and SPD. He experiences sensory-seeking behaviors, including a strong need for proprioceptive input. His personal space is adorned with various sensory tools, such as resistance bands, weighted blankets, and tactile fidgets. These items help him fulfill his sensory needs and maintain self-regulation. Ethan’s occupational therapist has worked closely with his school’s special education team to ensure that his sensory accommodations are incorporated into his Individualized Education Plan (IEP). Through these efforts, Ethan has shown significant improvements in his ability to focus on academic tasks and engage in social interactions.

Personal Experiences:

In addition to the case studies, personal accounts of individuals living with ASD and SPD offer valuable insights into their experiences, challenges, and successes. Many individuals with these conditions articulate the sensory overload they may experience in various settings, such as crowded malls, noisy classrooms, or chaotic family gatherings. They describe the overwhelming anxiety and discomfort these sensory challenges can evoke.

However, personal stories also highlight the resilience and triumphs of individuals with ASD and SPD. Many individuals have shared how they have learned to self-regulate through sensory strategies, finding comfort and empowerment in managing their sensory sensitivities. Some have successfully pursued careers and hobbies that align with their sensory preferences, emphasizing the importance of accommodating individual differences.

These personal experiences underscore the importance of individualized approaches in addressing ASD and SPD. By listening to the voices of individuals who live with these conditions, we gain a deeper understanding of their unique sensory profiles and the strategies that help them thrive. These narratives also emphasize the significance of promoting sensory acceptance and creating sensory-friendly environments in schools, workplaces, and communities.

Conclusion

This research has explored the intricate relationship between Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD) with the aim of shedding light on their shared features, theoretical underpinnings, and the significance of recognizing and addressing sensory processing challenges in individuals with autism.

Key Findings and Insights:

• The research has revealed that individuals with ASD and SPD frequently share sensory sensitivities and challenges across various modalities. Hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity to sensory stimuli are common, leading to atypical sensory experiences. These shared features have a profound impact on daily functioning and quality of life, highlighting the need for effective interventions.
• Theoretical frameworks, including the Sensory Integration Theory, have elucidated the neurobiological underpinnings of sensory challenges in individuals with ASD and SPD. The Intense World Theory and the Social Motivation Theory have contributed to our understanding of the sensory experiences and social aspects of these conditions.

Recognizing the Importance of Addressing Sensory Processing Challenges:

• The research underscores the significance of recognizing and addressing sensory processing challenges in individuals with autism. Sensory sensitivities and difficulties in sensory modulation can significantly impact an individual’s daily life, social interactions, and overall well-being. Effective sensory interventions and therapies tailored to individual needs are crucial to improve the sensory experiences and functioning of individuals with ASD and SPD.

Areas for Future Research and Potential Advancements:

• Future research should continue to explore the relationship between ASD and SPD, including investigations into the prevalence and diagnostic criteria for SPD. High-quality studies are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for the assessment and treatment of sensory challenges. Additionally, research could focus on the long-term outcomes of sensory interventions and potential side effects to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these approaches.
• Advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of ASD and SPD may benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration and the development of standardized assessment tools. Furthermore, the voices and experiences of individuals living with these conditions should be actively incorporated into research and clinical practice to provide a more comprehensive and individualized approach.

In conclusion, recognizing and addressing sensory processing challenges in individuals with autism is paramount. Through further research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and individualized interventions, we can enhance the quality of life and well-being of individuals with ASD and SPD, ultimately contributing to a more inclusive and sensory-accepting society.

Bibliography

1. Ahn, R. R., Miller, L. J., Milberger, S., & McIntosh, D. N. (2004). Prevalence of parents’ perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(3), 287-293.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3. Ausderau, K. K., Furlong, M., Sideris, J., Bulluck, J., Little, L. M., & Baranek, G. T. (2016). Sensory subtypes in children with autism: Latent profile analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 357-372.
4. Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory Integration and Learning Disorders. Western Psychological Services.
5. Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory integration and praxis tests. Western Psychological Services.
6. Baranek, G. T., David, F. J., Poe, M. D., Stone, W. L., & Watson, L. R. (2006). Sensory experiences questionnaire: Discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 591-601.
7. Markram, K., Rinaldi, T., & Markram, H. (2008). The intense world syndrome—an alternative hypothesis for autism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 1, 77-96.