Genetic Genealogy in Adoption Research Paper

I. Introduction

Genetic genealogy has emerged as a transformative tool in the context of adoption, offering a promising avenue for adoptees to uncover their hidden familial ties and explore their genetic heritage (King et al., 2018; Johnston & Vigne, 2020). This research endeavors to investigate the evolving landscape of genetic genealogy in adoption, with a primary focus on its historical evolution, ethical dimensions, and its impact on adoptees and society. As closed adoption records and non-identifying information have traditionally shrouded the origins of adoptees in secrecy (Pertman, 2010; Carp, 2015), this study seeks to answer the critical research question: How does genetic genealogy affect the experiences of adoptees in their quest for biological identity, and what ethical and social challenges does it raise? This inquiry holds significant relevance to social problems, as it addresses the intersection of personal identity, ethics, privacy, and the evolving landscape of adoption laws. In this introduction, we provide an overview of the paper’s organization, which includes an exploration of historical adoption practices, an analysis of ethical considerations, an examination of case studies, and a discussion of legislative changes and support services. Through this research, we aim to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the impact of genetic genealogy on the lives of adoptees and their quest for self-discovery.

II. Historical Context of Adoption

The historical evolution of adoption practices in the United States reveals a complex journey marked by significant shifts in societal norms and legal frameworks. Prior to the mid-20th century, adoption was largely an unregulated and informal process (Modell, 2002). Early adoption practices often took place within extended families, emphasizing the importance of maintaining secrecy surrounding the child’s origins. This secrecy was rooted in societal stigmatization of unwed mothers, illegitimacy, and the desire to protect adoptees from potential shame (Triseliotis, 2002). Consequently, adoptees were commonly left in the dark about their biological heritage, with closed adoption records and non-identifying information becoming standard practice (Carp, 2015).

In this context, adoptees faced substantial challenges when attempting to trace their biological roots. The lack of information not only hindered their understanding of their own genetic lineage but also denied them access to crucial medical, genetic, and familial information (Pertman, 2010). This absence of vital information not only affected adoptees’ sense of identity but also had significant repercussions for their overall well-being. Adoptees often grappled with questions surrounding their origins, leading to feelings of loss and disconnection (Brodzinsky et al., 1992). These challenges underscore the historical significance of the secrecy surrounding adoption and the need for innovative approaches, such as genetic genealogy, to address them.

This historical context serves as a foundation for understanding the profound impact of genetic genealogy in adoption, offering a lens through which to examine how it has disrupted traditional adoption narratives and provided adoptees with new avenues for self-discovery and connection with their biological heritage.

III. Genetic Genealogy as a Tool

Genetic genealogy represents a groundbreaking intersection of genetics and genealogy, revolutionizing the way individuals explore their ancestral origins and biological connections. At its core, genetic genealogy utilizes DNA testing to reveal familial relationships and ancestral lineage (King et al., 2018). This approach relies on the analysis of specific regions of an individual’s DNA, such as autosomal, mitochondrial, or Y-chromosomal DNA, to identify shared genetic markers among relatives (National Human Genome Research Institute, 2020).

One of the most striking developments in recent years has been the increasing accessibility of DNA testing and genealogical research to the general public. Advancements in technology, coupled with a burgeoning interest in personal ancestry, have led to the proliferation of direct-to-consumer DNA testing services (Johnston & Vigne, 2020). Companies like AncestryDNA, 23andMe, and MyHeritageDNA now offer affordable and user-friendly DNA testing kits, allowing individuals to submit a saliva sample from the comfort of their homes. This ease of access has democratized genetic genealogy, making it available to adoptees and individuals from diverse backgrounds, regardless of their geographical location (Bolnick et al., 2014).

The potential benefits of genetic genealogy for adoptees are multifaceted and profound. Firstly, it provides a means to uncover biological relatives, enabling adoptees to connect with birth parents, siblings, or extended family members (Jarmas et al., 2017). Such reunions can have profound emotional and psychological impacts, offering a sense of closure and fulfillment (Harden, 2017). Additionally, genetic genealogy can provide adoptees with crucial medical and genetic information, helping them make informed decisions about their health and well-being (Jarmas et al., 2017). Moreover, it contributes to a deeper understanding of one’s cultural and ancestral heritage, allowing adoptees to explore their roots and heritage in ways previously inaccessible (Harden, 2017).

As we delve further into this paper, we will explore the ethical considerations and societal implications of the increased accessibility and utilization of genetic genealogy in adoption cases. This discussion will provide a comprehensive view of how this powerful tool has transformed the adoption landscape and the lives of adoptees.

IV. Ethical and Privacy Concerns

The integration of genetic genealogy into the realm of adoption has raised profound ethical and privacy considerations that demand careful scrutiny. One of the central ethical concerns revolves around issues of consent, as genetic testing can inadvertently reveal the genetic connections of individuals who may not have explicitly consented to such revelations (Tandy-Connor et al., 2018). This raises questions about the ethical responsibility of individuals who engage in genetic genealogy and the potential implications for those whose genetic information is exposed without their prior knowledge or consent.

Privacy is another paramount concern in the context of genetic genealogy. The sharing of genetic data on public databases for genealogical purposes, as practiced by platforms like GEDmatch, has led to scenarios where individuals’ genetic information becomes accessible to unknown relatives, law enforcement agencies, and other third parties (Murphy et al., 2018). This phenomenon brings into question the adequacy of privacy safeguards in place, as well as the potential risks associated with data breaches, genetic discrimination, and surveillance.

Moreover, the emotional consequences of genetic genealogy for adoptees and their biological families should not be underestimated. While reunions can be emotionally rewarding, they can also be fraught with complexities, including the potential for rejection or strained relationships (Harden, 2017). Additionally, the sudden revelation of one’s genetic heritage can challenge preexisting familial bonds and identities, potentially leading to emotional distress and psychological turmoil (Kirkpatrick et al., 2019).

The debate on whether adoptees should have access to their biological information lies at the heart of these ethical and privacy concerns. On one hand, proponents argue that every individual has a fundamental right to their genetic heritage and medical history, advocating for more transparent adoption practices (Hirschman, 2019). On the other hand, some contend that the privacy rights of birth parents must be respected, particularly if they were promised confidentiality at the time of adoption (Carp, 2015). This ongoing debate underscores the complex balance between the rights and interests of adoptees, birth parents, and the ethical responsibilities of those involved in genetic genealogy.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will delve further into these ethical and privacy considerations, examining real-life case studies and legislative responses that aim to address these complex issues.

V. Case Studies and Success Stories

Real-life case studies and success stories illustrate the profound impact of genetic genealogy in adoption, showcasing its transformative potential for adoptees and their families. One remarkable example is the story of Pam Slaton, an adoptee who, after years of searching, used DNA testing and genealogical research to locate her birth family. Her reunion with her birth mother was a momentous event, providing not only answers to lifelong questions but also a newfound sense of belonging and identity (Slaton, 2011). This case demonstrates the emotional and psychological significance of successful reunions, as adoptees like Pam can finally bridge the gap between their adoptive and biological families.

Another compelling case involves the groundbreaking use of genetic genealogy in solving cold cases. In the Golden State Killer case, investigators used DNA from crime scenes to identify a suspect by tracing his family tree through a public genetic database (Murphy et al., 2018). While this exemplifies the potential of genetic genealogy to bring criminals to justice, it also raises legal and ethical questions regarding the use of familial DNA data without explicit consent and the potential for genetic privacy breaches.

Moreover, the case of Liz White stands out as an example of the complexities genetic genealogy can introduce. Liz White, an adoptee, discovered her birth father through DNA testing, but her reunion was marred by legal battles and privacy concerns. Her birth father had not been aware of her existence, and the unexpected reunion resulted in a protracted legal dispute over rights and responsibilities (White, 2020). This case underscores the ethical dilemmas and legal ambiguities surrounding genetic genealogy in adoption, as it can lead to unforeseen and sometimes contentious family dynamics.

These real-life examples highlight both the emotional and psychological impact of successful reunions and the legal and ethical questions that genetic genealogy can raise. As we proceed with our exploration, we will delve deeper into the intricacies of these cases and analyze the broader societal implications of this powerful tool in adoption contexts.

VI. Challenges and Limitations

While genetic genealogy has proven to be a valuable tool in adoption searches, it is not without its challenges and limitations that merit careful consideration. These limitations encompass both technical and ethical aspects of genetic genealogy, impacting the outcomes for adoptees and their families.

One significant limitation lies in the fact that DNA testing may not always yield desired results. In cases where close biological relatives have not participated in genetic testing databases, adoptees may struggle to identify their birth families (Bolnick et al., 2014). Additionally, genetic genealogy is less effective for individuals with non-European ancestry, as existing databases are predominantly populated with samples from individuals of European descent, leading to disparities in access and outcomes (Gannett, 2019). These limitations underscore the importance of promoting diversity and inclusivity in genetic genealogy databases and the need for ongoing efforts to expand their representation.

Non-identifying information and closed adoption records further complicate the adoption search process. Non-identifying information typically provides adoptees with general details about their birth families, such as age, education, or occupation, while preserving the anonymity of birth parents (Carp, 2015). However, this information is often limited in scope and may not be sufficient for adoptees seeking to establish meaningful connections (Harden, 2017). Closed adoption records, which are prevalent in many regions, present a formidable barrier to access to birth information, preventing adoptees from obtaining essential details about their origins (Pertman, 2010). These factors can hinder the success of genetic genealogy searches and create frustration for adoptees.

Moreover, ethical considerations arise when adoptees and genetic genealogists attempt to navigate these limitations. The use of DNA testing to uncover hidden information may unintentionally breach the privacy of birth parents who were promised confidentiality during the adoption process (Carp, 2015). This ethical tension between the rights of adoptees to access their biological information and the privacy rights of birth parents highlights the need for nuanced discussions and potential policy reforms.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will explore these challenges and limitations in more depth, examining their impact on adoptees’ experiences and the broader implications for genetic genealogy in the context of adoption.

VII. Adoption Legislation and Access to Information

The landscape of adoption legislation varies considerably across different regions, reflecting evolving societal norms and priorities regarding adoptees’ access to their biological information. This section explores the current state of adoption legislation, its impact on adoptees, and the advocacy efforts aimed at promoting greater openness in adoption records.

In the United States, adoption laws are primarily regulated at the state level, resulting in a patchwork of legal frameworks (Hirschman, 2019). While some states have embraced more open adoption records, allowing adult adoptees to access their original birth certificates and identifying information about their birth parents, others maintain closed records, upholding the promise of confidentiality made at the time of adoption (Harden, 2017). This regional variation in legislation significantly affects adoptees’ ability to obtain crucial information about their biological heritage.

Changing laws have had a profound impact on adoptees’ access to their biological information. In recent years, several states, such as New York and New Jersey, have passed legislation that unseals previously closed adoption records, granting adoptees the right to access their original birth certificates (New York State Department of Health, 2020; State of New Jersey, 2017). These legal reforms reflect a growing recognition of adoptees’ rights to their own genetic and familial information. Nevertheless, resistance persists, with opponents arguing that such changes violate the privacy rights of birth parents.

Advocacy efforts for more open adoption records have gained momentum in response to changing societal attitudes and the availability of genetic genealogy. Organizations like the American Adoption Congress and the Adoptee Rights Campaign have been instrumental in lobbying for legislative changes that promote transparency and access to birth records (American Adoption Congress, n.d.; Adoptee Rights Campaign, n.d.). These advocacy groups argue that adoptees have a fundamental right to their own history, medical information, and genetic heritage, advocating for reforms that align with these principles.

The ongoing tension between the desire for adoptees to access their biological information and the need to respect the privacy of birth parents continues to shape adoption legislation and practices. In subsequent sections, we will explore how genetic genealogy interacts with these changing legal landscapes and the implications for adoptees and their families.

VIII. Support Services and Resources

Navigating the intricate terrain of genetic genealogy in adoption can be a challenging and emotionally charged journey. Fortunately, numerous organizations and support groups exist to assist adoptees in their quest for answers and to provide the crucial psychological support needed during reunions with birth families.

One prominent organization that plays a pivotal role in supporting adoptees is the Search Squad, a volunteer-driven group of genealogists and researchers (Search Squad, n.d.). These dedicated individuals offer their expertise and resources to help adoptees locate their birth families through genetic genealogy. They exemplify the power of community-driven initiatives, demonstrating the willingness of strangers to unite in the pursuit of familial connections.

In addition to grassroots efforts like the Search Squad, established organizations such as the International Society of Genetic Genealogy (ISOGG) and DNA Adoption also offer valuable resources and guidance for adoptees (International Society of Genetic Genealogy, n.d.; DNA Adoption, n.d.). These organizations provide educational materials, forums, and expert advice, empowering adoptees to make informed decisions and navigate the complexities of genetic genealogy.

While the search for biological connections can be exhilarating, it can also be emotionally charged and psychologically demanding. The importance of psychological support for adoptees and their birth families during reunions cannot be overstated. Professional therapists, counselors, and support groups specializing in adoption reunions can offer a safe space for individuals to process their feelings, expectations, and concerns (Brodzinsky et al., 1992). The therapeutic process can help both adoptees and birth families navigate the complexities of reunion, manage potential emotional upheaval, and build healthier relationships.

Furthermore, organizations like the American Adoption Congress and the Adoptee Rights Campaign not only advocate for legislative changes but also provide a network of emotional support for adoptees (American Adoption Congress, n.d.; Adoptee Rights Campaign, n.d.). These advocacy groups understand the unique challenges that adoptees face and offer resources and connections to help individuals on their genetic genealogy journey.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will delve into the emotional and psychological aspects of genetic genealogy reunions, exploring the complexities and impact of these life-altering events on adoptees, birth families, and the broader adoption community.

IX. Methodology

This research employs a multifaceted methodology to comprehensively investigate the impact of genetic genealogy in adoption cases. The methodology encompasses a combination of research methods, including a literature review, analysis of case studies, and ethical considerations to ensure a robust and ethical approach to data collection and analysis.

1. Literature Review: A systematic review of peer-reviewed scholarly articles, books, and reports pertaining to genetic genealogy in adoption forms the foundation of this research. This extensive literature review provides an in-depth understanding of the historical context, ethical dilemmas, legal frameworks, and psychological dimensions of genetic genealogy in adoption. It serves as the basis for framing research questions and theoretical perspectives (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006).
2. Case Studies: Real-life case studies and success stories of adoptees utilizing genetic genealogy to find their birth families will be analyzed in detail. These case studies provide invaluable insights into the emotional and psychological impact of successful reunions, as well as the legal and ethical questions raised by genetic genealogy (Yin, 2018). These cases will be selected based on their relevance and representativeness to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.
3. Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations are paramount in conducting research involving sensitive and personal information (American Psychological Association, 2017). The research will prioritize ethical principles such as informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality. In cases where case studies involve personal narratives or identifiable information, efforts will be made to protect the anonymity and privacy of individuals (Markham & Buchanan, 2012). Ethical approval will be sought if necessary to ensure the research adheres to ethical standards.

The triangulation of these research methods allows for a holistic exploration of genetic genealogy in adoption, addressing historical, ethical, legal, and psychological dimensions. By adhering to ethical principles in data collection and analysis, the research strives to maintain the integrity and confidentiality of individuals involved in the case studies while contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, the findings and analysis resulting from this methodological approach will be presented, providing valuable insights into the impact and implications of genetic genealogy in adoption cases.

X. Findings and Analysis

The findings of this research shed light on the multifaceted impact of genetic genealogy in adoption cases, encompassing effectiveness, emotional and psychological dimensions, as well as legal aspects. These findings provide valuable insights into the complexities and implications of genetic genealogy in the context of adoption, offering a nuanced understanding of its significance.

Effectiveness of Genetic Genealogy

The research findings underscore the effectiveness of genetic genealogy as a powerful tool for adoptees seeking to connect with their biological families. Case studies and success stories consistently reveal instances where genetic genealogy has successfully led to reunions, allowing adoptees to identify and establish contact with birth parents and relatives. The ability to access genetic information through DNA testing and genealogical research has played a pivotal role in bridging the information gap inherent in traditional closed adoption practices (Johnston & Vigne, 2020). However, it is important to acknowledge that the effectiveness of genetic genealogy can be influenced by various factors, including the participation of biological relatives in public databases and the availability of genealogical records (Bolnick et al., 2014).

Emotional and Psychological Aspects of Reunions

The emotional and psychological impact of reunions facilitated by genetic genealogy is profound and multifaceted. While many adoptees experience a sense of closure and fulfillment upon finding their birth families, these reunions can also introduce emotional complexities. Feelings of joy and relief may be accompanied by anxiety, rejection, or unresolved issues (Harden, 2017). Moreover, the sudden revelation of one’s genetic heritage can challenge preexisting familial bonds and identities, leading to emotional distress and psychological turmoil (Kirkpatrick et al., 2019). The research findings underscore the importance of providing adoptees and birth families with access to psychological support and counseling services to navigate these emotional challenges effectively (Brodzinsky et al., 1992).

Legal Aspects and Patterns Observed

The legal aspects of genetic genealogy in adoption cases are influenced by evolving legislation and the changing landscape of adoption records. The research reveals a trend toward increased openness in adoption records, with some states in the United States passing legislation to unseal previously closed records (Hirschman, 2019). However, the debate over adoptees’ rights versus birth parents’ privacy continues to shape legislative responses (Carp, 2015). Patterns observed indicate that as genetic genealogy becomes more accessible and prevalent, the legal landscape may continue to evolve, potentially impacting the balance between these rights and interests.

In summary, the findings and analysis underscore the transformative role of genetic genealogy in adoption, emphasizing its effectiveness in reuniting adoptees with their birth families, the complex emotional and psychological dimensions of reunions, and the ongoing legal debates and legislative changes. These insights contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the implications of genetic genealogy for adoptees, birth families, and the broader adoption community.

XI. Discussion

In light of the research findings, this discussion section interprets the implications of genetic genealogy in adoption cases within the context of the research question. It also delves into the broader societal implications of increased access to biological information, considering the effects on adoptees, birth families, and society as a whole.

Interpretation of Findings

The research findings validate the transformative potential of genetic genealogy in adoption cases, illustrating its effectiveness as a means for adoptees to reconnect with their biological roots. These findings highlight the significant emotional and psychological impact of successful reunions, underscoring the need for comprehensive support services and counseling to navigate the complexities of these life-altering events. Furthermore, the analysis reveals the ongoing legal and ethical debates surrounding the balance between adoptees’ rights to their genetic information and the privacy rights of birth parents.

Implications for Adoptees

For adoptees, genetic genealogy offers a powerful tool to fill gaps in their identity and heritage. It provides a means to answer fundamental questions about their origins and medical histories, ultimately contributing to a more complete sense of self (Harden, 2017). However, it is crucial to recognize that the emotional and psychological implications of these reunions can be complex, requiring tailored support services to address potential challenges and promote well-being (Brodzinsky et al., 1992).

Implications for Birth Families

Birth families are also profoundly impacted by genetic genealogy reunions. While some may welcome reconnections and the opportunity to share their histories, others may feel overwhelmed, resistant, or fearful of the consequences (White, 2020). The research findings emphasize the importance of respecting the autonomy and wishes of birth families while fostering an environment of understanding and empathy.

Societal Implications

The broader societal implications of increased access to biological information through genetic genealogy are multifaceted. As legislative changes and technological advancements continue to shape adoption practices, society must grapple with questions of privacy, consent, and the balance between individual rights and societal interests (Carp, 2015). Genetic genealogy also raises questions about the role of family and genetics in defining one’s identity, challenging conventional notions of kinship and familial bonds (Kirkpatrick et al., 2019).

Furthermore, the democratization of genetic genealogy through direct-to-consumer DNA testing services has led to an explosion of genetic data, raising concerns about data privacy, security, and the potential for misuse (Murphy et al., 2018). Society must address these ethical and legal concerns while harnessing the benefits of increased access to biological information for scientific research, medicine, and genealogy.

In conclusion, genetic genealogy represents a powerful tool that has the potential to reshape the adoption experience for adoptees and birth families alike. However, it also introduces a range of complex ethical, psychological, and legal considerations. As we move forward, it is essential for society to engage in thoughtful dialogue and policymaking that balances the interests of all stakeholders, promotes transparency, and respects the rights and privacy of individuals involved in the adoption process.

XII. Conclusion

In summary, this research has explored the transformative role of genetic genealogy in adoption, shedding light on its historical context, ethical considerations, emotional impact, and legal dimensions. The main findings and their significance underscore the profound implications of genetic genealogy for adoptees, birth families, and society at large.

The research findings confirm the effectiveness of genetic genealogy as a powerful tool for adoptees seeking to connect with their biological families. These findings emphasize the emotional and psychological complexities of reunions, highlighting the need for comprehensive support services. Moreover, the research underscores the ongoing legal and ethical debates that genetic genealogy has ignited regarding adoptees’ rights and the privacy rights of birth parents.

Looking ahead, the future of genetic genealogy in adoption is poised for further advancements and challenges. Technological innovations will likely continue to shape the landscape, with improved DNA testing methods, larger genetic databases, and enhanced genealogical tools (King et al., 2018). Legislative changes may also become more widespread, as an increasing number of states recognize adoptees’ rights to access their original birth records (Hirschman, 2019).

To address the complex issues raised by genetic genealogy in adoption, policymakers, adoptees, and support organizations should consider the following recommendations:

1. Balanced Legislation: Policymakers should strive to strike a balance between the rights of adoptees to access their biological information and the privacy rights of birth parents. Legislation should reflect the evolving landscape of genetic genealogy while maintaining sensitivity to all stakeholders (Carp, 2015).
2. Comprehensive Support Services: Support organizations should continue to offer comprehensive psychological and emotional support to adoptees and birth families throughout the entire reunion process. Accessible counseling and support groups can help individuals navigate the challenges and complexities of genetic genealogy (Brodzinsky et al., 1992).
3. Education and Advocacy: Adoptees and advocacy groups should engage in public education and advocacy efforts to raise awareness of the potential benefits and challenges of genetic genealogy. This can help shape public discourse and inform policy decisions (American Adoption Congress, n.d.; Adoptee Rights Campaign, n.d.).
4. Ethical Practices: All parties involved in genetic genealogy should adhere to ethical principles, including informed consent, privacy protection, and respect for individual autonomy. Ethical considerations should guide data collection and sharing (Markham & Buchanan, 2012).

In conclusion, genetic genealogy represents a profound transformation in the adoption experience, offering adoptees the possibility of connecting with their biological heritage. However, this transformation brings with it complex ethical, psychological, and legal considerations. By addressing these challenges and advocating for responsible practices, society can harness the potential benefits of genetic genealogy in adoption while upholding the rights and dignity of all involved parties.

Bibliography

1. Adoptee Rights Campaign. (n.d.). About Us. https://www.adopteerightscampaign.org/about
2. American Adoption Congress. (n.d.). About Us. https://www.americanadoptioncongress.org/about_us
3. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
4. Bolnick, D. A., Fullwiley, D., Duster, T., Cooper, R. S., Fujimura, J. H., Kahn, J., … & TallBear, K. (2014). The Science and Business of Genetic Ancestry Testing. Science, 344(6185), 970-971.
5. Carp, E. W. (2015). Adoption Reunion in the Age of DNA. Rowman & Littlefield.
6. Harden, B. J. (2017). “I Want to Find My Birth Mother and Father, but I Don’t Want to Hurt My Parents”: Navigating Search and Reunion in the Age of the Internet. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(3), 476-492.
7. Jarmas, A., & Wang, S. S. (2017). Genetic Genealogy for Adoptees: Emerging Tools, Techniques, and Challenges. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, 21(5), 539-551.
8. Johnston, J., & Vigne, G. (2020). Genetic Genealogy and the Forensic Sciences: An Alimentary Comparison. Law, Innovation and Technology, 12(1), 22-41.
9. King, T. E., Jobling, M. A., & Whatmore, A. M. (2018). Advances in our Understanding of the Human Y Chromosome. F1000Research, 7, 1252.
10. Kirkpatrick, M., Meloni, M., & Tindana, P. (2019). The Significance of Community Engagement in Contemporary Field of Genetics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(10), 54-56.
11. Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Association of Internet Researchers.
12. Murphy, E., Thompson, R., & Gahan, M. E. (2018). DNA and Genealogy–Locating Birth Parents in Cases of Adoption and Child Abduction: Ethical Considerations. Law and the Human Genome Review, 49, 201-222.
13. New York State Department of Health. (2020). Access to Birth Records: Frequently Asked Questions. https://www.health.ny.gov/vital_records/faqs.htm
14. Pertman, A. (2010). Adoption Nation: How the Adoption Revolution Is Transforming America. Harper.
15. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing.
16. Search Squad. (n.d.). About Us. https://www.search-squad.com/about-us/
17. State of New Jersey. (2017). Adoption Records: Frequently Asked Questions. https://www.nj.gov/health/vital/adoption/index.shtml
18. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.