Adoption and Child Development Research Paper

I. Introduction

Adoption, a profound and intricate social institution, has undergone significant evolution over centuries, profoundly impacting both individual lives and society as a whole. This introduction section provides a comprehensive overview of the background, purpose, significance, and scope of this research study on Adoption and Child Development, contextualizing the subsequent exploration of this complex relationship.

Background Information

Definition of Adoption

Adoption, at its core, refers to the legal and social process through which individuals or couples take on the responsibilities of raising and nurturing a child who is not biologically their own. It involves the transfer of parental rights from biological parents or guardians to adoptive parents, thereby conferring upon the latter the legal and moral obligations associated with parenthood (Kirk, 2019). This definition underscores the transformative nature of adoption, as it establishes new family bonds and relationships that are often characterized by deep emotional and psychological connections.

Historical Context of Adoption Practices

The practice of adoption is deeply rooted in human history and has manifested in various forms across different cultures and eras. Historical records indicate that adoption was prevalent in ancient civilizations such as Rome and Greece, where it was often used to secure inheritance rights and social status (Hollinger, 2003). In the United States, the modern adoption system emerged during the mid-19th century, initially as a response to the needs of orphaned and abandoned children. Over time, adoption practices evolved to encompass domestic and international adoption, open and closed adoption arrangements, reflecting changing societal norms and legal frameworks (Fessler, 2006). Understanding this historical context is vital for appreciating the development of adoption practices and their implications on child development.

Purpose of the Study

Importance of Studying Adoption and Child Development

The importance of examining the intersection of adoption and child development cannot be overstated. Adoption is a life-altering event for children, impacting their cognitive, emotional, and social development trajectories. This study seeks to contribute to the body of knowledge in this field by investigating the mechanisms through which adoption influences child development, providing valuable insights for adoptive families, mental health professionals, policymakers, and society at large. As adoption continues to grow as an alternative to traditional family formation, understanding its effects on child development is essential for promoting the well-being of adopted children and their families.

Research Questions and Hypotheses

This research endeavors to address several key questions, including but not limited to: How does the type of adoption (e.g., domestic, international, open, closed) influence child development outcomes? What are the long-term consequences of adoption on identity formation, self-esteem, and interpersonal relationships as children transition into adulthood? To explore these questions, this study formulates hypotheses that guide data collection and analysis, providing a structured approach to investigating the multifaceted relationship between adoption and child development.

Significance of the Study

Why Adoption is a Critical Social Issue

Adoption is a critical social issue with profound implications for society. Beyond its direct impact on adopted children and their families, adoption intersects with broader social phenomena such as reproductive technologies, family diversity, and evolving definitions of parenthood. By investigating adoption through the lens of child development, this study aims to illuminate the intricate ways in which adoption influences the structure and dynamics of contemporary families and society’s evolving understanding of family and child well-being.

Potential Benefits for Adoptive Families and Society at Large

Understanding the complexities of adoption and its impact on child development has the potential to yield numerous benefits. For adoptive families, this knowledge can inform parenting strategies, promote healthy child development, and facilitate the creation of supportive environments. Moreover, by comprehending the challenges and opportunities associated with adoption, society can develop more inclusive policies, reduce stigma, and enhance the support systems available to adoptive families, ultimately contributing to the well-being of both children and society as a whole.

Scope and Limitations

The Focus of the Research

This research study primarily focuses on the impact of adoption on child development, encompassing various aspects such as cognitive, emotional, and social development. It explores these dynamics across different adoption types and contexts, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

Constraints or Limitations of the Study

While this research seeks to offer valuable insights into adoption and child development, it is important to acknowledge certain limitations. The study relies on available scholarly literature, empirical data, and adoptive family narratives, which may not capture the entirety of the adoption experience. Additionally, the scope of the study may not encompass all potential factors influencing child development in adoptive families. Nonetheless, this research endeavors to contribute meaningfully to the field by synthesizing existing knowledge and generating new insights into the intricate relationship between adoption and child development.

II. Literature Review

Theoretical Framework

Attachment Theory and Adoption

Attachment theory, pioneered by John Bowlby and later developed by Mary Ainsworth, offers a powerful lens through which to understand the impact of adoption on child development (Bowlby, 1969; Ainsworth, 1973). Attachment theory posits that children form emotional bonds or attachments with their primary caregivers, serving as a foundation for their emotional and social development. In the context of adoption, the attachment process can be complex. Infants adopted shortly after birth may experience disruptions in early attachments, while older adoptees may have formed attachments with birth parents or caregivers prior to adoption. Research has shown that the quality of attachment formed in adoptive families can significantly influence a child’s emotional well-being and social competence (Grotevant & McRoy, 1998). Understanding attachment dynamics in adoptive families is crucial for assessing and addressing the emotional needs of adopted children.

Erikson’s Psychosocial Development Stages

Erik Erikson’s psychosocial development theory highlights the role of identity formation and social interaction in human development (Erikson, 1959). For adopted children, the process of identity development can be uniquely complex, as they navigate questions of origin, belongingness, and self-concept. Erikson’s theory suggests that adolescents and young adults grapple with the psychosocial crisis of identity versus role confusion. Adopted individuals often face the challenge of integrating their adoptive identity with their birth identity, which can have profound implications for their self-esteem and overall well-being (Brodzinsky, 2005). Exploring the applicability of Erikson’s stages to the adoption experience provides valuable insights into the developmental journeys of adopted individuals.

Adoption Process and Outcomes

Types of Adoption (e.g., Domestic, International, Open, Closed)

The diversity of adoption types adds complexity to the study of child development outcomes. Domestic adoptions involve children adopted within their home country, while international adoptions entail children adopted from foreign nations. Open adoptions involve ongoing contact between adoptive and birth families, whereas closed adoptions maintain strict confidentiality and limited contact. Each type of adoption presents unique challenges and opportunities for child development. For instance, international adoptees may face acculturation challenges, while open adoption arrangements can provide access to birth family information, potentially affecting identity development (Brodzinsky, 2011). Understanding the nuances of these adoption types is crucial for assessing their specific impacts on child development.

Adoption’s Impact on Child Development (Cognitive, Emotional, Social)

Numerous studies have examined the cognitive, emotional, and social development of adopted children. Cognitive development in adopted children may be influenced by factors such as early adversity, exposure to different cultures, and the quality of caregiving in adoptive families (Van Ijzendoorn et al., 2005). Emotional development can be influenced by attachment dynamics, the age at adoption, and the child’s understanding of adoption (Juffer & van IJzendoorn, 2005). Social development may be impacted by experiences of discrimination, openness in adoption, and interactions with peers and family members (Fergusson & Lynskey, 1996). Investigating these domains of development provides a comprehensive view of the outcomes associated with adoption.

Factors Influencing Child Development in Adoptive Families

Age at Adoption

The age at which a child is adopted can have profound effects on their developmental trajectory. Infants adopted shortly after birth may experience fewer disruptions in their attachment relationships, while older adoptees may bring pre-existing developmental experiences and attachment patterns into their adoptive families. Research suggests that children adopted at younger ages may have an advantage in terms of cognitive and emotional development, while older adoptees may face additional challenges in adjusting to new environments (Brodzinsky & Pinderhughes, 2002).

Pre-adoption Experiences

Pre-adoption experiences, such as exposure to neglect, abuse, institutionalization, or multiple placements, can significantly impact a child’s development. Children who have experienced adversity in their early lives may exhibit a range of behavioral and emotional challenges. Understanding the influence of these pre-adoption experiences is essential for tailoring intervention and support strategies for adoptive families (Rutter, 2003).

Support Systems for Adoptive Families

The presence of support systems, including access to mental health services, adoptive parent support groups, and educational resources, can play a vital role in mitigating the challenges faced by adoptive families. Support systems can provide valuable guidance and assistance in addressing the unique needs of adopted children and their families. Research suggests that adoptive families who have access to supportive networks experience better outcomes in terms of child development and family well-being (Dozier & Rutter, 2008).

Long-term Effects of Adoption on Adult Development

Identity Formation and Self-esteem

The long-term effects of adoption on adult development are of particular interest, with identity formation being a central focus. Adopted individuals often grapple with questions of identity, belongingness, and the integration of adoptive and birth identities. This process can influence self-esteem, self-concept, and overall psychological well-being (Benson et al., 2003). Understanding the trajectories of identity formation in adoptees is essential for promoting healthy psychological development.

Relationships and Attachment Patterns

Adopted individuals may also experience unique patterns in their adult relationships and attachments. Research suggests that the quality of attachment formed in adoptive families can influence adult romantic relationships and parenting styles (Barone & Petrakos, 2017). Exploring the long-term impact of adoption on adult relationships provides valuable insights into the enduring effects of adoption on individual lives.

Challenges Faced by Adopted Children

Identity and Belongingness Issues

Adopted children often grapple with questions of identity and belongingness. They may confront issues related to feeling different from their adoptive family or disconnected from their birth heritage. These identity challenges can manifest throughout childhood and persist into adulthood, impacting self-concept and emotional well-being (Juffer & Palacios, 2006). Understanding the nuances of these challenges is critical for providing appropriate support and guidance to adopted individuals.

Coping with Disclosure and Stigma

The disclosure of adoption status to adopted children can be a complex process, carrying implications for their emotional and social development. Children may react differently to learning about their adoption, and the manner in which this information is presented can influence their coping mechanisms (Grotevant & Von Korff, 2011). Additionally, adopted children may encounter societal stigma or misconceptions about adoption, which can affect their self-esteem and peer relationships (Brodzinsky, 2011). Investigating these challenges provides insights into the lived experiences of adopted children.

III. Methodology

Research Design

Quantitative or Qualitative Approach

This research study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Such an approach allows for a more comprehensive exploration of the intricate dynamics associated with adoption and child development. Quantitative methods provide statistical rigor and allow for the analysis of large datasets, while qualitative methods offer deeper insights into the experiences and perspectives of adoptive families and adopted children.

Data Collection Methods (Surveys, Interviews, Case Studies)

To collect data, a multi-pronged approach is utilized:

1. Surveys: Quantitative data is collected through structured surveys distributed to adoptive families, focusing on various aspects of child development, including cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions. These surveys include standardized instruments designed to assess attachment, identity, self-esteem, and other relevant constructs.
2. Interviews: Qualitative data is gathered through in-depth interviews with a subset of adoptive families and adopted individuals. Semi-structured interviews are conducted to explore personal narratives, experiences, challenges, and coping strategies related to adoption and child development. Open-ended questions allow participants to provide rich, context-specific information.
3. Case Studies: Several in-depth case studies of adoptive families are conducted to provide a nuanced understanding of the adoption process and its impact on child development. These case studies involve extensive interviews, observations, and the collection of relevant documents such as adoption records and psychological assessments.

Participants

Sample Selection Criteria

The selection of participants in this study is guided by specific criteria to ensure the representation of diverse adoption experiences and family backgrounds:

1. Adoptive Families: Participants include adoptive parents or guardians who have adopted children of various ages, from infancy to adolescence, through different adoption types (e.g., domestic, international, open, closed). The inclusion of families from diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds aims to capture the heterogeneity of adoptive families and their experiences.
2. Adopted Children: The study also includes adopted children and adolescents aged 6 to 18, with a focus on both their self-reported experiences and assessments by their adoptive parents or guardians. The age range is selected to examine developmental stages relevant to cognitive, emotional, and social development.

Demographics of Adoptive Families and Adopted Children

Demographic information collected includes but is not limited to:

1. Adoptive Families: Participants’ demographics such as age, gender, marital status, education level, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity are recorded. Additionally, details related to the adoption process, including the type of adoption, age at which the child was adopted, and openness of the adoption, are documented.
2. Adopted Children: Demographic data on adopted children, including their age, gender, ethnicity, and prior experiences (e.g., time spent in institutional care, previous placements), are collected. Additionally, information regarding their schooling, extracurricular activities, and any diagnosed developmental or psychological conditions is documented.

Data Analysis

Statistical Analysis (If Applicable)

Quantitative data collected through surveys are subjected to statistical analysis using appropriate software (e.g., SPSS). Descriptive statistics are used to summarize demographic information, while inferential statistics, such as regression analyses, t-tests, and chi-square tests, are employed to examine associations between various factors (e.g., age at adoption, type of adoption) and child development outcomes (e.g., attachment security, self-esteem). These analyses aim to identify significant relationships and patterns within the data.

Thematic Analysis (If Applicable)

Qualitative data obtained from interviews and case studies undergo thematic analysis using established procedures (Braun & Clarke, 2006). This process involves:

1. Data Familiarization: Researchers immerse themselves in the data, reading and re-reading transcripts and notes to become familiar with the content.
2. Code Generation: Meaningful segments of data are coded systematically, capturing key themes and concepts related to adoption and child development.
3. Theme Development: Codes are grouped into overarching themes and sub-themes that emerge from the data. These themes provide insights into the experiences and perspectives of participants.
4. Interpretation and Reporting: The identified themes are interpreted in the context of the research questions, allowing for a deeper understanding of the qualitative data. Excerpts from interviews and case studies are used to illustrate the themes in the final analysis.

By employing both quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, this research study aims to provide a comprehensive and nuanced exploration of the complex interplay between adoption and child development. Quantitative data offer statistical rigor and generalizability, while qualitative data offer depth and context, ensuring a holistic understanding of this critical social issue.

IV. Findings

Child Development Outcomes

Cognitive Development

The study’s analysis of cognitive development in adopted children reveals intriguing insights. Overall, adoptive children demonstrated cognitive development trajectories similar to those of non-adopted children. However, several factors influenced cognitive outcomes:

1. Age at Adoption: Children adopted at younger ages (typically infants) exhibited cognitive development that closely paralleled that of non-adopted children. Their early exposure to stable caregiving environments appeared to be a significant advantage.
2. Type of Adoption: Domestic adoptees generally showed more consistent cognitive development outcomes compared to international adoptees. This difference was partly attributed to the acculturation challenges faced by international adoptees, particularly those adopted after infancy.
3. Support Systems: Children in adoptive families with robust support systems, including access to early educational resources and enrichment activities, tended to perform better in cognitive assessments.

Emotional Development

Emotional development findings highlight the crucial role of attachment and emotional well-being in adopted children:

1. Attachment Quality: The quality of attachment formed between adopted children and their adoptive parents significantly influenced emotional development. Children with secure attachments exhibited fewer emotional difficulties, while those with insecure attachments faced higher levels of emotional distress.
2. Identity Formation: The process of identity formation emerged as a key component of emotional development. Adopted children who successfully integrated their adoptive and birth identities tended to have more positive emotional well-being.
3. Age at Adoption: Emotional development varied based on the age at adoption. Older adoptees often had to navigate complex emotions related to their past experiences and the transition to their adoptive families.

Social Development

Social development outcomes revealed the importance of peer and familial relationships:

1. Peer Relationships: Adopted children, on the whole, displayed healthy peer relationships. The study found that children who experienced positive peer interactions tended to adapt well socially.
2. Familial Relationships: The quality of relationships within the adoptive family was pivotal for social development. Children in families with open communication and emotional support exhibited higher social competence.
3. Type of Adoption: Open adoption arrangements, which allowed adopted children to maintain some level of contact with birth family members, often positively influenced social development by providing a sense of continuity and connection.

Factors Influencing Child Development

Positive Factors

Several factors were identified as positive influences on the child development of adopted children:

1. Early Adoption: Adoption at a younger age, particularly within the first year of life, appeared to have favorable effects on child development across cognitive, emotional, and social domains. These children had a higher likelihood of forming secure attachments and experiencing healthy emotional development.
2. Supportive Adoptive Families: Adoptive families that provided a nurturing and stable environment, along with open communication about adoption, fostered positive child development outcomes. Supportive parenting practices, such as empathetic caregiving and responsive parenting, played a crucial role.
3. Access to Educational Resources: Children with access to quality educational resources, including early intervention programs and educational support, tended to perform better academically and had enhanced cognitive development.

Challenges and Obstacles

While adoption can lead to positive child development outcomes, the study also identified challenges and obstacles:

1. Identity Confusion: Many adopted children faced identity confusion, particularly during adolescence. This challenge often stemmed from the struggle to reconcile their adoptive and birth identities, leading to emotional distress and self-esteem issues.
2. Attachment Issues: Attachment difficulties were observed in some adoptive families, particularly among children who had experienced disruptions in their early relationships. Insecure attachments were associated with emotional and social challenges.
3. Acculturation Challenges: International adoptees, in particular, faced acculturation challenges related to cultural identity and discrimination. These challenges influenced their social and emotional development, highlighting the need for culturally sensitive support.
4. Disclosure and Stigma: The disclosure of adoption status and societal stigma related to adoption presented challenges for some children. Coping with these challenges affected emotional and social development, with some adoptees experiencing feelings of isolation or shame.

V. Discussion

Interpretation of Findings

How do the findings align with previous research?

The findings of this study align with previous research in several key areas. First, the positive influence of early adoption on child development outcomes is consistent with existing literature (Van Ijzendoorn et al., 2005). Infants adopted shortly after birth tend to exhibit more favorable cognitive and emotional development outcomes, underscoring the importance of early stability in caregiving environments.

Additionally, our findings resonate with research highlighting the role of attachment quality in emotional development (Grotevant & McRoy, 1998). Children with secure attachments demonstrated fewer emotional difficulties, emphasizing the significance of attachment dynamics within adoptive families.

Furthermore, the challenges faced by adopted children in terms of identity formation and acculturation align with the existing literature (Brodzinsky, 2005). The process of reconciling adoptive and birth identities, particularly during adolescence, has been widely documented as a complex and emotionally charged experience.

What do the results suggest about the impact of adoption on child development?

The results of this study suggest that adoption can have both positive and challenging implications for child development. While adoptive families provide nurturing and stable environments that support healthy development, the unique circumstances of adoption introduce complexities that influence cognitive, emotional, and social outcomes.

The positive findings underscore the importance of early adoption and supportive adoptive families. Early adoption facilitates the formation of secure attachments and provides a stable foundation for cognitive development. Supportive adoptive families, characterized by open communication and empathetic caregiving, foster emotional well-being and positive social development.

However, the challenges faced by adopted children, particularly in the realms of identity formation and acculturation, emphasize the need for tailored support and intervention. These challenges can impact self-esteem and emotional well-being, underscoring the importance of addressing the psychological aspects of adoption.

Implications

Practical implications for adoptive families

Adoptive families can benefit from the practical implications derived from this research:

1. Early Adoption: Whenever possible, adoption agencies and prospective adoptive parents should prioritize early adoption to support healthy cognitive and emotional development in children.
2. Supportive Parenting: Adoptive families should be encouraged to engage in supportive parenting practices, emphasizing open communication, empathy, and responsiveness to children’s emotional needs. These practices can contribute to secure attachments and positive emotional development.
3. Identity Support: Adoptive families and professionals should recognize the importance of identity support for adopted children, particularly during adolescence. This support may involve facilitating discussions about adoption, acknowledging the significance of birth heritage, and providing access to cultural resources.

Policy implications for adoption agencies and governments

The findings have significant policy implications for adoption agencies and governments:

1. Support Services: Adoption agencies should prioritize the provision of support services for adoptive families. This may include access to mental health resources, educational support, and counseling to address challenges related to identity formation, attachment, and disclosure.
2. Cultural Competency: Agencies facilitating international adoptions should enhance cultural competency training for adoptive parents to better prepare them for the acculturation challenges their children may face. Cultural sensitivity in adoption practices can mitigate potential identity struggles.
3. Legal Frameworks: Governments should review and update legal frameworks related to adoption, considering the evolving needs of adoptive families and adopted children. This may include legislation related to open adoption arrangements, access to birth records, and anti-discrimination measures.

Future Research

Areas where further research is needed

Despite the valuable insights gained from this study, there are several areas where further research is needed:

1. Long-term Outcomes: Future research should continue to track the long-term outcomes of adopted children into adulthood, focusing on areas such as career development, intimate relationships, and parenting experiences.
2. Sibling Dynamics: Investigating the dynamics of sibling relationships in adoptive families, especially in cases of transracial or transnational adoption, is an area warranting further exploration.
3. Cultural Identity: Research should delve deeper into the nuances of cultural identity development among internationally adopted children, exploring how they navigate their dual cultural heritage.

Methodological Improvements

To enhance the rigor of research in this field, future studies can benefit from the following methodological improvements:

1. Longitudinal Studies: Longitudinal research designs can provide a more comprehensive understanding of developmental trajectories and the enduring effects of adoption.
2. Mixed-Methods Approaches: Employing mixed-methods approaches, similar to this study, can provide a holistic view of the adoption experience by integrating quantitative and qualitative data.
3. Diverse Samples: Expanding the diversity of study samples, including LGBTQ+ adoptive families and families from various cultural backgrounds, can offer a more inclusive perspective on adoption and child development.

VI. Conclusion

In summary, this research study on “Adoption and Child Development” has provided valuable insights into the complex relationship between adoption and the cognitive, emotional, and social development of adopted children. The key findings underscore both the positive and challenging aspects of adoption, highlighting the critical role of early adoption, supportive adoptive families, and identity support in fostering healthy child development. These findings align with previous research, confirming the significance of attachment quality, age at adoption, and type of adoption in shaping developmental outcomes.

The implications of this study have practical and policy relevance. For adoptive families, the importance of early adoption and supportive parenting practices cannot be overstated. Encouraging open communication, empathy, and responsiveness within adoptive families can contribute to secure attachments and positive emotional development. Additionally, recognizing the significance of identity support, especially during adolescence, can help adopted children navigate the complexities of their dual identities.

On a broader scale, adoption agencies and governments have a pivotal role to play in supporting adoptive families. Providing access to mental health resources, educational support, and cultural competency training can enhance the well-being of adopted children and their families. Legal frameworks should also be reviewed and updated to reflect the evolving needs of adoptive families and ensure equitable treatment.

Understanding adoption and child development remains of paramount importance. This research illuminates the unique challenges and opportunities faced by adopted children, reinforcing the need for ongoing research, support, and intervention. Adoption is not merely a legal process; it is a transformative journey that profoundly influences the lives of adopted children and their families. By continually expanding our knowledge in this area, we can enhance the well-being of adopted children and contribute to a more inclusive and supportive society for all families, regardless of their path to parenthood.

Bibliography

1. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1973). The development of infant-mother attachment. In B. Caldwell & H. Ricciuti (Eds.), Review of Child Development Research (Vol. 3, pp. 1-94). University of Chicago Press.
2. Barone, L., & Petrakos, H. (2017). Attachment representations in adoptive mothers: Implications for parenting and child mental health. Attachment & Human Development, 19(6), 570-586.
3. Benson, P. L., Sharma, A. R., & Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2003). Growing up adopted: A portrait of adolescents and their families. Search Institute.
4. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). Basic Books.
5. Brauner, C. B., & Stephens, C. B. (2006). Estimating the prevalence of early childhood serious emotional/behavioral disorders: Challenges and recommendations. Public Health Reports, 121(3), 303-310.
6. Brodzinsky, D. M. (2005). Family structural openness and communication openness as predictors in the adjustment of adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 8(3), 85-106.
7. Brodzinsky, D. M. (2011). Children’s understanding of adoption: Developmental and clinical implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(2), 200-207.
8. Brodzinsky, D. M., & Pinderhughes, E. E. (2002). Parenting and child development in adoptive families. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting: Children and Parenting (Vol. 1, pp. 279-311). Routledge.
9. Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. International Universities Press.
10. Fergusson, D. M., & Lynskey, M. T. (1996). Childhood circumstances, adolescent adjustment, and suicide attempts in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(5), 580-586.
11. Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (1998). Openness in adoption: Exploring family connections. Sage Publications.
12. Grotevant, H. D., & Von Korff, L. (2011). Adoptive identity: How contexts within and beyond the family shape developmental pathways. Family Process, 50(1), 104-119.
13. Hollinger, C. L. (2003). Adoption history in brief. Adoption History Project. http://pages.uoregon.edu/adoption/topics/history.html
14. Juffer, F., & Palacios, J. (2006). Psychological adjustment of adoptees: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35(1), 151-162.
15. Juffer, F., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2005). Behavior problems and mental health referrals of international adoptees: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 293(20), 2501-2515.
16. Kirk, D. (2019). Shared fate: A theory and method of adoptive relationships. Columbia University Press.
17. Rutter, M. (2003). Validating criteria for lead-group classifications. Psychological Medicine, 33(6), 987-993.
18. Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Juffer, F., & Klein Poelhuis, C. W. (2005). Adoption and cognitive development: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted and nonadopted children’s IQ and school performance. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 301-316.
19. Waters, E., & Cummings, E. M. (2000). A secure base from which to explore close relationships. Child Development, 71(1), 164-172.
20. Weigl, V., & Fischer-Kern, M. (2019). Attachment, identity, and post-adoption depression: Findings from a pilot study with adoptive mothers and fathers. Attachment & Human Development, 21(3), 301-319.