How to do Research on Criminal Justice




How to Do Research on Criminal JusticeCriminal justice research draws on an unusually wide range of disciplines and source types. A single research paper on sentencing policy, for example, might require crime statistics from federal agencies, case law from court databases, peer-reviewed articles from criminology and sociology journals, legislative records, policy analyses from think tanks, and qualitative data from interviews or field observations. This interdisciplinary breadth is both the field’s greatest intellectual asset and its primary research challenge: students must learn to work across multiple databases, data systems, and methodological traditions rather than relying on a single disciplinary database the way a psychology student might rely on PsycINFO or an economics student on EconLit. This guide, part of iResearchNet’s How to Do Research series, covers the academic databases, government data sources, legal resources, and research methods that U.S. college and university students need for research papers in criminal justice, criminology, and related fields. For topic ideas, see iResearchNet’s Criminal Justice Research Paper Topics.

Academic Databases for Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice Abstracts

Criminal Justice Abstracts, available through EBSCO, is the field’s primary bibliographic database. It indexes journal articles, books, dissertations, government reports, and unpublished papers covering all aspects of criminal justice and criminology, including policing, courts, corrections, juvenile justice, crime prevention, victimology, forensic science, and criminal law. The database uses a controlled subject heading system that allows students to search by standardized terms rather than relying solely on keywords, which is particularly valuable in a field where terminology varies across jurisdictions and decades. Most U.S. university libraries provide access through EBSCOhost.

National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS)

The National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS), maintained by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs, is the most important freely accessible resource for criminal justice research. NCJRS indexes and provides access to more than 230,000 documents — journal articles, government reports, program evaluations, statistical reports, and policy analyses — produced by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), and other federal agencies. Many of these documents are available in full text at no cost. NCJRS also maintains an abstracts database that is searchable by keyword, author, date, and document type. For any criminal justice research paper, NCJRS should be among the first resources consulted.

Additional Databases

Several general social science databases provide strong coverage of criminal justice topics. Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest) indexes research in sociology, including criminology, deviance, and social control. PsycINFO (APA) covers forensic psychology, criminal behavior, victimization, and mental health in correctional settings. Social Science Citation Index (Web of Science) provides citation tracking that allows students to trace the influence of a seminal study across subsequent literature. JSTOR archives complete runs of major criminology and law journals and is essential for historical and foundational research. Google Scholar provides broad indexing and citation tracking; students should configure Library Links to connect it to their university’s subscriptions.

For legal research specifically, HeinOnline provides full-text access to law reviews, law journals, congressional records, and historical legal documents. LexisNexis Academic and Westlaw — available through many university law libraries — provide searchable databases of case law, statutes, regulations, and legal commentary.




↑ Back to top

Government Data Sources

Criminal justice is one of the most data-rich fields in the social sciences, in large part because federal, state, and local agencies collect and publish enormous quantities of crime, victimization, and corrections data. Familiarity with the major government data systems is essential for any student writing a data-informed criminal justice research paper.

Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)

The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), a division of the U.S. Department of Justice, is the primary federal source of statistical data on crime, criminal offenders, victims of crime, and the operations of the justice system at the federal, state, and local levels. BJS publishes dozens of reports annually and maintains several major recurring data collections, including the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), which surveys households about their experiences with crime regardless of whether those crimes were reported to police; the Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities; the Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities; and the National Judicial Reporting Program. BJS data is freely accessible through its website and through the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), which archives the raw datasets for secondary analysis.

FBI Uniform Crime Report (UCR) and NIBRS

The FBI publishes national crime statistics through two complementary programs. The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, established in 1930, has historically collected summary data on eight index crimes (murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson) reported to law enforcement agencies nationwide. The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), which is replacing the legacy UCR summary system, collects detailed data on each criminal incident — including information about the offense, the offender, the victim, and the property involved — across 52 categories of crime. NIBRS data provides substantially more analytical depth than the legacy UCR data, allowing researchers to examine relationships between victims and offenders, circumstances of offenses, and demographic patterns that the summary system could not capture.

Students should understand the distinction between crimes reported to police (which UCR and NIBRS measure) and crimes actually experienced by the population (which the NCVS measures). The gap between these two — the “dark figure of crime” — is a foundational concept in criminology and is relevant to virtually any research paper that uses crime statistics as evidence.

Sentencing and Corrections Data

The United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) publishes detailed data on federal sentencing practices, including annual sourcebooks that report sentencing outcomes by offense type, offender characteristics, departure rates, and judicial district. The Bureau of Justice Statistics publishes reports on state and federal prisoner populations, recidivism rates, probation and parole populations, and the characteristics of jail inmates. The Vera Institute of Justice publishes research and data on incarceration trends, pretrial detention, and justice reform. For research papers on mass incarceration, sentencing disparities, prisoner reentry, or correctional policy, these sources provide the quantitative foundation.

Additional Government Sources

The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) publishes data and reports on juvenile crime, juvenile court processing, youth in custody, and prevention programs. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) maintains data on homicide, suicide, and violent injury through its WISQARS (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System) and the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS). The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) publishes data on drug seizures, trafficking patterns, and substance scheduling. State-level data is often available through individual state departments of corrections, state court administrative offices, and state statistical analysis centers, though the accessibility and quality of state data vary considerably.

↑ Back to top

Understanding Crime Data and Its Limitations

Working with crime data requires understanding not just where to find it but how it is produced and what its inherent limitations are. Crime statistics are not neutral measurements of an objective reality; they are social products shaped by reporting practices, policing priorities, legal definitions, and political contexts. A student who uses crime data without understanding these limitations risks drawing conclusions that the data cannot support.

The most fundamental limitation is underreporting. The NCVS consistently shows that a substantial proportion of crimes — including the majority of sexual assaults, a significant share of property crimes, and a meaningful fraction of violent crimes — are never reported to police. Crimes that are not reported do not appear in UCR or NIBRS data, which means that official crime statistics systematically undercount the actual volume of crime. The gap between reported crime and actual crime varies by offense type, victim demographic, and geographic area, and this variation can distort comparisons across jurisdictions or time periods.

Changes in crime statistics may reflect changes in actual criminal behavior, but they may also reflect changes in reporting practices, policing strategies, legal definitions, or data collection methods. A city that implements a new community policing initiative encouraging residents to report crimes may see an increase in its official crime rate even if actual criminal behavior remains unchanged. A state that expands its legal definition of domestic violence will show a statistical increase in domestic violence incidents even if behavior patterns are stable. Students should consider these alternative explanations before attributing changes in crime statistics to changes in criminal behavior.

Ecological fallacy — the error of drawing conclusions about individuals from aggregate data — is a particular risk in criminal justice research. A finding that neighborhoods with higher poverty rates have higher crime rates does not mean that poor individuals are more likely to commit crimes; the relationship may be driven by neighborhood-level factors (social disorganization, reduced collective efficacy, concentrated disadvantage) rather than individual-level characteristics. Students should be explicit about the unit of analysis in their research and should avoid claims about individuals when their data describes groups or geographic areas.

↑ Back to top

Criminal justice research frequently requires engagement with legal sources — statutes, case law, regulations, and legal commentary — that differ from the social science literature in format, citation conventions, and analytical approach.

Statutes and Regulations

Federal criminal statutes are codified in Title 18 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), which is freely accessible through the Office of the Law Revision Counsel and through Congress.gov. State criminal codes are published by each state’s legislature and are typically accessible through the state government’s website. Students writing about criminal law or sentencing policy should cite the relevant statutory provisions directly, using the standard legal citation format (e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 3553 for the federal sentencing statute).

Federal regulations — rules issued by executive agencies under statutory authority — are published in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and the Federal Register, both freely accessible through the Government Publishing Office. Regulations issued by the Bureau of Prisons, the Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies with criminal justice responsibilities are found in various titles of the CFR.

Case Law

Federal court opinions are freely accessible through CourtListener and the U.S. Courts website. Supreme Court opinions are available through Justia and the Supreme Court’s own website. Students with access to university law libraries can use Westlaw or LexisNexis for more advanced case law research, including headnote searching, case history tracking, and citator tools that show whether a case has been overruled, distinguished, or affirmed by subsequent decisions.

For research papers on constitutional criminal procedure (search and seizure, Miranda rights, right to counsel, cruel and unusual punishment), the relevant Supreme Court decisions are primary sources that the paper should cite and analyze directly rather than relying solely on secondary descriptions from textbooks or law review articles.

Law reviews — scholarly journals published by law schools — are a major source of legal analysis on criminal justice topics. Unlike peer-reviewed journals in the social sciences, law reviews are edited by law students rather than by faculty, though articles are typically authored by law professors and practitioners. HeinOnline provides full-text access to virtually all U.S. law reviews and is the primary database for legal scholarship. Leading law reviews that regularly publish criminal justice research include the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Journal, Stanford Law Review, Columbia Law Review, and the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (Northwestern).

↑ Back to top

Key Journals in Criminal Justice and Criminology

The major peer-reviewed journals in the field publish the research that defines current scholarly debates and establishes the evidentiary standards that student papers should aspire to meet. The top general-interest criminology journals include Criminology (the flagship journal of the American Society of Criminology), Justice Quarterly (the flagship of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences), the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, and the British Journal of Criminology.

Specialized journals serve particular subfields. Crime and Delinquency covers criminal justice policy and practice. Criminology and Public Policy publishes research with explicit policy implications alongside policy essays by practitioners and officials. Journal of Criminal Justice covers policing, courts, and corrections. Punishment and Society focuses on penal theory and the sociology of punishment. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice specializes in juvenile delinquency and youth crime. Feminist Criminology examines gender, crime, and justice. The Prison Journal focuses specifically on incarceration and correctional institutions.

Students should also be aware of interdisciplinary journals that frequently publish criminal justice research, including Law and Society Review, Law and Human Behavior, Social Problems, and the Annual Review of Criminology — a relatively new publication that provides authoritative review articles synthesizing the state of knowledge on major criminological topics.

↑ Back to top

Research Methods in Criminal Justice

Criminal justice research employs both quantitative and qualitative methods, and many of the field’s most influential studies use mixed-methods approaches that combine statistical analysis with case studies, interviews, or observational fieldwork.

Quantitative Approaches

Quantitative methods dominate the field’s top journals. Common approaches include analysis of official crime data (UCR, NCVS, BJS datasets), regression analysis modeling the relationship between variables (e.g., the effect of policing strategies on crime rates, or the relationship between poverty and incarceration), program evaluation using experimental or quasi-experimental designs (e.g., randomized controlled trials of diversion programs), and survival analysis modeling time to recidivism after release from incarceration. Students using quantitative methods should identify their data source, describe their sample, specify their analytical technique, and report results in standard statistical formats. Datasets from BJS, the FBI, and the ICPSR are freely available for secondary analysis and are commonly used in student research projects.

Qualitative Approaches

Qualitative methods — ethnographic fieldwork, in-depth interviews, case studies, and content analysis — provide depth and context that quantitative methods alone cannot capture. Classic criminological studies have used participant observation in police departments, prisons, and neighborhoods to understand how the criminal justice system operates in practice rather than in theory. Interview-based studies with formerly incarcerated individuals, crime victims, judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys reveal perspectives and experiences that statistical data does not capture.

Students conducting qualitative criminal justice research face particular ethical challenges. Research involving incarcerated populations requires IRB approval and must address the coercive dynamics of the prison environment, where individuals may feel pressured to participate. Research on crime victims must be conducted with sensitivity to trauma. Research on law enforcement may involve access negotiations and confidentiality concerns. The ethical guidelines published by the American Society of Criminology and the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences provide discipline-specific guidance that supplements general human-subjects protections.

Mixed-Methods and Evaluation Research

Mixed-methods research — combining quantitative and qualitative approaches within a single study — is increasingly common in criminal justice scholarship. A study evaluating a drug court program, for example, might combine statistical analysis of recidivism rates (quantitative) with interviews of participants, judges, and case managers (qualitative) to understand both whether the program works and how and why it works. Program evaluation research is a particularly important genre in criminal justice, where policymakers and funders require evidence of program effectiveness before committing public resources. The National Institute of Justice publishes evaluation guidelines and funds evaluation studies whose reports are accessible through NCJRS.

Students writing evaluation-oriented research papers should familiarize themselves with the hierarchy of evidence used in the field: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the strongest design for establishing causal effects, followed by quasi-experimental designs with comparison groups, followed by pre-post designs without comparison groups, followed by descriptive and correlational studies. The CrimeSolutions database, maintained by the National Institute of Justice, rates crime and justice programs as “effective,” “promising,” or “no effects” based on the quality of the evaluation evidence, and is a useful starting point for identifying evidence-based programs.

↑ Back to top

Criminological Theory and Its Role in Research

A strong criminal justice research paper does more than describe a problem or present data — it uses theoretical frameworks to explain patterns, interpret evidence, and connect specific findings to broader scholarly conversations. Students should identify one or more theoretical perspectives relevant to their topic and use that framework to organize their analysis.

The major theoretical traditions in criminology provide different lenses for understanding crime and justice. Classical and deterrence theories focus on rational choice and the effectiveness of punishment as a crime-reduction mechanism. Social learning theories examine how criminal behavior is acquired through social interaction and reinforcement. Strain theories argue that crime results from the gap between culturally valued goals and the legitimate means available to achieve them. Social control and bonding theories ask why most people do not commit crime, identifying social bonds (attachment, commitment, involvement, belief) as the mechanisms that restrain criminal behavior. Social disorganization theory examines how neighborhood-level structural conditions — poverty, residential instability, ethnic heterogeneity — weaken informal social controls and produce higher crime rates. Critical and conflict theories locate the origins of crime and criminal justice in power relations, economic inequality, and systemic racism.

Choosing a theoretical framework is not a matter of declaring allegiance to one perspective over others. It is a matter of selecting the framework most relevant to the specific research question and using it to generate hypotheses, organize evidence, and interpret findings. A paper on the effectiveness of mandatory minimum sentences, for instance, draws naturally on deterrence theory; a paper on racial disparities in policing draws on conflict theory and institutional analysis; a paper on juvenile delinquency in disadvantaged neighborhoods draws on social disorganization or social learning theory. The theoretical framework should appear early in the paper — typically in the literature review section — and should inform the analysis throughout.

↑ Back to top

Professional Associations and Research Centers

The two principal professional associations in the field are the American Society of Criminology (ASC) and the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS). Both hold annual conferences whose programs list current research projects and whose proceedings can be valuable sources of emerging scholarship. Both maintain student membership categories that provide journal access and conference participation at reduced rates.

Several independent research organizations produce influential criminal justice research. The RAND Corporation publishes research on policing, sentencing, drug policy, and homeland security. The Vera Institute of Justice focuses on incarceration, pretrial justice, and immigration enforcement. The Urban Institute publishes research on prisoner reentry, juvenile justice, and justice system reform. The Sentencing Project publishes data and analysis on sentencing policy, racial disparities, and incarceration trends. The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU publishes research on criminal justice reform, policing, and democratic governance. Each of these organizations makes its reports freely available online.

↑ Back to top

iResearchNet Criminal Justice Resources

iResearchNet maintains an extensive collection of criminal justice research materials that students can use alongside the databases and data sources described above. The Criminal Justice Research Paper Topics page provides hundreds of topic ideas organized by subfield, from policing and courts to juvenile justice and white-collar crime. The Research Paper Examples archive includes sample papers in criminal justice and related fields that demonstrate how published scholarship, government data, and theoretical frameworks are integrated into finished research papers. For students researching thesis-level topics, the Thesis Topics collection includes criminal justice and related subfield ideas suitable for capstone and graduate projects.

Students writing criminal justice research papers should also consult the methodological guides elsewhere in this series. The guide to library research covers catalog searching, database navigation, and working with reference librarians — skills that are particularly important in criminal justice given the number of specialized databases the field requires. The guide to original research covers interviews, surveys, and fieldwork methods that criminal justice students may use for primary data collection. The guide to online research covers source evaluation principles that apply to the government reports, think tank publications, and advocacy documents that criminal justice researchers frequently encounter.

↑ Back to top

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between criminal justice and criminology?

Criminal justice and criminology are related but distinct fields. Criminology is the scientific study of crime, its causes, its consequences, and society’s response to it — it is primarily an academic discipline rooted in sociology. Criminal justice refers to the system of institutions (police, courts, corrections) through which the state enforces criminal law and processes criminal cases. In practice, the two fields overlap substantially, and most university departments that offer degrees in one also cover the other. Research papers in either field draw on the same databases, data sources, and journals, though their analytical focus may differ: criminology papers tend to emphasize theory and causation, while criminal justice papers tend to emphasize policy, practice, and institutional operations.

Where do I find crime statistics for a specific city or state?

Local crime data is available from several sources. The FBI’s UCR and NIBRS data can be filtered by state and by individual law enforcement agency through the FBI’s online crime data portal. Many city police departments publish annual crime reports on their websites. State statistical analysis centers (SACs) publish state-level crime, court, and corrections data. BJS publishes state-level data on incarceration, probation, and parole. For victimization data at the state or metropolitan level, the NCVS provides some geographic breakdowns, though its primary design is national.

How do I cite a court case in my research paper?

Legal citation follows its own conventions, which differ from APA, MLA, or Chicago style. In general, a case citation includes the case name (italicized), the volume and reporter in which the opinion appears, the page number, and the year. For example, the Supreme Court’s landmark exclusionary rule case is cited as Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). If the research paper uses a social science citation style rather than legal citation, the student should consult the relevant style guide’s section on legal references — APA provides specific guidance on citing legal materials in its Publication Manual.

Can I use news reports about crimes in my research paper?

News reports can provide factual context — details about specific incidents, timeline of events, public reaction — but they should not substitute for scholarly analysis. Journalism operates under different standards than academic research: reporters work under deadline pressure, may rely on police accounts that later prove incomplete, and typically do not engage with the criminological literature that contextualizes individual events within broader patterns. News sources are appropriate for establishing that an event occurred and for capturing public discourse about crime, but the paper’s analytical claims should be grounded in peer-reviewed research and government data.

↑ Back to top

↑ Back to top